西藏冻融侵蚀分级评价

doi:10.11821/xb200609002

地理学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 911-918.doi: 10.11821/xb200609002

西藏冻融侵蚀分级评价

张建国¹, 刘淑珍², 杨思全³

1. 南通大学地理科学学院,南通 226007;
2. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都 610041;
3. 民政部国家减灾中心,北京 100053

收稿日期:2006-05-18 修回日期:2006-07-18 出版日期:2006-09-25 发布日期:2006-09-25
作者简介:张建国 (1973-), 男, 甘肃陇西人, 博士, 讲师, 主要研究方向为生态环境动态监测。E-mail: sezjg@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重大基础研究前期研究专项 (2004CCA03600)

Classification and Assessment of Freeze-thaw Erosion in Tibet

ZHANG Jianguo¹, LIU Shuzhen², YANG Siquan³

1. School of Geography, Nantong University, Nantong 226007, Jiangsu, China;
2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS, Chengdu 610041, China;
3. National Disaster Reduction Center, MCA, Beijing 100053, China

Received:2006-05-18 Revised:2006-07-18 Online:2006-09-25 Published:2006-09-25
Supported by:
Early-Stage Research on Key Basic Research Projects of China, No.2004CCA03600

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

冻融侵蚀是仅次于水蚀和风蚀的第三大土壤侵蚀类型,由于受诸多因素限制,到目前为止,国内外对其研究甚少,有关其强度分级评价方面的研究则更为鲜见。本文在综合分析冻融侵蚀影响因子的基础上,选取气温年较差、坡度、坡向、植被、年降水量、土壤等六个因子作为西藏冻融侵蚀分级评价指标,用加权加和的方法建立了适合西藏自治区的冻融侵蚀相对分级评价模型,并在地理信息系统软件的支持下实现了西藏自治区冻融侵蚀相对分级。最后,利用分级结果对西藏自治区冻融侵蚀进行了综合评价。结果表明,西藏冻融侵蚀具有分布范围广,不同强度冻融侵蚀空间分异明显,冻融侵蚀地区分布差异明显等特点。

关键词: 西藏, 冻融侵蚀, GIS, 分级评价

Abstract:

Freeze-thaw erosion is the third largest soil erosion type after water erosion and wind erosion. Up to now, being restricted by many factors, few researches on freeze-thaw erosion have been done at home and abroad, especially on the assessment method of freeze-thaw erosion. Based on the comprehensive analysis of impact factors of free-thaw erosion, this paper chooses six indexes, including the annual temperature range, annual precipitation, slope, aspect, vegetation and soil, to build the model for relative classification of freeze-thaw erosion using weighted and additive methods and realizes the relative classification of the freeze-thaw erosion in Tibet with the support of GIS software. Then a synthetic assessment of freeze-thaw erosion in Tibet has been carried out according to the relative classification result. The result shows that the distribution of freeze-thaw erosion area is very extensive, accounting for 55.3% of the total land area of Tibet. The spatial differentiation of freeze-thaw erosion with different intensities is obvious and the difference in distribution among different freeze-thaw areas is also obvious.

Key words: Tibet, freeze-thaw erosion, GIS, classification and assessment

张建国,刘淑珍,杨思全. 西藏冻融侵蚀分级评价[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(9): 911-918.

ZHANG Jianguo,LIU Shuzhen,YANG Siquan. Classification and Assessment of Freeze-thaw Erosion in Tibet[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(9): 911-918.

参考文献

[1] Tang Keli. Soil and Water Conservation in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2003. 3-27.
[唐克丽. 中国水土保持. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003. 3-27.]

[2] Tang Keli. Characteristics and perspectives on scientific discipline of soil erosion and soil and water conservation in China. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 1999, 6(2): 2-7.
[唐克丽. 中国土壤侵蚀与水土保持学的特点及展望. 水土保持研究, 1999, 6(2): 2-7.]

[3] Fan Haoming, Cai Qiangguo. Review of research progress in freeze-thaw erosion. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2003, 1(4): 50-55.
[范昊明, 蔡强国. 冻融侵蚀研究进展. 中国水土保持科学, 2003, 1(4): 50-55.]

[4] Dong Ruikun, Xu Zhaoyi, Yang Chengyong. Freeze-thaw erosion in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Yangtze River, 2000, 31(9): 39-41.
[董瑞琨, 许兆义, 杨成永. 青藏高原的冻融侵蚀问题. 人民长江, 2000, 31(9): 39-41.]

[5] Zhang Jianguo, Liu Shuzhen. A new way for definiting the freezing-thaw erosion area in Tibet. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2005, 21(2): 32-34.
[张建国, 刘淑珍. 界定西藏冻融侵蚀区分布的一种新方法. 地理与地理信息科学, 2005, 21(2): 32-34.]

[6] Zhu Liping, Whalley W B, Wang Jiacheng. A simulated weathering experiment of small free granite blocks under freeze-thaw conditions. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 1997, 19(4): 313-319.
[朱立平, Whalley W B, 王家澄. 寒冻条件下花岗岩小块体的风化模拟试验及其分析. 冰川冻土, 1997, 19(4): 313-319.]

[7] Qiu Guoqing, Zhou Youwu, Cheng Guodong et al. Geocryology in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2000. 15-20, 115.
[邱国庆, 周幼吾, 程国栋等. 中国冻土. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000. 15-20, 115.]

[8] Jane C Froese, Richard M Cruse, Mohammadreza Ghaffarzadeh. The mechanism of freezing and thawing erosion. Scientific and Technical Information of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, (3): 26-28.
[Jane C Froese, Richard M Cruse, Mohammadreza Ghaffarzadeh. 冻融侵蚀机理. 水土保持科技情报, 2001, (3): 26-28.]

[1]	黄海, 田尤, 刘建康, 张佳佳, 杨东旭, 杨顺. 藏东地区斜坡土壤冻融侵蚀力学机制及敏感性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 87-100.
[2]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 周亮, 王旭峰, 李振亚, 庞素菲, 颉斌斌. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1948-1965.
[3]	杜军, 胡军, 尼玛吉, 次旺顿珠. 1981-2017年西藏“一江两河”流域5 cm地温及其界限温度时空变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1821-1834.
[4]	牛方曲, 封志明, 刘慧. 资源环境承载力综合评价方法在西藏产业结构调整中的应用[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1563-1575.
[5]	熊俊楠,李进,程维明,周成虎,郭良,张晓蕾,王楠,李伟. 西南地区山洪灾害时空分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1374-1391.
[6]	吴宜进,赵行双,奚悦,刘慧,李畅. 基于MODIS的2006-2016年西藏生态质量综合评价及其时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1438-1449.
[7]	陈峰, 李红波, 张安录. 基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 432-445.
[8]	王姣娥,焦敬娟,黄洁,金凤君. 交通发展区位测度的理论与方法[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 666-676.
[9]	杜军, 马鹏飞, 潘多. 1981-2014年西藏各时次气温的变化趋势分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 422-432.
[10]	包善驹, 陆林. 合肥城市规划引导空间演进对地价时空演变的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(6): 906-918.
[11]	姚俊, 施野, 张国安. 近50年来长江河口分汊型河槽水体和泥沙容量的变化过程[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(5): 828-836.
[12]	田原, 余成群, 雒昆利, 武建双, 张宪洲, 倪润祥, 田兴磊. 西藏地区天然水的水化学性质和元素特征[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(7): 969-982.
[13]	拉巴次仁, 索朗加措, 白玛. 1981-2010年西藏霜冻日数的变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(5): 690-696.
[14]	李广东, 方创琳. 中国县域国土空间集约利用计量测度与影响机理[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(12): 1739-1752.
[15]	杜军, 路红亚, 建军. 1961-2010 年西藏极端气温事件的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(9): 1269-1280.

西藏冻融侵蚀分级评价

Classification and Assessment of Freeze-thaw Erosion in Tibet

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价