中国地级行政区域市场潜力评价

doi:10.11821/xb200710006

地理学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (10): 1063-1072.doi: 10.11821/xb200710006

中国地级行政区域市场潜力评价

石敏俊^1,2, 赵曌^1,2, 金凤君³

1. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京100049;
2. 中国科学院虚拟经济与数据科学研究中心, 北京100080;
3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101

收稿日期:2007-02-06 修回日期:2007-08-22 出版日期:2007-10-25 发布日期:2007-10-25
作者简介:石敏俊(1964-), 男, 教授, 博士生导师。主要从事空间经济过程与区域可持续发展的经济学研究。 Email: mjshi@gucas.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院百人计划择优支持项目; 国家自然科学基金重点项目(40635026); 国家自然科学基金创新群体项目(70621001)

A Quantitative Evaluation on Regional Market Potential in China

SHI Minjun^1,2, ZHAO Zhao^1,2, JIN Fengjun³

1. Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China;
2. Research Center of Fictitous economy and Data Science, CAS, Beijing 100080, China;
3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2007-02-06 Revised:2007-08-22 Online:2007-10-25 Published:2007-10-25
Supported by:
Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40635026, No.70621001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从产地—市场空间关系角度, 定量分析了我国地级行政区域的市场潜力及其空间格局, 揭示了市场通达性与区域发展之间的关联。我国市场潜力指数从沿海地区向内陆地区逐级递减,形成了以沿海地区为中心、内陆地区为外围的中心- 外围格局, 而且差异在继续扩大。市场潜力与区域经济发展之间在宏观尺度上呈现高度的空间关联, 市场潜力高的区域是经济总量集中分布的地区。这种关联印证了市场通达性是区域经济发展的重要影响因素之一, 市场潜力与区域经济发展之间存在着循环因果关系。这种循环累积效应使得沿海地区在未来发展中将继续处于优势地位, 并导致区域发展差异的进一步扩大。鉴于地区间经济联系对产地- 市场空间联系的重要性, 经济区位分析需将视野从本地市场扩展到地区间经济联系。西部地区发展与沿海地区的经济联系受到距离和运输成本的限制, 应重视扩大内需, 改善其市场通达性, 促进当地经济发展。

关键词: 产地—市场空间关系, 市场通达性, 市场潜力, 运输成本, 区域发展, 中国

Abstract:

This paper focuses on market potential by taking it as an indicator of market accessibility from a viewpoint of location-market connection, based on the analysis of district-level data in China. The results indicate that market potential index (MPI) degrades from the coastal areas to the inland areas. Furthermore, disparity of market potential between the coastal areas and the inland areas is still expanding unceasingly. Manufacturing industries concentrate in the regions with high market potential. A significant spatial correlation between market potential index and regional economic performance is observed at regional level. Such a spatial correlation has verified that market accessibility is one of the determinants of location choice for manufacturing industries. It also has revealed that there is a circulatory causality between market potential and regional development. The circulatory causality may spur the coastal areas to keep predominance in future and then lead to a continuous expansion of regional disparity. As the inter-regional economic exchange is significant to location-market connection, location analysis should take into account the inter-regional economic exchange. Western China is restricted to develop external linkage with the coastal areas due to long distance to the latter and expensive transport cost. Therefore, the western areas should make a point of expanding internal market to improve market accessibility.

Key words: location-market connection, market accessibility, market potential, transport cost, regional development, China

石敏俊, 赵曌, 金凤君. 中国地级行政区域市场潜力评价[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(10): 1063-1072.

SHI Minjun, ZHAO Zhao, JIN Fengjun. A Quantitative Evaluation on Regional Market Potential in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(10): 1063-1072.

参考文献

[1] L!sch A. Die R"umliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. 1940. Gustav Fisher, Jena, Germany. English translation: The Economics of Location. Yale University Press, New Haven CT. 1954.
[廖什著. 王守礼译. 经济空间秩序. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1995.]

[2] Harris C D. The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1954, 44: 315-348.

[3] Dixit A, Stiglitz J. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 1977, 67: 297-308.

[4] Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. MIT Press, 2000. 426.
[藤田昌久, 保罗·克鲁格曼, 安东尼·J·维纳布尔斯. 空间经济学: 城市、区域与国际贸易. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005. 426.]

[5] Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 1991, 99(3): 483-499.

[6] Krugman P. A dynamic spatial model. NBER Working Paper No. 4219, 1992.1-60.

[7] Krugman P. What's new about the new economic geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2): 7-17.

[8] Krugman P. Geography and Trade. MIT Press, 1993. 150.
[保罗.克鲁格曼. 张兆杰译. 地理与贸易. 北京: 北京大学出版社; 中国人民大学出版社, 2000. 150.]

[9] Brakman S, Garretsen H, Marrewijk C. An Introduction to Geographical Economics. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[布雷克曼, 盖瑞森, 马勒惠克. 西南财经大学文献中心译. 地理经济学. 成都: 西南财经大学出版社, 2004. 19-122.]

[10] Krugman P. The "new" economic geogr aphy: Where are we? Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, Princeton University, 2004. 1-14.

[11] Fujita M, Krugman P. When is the economy monocentric?: von Thünen and Chamberlin unified. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1995, 25: 505-528.

[12] Fujita M, Krugman P. The new economic geography: Past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science, 2004,83: 139-164.

[13] Fujita M, Mori T. Frontiers of the New Economic Geography. Papers in Regional Science, 2005, 84: 377-405.

[14] Fujita M, Krugman P, Mori T. On the evolution of hierarchical urban systems. European Economic Review, 1999, 43: 209-251.

[15] Gu Chaoling, Wang Enru, Shi Aihua. Divarication and opposability between "new economic geography" and economic geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(4): 497-504.
[顾朝林, 王恩儒, 石爱华. “新经济地理学”与经济地理学的分异与对立. 地理学报, 2002, 57(4): 497-504.]

[16] Hamaguchi N, Fujita M. An analysis on investment conversion effect based on new spatial economic model. In: Economic Development and Regional Economic Structure: Prospects of Regional Economics Approach. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, 2000. 161-182.
[滨口伸明, 藤田昌久. 基于新空间经济模型的投资转换效果分析. 经济发展与地域经济结构. 东京: 亚洲经济研究所. 2000: 161-182.]

[17] Shi Minjun, Jin Fengjun, Li Na et al. Interregional economic linkage and regional development driving forces based on an interregional input-output analysis of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(6): 593-603.
[石敏俊, 金凤君, 李娜等. 中国地区间经济联系与区域发展驱动力分析. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6): 593-603.]

[18] Zhong Yingjie, Wang Zheng. An investigation to the demand of consumption in eight areas in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(4): 295-302.
[钟颖杰, 王铮. 中国八个地区的消费需求分析. 地理学报, 1998, 53(4): 295-302.]

[19] Zhao Zhao, Shi Minjun, Chen Xianzhang. An analysis on market potential in west China. Arid Land Geography, 2006, 29(5): 766-771.
[赵曌, 石敏俊, 陈贤章. 西部地区市场潜力分析. 干旱区地理, 2006, 29(5): 766-771.]

[20] Dai Teqi. Spatial interactions and evolvement of urban system of China in terms of rail passenger and freight flows. Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2005.
[戴特奇. 空间相互作用与城市体系演进: 从铁路流角度. 中国科学院研究生院硕士论文, 2005.]

[21] Hanson G. Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration. Journal of International Economics, 2005, 67: 1-24.

中国地级行政区域市场潜力评价

A Quantitative Evaluation on Regional Market Potential in China

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邓祥征, 梁立, 吴锋, 王振波, 何书金. 发展地理学视角下中国区域均衡发展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 261-276.
[2]	古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[3]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.
[4]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[5]	葛全胜, 朱会义. 两千年来中国自然与人文地理环境变迁及启示[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 3-14.
[6]	张兴航, 张百平, 王晶, 余付勤, 赵超, 姚永慧. 中国南北过渡带东段样带植被序列与气候分界问题[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 30-43.
[7]	陈发虎, 吴绍洪, 崔鹏, 蔡运龙, 张镱锂, 尹云鹤, 刘国彬, 欧阳竹, 马巍, 杨林生, 吴铎, 雷加强, 张国友, 邹学勇, 陈晓清, 谈明洪, 王训明, 包安明, 程维新, 党小虎, 韦炳干, 王国梁, 王五一, 张兴权, 刘晓晨, 李生宇. 1949—2019年中国自然地理学与生存环境应用研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1799-1830.
[8]	李哲, 丁永建, 陈艾姣, 张智华, 张世强. 1960—2019年西北地区气候变化中的Hiatus现象及特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1845-1859.
[9]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 周亮, 王旭峰, 李振亚, 庞素菲, 颉斌斌. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1948-1965.
[10]	敖荣军, 常亮. 基于结构方程模型的中国县域人口老龄化影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1572-1584.
[11]	宋周莺, 祝巧玲. 中国边境地区的城镇化格局及其驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1603-1616.
[12]	马春玥, 买买提·沙吾提, 姚杰, 古丽努尔·依沙克. 1950—2015年中国棉花生产时空动态变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1699-1710.
[13]	郑景云, 张学珍, 刘洋, 郝志新. 过去千年中国不同区域干湿的多尺度变化特征评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1432-1450.
[14]	陶泽兴, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 1963—2018年中国垂柳和榆树开花始期积温需求的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1451-1464.
[15]	瞿诗进, 胡守庚, 李全峰. 中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553.