生态补偿机制中若干关键科学问题——以甘南藏族自治州草地生态系统为例

doi:10.11821/xb201004011

地理学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (4): 494-506.doi: 10.11821/xb201004011

生态补偿机制中若干关键科学问题——以甘南藏族自治州草地生态系统为例

戴其文¹, 赵雪雁^{1, 2}

1. 西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州730070;
2. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 兰州730000

收稿日期:2009-08-07 修回日期:2009-12-14 出版日期:2010-04-25 发布日期:2010-04-25
作者简介:戴其文(1985-), 男, 安徽郎溪人, 硕士, 中国地理学会会员(S110007646A), 主要研究方向为区域生态经济与可持续发展。E-mail: sxsfdx520@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40971291); 西北师范大学科研团队项目(NWNU-KJCXGC-03-20); 西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院学生学术科研基金项目

Discussion on Several Key Scientific Issues of Eco-compensation Mechanism in Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture

DAI Qi-wen¹; ZHAO Xue-yan^1,2

1.College of Geography and Environment Science; Northwest Normal University; Lanzhou 730070; China;
2.Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute; CAS; Lanzhou 730000; China

Received:2009-08-07 Revised:2009-12-14 Online:2010-04-25 Published:2010-04-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40971291; Northwest Normal University Research Team Foundation, No.NWNU-KJCXGC-03-20; Student Academic Research Foundation of College of Geography and Environment Science of Northwest Normal University

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以甘南州草地生态系统水源涵养服务为例,构建以机会成本、交易成本和实施成本为参数的参与成本模型确定生态补偿标准。基于生态补偿资金效率的考虑,构建以土地所有者提供的生态系统服务、土地所有者的参与成本和生态系统服务受损风险为参数的空间选择模型,以乡镇为研究单元,对生态补偿区域进行选择,采用聚类分析将全州划为5大等级补偿区:优先补偿区、次级优先补偿区、次级补偿区、临界补偿区和潜在补偿区或可能补偿区,并对各类补偿区的特征进行了分析。构建生态补偿额基尼系数与生态补偿资金效率评价模型,分别评价了补偿额在受偿群体和补偿区域中分配的公平性、合理性与不同等级补偿区的补偿效率。结果表明:①以草地生态系统服务功能的价值(4776.4元/hm²·a)和机会成本(621.3元/m²·a)作为补偿标准的上下限,结合参与成本确定甘南州草地生态系统补偿标准为1999.8元/hm²·a;②草地生态系统的补偿优先度与生态重要性、生态脆弱性呈现出吻合趋同的状态,即草地生态系统优先补偿区既是高效补偿区,又是重要生态区和生态脆弱区;③受偿者(草地生态系统水源涵养服务供给者)得到的补偿额有明显不均衡状态,而在补偿区域(草地生态系统)上的分配却处于绝对平均范围内;④草地生态系统补偿区的优先等级次序与补偿效率吻合,即草地生态系统的优先补偿区的补偿效率最高,每元获取的草地生态系统水源涵养服务为38.18,是临界补偿区的14.68倍;次级优先补偿区的效率仅次于优先补偿区,每元补偿的生态系统服务为21.02。

关键词: 生态补偿, 机制, 草地生态系统, 科学问题, 甘南藏族自治州

Abstract:

The participation costs model,including the opportunity costs,transaction costs and implementation costs is constructed to determine the ecological compensation standards in Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture.Based on the efficiency of ecological compensation funds,we construct an applied site selection tool,which takes into account three variables that vary in space:environmental services provided,risks of losing those services,and participation costs,with town as a basic unit,to determine and choose the scope of ecological compensation.On the basis of the model,this study classifies Gannan into five compensation zones by cluster analysis:priority compensation zones,sub-priority compensation zones,secondary compensation zones,critical compensation zones and potential compensation zones,and analyzes the characteristics of the above five types of compensation zones.Besides,Gini coefficient for ecological compensation payments is designed according to the conception of Gini coefficient and used to evaluate the fairness levels of payments distribution in the communities receiving payments and compensation zones.The evaluation model of compensation funds efficiency is built to assess the efficiency of five compensation areas at different levels.Results are drawn as follows:(1) The opportunity cost (621.3 yuan/hm²·a) and the grassland ecosystem services value (4776.4 yuan/hm²·a) are taken as upper and lower limits of compensation criterion,combined with the participation costs of farmers and herdsmen,and the compensation standard of grassland ecosystem is 1999.8 yuan/hm²·a.(2) (2) The five types of compensation zones coincide with the order of efficient compensation as well as the order of the ecological importance.The main priority compensation zones of grassland ecosystem cover larger pasture,the grassland sizes of towns compensated are larger,but few participants are involved,however secondary compensation zones cover nearly half of the grassland ecosystem,towns and the population.In terms of spatial distribution,the main priority compensation zones are mainly in pastoral areas,while non-priority zones are mainly in the farming-pastoral areas,agricultural areas and forest areas.(3) There are great differences in the distribution of compensation payments among participants (suppliers of grassland ecosystem services),however the payments are evenly distributed in compensation zones of grassland ecosystem.(4) The order of compensation efficiency of grassland ecosystem is consistent with priorities of compensation areas.The priority compensation zones is most efficient,and their payments are more than 14 times (38.18) those of the environmental benefits for each yuan in the critical zones,followed by the sub-priority zones,being 21.02 for each yuan.

Key words: ecological compensation, mechanism, grassland ecosystem, scientific issues, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture

中图分类号:

X171.1

戴其文; 赵雪雁. 生态补偿机制中若干关键科学问题——以甘南藏族自治州草地生态系统为例[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(4): 494-506.

DAI Qiwen1; ZHAO Xueyan1; 2. Discussion on Several Key Scientific Issues of Eco-compensation Mechanism in Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(4): 494-506.

参考文献

[1] Li Wenhua. Discussion on establishment of eco-compensation mechanism in China. Environmental Protection, 2006, (10): 1-5. [李文华. 探索建立中国式生态补偿机制. 环境保护, 2006, (10): 1-5.]
[2] Sun Xinzhang, Zhou Hailin. Key problems of eco-compensation system building in China and strategies for resolving them. China Population Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(5): 139-143. [孙新章, 周海林. 我国生态补偿制度建设的突出问题与重大战略对策. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(5): 139-143.]
[3] Li Wenhua, Li Shidong, Li Fen et al. Discussions on several issues of forest eco-compensation mechanism. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2007, 17(2): 13-18. [李文华, 李世东, 李芬等. 森林生态补偿机制若干重点问题研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2007, 17(2): 13-18.]
[4] Li Wenhua, Li Fen, Li Shidong et al. The status and prospect of forest ecological benefit compensation. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(5): 677-687. [李文华, 李芬, 李世东等. 森林生态效益补偿的研究现状与展望. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(5): 677-687.]
[5] Task Force on Eco-compensation Mechanisms and Policies. Eco-compensation Mechanisms and Policies in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2007: 78-80. [中国生态补偿机制与政策研究课题组. 中国生态补偿机制与政策研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 78-80.]
[6] Liu Yulong, Xu Fengran, Zhang Chunling et al. Model for river basin ecological compensation. China Water Resources, 2006, (22): 35-38. [刘玉龙, 许凤冉, 张春玲等. 流域生态补偿标准计算模型研究. 中国水利, 2006, (22): 35-38.]
[7] Zheng Haixia, Zhang Lubiao. Research on the standardization of compensation for the service of eco-system in river valley. Environmental Protection, 2006, (1): 42-46. [郑海霞, 张陆彪. 流域生态服务补偿定量标准研究.环境保护, 2006, (1): 42-46.]
[8] Cai Bangcheng, Lu Genfa, Song Lijuan et al. The Ecological compensation standardization for ecological restoration: A case study of ecological restoration in the water resource protection zone for Eastern South-to-North Water Transfer Project. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(5): 2413-2416. [蔡邦成, 陆根法, 宋莉娟等. 生态建设补偿的定量标准: 以南水北调东线水源地保护区一期生态建设工程为例. 生态学报, 2008, 28(5): 2413-2416.]
[9] Zhang Yifei, Chen Hongmin, Li Jin. Applying the CVM to make the standard of ecological compensation reasonable. Ecological Economy, 2007, (9): 28-31. [张翼飞, 陈红敏, 李瑾. 应用意愿价值评估法,科学制订生态补偿标准. 生态经济, 2007, (9): 28-31.]
[10] Liu Yulong, Hu Peng. Ecological compensation standard for Xinanjiang River basin based on Pareto optimization. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 40(6): 703-708. [刘玉龙, 胡鹏. 基于帕累托最优的新安江流域生态补偿标准. 水利学报, 2009, 40(6): 703-708.]
[11] Pagiola S. Assessing the efficiency of payments for environmental services programs: A framework for analysis. World Bank, Washington, 2005.
[12] Ferraro P J. Conservation contracting in heterogeneous landscapes: An application to watershed protection with threshold constraints. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 2003, 32(1): 53-64.
[13] Alix-Garcia J, de Janvry A, Sadoulet E. The role of risk i n targeting payments for environmental services. Social Science Research Network (SSRN), 2005.
[14] Alexander S, Pfaff P, Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa G. Deforestation pressure and biological reserve planning: A conceptual approach and an illustrative application for Costa Rica. Resource and Energy Economics, 2004, 26: 237-254.
[15] Zhang Runhao. The scope and basic principles of ecological compensation. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 2004, 24(6): 18-22. [张润昊. 论生态效益补偿的范围与基本原则. 中南林学院学报, 2004, 24(6): 18-22.]
[16] Chen Qin, Wei Yuanzhu. Standard, scope and method of ecological compensation related with non-commercial forest. Science & Technology Review, 2007, 25(10): 64-66. [陈钦, 魏远竹. 公益林生态补偿标准、范围和方式探讨. 科技导报, 2007, 25(10): 64-66.]
[17] Babcock B A, Lakshminarayan P G, Wu J et al. Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities. Land Economics, 1997, 73(3): 325-339.
[18] Powell G V N, Barborak J, Rodriguez M. Assessing representativeness of protected natural areas in Costa Rica for protecting biodiversity: A preliminary gab analysis. Biological Conservation, 2000, 93: 35-41.
[19] Ferraro P J. Conservation contracting in heterogeneous landscapes: An application to watershed protection with threshold constraints. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 2003, 32(1): 53-64.
[20] Alix-Garcia J, de Janvry A, Sadoulet E. The role of risk in targeting payments for environmental services. Social Science Research Network (SSRN), 2005.
[21] Imbach P. Priority areas for Payment for Environmental Services (PES) in Costa Rica. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigacióny Ensenanza (CATIE), Turrialba, Costa Rica, 2005.
[22] Claassen R, Cattaneo A, Johansson R. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65: 737-752.
[23] Wan Jun, Zhang Huiyuan, Wang Jinnan et al. Policy evaluation and framework discussion of ecological compensation mechanism in China. Research of Environment Sciences, 2005, 18(2): 1-8. [万军, 张惠远, 王金南等. 中国生态补偿政策评估与框架初探. 环境科学研究, 2005, 18(2): 1-8.]
[24] Zhang Sifen, Yu Ping, Sun Bo. Estimating compensation for damaged vegetation ecosystem in Shanxi province based on HEA. Resources Science, 2007, 29(6): 61-67. [张思锋, 余平, 孙博. 基于HEA 方法的陕西省受损植被生态服务功能补偿评估. 资源科学, 2007, 29(6): 61-67.]
[25] Xu Jian, Cui Xiaohong, Wang Jigan. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of ecological compensation mechanism in China. Science and Technology Management Research, 2009, (4): 44-46. [徐健, 崔晓红, 王济干. 我国生态补偿现状的模糊综合评价. 科技管理研究, 2009, (4): 44-46.]
[26] Xiong Ying, Wang Kelin, Lan Wanlian et al. Evaluation of the lake recovery area eco-compensation in Dongting Lake area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(5): 772-780. [熊鹰, 王克林, 蓝万炼等. 洞庭湖区湿地恢复的生态补偿效应评估. 地理学报, 2004, 59(5): 772-780.]
[27] Tobias Wünscher, Stefanie Engel, Sven Wunder. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: A tool for boosting conservation benefits. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65: 822-833.
[28] Herzog F, Dreier S, Hofer G et al. Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes, Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, (108): 189-204.
[29] Dietschi S, Holderegger R, Schmidt S G et al. Agri-environment incentive payments and plant species richness under different management intensities in mountain meadows of Switzerland. Acta Oecologica, 2007, 31(2): 216-222.
[30] Wunder S. Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No.42, 2005: 3-8.
[31] Mao Xianqiang, Zhong Yu, Zhang Sheng. Conception and mechanism of eco-compensation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2002, 12(4): 38-41. [毛显强, 钟瑜, 张胜. 生态补偿的理论探讨. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2002, 12(4): 38-41.]
[32] Ren Yong. The seven issues of ecological compensation mechanism in China. Environmental Economy, 2008, (8): 28-36. [任勇. 我国生态补偿机制建立的七大问题. 环境经济, 2008, (8): 28-36.]
[33] Luosang Lingzhiduojie, Zhang Zhiliang, Hu Zizhi et al. Study on Gannan Ecological Economy Demonstration District of Tibetan Plateau. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Technology Press, 2005. [洛桑·灵智多杰, 张志良, 胡自治等. 青藏高原甘南生态经济示范区研究. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 2005.]
[34] Chang Xuexiang, Wang Jinye, Zhang Xuelong et al. Evaluation on water resource conservation effect of forest in Qilian Mountains. Journal of Northwest Forestry College, 2001, 16(suppl.1): 51-54. [常学向, 王金叶, 张学龙等. 祁连山森林水源涵养效益初析. 西北林学院学报, 2001, 16(增刊1): 51-54.]
[35] Luo Weixiang, Bai Liqiang, Song Xide et al. Runoff and scouring amount in forest and grass land with different cover rate. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1990, 4(1): 30-35. [罗伟祥. 白立强, 宋西德等. 不同覆盖度林地和草地的径流量与冲刷量. 水土保持学报, 1990, 4(1): 30-35.]
[36] Huang Tao, Hu Yiguo, Hu Yichao. An analysis of regional Gini coefficient of per capita GDP. Management World, 2006, (5): 45-51. [黄涛, 胡宜国, 胡宜朝. 地区人均GDP 分布的基尼系数分析. 管理世界, 2006, (5): 45-51.]
[37] Development and Reform Commission of Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. The 11th Five-Year Plan of Animal Husbandry Development in Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture (2006-2010). Hezuo, 2007. [甘南藏族自治州发展与改革委员会. 甘南藏族自治州畜牧业发展第十一个五年规划(2006-2010 年). 合作, 2007.]
[38] Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Xiao Yu et al. The economic evaluation of grassland ecosystem services in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Mountain Science, 2003, 21(1): 50-55. [谢高地, 鲁春霞, 肖玉等. 青藏高原高喊草地生态系统服务价值评估. 山地学报, 2003, 21(1): 50-55.]
[39] Hong Xingjian. Acceptable range and security line of Gini Coefficient. Statistical Research, 2007, 24(8): 84-87. [ 洪兴建. 基尼系数合意值和警戒线的探讨. 统计研究, 2007, 24(8): 84-87.]
[40] Zhao Xueyan. Human dimensions of grassland degradation: A case study in Maqu county of Gansu province. Resources Science, 2007, 29(5): 50-56. [赵雪雁. 黄河首曲地区草地退化的人文因素分析: 以甘肃省玛曲县为例. 资源科学, 2007, 29(5): 50-56.]
[41] Cui Qinghu, Jiang Zhigang, Liu Jike et al. A review of the cause of rangeland degradation on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2007, 24(5): 20-26. [崔庆虎, 蒋志刚, 刘季科等. 苏建平青藏高原草地退化原因述评. 草业科学, 2007, 24(5): 20-26.]

生态补偿机制中若干关键科学问题——以甘南藏族自治州草地生态系统为例

Discussion on Several Key Scientific Issues of Eco-compensation Mechanism in Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	袁丹, 朱传耿, 陈寒昱. 中国按比例安排残疾人就业的动力机制与空间分布[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 341-351.
[2]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[3]	敖荣军, 常亮. 基于结构方程模型的中国县域人口老龄化影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1572-1584.
[4]	任以胜, 陆林, 虞虎, 朱道才. 尺度政治视角下的新安江流域生态补偿政府主体博弈[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1667-1679.
[5]	潘竟虎, 冯娅娅. 中国农村深度贫困的空间扫描与贫困分异机制的地理探测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 769-788.
[6]	胡最, 邓运员, 刘沛林, 彭惠军. 传统聚落文化景观基因的符号机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 789-803.
[7]	鲁大铭, 杨新军, 石育中, 王子侨. 黄土高原乡村体制转换与转型发展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 348-364.
[8]	冯颖, 侯孟阳, 姚顺波. 中国粮食生产空间关联网络的结构特征及其形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2380-2395.
[9]	王桂新, 李刚. 生态省建设的碳减排效应研究[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2431-2442.
[10]	孙毅中, 杨静, 宋书颖, 朱杰, 戴俊杰. 多层次矢量元胞自动机建模及土地利用变化模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2164-2179.
[11]	黄木易, 岳文泽, 方斌, 冯少茹. 1970-2015年大别山区生态服务价值尺度响应特征及地理探测机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1904-1920.
[12]	田原,余成群,查欣洁,高星,于明寨. 青藏高原西部、南部和东北部边界地区天然水的水化学性质及其成因[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 975-991.
[13]	陈雯,王珏,孙伟. 基于成本—收益的长三角地方政府的区域合作行为机制案例分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 312-322.
[14]	李广东, 戚伟. 中国建设用地扩张对景观格局演化的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2572-2591.
[15]	周榕, 庄汝龙, 黄晨熹. 中国人口老龄化格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2163-2177.