北京亚奥地区居住环境设计与管理的经济利益

doi:10.11821/xb200702004

地理学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2): 147-156.doi: 10.11821/xb200702004

北京亚奥地区居住环境设计与管理的经济利益

高晓路

中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101

收稿日期:2006-10-09 修回日期:2006-12-08 出版日期:2007-02-25 发布日期:2007-02-25
作者简介:高晓路(1969-), 研究员, 博士。主要研究方向包括：城市规划政策, 城市人居环境评价, 土地利用规划, 住宅与房地产经济, GIS 与空间分析。E-mail: gaoxl@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40671063); 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所知识创新工程所长基金项目; 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助项目

Incentives of Environmental Design and Management in Residential Areas of Beijing

GAO Xiaolu

Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2006-10-09 Revised:2006-12-08 Online:2007-02-25 Published:2007-02-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40671063; Knowledge Innovation Project of the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research of CAS; The project sponsored by SRF for ROCS, SEM

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了推动城市居住区环境设计与管理模式的创新, 为相关政策提供决策依据, 有必要定量地把握环境设计与管理所带来的经济价值, 以及伴随政策导入各种利益关系可能发生的变化。运用北京市亚奥地区居住小区的调查数据, 探讨了居住区环境设计与管理的主要影响因素以及与居住区环境政策密切相关的经济利益驱动机制问题。分析表明, 居住小区的规划设计、与周边住宅区的协调性, 以及物业管理是居住区环境品质中最关键的影响因素。同时, 分析定量地证明了居住区环境设计和管理的经济价值, 由此明确了在居住区实行环境设计和管理的潜在动机, 和改善环境设计与管理对提升地区价值所产生的效果。在以上分析的基础上, 提出了推进旧住宅区的物业管理体制改革、通过政策来诱导和推动地区的有机融合、在居住区规划设计和管理方面注重地区文脉、设定适宜的物业收费标准等建议。

关键词: 居住小区, 环境设计, 景观, 物业管理, 经济价值, 地域协调, 北京

Abstract:

To increase the quality of life in urban areas, new management systems facilitating the long-run improvement of residential environments are expected. This necessitates a good understanding of the benefits of environmental design and management, as well as the social effects of relevant policies. This paper addressed this issue by studying the incentives of environmental design and management with data of Beijing. Through detailed survey of neighborhoods, the critical factors of environmental design and management were explored, and then the economic effects of these factors on housing prices were investigated. In this way, the incentives of improving the design and management of residential environments were clarified. The results suggested that, planning and design, incompatibility with surrounding neighborhoods, and the property management of neighborhoods, are three critical factors influencing the quality of residential environments, and the environmental design and management of neighborhoods have significant economic values. These results implied that the introduction of environmental design and management system would effectively bring benefits to the neighborhoods. Based on analysis results, the appropriate range of property management fee is also proposed.

Key words: residential blocks, environmental design, landscape, property management, economic value, areal coordination, Beijing

高晓路. 北京亚奥地区居住环境设计与管理的经济利益[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(2): 147-156.

GAO Xiaolu. Incentives of Environmental Design and Management in Residential Areas of Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(2): 147-156.

参考文献

[1] Adams L W, Leedy D L (eds). Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment. Columbia MD: National Institute for Urban Wildlife, 1987.

[2] de Haas W, Kranendonk R, Pleijte M. Valuable man-made landscapes (VMLs) in the Netherlands: a policy evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1999, 46: 133-141.

[3] Jim C Y. Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities, 2004, 21 (4): 311-320.

[4] Department of the Environment. Guidance on the Protection of Strategic Views for London. Department of the Environment Consultation Letter, UK, 1990.

[5] Murtagh W J. Keeping Time: The History and Theory of Preservation in America. Revised edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1997.

[6] Lichfield N. Economics in Urban Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

[7] Carter R W, Bramley R. Defining heritage values and significance for improved resource management: an application to Australian tourism. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2002, 8(3): 175-199.

[8] Coeterier J F. Lay people's evaluation of historic sites. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 59(2): 111-123.

[9] !pekoglu B. An architectural evaluation method for conservation of traditional dwellings. Building Environment, 2006, 41(3): 386-394.

[10] Gómez-Sal A, Belmontes J A, Nicolau J M. Assessing landscape values: a proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecological Modelling, 2003, 168(3): 319-341.

[11] Prato T. Multiple attribute evaluation of landscape management. Journal of Environmental Management, 2000, 60(4): 325-337.

[12] Groat L. Public opinion of contextual fit. Journal of American Institute of Architects, 1984, 73: 72-75.

[13] Willis K G, Garrod G D. Valuing landscape: a contingent valuation approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 1993, 37(1): 1-22.

[14] Tyrvainen L, Vaananen H. The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 43: 105-118.

[15] McLeod P B. The demand for local amenity: a hedonic price analysis. Environment and Planning A, 1984, 16: 389-400.

[16] Tyrvainen L. The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1997, 37: 211-222.

[17] Tyrvainen L, Miettinen A. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environment and Economic Management, 2000, 39: 205-223.

[18] Geoghegan J, Wainger L A, Bockstael N E. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics, 1997, 23: 251-264.

[19] Chen Fu, Chen Haiyan, Zhu Zhenhua et al. Analysis on evaluation of urban residential quality and satisfaction. Human Geography, 2000, 15(4): 20-23.
[ 陈浮, 陈海燕, 朱振华等. 城市人居环境与满意度评价研究. 人文地理, 2000, 15 (4): 20-23.]

[20] Gu Chuanhui, Chen Guizhu. Study on index system of eco-city assessment. Environmental Protection, 2001, (11): 24-25.
[顾传辉, 陈桂珠. 生态城市评价指标体系研究. 环境保护, 2001, (11): 24-25.]

[21] Hua Hong. The quality evaluation of environment for the urban old residential area. Environmental Protection, 1999, (6): 26-28.
[华虹. 城市旧居住区的环境质量评价. 环境保护, 1999, (6): 26-28.]

[22] Li Bin. Evaluation of the development of human settlements in Lanzhou city. Ecological Economy, 2005, (5): 34-37.
[李斌. 兰州城市人居环境建设质量评价研究. 生态经济, 2005, (5): 34-37.]

[23] Li Wangming, Ye Xinyue. The assessment of urban human settlements. Economic Geography, 1999, 19(2): 38-43.
[李王鸣, 叶信岳. 城市人居环境评价. 经济地理, 1999, 19(2): 38-43.]

[24] Li Xueming, Li Jianhong. Analysis of urban space in Dalian. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(8): 809-817.
[李雪铭, 李建宏. 大连城市空间意象分析. 地理学报, 2006, 61(8): 809-817.]

[25] Li Zhibin. Renovation of urban landscape. Economic Geography, 2001, 21(suppl.): 106-108.
[李植斌. 城市景观特色的整治与创新. 经济地理, 2001, 21(增刊): 106-108.]

[26] Ning Yuemin, Zha Zhiqiang. A study on urban human settlements assessment and optimization measures. City Planning Review, 1999, 23(6): 15-20.
[宁越敏, 查志强. 大都市人居环境评价和优化研究. 城市规划, 1999, 23(6): 15-20]

[27] Wang Maojun, Zhang Xuexia, Zhang Wenzhong. An evaluation of spatial structure of urban residential environment in Dalian: Based on area source model. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(6): 753-762.
[王茂军, 张学霞, 张文忠. 基于面源模型的城市居住环境评价空间分异研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(6): 753-762]

[28] Wu Qiong, Wang Rusong, Li Hongqing et al. The indices and the evaluation method of eco-city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(8): 2090-2095.
[吴琼, 王如松, 李宏卿等. 生态城市指标体系与评价方法. 生态学报, 2005, 25(8): 2090-2095.]

[29] Wu Zhiqiang, Wei Fang et al. Evaluation System of Sustainable Human Settlements in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2003.
[吴志强, 蔚芳等. 可持续发展中国人居环境评价体系. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.]

[30] Xie Rangzhi. Comprehensive evaluation of the environmental quality and the sustainability of urban residential areas in China. City, 1997, (3): 38-40.
[谢让志. 中国城市住区环境质量综合评估及其可持续发展研究. 城市, 1997, (3): 38-40].

[31] Zhang Wenzhong, Liu Wang, Meng Bin. A study on location advantage value of residential environment (LAVRE) in the urban and suburban Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(1): 115-121.
[张文忠, 刘旺, 孟斌. 北京城市内部居住环境的区位优势度分析. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 115-121.]

[32] Wu Shuoxian, Li Jinpeng, Huo Yun et al. Evaluation of factores affecting the living and environmental quality of resident areas. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 1995, 15(3): 354-362.
[吴硕贤, 李劲鹏, 霍云等. 居住区生活环境质量影响因素的多元统计分析与评价. 环境科学学报, 1995, 15(3): 354-362.]

北京亚奥地区居住环境设计与管理的经济利益

Incentives of Environmental Design and Management in Residential Areas of Beijing

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张学波, 宋金平, 于伟, 王振波. 基于感知的北京居民职住空间关系生成机理[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 383-397.
[2]	史娜娜, 韩煜, 王琦, 汉瑞英, 高晓奇, 赵志平, 刘高慧, 肖能文. 新疆南部地区风沙扩散风险评价及景观格局优化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 73-86.
[3]	袁玉, 方国华, 陆承璇, 颜敏. 基于景观生态学的城市化背景下洪灾风险评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1921-1933.
[4]	高晓路, 吴丹贤, 颜秉秋. 北京城市老年贫困人口识别与空间分布[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1557-1571.
[5]	刘焱序, 傅伯杰, 王帅, 赵文武, 李琰. 空间恢复力理论支持下的人地系统动态研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 891-903.
[6]	胡最, 邓运员, 刘沛林, 彭惠军. 传统聚落文化景观基因的符号机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 789-803.
[7]	欧阳晓, 朱翔. 中国城市群城市用地扩张时空动态特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(3): 571-588.
[8]	刘春腊, 徐美, 刘沛林, 曾凡超. 传统村落文化景观保护性补偿模型及湘西实证[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 382-397.
[9]	张杰, 史培军, 杨静, 龚道溢. 北京地区景观城市化进程对暴雨过程的影响——以“7·21”暴雨为例[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1): 113-125.
[10]	李青圃,张正栋,万露文,杨传训,张杰,叶晨,陈裕婵. 基于景观生态风险评价的宁江流域景观格局优化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1420-1437.
[11]	张行,梁小英,刘迪,史琴琴,陈海. 生态脆弱区社会—生态景观恢复力时空演变及情景模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1450-1466.
[12]	乔治, 黄宁钰, 徐新良, 孙宗耀, 吴晨, 杨俊. 2003-2017年北京市地表热力景观时空分异特征及演变规律[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 475-489.
[13]	张延吉,秦波,朱春武. 北京城市建成环境对犯罪行为和居住安全感的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 238-252.
[14]	王亮,刘慧. 基于PS-DR-DP理论模型的区域资源环境承载力综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 340-352.
[15]	李广东, 戚伟. 中国建设用地扩张对景观格局演化的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2572-2591.