长江三角洲城市合作模式及其理论框架分析

doi:10.11821/xb200702001

地理学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2): 115-126.doi: 10.11821/xb200702001

• 城市发展 • 下一篇

长江三角洲城市合作模式及其理论框架分析

罗小龙¹, 沈建法²

1. 中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所, 南京210008;
2. 香港中文大学地理与资源管理学系, 香港新界沙田

收稿日期:2006-09-20 修回日期:2006-12-08 出版日期:2007-02-25 发布日期:2007-02-25
作者简介:罗小龙(1977-), 男, 博士, 助理研究员, 主要从事城市/ 区域发展政策、规划和管治研究。 E-mail: xluo@niglas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40601031); 中科院南京地理与湖泊研究所所长科研专项基金项目 (CXNIGLAS2006-8)

Models of Inter-city Cooper ation and Its Theoretical Implications: An Empirical Study on the Yangtze River Delta

LUO Xiaolong¹, SHEN Jianfa²

1. Nanjing Institute of Geography & Limnology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China;
2. Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, NT, Hong Kong, China

Received:2006-09-20 Revised:2006-12-08 Online:2007-02-25 Published:2007-02-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40601031; Director's Research Grant of Nanjing Institute of Geography & Limnology, CAS, No.CXNIGLAS2006-8

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

城市合作是长江三角洲城市与区域发展中的新现象, 并且已经成为政府和学术界关注的焦点问题。选择长江三角洲的苏锡常都市圈规划、长江三角洲城市经济协调会和江阴经济开发区靖江园区三个典型的城市合作案例, 从伙伴关系的理论视角, 进行城市合作的实证研究, 分别探讨了科层的城市合作、自发的城市合作和混合式的城市合作三种类型伙伴关系的制度安排。基于长三角的经验, 该研究在区域尺度上对伙伴关系理论的应用进行了拓展。研究的焦点在于三种模式城市合作的有效性(绩效)。通过对伙伴关系形成过程和利益相关者互动的追踪, 研究认为合作是否有效取决于合作的机制、合作的过程、合作的性质和领域、伙伴的选择和伙伴关系形成中利益相关者的作用。

关键词: 城市合作模式, 绩效, 伙伴关系, 理论框架, 长江三角洲

Abstract:

Inter-city cooperation in the Yangtze River Delta region is a new phenomenon and has received much governmental and scholarly attention in recent years. This paper examines inter-city cooperation from partnership perspective. In this study, three typical cases of inter-city cooperation, Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou Urban Region Planning, the Forum for the Coordination of Urban Economy of Yangtze River Delta Region and Jiangyin Economic Development Zone in Jingjiang are selected to examine three types of partnership arrangements, namely, hierarchical partnership, spontaneous partnership and hybrid partnership. This research applies the partnership approach to regional scale based on the Yangtze River delta's experiences. The research focus of this paper is the effectiveness of three types of inter-city cooperation. Through tracing the process of partnership formation and investigating stakeholder interactions, this paper argues that the effectiveness of inter-city cooperation depends on cooperation mechanism, the process of cooperation, the nature and scope of the cooperation, and the partner selection and roles of actors in partnership formation.

Key words: models of inter-city cooperation, effectiveness, partnership, theoretical implementations, the Yangtze River delta

罗小龙, 沈建法. 长江三角洲城市合作模式及其理论框架分析[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(2): 115-126.

LUO Xiaolong, SHEN Jianfa. Models of Inter-city Cooper ation and Its Theoretical Implications: An Empirical Study on the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(2): 115-126.

参考文献

[1] Heeg S, Klagge B, Ossenbrǖgge J. Metropolitan cooperation in Europe: Theoretical issues and perspectives for urban networking. European Planning Studies, 2003, 11(2): 139-153.

[2] Jessop B. The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 1998, 50(1): 29-45.

[3] Ma L J C, Fan M. Urbanization from below: The growth of towns in Jiangsu, China. Urban Studies, 1994, 31: 1625-1645.

[4] Shen J, Wong K Y, Feng Z Q. State-sponsored and spontaneous urbanization in the Pearl River Delta of South China. Urban Geography, 2002, 33: 674-694.

[5] Wu F. China's changing urban governance in the transition towards a more market-oriented economy. Urban Studies, 2002, 39(7): 1071-1093.

[6] Ma L J C. China's changing urban administrative system: Spatial restructuring and local economic development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Globalization, the State, and Urban Transformation in China, Hong Kong Baptist University, 2003.

[7] Shen J. Space, scale and the state: Reorganizing urban space in China. In: Ma L J C, Wu F (eds.), Restructuring the Chinese City: Changing Society, Economy and Space. London and New York: Routledge, 2005. 39-58.

[8] Zhou M, Logan J R. Market transition and the commodification of housing in urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1996, 20(3): 400-421.

[9] Kitajima S. Industrial and regional restructuring and changing form of state intervention: The development of partnerships in postwar Japan. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1998, 22(1): 26-41.

[10] Bailey N, Barker A, MacDonald K. Partnership Agencies in British Urban Policy. London: UCL Press, 1995.

[11] Molotch H L. The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 82: 309-330.

[12] Stone C N. Regime politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1989.

[13] Stone C N. Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1993, 15(1): 1-28.

[14] Elander I. Partnerships and urban governance. International Social Science Journal, 2002, 54(172): 191-204.

[15] Mbodj E H. Prospects for partnership among African cities. International Social Science Journal, 2002, 54 (172): 233-238.

[16] Yang C. Multilevel governance in the cross-boundary region of Hong Kong- Pearl River delta, China. Enivronment and Planning A, 2005, 37: 2147-2168.

[17] Lu Lachang. Regional integration between Zhujiang River delta and its surrounding region. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(5): 522-527.
[ 吕拉昌. 珠江三角洲与外围地区的整合模式研究. 地理科学, 2004, 15(5): 522-527.]

[18] Yu Taofang, Li Na. Study on the regional integration in the Yangtze River Delta area. Planner, 2005, 21(4): 17-24.
[于涛方, 李娜. 长江三角洲地区区域整合研究. 规划师, 2005, 21(4): 17-24.]

[19] Michael Arndt, Thomas Gawron, Petra Jahnke. Regional policy through co-operation: from urban forum to urban network. Urban Studies, 2000, 37(11): 1903-1923.

[20] Luo Xiaolong, Zhang Jingxiang. Urban competition and changing urban governance in Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou region. Asian Geographer, 2005, 23(1/22): 55-69.

[21] Jiangsu Construction Commission, Jiangsu Urban and Rural Planning Institute. Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou Urban Region Plan. Nanjing: Jiangsu Construction Commission, Jiangsu Urban and Rural Planning Institute, 2002.
[ 江苏省建设厅, 江苏省城乡规划设计研究院. 苏锡常都市圈规划. 南京: 江苏省建设厅, 江苏省城乡规划设计研究院, 2002.]

[22] Luo Xiaolong, Shen Jianfa. Why urban region planning does not work well: lessons from Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou metropolitan coordinating region planning. City Planning Review, 2005, 29(1): 30-35.
[罗小龙, 沈建法. " 都市圈" 还是都" 圈" 市: 透过效果不理想的苏锡常都市圈规划解读" 圈" 都市现象. 城市规划, 2005, 29(1): 30-35.]

[23] Zeng Gang. Thinking of regional coordinative mechanisms in the Yangtze River Delta region. In: Shen Lijiang, Ge Licheng (eds.). New Theoretical Perspectives on Region Integration in the Yangtze River Delta Region. Hangzhou: Zhejiang People's Press, 2003. 203.
[曾刚. 长江三角洲区域协调发展机制建设之我见. 见: 沈立江, 葛立成主编. 长三角一体化理论新视角. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 2003. 203.]

[24] Luo Xiaolong, Shen Jianfa. Urban growth between cities: The case of Jiangyin Economic Development Zone in Jingjiang. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(4): 435-445.
[罗小龙, 沈建法. 跨界的城市增长: 以江阴经济开发区靖江园区为例. 地理学报, 2006, 61(4): 435-445.]

[25] Leitner H, Sheppard E. Transceding interurban competition: Conceptual issues and policy alternatives in the European Union. In: Jonas A E G, Wilson D (eds.), The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives, Two Decades Later. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999. 227-243.

[26] Olson M. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups (2nd eds.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

[27] Chong D. Collective action and the civil rights movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

[28] DiGaetano A, Klemanski J S. Power and city governance: Comparative perspectives on urban development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

[29] Ricker W H, Ordeshook P C. An introduction to positive political theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1973.

[30] Vazquez-Castillo M T. Mexico-US bilateral planning: Institutions, planners and communities. European Planning Studies, 2001, 9(5): 649-662.

长江三角洲城市合作模式及其理论框架分析

Models of Inter-city Cooper ation and Its Theoretical Implications: An Empirical Study on the Yangtze River Delta

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 史晨怡. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.
[2]	陈雯,王珏,孙伟. 基于成本—收益的长三角地方政府的区域合作行为机制案例分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 312-322.
[3]	方创琳, 周成虎, 顾朝林, 陈利顶, 李双成. 特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(4): 531-550.
[4]	葛莹, 蒲英霞, 赵慧慧, 李云婷. 基于边际K函数的长三角地区城市群经济空间划分[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 528-538.
[5]	薛静静, 沈镭, 彭保发, 刘立涛. 区域能源消费与经济和环境绩效——基于14个能源输出和输入大省的实证研究[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(10): 1414-1424.
[6]	刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.
[7]	张莉, 陆玉麒. “点—轴系统”的空间分析方法研究——以长江三角洲为例[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(12): 1534-1547.
[8]	段学军, 虞孝感, Josef Nipper. 从极化区的功能探讨长江三角洲的扩展范围[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(2): 211-220.
[9]	李山, 王铮. 适度旅游圈时空规模的可计算模型[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(10): 1255-1266.
[10]	班茂盛,, 方创琳, 刘晓丽, 刘海燕. 北京高新技术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.
[11]	谢志清, 杜银, 曾燕 , 施雅风, 武金岗. 长江三角洲城市带扩展对区域温度变化的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(7): 717-727.
[12]	徐永明, 刘勇洪, 魏鸣, 吕晶晶. 基于MODIS 数据的长江三角洲地区土地覆盖分类[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 640-648.
[13]	李加林, 许继琴, 李伟芳, 刘闯. 长江三角洲地区城市用地增长的时空特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(4): 437-447.
[14]	苏伟忠, 杨桂山, 甄峰. 长江三角洲生态用地破碎度及其城市化关联[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(12): 1309-1317.
[15]	信忠保, 谢志仁. 长江三角洲地貌演变模拟模型的构建[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(5): 549-560.