面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径

doi:10.11821/dlxb202106008

地理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (6): 1422-1437.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106008

面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径

戈大专(), 陆玉麒

南京师范大学地理科学学院江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023

收稿日期:2020-09-22 修回日期:2021-03-10 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-08-25
作者简介:戈大专(1987-), 男, 江苏新沂人, 博士后, 硕士生导师, 中国地理学会会员(S110011568M), 主要从事乡村空间治理与土地利用转型研究。E-mail: gedz@njnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41901204);中国博士后科学基金项目(2019M660109);中国博士后科学基金项目(2021T140303);教育部人文社会科学基金项目(19YJCZH036);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20190717);江苏省社会科学基金项目(19GLC002)

Rural spatial governance for territorial spatial planning in China: Mechanisms and path

GE Dazhuan(), LU Yuqi

Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2020-09-22 Revised:2021-03-10 Published:2021-06-25 Online:2021-08-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41901204);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2019M660109);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2021T140303);The Foundation of Humanity and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of China(19YJCZH036);Jiangsu Provincial Science Foundation(BK20190717);Jiangsu Provincial Social Science Foundation(19GLC002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

城乡国土空间统一用途管制背景下,乡村空间治理成为国土空间治理体系的重要组成部分。从乡村空间治理的理论内涵出发,构建了乡村空间治理理论分析框架,探讨了乡村空间治理作用于国土空间规划的内在机制和可行路径。结论如下：① 乡村空间治理是以乡村空间为治理对象,通过规划和协商等方式,实现乡村空间用途有效管制,空间权利有序配置,凸显多元主体参与的“自上而下”和“自下而上”相结合的综合治理过程;② 通过“举措—效能—目标”体系,构建了刚性与弹性结合、物质空间与空间关系交互、空间权属与空间组织叠加的乡村空间“物质—组织—权属”综合治理分析框架;③ 多级尺度互联互通（区域—村域—地块）的乡村空间治理特征有利于完善乡村空间治理体系;④ 乡村空间治理通过多种手段并施、多元主体参与、多重价值共享,完善国土空间规划体系,推进多规融合,细化国土空间用途管制,促进乡村善治和生态治理;⑤ 乡村空间治理通过“自上而下”和“自下而上”相结合的动员和行动策略,构建新型村庄运营模式和组织机制,为落实实用性村庄规划和乡村振兴战略创造条件。

关键词: 乡村空间重构, 乡村振兴, 空间治理, 村庄规划, 国土空间规划

Abstract:

Under the background of unified management of urban and rural space, rural spatial governance has become an important part of the spatial governance system. Conducting in-depth theoretical and practical research on rural spatial governance and analyzing the mechanisms and path of rural spatial governance in national spatial planning will be conducive to improving the planning and control system of rural space. Starting from the connotation rural spatial governance, this paper constructs a theoretical analysis framework of rural spatial governance based on the comprehensive perspective of spatial governance, discusses the internal mechanism and feasible paths of rural spatial governance in territorial spatial planning, and then realizes the theoretical and practical research of rural spatial governance. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Rural spatial governance starts from the coordination theory of human-land relations in the rural regional system. Through planning and negotiation, it realizes effective control of rural space usage, and orderly allocation of space rights. Rural spatial governance highlights the comprehensive governance process that combines "top-down" and "bottom-up" participation by multiple subjects. (2) Through the "action-efficiency-target" system, the comprehensive governance analysis framework of "matter-organization-ownership" in rural space provides an effective scheme for the construction of multiple rural spatial governance that combines rigidity and flexibility, interaction between material space and space relationship, and superposition of spatial ownership and spatial organization. (3) The rural spatial governance features of interconnecting various scales (region-village-plot) are conducive to improving the rural spatial governance system. (4) The multiple governance means, participation modes and value-sharing mechanisms of rural spatial governance are conducive to enriching the territorial spatial planning system, promoting the integration of multiple regulations, refining the control of territorial space use, and ensuring good rural governance and ecological governance. (5) Rural spatial governance uses mobilization strategies of "top-down" and "bottom-up", and creates conditions for the implementation of practical village planning and revitalization strategies through the construction of new village operation models and reconstruction of organizational mechanisms.

Key words: rural spatial restructuring, rural revitalization, spatial governance, village planning, territorial spatial planning

戈大专, 陆玉麒. 面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437.

GE Dazhuan, LU Yuqi. Rural spatial governance for territorial spatial planning in China: Mechanisms and path[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437.

图/表 4

参考文献 60

[1]	Fan Jie. High-quality development of national territory space governance and regional economic layout during 14th Five-year Plan in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020,35(7):796-805.
	[ 樊杰. 我国“十四五”时期高质量发展的国土空间治理与区域经济布局. 中国科学院院刊, 2020,35(7):796-805.]
[2]	Ge Dazhuan, Long Hualou. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(6):1272-1286.
	[ 戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展. 地理学报, 2020,75(6):1272-1286.]
[3]	Zhang Jingxiang, Xia Tianci. The change and reconstruction of spatial planning system under the goal of modern national governance. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(10):2040-2050. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191002
	[ 张京祥, 夏天慈. 治理现代化目标下国家空间规划体系的变迁与重构. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(10):2040-2050.]
[4]	Zhang Bing. Coordinated development for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: A strategic trade-off in state spatial governance. Urban Planning Forum, 2016(4):15-21.
	[ 张兵. 京津冀协同发展与国家空间治理的战略性思考. 城市规划学刊, 2016(4):15-21.]
[5]	Long Hualou. Land use transition and land management. Geographical Research, 2015,34(9):1607-1618.
	[ 龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与土地资源管理. 地理研究, 2015,34(9):1607-1618.]
[6]	Liu Weidong. Economic geography for spatial governance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(8):1109-1116.
	[ 刘卫东. 经济地理学与空间治理. 地理学报, 2014,69(8):1109-1116.]
[7]	Long H L. Land Use Transitions and Rural Restructuring in China. Singapore: Springer, 2020.
[8]	Ge D Z, Zhou G P, Qiao W F, et al. Land use transition and rural spatial governance: Mechanism, framework and perspectives. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020,30(8):1325-1340. doi: 10.1007/s11442-020-1784-x
[9]	Long Hualou. Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(8):1019-1028.
	[ 龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构. 地理学报, 2013,68(8):1019-1028.]
[10]	Dong Zuoji. Promoting rural development through space governance transformation: The practice and implication of the urban-rural integrated land management innovation in Jiangsu Sucheng. China Land, 2019(1):16-20.
	[ 董祚继. 以空间治理转型提质促农村社会转型发展: 江苏宿城创新城乡统筹土地管理的做法与启示. 中国土地, 2019(1):16-20.]
[11]	Deng Hongdi, Yuan Hong, Qi Fan. Thoughts on territorial development regulation based on natural ecological spaces, Urban Planning Forum, 2020(1):23-30.
	[ 邓红蒂, 袁弘, 祁帆. 基于自然生态空间用途管制实践的国土空间用途管制思考. 城市规划学刊, 2020(1):23-30.]
[12]	Fan Jie. Spatial organization pathway for territorial function-structure: Discussion on implementation of major function zoning strategy in territorial spatial planning. Geographical Research, 2019,38(10):2373-2387.
	[ 樊杰. 地域功能—结构的空间组织途径: 对国土空间规划实施主体功能区战略的讨论. 地理研究, 2019,38(10):2373-2387.]
[13]	Zhang Jingxiang, Chen Hao. Spatial governance: Political economy of China's urban and rural planning transformation. City Planning Review, 2014,38(11):9-15.
	[ 张京祥, 陈浩 . 空间治理: 中国城乡规划转型的政治经济学. 城市规划, 2014,38(11):9-15.]
[14]	Shen Mingrui. From rural construction to rural operation: Benefit and dilemma of the market-oriented service provision in China's rural revitalization. City Planning Review, 2020,44(7):9-17.
	[ 申明锐. 从乡村建设到乡村运营: 政府项目市场托管的成效与困境. 城市规划, 2020,44(7):9-17.]
[15]	Sun Ying. Improving rural governance through participatory planning: A case study of the effects of participatory rural planning from the perspective of governance. City Planning Review, 2018,42(2):70-77.
	[ 孙莹. 以“参与”促“善治”: 治理视角下参与式乡村规划的影响效应研究. 城市规划, 2018,42(2):70-77.]
[16]	Woods M. Rural. New York: Routledge, 2011.
[17]	Cejudo E, Navarro F. Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons. Switzerland: Springer, 2020.
[18]	MacKinnon D. Rural governance and local involvement: Assessing state-community relations in the Scottish Highlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 2002,18(3):307-324. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00048-1
[19]	Esparcia J, Escribano J, Serrano J J. From development to power relations and territorial governance: Increasing the leadership role of LEADER Local Action Groups in Spain. Journal of Rural Studies, 2015,42:29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.005
[20]	Shucksmith M, Brown D L. Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies. New York: Routledge, 2016.
[21]	Navarro F A, Woods M, Cejudo E. The LEADER initiative has been a victim of its own success. The decline of the bottom-up approach in rural development programmes. The cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis, 2016,56(2):270-288. doi: 10.1111/soru.2016.56.issue-2
[22]	Zhang Shangwu, Li Jingsheng, Guo Jiqing, et al. Rural planning and rural governance. City Planning Review, 2014,38(11):23-28.
	[ 张尚武, 李京生, 郭继青, 等. 乡村规划与乡村治理. 城市规划, 2014,38(11):23-28.]
[23]	Fang Yangang, Liu Jisheng. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(2):257-270.
	[ 房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式. 地理学报, 2015,70(2):257-270.]
[24]	Long Hualou, Zhang Yingnan, Tu Shuangshuang. Land consolidation and rural vitalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(10):1837-1849.
	[ 龙花楼, 张英男, 屠爽爽. 论土地整治与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018,73(10):1837-1849.]
[25]	Wen Tiejun, Yang Shuai. Rural governance and rural development in the background of rural social structure change in China. Theoretical Investigation, 2012(6):76-80.
	[ 温铁军, 杨帅. 中国农村社会结构变化背景下的乡村治理与农村发展. 理论探讨, 2012(6):76-80.]
[26]	Liu Yansui. Modern human-earth relationship and human-earth system science. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(8):1221-1234. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.001
	[ 刘彦随. 现代人地关系与人地系统科学. 地理科学, 2020,40(8):1221-1234.]
[27]	Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4):637-650.
	[ 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018,73(4):637-650.]
[28]	Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang. Rural restructuring: Theory, approach and research prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(4):563-576.
	[ 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 论乡村重构. 地理学报, 2017,72(4):563-576.]
[29]	Yang Ren. Spatial differentiation and mechanisms of typical rural areas in the suburbs of a metropolis: A case study of Beicun Village, Baiyun District, Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(8):1622-1636.
	[ 杨忍. 广州市城郊典型乡村空间分化过程及机制. 地理学报, 2019,74(8):1622-1636.]
[30]	Lin Jian, Wu ting, Zhang Yexiao,et al. Thoughts on unifying the regulation of territorial space use. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(10):2200-2208. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191015
	[ 林坚, 武婷, 张叶笑, 等. 统一国土空间用途管制制度的思考. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(10):2200-2208.]
[31]	Sun Shiwen, Liu Qizhi, Deng Hongdi, et al. How to make the spatial planning? City Planning Review, 2020,44(1):112-116.
	[ 孙施文, 刘奇志, 邓红蒂, 等. 国土空间规划怎么做. 城市规划, 2020,44(1):112-116.]
[32]	Yue Wenze, Wang Tianyu. Rethinking on the basic issues of territorial and spatial use control in China. China Land Science, 2019,33(8):8-15.
	[ 岳文泽, 王田雨. 中国国土空间用途管制的基础性问题思考. 中国土地科学, 2019,33(8):8-15.]
[33]	Liu Yansui, Wang Jieyong. Theoretical analysis and technical methods of "multiple planning integration" in the rural to urban transition period in China. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(5):529-536. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.05.001
	[ 刘彦随, 王介勇. 转型发展期“多规合一”理论认知与技术方法. 地理科学进展, 2016,35(5):529-536.]
[34]	Ye Chao, Yu Jie, Zhang Qingyuan, et al. From governance to rural-urban co-governance: Research frontiers, trends, and the Chinese paths. Progress in Geography, 2021,40(1):15-27. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002
	[ 叶超, 于洁, 张清源, 等. 从治理到城乡治理:国际前沿、发展态势与中国路径. 地理科学进展, 2021,40(1):15-27.]
[35]	Lefebvre H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.
[36]	Li Hongbo, Hu Xiaoliang, Zhang Xiaolin, et al. On the analysis of rural space. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):591-600. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.003
	[ 李红波, 胡晓亮, 张小林, 等. 乡村空间辨析. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(5):591-600.]
[37]	Zhou Guohua, Liu Chang, Tang Chengli, et al. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of quality of life in rural areas of Hunan province. Geographical Research, 2018,37(12):2475-2489.
	[ 周国华, 刘畅, 唐承丽, 等. 湖南乡村生活质量的空间格局及其影响因素. 地理研究, 2018,37(12):2475-2489.]
[38]	Halfacree K. Trial by space for a 'radical rural': Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 2007,23(2):125-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.002
[39]	Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Li Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(12):2511-2528.
	[ 刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略. 地理学报, 2019,74(12):2511-2528.]
[40]	Zhou Guohua, He Yanhua, Tang Chengli, et al. Dynamic mechanism and present situation of rural settlements evolution in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011,66(4):515-524.
	[ 周国华, 贺艳华, 唐承丽, 等. 中国农村聚居演变的驱动机制及态势分析. 地理学报, 2011,66(4):515-524.]
[41]	Ou Minghao, Ding Guanqiao, Guo Jie, et al. Multi-objective collaborative governance mechanism of territorial space planning, China Land Science, 2020,34(5):8-17.
	[ 欧名豪, 丁冠乔, 郭杰, 等. 国土空间规划的多目标协同治理机制. 中国土地科学, 2020,34(5):8-17.]
[42]	Chen Mingxing, Liang Longwu, Wang Zhenbo, et al. Geographical thinking on the relationship between beautiful China and land spatial planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(12):2467-2481.
	[ 陈明星, 梁龙武, 王振波, 等. 美丽中国与国土空间规划关系的地理学思考. 地理学报, 2019,74(12):2467-2481.]
[43]	Liu Y, Li Y. Revitalize the world's countryside. Nature, 2017,548(7667):275-277. doi: 10.1038/548275a
[44]	Ye C, Liu Z M. Rural-urban co-governance: Multi-scale practice. Science Bulletin, 2020,65(10):778-780. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2020.02.021
[45]	Zhang Yingnan, Long Hualou, Ma Li, et al. Research progress of urban-rural relations and its implications for rural revitalization. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):578-594.
	[ 张英男, 龙花楼, 马历, 等. 城乡关系研究进展及其对乡村振兴的启示. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):578-594.]
[46]	Long Hualou, Ge Dazhuan, Wang Jieyong. Progress and prospects of the coupling research on land use transitions and rural transformation development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(12):2547-2559.
	[ 龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇. 土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望. 地理学报, 2019,74(12):2547-2559.]
[47]	Long H L, Zhang Y N. Rural planning in China: Evolving theories, approaches, and trends. Planning Theory & Practice, 2020,21(5):782-786.
[48]	Wu F L. Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism. Urban Studies, 2018,55(7):1383-1399. doi: 10.1177/0042098017721828
[49]	Meng Peng, Wang Qingri, Lang Haiou, et al. Analysis of the challenges and reform orientation of territorial spatial planning system in China under the background of spatial governance system modernization: Reviews from the serial research of territorial spatial governance. China Land Science, 2019,33(11):8-14.
	[ 孟鹏, 王庆日, 郎海鸥, 等. 空间治理现代化下中国国土空间规划面临的挑战与改革导向: 基于国土空间治理重点问题系列研讨的思考. 中国土地科学, 2019,33(11):8-14.]
[50]	Tu Shuangshuang, Long Hualou, Zhang Yingnan, et al. Process and driving factors of rural restructuring at typical villages. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(2):323-339.
	[ 屠爽爽, 龙花楼, 张英男, 等. 典型村域乡村重构的过程及其驱动因素. 地理学报, 2019,74(2):323-339.]
[51]	Ge D Z, Long H L, Qiao W F, et al. Effects of rural-urban migration on agricultural transformation: A case of Yucheng City, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 2020,76:85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.010
[52]	Fu Bojie. The integrated studies of geography: Coupling of patterns and processes. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(8):1052-1059.
	[ 傅伯杰. 地理学综合研究的途径与方法: 格局与过程耦合. 地理学报, 2014,69(8):1052-1059.]
[53]	Chen Xiaohui, Lü Hai. The rural spatial planning under the construction of territorial spatial planning system: Take Jiangsu as an example. Urban Planning Forum, 2021(1):74-81.
	[ 陈小卉, 闾海. 国土空间规划体系建构下乡村空间规划探索: 以江苏为例. 城市规划学刊, 2021(1):74-81.]
[54]	Liu Yungang, Chen Lin, Song Hongyang. Human support towards rural regeneration in Japan and its implications for rural revitalization of China. Urban Planning International, 2020,35(3):94-102.
	[ 刘云刚, 陈林, 宋弘扬. 基于人才支援的乡村振兴战略: 日本的经验与借鉴. 国际城市规划, 2020,35(3):94-102.]
[55]	Frisvoll S. Power in the production of spaces transformed by rural tourism. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012,28(4):447-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.06.001
[56]	Chen Qianhu, Liu Xue, Huang Zuhui, et al. Co-construction: A path to high-quality rural revitalization. City Planning Review, 2019,43(3):67-74.
	[ 陈前虎, 刘学, 黄祖辉, 等. 共同缔造:高质量乡村振兴之路. 城市规划, 2019,43(3):67-74.]
[57]	Peng Jian, Li Bing, Dong Jianquan, et al. Basic logic of territorial ecological restoration. China Land Science, 2020,34(5):18-26.
	[ 彭建, 李冰, 董建权, 等. 论国土空间生态修复基本逻辑. 中国土地科学, 2020,34(5):18-26.]
[58]	Liu Yansui. The basic theory and methodology of rural revitalization planning in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(6):1120-1133.
	[ 刘彦随. 中国乡村振兴规划的基础理论与方法论. 地理学报, 2020,75(6):1120-1133.]
[59]	Zhu Xigang, Cui Gonghao, Huang Qinshi. From urban-rural coordination to multi-plan integration: Origin and practice of Zhejiang province in spatial planning. City Planning Review, 2019,43(12):27-36.
	[ 朱喜钢, 崔功豪, 黄琴诗. 从城乡统筹到多规合一: 国土空间规划的浙江缘起与实践. 城市规划, 2019,43(12):27-36.]
[60]	Ge D Z, Wang Z H, Tu S S, et al. Coupling analysis of greenhouse-led farmland transition and rural transformation development in China's traditional farming area: A case of Qingzhou City. Land Use Policy, 2019,86:113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.002

面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径

Rural spatial governance for territorial spatial planning in China: Mechanisms and path

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 60

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨忍, 潘瑜鑫. 中国县域乡村脆弱性空间特征与形成机制及对策[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454.
[2]	郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村发展进程与乡村振兴路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421.
[3]	周扬, 李寻欢, 童春阳, 黄晗. 中国村域贫困地理格局及其分异机理[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 903-920.
[4]	曹智, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞, 王永生. 中国专业村镇空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1647-1666.
[5]	刘彦随. 中国乡村振兴规划的基础理论与方法论[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1120-1133.
[6]	戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.
[7]	屠爽爽, 郑瑜晗, 龙花楼, 万诗梦, 梁小丽, 王炜. 乡村发展与重构格局特征及振兴路径——以广西为例[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 365-381.
[8]	周扬, 黄晗, 刘彦随. 中国村庄空间分布规律及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2206-2223.
[9]	胡西武, 刘小鹏, 黄越, 黄立军, 东梅. 宁夏生态移民村空间剥夺测度及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2224-2240.
[10]	程明洋, 刘彦随, 蒋宁. 黄淮海地区乡村人—地—业协调发展格局与机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1576-1589.
[11]	杨忍. 广州市城郊典型乡村空间分化过程及机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1622-1636.
[12]	李裕瑞,曹智,龙花楼. 发展乡村科学,助力乡村振兴——第二届乡村振兴与乡村科学论坛综述[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1482-1486.
[13]	屠爽爽,龙花楼,张英男,周星颖. 典型村域乡村重构的过程及其驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 323-339.
[14]	樊杰, 王亚飞, 梁博. 中国区域发展格局演变过程与调控[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2437-2454.
[15]	陈明星, 梁龙武, 王振波, 张文忠, 余建辉, 梁宜. 美丽中国与国土空间规划关系的地理学思考[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2467-2481.