地理学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (8): 1408-1418.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201708006
收稿日期:
2016-12-22
修回日期:
2017-03-20
出版日期:
2017-08-20
发布日期:
2017-08-23
作者简介:
作者简介:王鹏飞(1964-), 男, 北京人, 教授, 博士生导师, 中国地理学会会员(S110005996M), 国际地理学会可持续农村发展委员会委员, 主要研究方向为农业地理学。E-mail:
基金资助:
Received:
2016-12-22
Revised:
2017-03-20
Online:
2017-08-20
Published:
2017-08-23
Supported by:
摘要:
乡村旅游作为农村空间商品化的表现形式之一,在增加农民收入、阻止农村衰退、振兴农村经济方面发挥着重要作用。为此本文以北京市昌平区麻峪房村的乡村旅游为例,借助行动者网络理论分析农村空间商品化的形成与演变,并讨论农户在此过程中的参与。麻峪房村在从农民生活空间转变为城市居民消费空间的过程中,形成了以区旅游局、乡旅游公司为关键行动者,并吸纳了多个人类和非人类行动者所构成的行动者网络。在网络形成的过程中农户参与乡村旅游的程度逐渐提高,由此推动了麻峪房村农村空间商品化的发展。麻峪房村演变为城市居民消费空间后,由于行动者网络发生变化使农村空间商品化发生变化,导致麻峪房村农村空间商品化程度降低。同时新的行动者网络中的各行动者的不对等性明显,各行动者之间存在很多异议,使该网络趋于僵化、丧失活力,不足以支撑麻峪房村乡村旅游继续发展。在麻峪房村农村空间商品化的形成过程中,农户的院落区位、年龄与原有工作等对农户参与乡村旅游的意愿产生不同的影响。当农村地区行动者网络中的关键行动者与行动者利益共通且紧密联系时,其空间商品化就得到强化,反之亦然。
王鹏飞, 王瑞璠. 行动者网络理论与农村空间商品化——以北京市麻峪房村乡村旅游为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1408-1418.
Pengfei WANG, Ruifan WANG. Actor network theory and commodification in rural space: A case study of Mayufang village in Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(8): 1408-1418.
[1] |
Long Hualou, Li Yurui, Liu Yansui.Analysis of evolutive characteristics and their driving mechanism of hollowing villages in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(10): 1203-1213.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.10.006 |
[龙花楼, 李裕瑞, 刘彦随. 中国空心化村庄演化特征及其动力机制. 地理学报, 2009, 64(10): 1203-1213.]
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.10.006 |
|
[2] | Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2015 Yearbook 2015. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2015. |
[北京统计年鉴, 2015. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2015.] | |
[3] |
Long H L, Tu S S, Ge D Z et al. The allocation and management of critical resources in rural China under restructuring: Problems and prospects. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 47: 392-412.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.011 |
[4] | Wu Ying, Lu Yuxia, Chen Jiajian et al. Follow the actors to restructure the society, read Latour's restructuring society: Actors network theory. Social Studies, 2008(2): 218-234. |
[吴莹, 卢雨霞, 陈家建, 等. 跟随行动者重组社会: 读拉图尔的《重组社会: 行动者网络理论》. 社会学研究, 2008(2): 218-234.] | |
[5] |
Li Lihua, Fu Difei, Liu Rui.Spatial turn of tourism studies: A review on tourism studies from the perspective of the actor-network theory. Tourism Tribune, 2014, 29(3): 107-115.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.03.012 |
[李立华, 付涤非, 刘睿. 旅游研究的空间转向—行动者网络理论视角的旅游研究述评. 旅游学刊, 2014, 29(3): 107-115.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.03.012 |
|
[6] | Latour B.Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005: 165-174. |
[7] | Latour B, Woolgar S.Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986: 16-25. |
[8] |
Zhu Feng, Bao Jigang, Xiang Yixian.Actor-network-theory and paradigm innovation for tourism research. Tourism Tribune, 2012, 27(11): 24-31.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2012.11.003 |
[朱峰, 保继刚, 项怡娴. 行动者网络理论与旅游研究范式创新. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(11): 24-31.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2012.11.003 |
|
[9] |
Liu Xuan, Wang Xiaoyi.A review on the application of actor network theory to human geography. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(7): 1139-1147.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.07.016 |
[刘宣, 王小依. 行动者网络理论在人文地理领域应用研究述评. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(7): 1139-1147.]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.07.016 |
|
[10] |
Van der Duim R. Tourismscapes: An actor-network perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 2007, 34(4): 961-976.
doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2007.05.008 |
[11] |
Povilanskas R, Armaitienė A.Seaside resort-hinterland nexus: Palanga, Lithuania. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 38(3): 1156-1177.
doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.02.004 |
[12] |
Valkonen J.Acting in nature: Service events and agency in wilderness guiding. Tourist Studies, 2009, 9(2): 164-180.
doi: 10.1177/1468797609360595 |
[13] |
Ren C.Non-human agency, radical ontology and tourism realities. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 38(3): 858-881.
doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2010.12.007 |
[14] | Busch L, Juska A.Beyond political economy: Actor networks and the globalization of agriculture. Review of International Political Economy, 1997, 4(4): 688-708. |
[15] |
Chen Peipei, Zhang Min.From beautiful village to urban residents' consumption space: Actor network theory and the social space reconstruction of Dashiao village. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(8): 1435-1446.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201508003 |
[陈培培, 张敏. 从美丽乡村到都市居民消费空间: 行动者网络理论与大世凹村的社会空间重构. 地理研究, 2015, 34(8): 435-1446.]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201508003 |
|
[16] |
Zhang Huanzhou, Zhou Yongguang, Wei Huiya, et al.An empirical study of rural tourism endogenous development based on actor network theory. Tourism Tribune, 2008, 23(2): 65-71.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2008.02.017 |
[张环宙, 周永广, 魏蕙雅, 等. 基于行动者网络理论的乡村旅游内生式发展的实证研究: 以浙江浦江仙华山村为例. 旅游学刊, 2008, 23(2): 65-71.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2008.02.017 |
|
[17] | Cloke P.The countryside as commodity: New rural spaces for leisure//Patmore J A. Leisure and the Environment.London: Belhaven Press, 1993: 53-67. |
[18] | Woods M. Rural Geography. London: SAGE Publications, 2005. |
[19] |
Perkins H C.Commodification: Re-resourcing rural areas. Handbook of Rural Studies, 2006: 243-257.
doi: 10.4135/9781848608016.n17 |
[20] |
Dahms F.The graying of south Georgian Bay. The Canadian Geographer, 1996, 40(2): 148-163.
doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1996.tb00442.x |
[21] |
Akira T.Regional development owing to the commodification of rural spaces in Japan. Geographical Review of Japan Series B, 2010, 82(2): 103-125.
doi: 10.4157/geogrevjapanb.82.103 |
[22] | Sharpley R, Sharpley J.Rural Tourism: An introduction. International Thomson Business Press, 1997. |
[23] | Nagatada T.Rural revitalization with sunflowers as amenity crops in a Japanese countryside. Geographical Review of Japan Series B, 2010, 82(2): 78-88. |
[24] |
Keisuke M.Commodification of a rural space in a world heritage registration movement: Case study of Nagasaki church group. Geographical Review of Japan Series B, 2010, 82(2): 149-166.
doi: 10.4157/geogrevjapanb.82.149 |
[25] | Song Zhijun, Liu Liming.Spatial characteristics analysis for multifunctional transition of suburban agricultural areas in Beijing. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(4): 427-433. |
[宋志军, 刘黎明. 北京市城郊农业区多功能演变的空间特征. 地理科学, 2011, 31(4): 427-433.] | |
[26] | Shi Yuanyuan, Zhao Huafu, Yun Wenju, et al.Analysis on spatial differentiation of arable land multifunction and socio-economic coordination model in Beijing. Resources Science, 2015, 37(2): 247-257. |
[施园园, 赵华甫, 郧文聚, 等. 北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释. 资源科学, 2015, 37(2): 247-257.] | |
[27] | Qian Jing, Lv Jiang.Urban Modern Agriculture on Ecology, Circulation, Three-dimension in Suburb Beijing. Beijing: Agricultural Science & Technology Press, 2008: 55-58. |
[钱静, 律江. 北京市城郊生态—循环—立体型都市现代农业. 北京: 农业科学技术出版社, 2008: 55-58.] | |
[28] |
Wang Pengfei.A study on commodification in rural space and the relationship between urban and rural areas in Beijing City. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(12): 1657-1667.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201312006 |
[王鹏飞. 论北京农村空间的商品化与城乡关系. 地理学报, 2013, 68(12): 1657-1667.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201312006 |
[1] | 梅琳, 薛德升, Frauke KRAAS. 跨国机构与地方共同作用下的城市全球化——德国波恩的案例研究[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(2): 156-168. |
[2] | 汪德根, 王金莲, 陈田, 章鋆. 乡村居民旅游支持度影响模型及机理——基于不同生命周期阶段的苏州乡村旅游地比较[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1413-1426. |
|