不同海岸地貌背景下的南海周边岸带35年建设用地扩张分析

doi:10.11821/dlxb201601008

地理学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 71 ›› Issue (1): 104-117.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601008

不同海岸地貌背景下的南海周边岸带35年建设用地扩张分析

张君珏^1,^2,³(), 苏奋振^1,³(), 周成虎¹, 左秀玲^1,^2,³, 丁智^1,^2,³, 李浩川⁴

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室,北京 100101
2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
3. 中国南海研究协同创新中心,南京 210023
4. 国家信息中心,北京 100053

收稿日期:2015-07-15 修回日期:2015-10-19 出版日期:2016-01-31 发布日期:2016-01-15
作者简介:
作者简介:张君珏(1987-), 女, 湖北鄂州人, 博士, 主要从事海岸带遥感,GIS应用研究.E-mail: zhangjj@lreis.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划) (2012AA12A406, 2012AA12A408)；国家自然科学基金项目(41271409)

Construction land expansion in coastal zone around the South China Sea based on different geomorphologic backgrounds in the past 35 years

ZHANG Junjue^1,^2,³(), SU Fenzhen^1,³(), ZHOU Chenghu^1,³, ZUO Xiuling^1,^2,³, DING Zhi^1,^2,³, LI Haochuan⁴

1. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. Collaborative Innovation Center for the South China Sea Studies, Nanjing 210023, China
4. State Information Center, Beijing 100053, China

Received:2015-07-15 Revised:2015-10-19 Published:2016-01-31 Online:2016-01-15
Supported by:
National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program), No.2012AA 12A406, No.2012AA12A408;National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41271409

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过提取1975年与2010年左右南海海岸带建设用地信息,并对南海海岸带区域进行地貌分区,分析了不同类型海岸带35年建设用地扩张空间格局.结果表明:① 华南大陆和马来半岛建设用地扩张普遍快,中南半岛扩张程度中等,苏门答腊岛,加里曼丹岛和菲律宾群岛除马尼拉湾外普遍扩张程度慢.② 不同海岸地貌因自然资源条件,开发难易程度,腹地大小不同,其建设用地扩张程度差异显著.三角洲平原岸和河口平原岸因水运条件好,腹地广,建设用地扩张普遍显著,台地岸和沙坝--潟湖平原岸因适宜建中小型港口,扩张较为显著,海湾平原岸与山地岸则因平原面积小,开发潜力有限,建设用地扩张普遍不大,平直沙堤平原岸因腹地小,水运不发达而扩张甚微.③ 不同类型海岸带开发模式各异.三角洲平原岸和河口平原岸建设用地空间形态多样化,山地岸,台地岸,海湾平原岸以团块状或条带状为主,沙坝--潟湖平原岸以团块状与星状为主,平直沙堤平原岸多呈条带状,线状或点状分布.

关键词: 南海, 海岸带, 海岸地貌, 建设用地, 空间扩张

Abstract:

Data of coastal construction land around the South China Sea in 2010 and 1975 were extracted and the spatial-temporal characteristics of construction land expansion based on different geomorphologic backgrounds in this period was discussed. Results showed that: (1) In South China Mainland and Malay Peninsula, construction land in coastal zone was generally expanded rapidly; in Indochina, construction land in coastal zone was expanded moderately; in Sumatra, Kalimantan and Philippines, construction land in coastal zone was expanded slowly except Manila Bay. (2) There were significant differences in construction land expansion between different geomorphology types because of natural resources, development difficulty and hinterland area. As there were good conditions of water transport and wide hinterland, construction land in delta plain coast and estuary plain coast expanded rapidly; construction land expansion in mesa coast and barrier - lagoon coast was remarkable due to the suitability for building small or medium-sized ports; construction land expansion in gulf coast and mountain coast was relatively slow because there existed limited development potential; construction land expansion in flat dike coast was even slower because of the limited hinterland and underdeveloped water transport. (3) Development patterns varied according to coastal geomorphologic features. The spatial morphology of construction land was diverse in delta plain coast and estuary plain coast; in mountain coast, mesa coast and gulf plain coast, it presented agglomerating or zonal distribution; in barrier - lagoon coast, it presented agglomerating or star distribution; in flat dyke coast, it presented zonal, linear or point distribution.

Key words: South China Sea, coastal zone, coastal geomorphology, construction land, spatial-temporal expansion

张君珏, 苏奋振, 周成虎, 左秀玲, 丁智, 李浩川. 不同海岸地貌背景下的南海周边岸带35年建设用地扩张分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 104-117.

ZHANG Junjue,SU Fenzhen,ZHOU Chenghu,ZUO Xiuling,DING Zhi,LI Haochuan. Construction land expansion in coastal zone around the South China Sea based on different geomorphologic backgrounds in the past 35 years[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1): 104-117.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表1

参考文献 20

[1]	Seto K C, Fragkias M, Güneralp B.A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS One, 2011, 6(8): e23777.
[2]	Grimm N B, Faeth S H, Golubiewski N E.Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 2008, 319(5864): 756-760.
[3]	Güneralp B, Seto K C.Futures of global urban expansion: Uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation. Environmental Research Letters, 2013, 8(1): 14-25.
[4]	Güneralp B, Güneralp İ, Liu Y.Changing global patterns of urban exposure to flood and drought hazards. Global Environmental Change, 2015, 31: 217-225.
[5]	Xue Zhenshan, Su Fenzhen, Yang Xiaomei, et al.Dynamic change of land use in coastal zone of the Pearl River Estuary with landform analysis. Tropical Geography, 2012, 32(4): 409-415.
	[薛振山, 苏奋振, 杨晓梅, 等. 珠江口海岸带地貌特征对土地利用动态变化影响. 热带地理, 2012, 32(4): 409-415.]
[6]	Wang Cuiping, Wang Haowei, Li Chunming, et al.Analysis of the spatial expansion characteristics of major urban agglomerations in China using DMSP/OLS images. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(3): 942-954.
	[王翠平, 王豪伟, 李春明, 等. 基于DMSP/OLS 影像的我国主要城市群空间扩张特征分析. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3): 942-954.]
[7]	Jiang Qun'ou, Deng Xiangzheng, Ke Xinli, et al. Prediction and simulation of urban area expansion in Pearl River Delta Region under the RCPs climate scenarios. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(12): 3627-3636.
	[姜群鸥, 邓祥征, 柯新利, 等. RCPs气候情景下珠江三角洲地区城市用地扩展的预测与模拟. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(12): 3627-3636.]
[8]	Nong D, Lepczyk C, Miura T, et al.Quantify spatiotemporal patterns of urban growth in Hanoi using time series spatial metrics and urbanization gradient approach. EAST-WEST Center Working Papers, 2014.
[9]	Kontgis C, Schneider A, Fox J, et al.Monitoring peri-urbanization in the greater Ho Chi Minh City metropolitan area. Applied Geography, 2014, 53: 377-388.
[10]	Srivanit M, Hokao K, Phonekeo V.Assessing the impact of urbanization on urban thermal environment: A case study of Bangkok Metropolitan. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2012, 2(7): 243-54.
[11]	Shi X, Zhang Y.Study on regional agro-ecological risk and pressure supported by city expansion model and SERA Model//Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture IV. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 641-649.
[12]	Tehrany M S.Remote sensing data reveals eco-environmental changes in urban areas of Klang Valley, Malaysia: Contribution from object based analysis. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2013, 41(4): 981-991.
[13]	Murakami A, Zain A M, Takeuchi K, et al.Trends in urbanization and patterns of land use in the Asian mega cities Jakarta, Bangkok, and Metro Manila. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 70(3): 251-259.
[14]	Jones G W.Southeast Asian urbanization and the growth of mega-urban regions. Journal of Population Research, 2002, 19(2): 119-136.
[15]	Pereira R A, Lopez E D.Characterizing the spatial pattern changes of urban heat islands in Metro Manila using remote sensing techniques. Philippine Engineering Journal, 2004, 25(1): 15-34.
[16]	Mao Jiangxing, Li Zhigang, Yan Xiaopei, et al.Research on the spatial-temporal changes of land use in relation to topography factors in Shenzhen City. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2008, 24(2): 71-76.
	[毛蒋兴, 李志刚, 闫小培, 等. 深圳土地利用时空变化与地形因子的关系研究. 地理与地理信息科学, 2008, 24(2): 71-76.]
[17]	Liu Zhaoshu, Fan Shiqing, Zhao Huanting.Geology of the South China Sea. Beijing: Science Press, 2002.
	[刘昭蜀, 范时清, 赵焕庭. 南海地质. 北京:科学出版社, 2002.]
[18]	Zhang Junjue, Su Fenzhen, Zuo Xiuling, et al.Research on the spatial differentiation of coastal land development surrounding South Sea. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 319-332.
	[张君珏, 苏奋振, 左秀玲, 等. 南海周边海岸带开发利用空间分异. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 319-332.]
[19]	Zeng Shaoxuan.Types and characteristics of China coast. Marine Science Bulletin, 1977(1): 1-28.
	[曾昭璇. 中国海岸类型及其特征. 海洋通报, 1977(1): 1-28.]
[20]	Zhao Huanting, Zhang Qiaoming, Song Chaojing, et al.Geomorphology and Environment of the South China Coast and the South China Sea Islands. Beijing: Science Press, 1999.
	[赵焕庭, 张乔民, 宋朝景, 等. 华南海岸和南海诸岛地貌与环境. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.]

海岸类型	空间形态	空间分布	典型岸段
山地岸	团块状或条带状	山麓下的港湾或山间谷地	铁炉嶂岸段;红河北部高地岸段
台地岸	团块状或条带状	台地溺谷或岬湾	丁加奴高地东侧沿海岸段;柔佛南岸岸段
三角洲平原	空间形态多样化,核心区呈团块状,其它呈放射条带状/网状小斑块,分布密集而均匀;还有沿堤岸而建,纵横阡陌式的线状分布	广布,核心区位于河口或河曲	昭披耶河三角洲岸段;红河三角洲岸段;湄公河三角洲岸段
河口平原	与三角洲平原类似	河口/河曲或沿河流,海岸线而建	清化--河静平原岸段
海湾平原	团块状或条带状	湾头或湾口	豆蔻山脉北丘岸段
沙坝--潟湖平原	团块状;星状	潟湖口	汕头--汕尾岸段
平直沙堤平原	条带状分布;线状分布;点状分布	沿交通干线或沿海岸线	普吉山沿海岸带

不同海岸地貌背景下的南海周边岸带35年建设用地扩张分析

Construction land expansion in coastal zone around the South China Sea based on different geomorphologic backgrounds in the past 35 years

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕建树. 烟台海岸带土壤重金属定量源解析及空间预测[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 713-725.
[2]	金凤君, 姚作林, 陈卓. 环南海区域发展特征与一体化经济区建设前景[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 428-443.
[3]	瞿诗进, 胡守庚, 李全峰. 中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553.
[4]	韩冬梅, 曹国亮, 宋献方. 南海珊瑚礁人工岛淡水透镜体形成过程及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 1053-1064.
[5]	左秀玲, 苏奋振, 张宇, 吴文周, 吴迪. 全球气候变化下南海诸岛保护优先区识别分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(3): 647-661.
[6]	徐勇, 赵燊, 樊杰. 中国城市规划建设用地标准及气候和地形地貌修订[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1): 194-208.
[7]	李广东, 戚伟. 中国建设用地扩张对景观格局演化的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2572-2591.
[8]	周春山,金万富,张国俊,黎明,王少剑. 中国国有建设用地供应规模时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 16-31.
[9]	刘艳军,于会胜,刘德刚,祝丽媛. 东北地区建设用地开发强度格局演变的空间分异机制[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 818-831.
[10]	熊鹰,陈云,李静芝,阎晓静. 基于土地集约利用的长株潭城市群建设用地供需仿真模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3): 562-577.
[11]	林忆南, 金晓斌, 杨绪红, 龙瀛, 周寅康. 近两百年江苏省城乡建设用地数量估算与空间重建[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 488-506.
[12]	唐盟, 马劲松, 王颖, 夏非. 1947年中国南海断续线精准划定的地形依据[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(6): 914-927.
[13]	刘纪远, 刘文超, 匡文慧, 宁佳. 基于主体功能区规划的中国城乡建设用地扩张时空特征遥感分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 335-369.
[14]	赵亮, 张争胜, 南文龙. 曾昭璇先生对南海地理研究的重要贡献[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 515-523.
[15]	徐勇, 孙晓一, 汤青. 陆地表层人类活动强度：概念、方法及应用[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(7): 1068-1079.