长江流域国土空间开发适宜性综合评价

doi:10.11821/xb201212001

地理学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (12): 1587-1598.doi: 10.11821/xb201212001

• 国土开发与环境 • 下一篇

长江流域国土空间开发适宜性综合评价

唐常春^1,2, 孙威^2,3

1. 长沙理工大学土木与建筑学院, 长沙 410004;
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
3. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2012-01-28 修回日期:2012-09-19 出版日期:2012-12-20 发布日期:2012-12-20
通讯作者: 孙威(1975-),男,河南开封人,副研究员,中国地理学会会员(S110008181M),主要研究方向为区域发展与规划。E-mail:sunw@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:唐常春(1976-),男,湖南衡南人,博士后,副教授,中国地理学会会员(S110009172M),主要研究方向为区域发展与土地利用。E-mail:tangchangchun@163.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目 (09CJL045);中国博士后科学基金资助项目 (2011M500377, 2012T50127)

Comprehensive Evaluation of Land Spatial Development Suitability of the Yangtze River Basin

TANG Changchun^1,2, SUN Wei^2,3

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410004, China;
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2012-01-28 Revised:2012-09-19 Online:2012-12-20 Published:2012-12-20
Supported by:
National Social Science Foundation of China, No.09CJL045;China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project, No.2011M500377, No.2012T50127

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国土空间开发适宜性评价是国土开发格局优化与区域协调发展的科学基础,开展长江流域国土空间综合评价,可以加强和深化对流域国土空间合理开发的科学认知,指导流域治理与可持续发展实践。根据“3步骤4原则”首次界定长江流域覆盖的县级行政区域范围,从长江流域实际出发,采用Delphi与AHP方法,构建国土空间开发适宜性综合评价指标体系, 建立以724个县级行政区为基本单元的长江流域综合数据库。在此基础上,结合专业知识与 GIS 空间聚类方法进行单因子分级评价,运用动态加权求和法建立测度模型开展综合评价,构建耦合差系数模型进行人口—经济空间耦合度分析。研究结果表明：全流域开发约束总体水平较高,高值区 (V~VIII级) 主要分布在上中游地区。开发强度和开发潜力的空间集中度高, 区域发展差异呈继续扩大态势。综合评价分级高值区土地面积比重为22.95%,表明适宜开发区域仅占少部分流域国土面积；人口—GDP耦合差系数 (D值) 为8.70,流域人口与经济空间耦合度较低；上中下游开发适宜性存在显著差异,适宜性高值区主要包括长江三角洲、合肥与皖江沿线地区、武汉城市圈、荆州—宜昌长江沿线地区、襄阳—南阳地区、长株潭城市群、南昌—九江—新余地区、成渝城市群、贵阳—安顺地区、昆明市及大部分地级城市。

关键词: 国土空间, 综合评价, 开发, 适宜性, 长江流域

Abstract: The evaluation of land spatial development suitability is the scientific foundation of spatial pattern optimization and regional coordinated development. So, the comprehensive evaluation of land spatial development suitability in the Yangtze River Basin can strengthen and deepen the understanding of land reasonable development of river basin and guide the river basin government and the sustainable development practice. According to "Three Steps and Four Principles", the county-level administrative area of the Yangtze River Basin is firstly defined, which includes 724 counties. Using the Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods, the comprehensive evaluation index system and index weight coefficient are established. Furthermore, the single index evaluation and composite index evaluation are analyzed by using GIS spatial clustering method and dynamic weighted summation method, and population-economic spatial coupling degree is calculated by constructing coupling difference coefficient model. The results show that: the overall level of development constraint of the Yangtze River Basin is relatively high, high-value regions (Ⅴ to Ⅷ level) are mainly distributed in the upper and middle reaches of the basin. The spatial concentration degrees of development intensity and development potential are high, and the regional development gap is widening. The area of high value regions of comprehensive evaluation accounts for 22.95% of the total basin area, indicating that the suitable development area is in a minority of Yangtze River Basin area. The coupling difference coefficient between population and economy is 8.70, and the spatial coupling degree between population and economy is low. The variation of land spatial suitability is significant among the upper, middle reaches and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin. The high value regions include the Yangtze River Delta region, Hefei city and City Cluster along the Wanjiang River in Anhui Province, City Cluster of Wuhan and Jingzhou-Yichang region, Xiangyang-Nanyang region, City Cluster of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan, Nanchang-Jiujiang-Xinyu region, City Cluster of Chengdu-Chongqing, Guiyang-Anshun region, Kunming city, and most of prefecture-level cities.

Key words: land space, comprehensive evaluation, development, suitability, Yangtze River Basin

唐常春, 孙威. 长江流域国土空间开发适宜性综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(12): 1587-1598.

TANG Changchun, SUN Wei. Comprehensive Evaluation of Land Spatial Development Suitability of the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(12): 1587-1598.

参考文献

[1] He Yingbin, Chen Youqi, Yang Peng et al. An overview and perspective of alien land suitability evaluation study based on GIS technology. Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(6): 898-904. [何英彬, 陈佑启, 杨鹏等. 国外基于GIS土地适宜性评价研究进展及展望. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(6): 898-904.]

[2] Mac Dougall E B. The accuracy of map overlay. Landscape Planning, 1975, (2): 23-30.

[3] Steinitz C, Parker P, Jordan L. Hand drawn overlays: Their history and prospective uses. Landscape Architecture, 1976, (9): 444-455.

[4] Carver S J. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information system. International Journal of Geographical Information System, 1991, 5(3): 321-339.

[5] Banai R. Fuzziness in geographical information systems: Contributions from the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1993, (7): 315-329.

[6] Malczewski J. GIS and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1999.

[7] Openshaw S, Abrahart R J. Geo-Computation. London: Taylor & Francis, 2000.

[8] Wang F, Brent Hall G, Subaryono. Fuzzy information representation and processing in conventional GIS software: Database design and applications. International Journal of Geographical Information System, 1990, (4): 261-283.

[9] Burrough P A, McDonnell R A. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

[10] Sui D Z. Integrating neural networks with GIS for spatial decision-making. Operational Geographer, 1993, 11(2): 13-20.

[11] Krzanowski R, Raper J. Spatial Evolutionary Modeling. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

[12] Batty M, Xie Y. From cells to cities. Environment and Planning B, 1994, 21(7): 31-48.

[13] Murray T, Roger P, Sinton D et al. Honey Hill: A systems analysis for planning the multiple uses of controlled water areas. 2 vols. Report Nos. AD736343 and AD736344. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1971.

[14] Ding Jianzhong, Chen Yi, Chen Wen. Regionalization of spatial feasible development on based analysis of eco-economy in Taizhou City. Scientia geographica sinica, 2008, 28(6): 842-848. [丁建中, 陈逸, 陈雯. 基于生态-经济分析的泰州空间开发适宜性分区研究. 地理科学, 2008, 28(6): 842-848.]

[15] Qi Yuwei, Gu Chaolin. Study on the methods and their application for the urban development spatial division: A case of Nanjing. Geographical research, 2010, 29(11): 2035-2044. [祁豫玮, 顾朝林. 市域开发空间区划方法与应用: 以南京市为例. 地理研究, 2010, 29(11): 2035-2044.]

[16] Li Na. Regionalization of feasible development in Yizheng City based on GIS. Areal research and development, 2009, 28(2): 123-128. [李娜. 基于GIS的仪征空间开发适宜性分区研究. 地域研究与开发, 2009, 28(2): 123-128.]

[17] Sun Wei, Chen Wen. Regionalization of spatial potential development and distribution guidance: A case study of Ningbo city. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(3): 402-413. [孙伟, 陈雯. 市域空间开发适宜性分区与布局引导研究: 以宁波市为例. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(3): 402-413.]

[18] Fan Jie, Pan Wenfeng, Hu Dongsheng et al. A Research on Sustainable Development of Xijiang Economic Belt (Section of Guangxi): Function, Process and Pattern. Beijing: Science Press, 2011. [樊杰, 潘文峰, 胡东升等. 西江经济带(广西段)可持续发展研究: 功能、过程与格局. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.]

[19] Fan Jie. The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(4): 339-350. [樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础. 地理学报, 2007, 62(4): 339-350.]

[20] Zhang Wenhe. Theories and methods of economic zoning of river basin. Tianfu New Forum, 1991, (6): 28-34. [张文合. 流域经济区划的理论与方法. 天府新论, 1991, (6): 28-34.]

[21] Chen Wen, Yu Xiaogan. Characteristics, problems and development strategy in regions along the Changjiang River. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1997, 17(2): 113-119. [陈雯, 虞孝感. 长江产业带建设特征、问题与发展思路. 地理科学, 1997, 17(2): 113-119.]

[22] Liu Shengjia. Economic Development and Comparative Study among the Upper, Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze Basin. Wuhan: Huazhong Normal University Press, 1998. [刘盛佳. 长江流域经济发展和上、中、下游比较研究. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社, 1998.]

[23] Yu Xiaogan. Study on Sustainable Development of the Yangtze River Basin. Beijing: Science Press, 2003. [虞孝感. 长江流域可持续发展研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.]

[24] Liu Zhaode, Yu Xiaogan, Wang Zhixian. The current water pollution of Taihu drainage basin and the new management proposals. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(4): 467-474. [刘兆德, 虞孝感, 王志宪.太湖流域水环境污染现状与治理的新建议. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(4): 467-474.]

[25] Wang Xincai, Rong Fengcong. Comprehensive planning and sustainable development of Yangtze River Basin. Yangtze River, 2010, 41(4): 5-8, 18. [王新才, 荣凤聪. 长江流域综合规划与可持续发展. 人民长江, 2010, 41(4): 5-8, 18.]

[26] Zhu Chuangeng, Ma Xiaodong, Meng Zhaoyi et al. The Theory, Method and Case of Regional Major Function Oriented Zoning. Beijing: Science Press, 2007. [朱传耿, 马晓冬, 孟召宜等. 地域主体功能区划理论·方法·实证. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007.]

[27] Guo Zhigang. Social Statistical Methods and the Application of SPSS. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2002. [郭志刚. 社会统计方法与 SPSS 应用. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2002.]

[28] Ge Meiling, Feng Zhiming. Population distribution of china based on GIS: Classification of population densities and curve of population gravity centers. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(2): 202-210. [葛美玲, 封志明. 中国人口分布的密度分级与重心曲线特征分析. 地理学报, 2009, 64(2): 202-210.]

[29] Fan Jie, Tao Anjun, Lv Chen. The coupling mechanism of the centroids of economic gravity and population gravity and its effect on the regional gap in China. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(1): 87-95. [樊杰, 陶岸君, 吕晨. 中国经济与人口重心的耦合态势及其对区域发展的影响. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(1): 87-95.]

长江流域国土空间开发适宜性综合评价

Comprehensive Evaluation of Land Spatial Development Suitability of the Yangtze River Basin

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈娜, 任安之, 马伯, 黎璟玉, 向辉. 湖南省凤凰县城雨洪管控路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 153-166.
[2]	封志明, 李文君, 李鹏, 肖池伟. 青藏高原地形起伏度及其地理意义[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1359-1372.
[3]	李加林, 王丽佳. 围填海影响下东海区主要海湾形态时空演变[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1): 126-142.
[4]	杨宇,李小云,董雯,洪辉,何则,金凤君,刘毅. 中国人地关系综合评价的理论模型与实证[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(6): 1063-1078.
[5]	陈明星, 梁龙武, 王振波, 张文忠, 余建辉, 梁宜. 美丽中国与国土空间规划关系的地理学思考[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2467-2481.
[6]	刘艳军,于会胜,刘德刚,祝丽媛. 东北地区建设用地开发强度格局演变的空间分异机制[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 818-831.
[7]	黄麟, 郑瑜晗, 肖桐. 中国县域尺度生态保护的地域分异及其适宜性[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1305-1315.
[8]	刘永林, 延军平, 岑敏仪. 中国降水非均匀性综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(3): 392-406.
[9]	杨俊, 解鹏, 席建超, 葛全胜, 李雪铭, 马占东. 基于元胞自动机模型的土地利用变化模拟——以大连经济技术开发区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(3): 461-475.
[10]	刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建, 魏海, 宋治清, 张小飞. 耦合恢复力的林区土地生态适宜性评价——以吉林省汪清县为例[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(3): 476-487.
[11]	张君珏, 苏奋振, 左秀玲, 方月, 杨娟. 南海周边海岸带开发利用空间分异[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 319-332.
[12]	高超, 金凤君. 沿海地区经济技术开发区空间格局演化及产业特征[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 202-213.
[13]	史文娇, 胡云锋, 石晓丽, 王宗, 闫慧敏, 任博, 匡文慧, 徐新良, 陈延, 武东波, 徐自为. 宁夏农业综合开发战略转型区划研究[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(12): 1884-1896.
[14]	钟赛香, 胡鹏, 薛熙明, 杨硕, 朱佩娟. 基于合理权重赋值方法选择的多因素综合评价模型——以JCR中70种人文地理期刊为例[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(12): 2011-2031.
[15]	彭建, 谢盼, 刘焱序, 胡晓旭. 低丘缓坡建设开发综合生态风险评价及发展权衡——以大理白族自治州为例[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(11): 1747-1761.