三峡库区重庆段水土流失的时空格局特征

doi:10.11821/xb200805006

地理学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (5): 502-513.doi: 10.11821/xb200805006

三峡库区重庆段水土流失的时空格局特征

李月臣^1,2, 刘春霞¹, 赵纯勇¹, 黄建辉³

1. 重庆师范大学地理科学学院, GIS 应用研究重庆市重点实验室, 重庆400047;
2. 重庆大学资源及环境学院, 重庆400044;
3. 重庆市水土保持生态环境监测总站, 重庆400015

收稿日期:2007-08-25 修回日期:2008-01-25 出版日期:2008-05-26 发布日期:2008-05-26
作者简介:李月臣(1974-), 男, 博士后, 副教授, 中国地理学会会员。从事资源环境遥感与地理信息系统研究。 E-mail: liyuechen@cqnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
重庆市教育委员会科学技术研究项目(KJ070811); 重庆师范大学博士科研启动基金项目(06XLB004); 重庆市水利局资助项目

Spatiotemporal Features of Soil and Water Loss in the Three Gorges Reservoir Areaof Chongqing

LI Yuechen^1,2, LIU Chunxia¹, ZHAO Chunyong¹, HUANG Jianhui³

1. College of Geography Science, Key Laboratory of GIS Application, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, China;
2. College of Resources and Environmental Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
3. Chongqing General Station of Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring, Chongqing 400015, China

Received:2007-08-25 Revised:2008-01-25 Online:2008-05-26 Published:2008-05-26
Supported by:
Science & Technology Research Project Supported by Chongqing Municipal Education Commission, No.KJ070811; Doctoral Fund of Chongqing Normal University, No.06XLB004; Project by Chongqing Water Conservancy Bureau

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在TM 解译的三峡库区重庆段1999 年和2004 年水土流失数据及相关辅助数据的支持下, 借助GIS 技术, 分析了研究区5 年来水土流失的时空演变及地理空间分异特征与规律。研究结果表明: (1) 研究区水土流失总体呈现好转趋势, 极强度和剧烈水土流失面积下降变幅最大。(2) 水土流失主要分布在紫色土、黄壤、石灰(岩) 土、水稻土和黄棕壤分布区。(3) 水土流失主要发生在受人类活动影响最为剧烈的旱坡地和疏林地。(4) 水土流失表现出明显的垂直分异特征, 主要集中于高程200~1500 m 的低山、丘陵地区。(5) 水土流失与坡度具有很好的相关性, 主要分布在15^o以上的陡坡地。(6) 水土流失与坡向分异无明显的相关关系。各坡向水土流失面积和强度分布基本相当。(7) 水土流失主要集中在300~320 和320~340 j.cm/hm². h 的降雨侵蚀力(R) 值分布区。剧烈水土流失与高降雨侵蚀力具有较好的对应关系。

关键词: 水土流失, 重庆市, 三峡库区

Abstract:

The soil and water loss (SWL) has been the most serious eco-environmental problem in the Three Gorges Reservoir area of Chongqing. In this paper the authors analyze the spatiotemporal features of SWL from 1999 to 2004 based on RS and GIS. The results are shown in the following aspects. (1) The SWL area in the Three Gorges Reservoir area presents a decreasing trend from 1999 to 2004, and the intensity of acute and extremely intense SWL reduces evidently. (2) The SWL mainly exists in purple soil, yellow soil, limestone soil, paddy soil and yellow brown soil distributed areas. The moderate (quite obvious SWL), intense (relatively high SWL), extremely intense (relatively obvious SWL) and acute SWL (high SWL) are mainly distribuited in purple soil and yellow soil areas. (3) The dry slope land and sparse woodland that are influenced intensively by human activities are hit by most serious SWL. The total SWL area exceeds 70%. About 90% of the high intense SWL happens on the dry slope land. (4) The SWL in the study area shows an obvious vertical differentiation characteristic. The SWL mainly occurs in the low mountain and hilly regions with an elevation of 200-1500 m, being more than 90% of the total area. The SWL types are mainly intense and extremely intense. There is almost no SWL in the regions of river valleys and terraces where the elevation is lower than 200 m, or in regions where the elevation is higher than 1500 m with high vegetation coverage . (5) SWL is well correlated with slope. About 70% of SWL happens on the steep slope greater than 15^o and high intense SWL does as well, especially, above extremely intense SWL occupies over 80%. (6) There is no obvious correlation between SWL and aspect. The affected areas and intensity are similar in different aspects. (7) The SWL concentrates mainly in the regions where the values of R are between 300 and 340. The area of SWL in the regions where the values of R are from 340 to 357 is small, but the extremely intense SWL is relatively well correlated with the high R values.

Key words: soil and water loss, Chongqing, Three Gorges Reservoir area

李月臣, 刘春霞,赵纯勇, 黄建辉. 三峡库区重庆段水土流失的时空格局特征[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(5): 502-513.

LI Yuechen, LIU Chunxia, ZHAO Chunyong, HUANG Jianhui. Spatiotemporal Features of Soil and Water Loss in the Three Gorges Reservoir Areaof Chongqing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(5): 502-513.

参考文献

[1] Gu Shengzu, Hou Weili. Countermeasure of water and soil erosion in upper reaches of Changjiang River. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2000, 9(2): 260-264.
[辜胜阻, 侯伟丽. 治理长江上游水土流失的对策. 长江流域资源与环境, 2000, 9(2): 260-264.]

[2] Zhou Tinggang, Zhang Qiliang. Factors contributing to soil erosion in upper reaches of the Changjiang River. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2004, 13(1): 89-93.
[周廷刚, 张其良. 长江上游水土流失成因及治理模式研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 89-93.]

[3] Wu Jianguo, Huang Jianhui, Han Xingguo et al. Three-Gorges dam-experiment in habitat fragmentation? Science, 2003, 300: 1239-1240.

[4] Zhang Sheng, Zhu Cheng. Soil loss and its effect on flooding catastrophe in Yangtze drainage basin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 15(6): 9-13.
[张生, 朱诚. 长江流域水土流失及其对洪灾的影响. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15 (6): 9-13.]

[5] Zhan Xiaoguo, Tan Debao. Research on rapid and dynamical supervision on water and soil erosion in Three Gorges Reservoir area based on RS and GIS. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2003, 20(1): 44-46.
[詹小国, 谭德宝. 基于RS 和GIS 的三峡库区水土流失快速动态监测研究, 长江科学院院报, 2003, 20(1): 44-46.]

[6] Liao Xiaoyong, Chen Zhijian, Liu Shaoquan et al. Study on soil losses in different land use types of purple slope cropland in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 12(1): 159-161.
[ 廖小勇, 陈治谏, 刘邵权等. 三峡库区紫色土破耕地不同利用方式的水土流失特征. 水土保持学报, 2005, 12(1): 159-161.]

[7] Fu Tao, Ni Jiupai, Wei Chaofu et al. Research on nutrient loss from Terra Gialla soil in Three Gorges region under different rainfall intensity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002, 16(2): 33-35.
[傅涛, 倪九派, 魏朝富等. 雨强对三峡库区黄色石灰土养分流失的影响. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(2): 33-35.]

[8] Li Hongwei, Peng Buzhuo. Traits of soil and water loss, environmental harmfulness and countermeasures in the forthcoming Three-Gorge Reservoir area. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 1993, 2(4): 331-339.
[李红卫, 彭补拙. 三峡库区水土流失特定及其环境危害防治措施探讨. 长江流域资源与环境, 1993, 2(4): 331-339.]

[9] Du Zuohua, Yan Guoan. Soil and water conservation and improving ecological environment in the Three-Gorge Reservoir area. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 1999, 8(3): 299-304.
[杜佐华, 严国安. 三峡库区水土保持与生态环境改善. 长江流域资源与环境, 1999, 8(3): 299-304.]

[10] He Chunyang, Shi Peijun, Chen Jin et al. A study on land use/cover change in Beijing area. Geographical Research, 2001, 20(6): 679-687.
[ 何春阳, 史培军, 陈晋等. 北京地区土地利用/ 覆盖变化研究. 地理研究, 2001, 20(6): 679-687.]

[11] Li Yuechen, Liu Chunxia. Land use/cover dynamic changes in the northern China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(1): 45-52.
[李月臣, 刘春霞. 北方13 省土地利用/ 覆盖动态变化分析. 地理科学, 2007, 27(1): 45-52.]

[12] Shi Deming, Shi Xuezheng, Liang Yin et al. The problems of soil and water loss and conservation in subtropics of China. Subtropical Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 17(3): 1-5.
[史德明, 史学正, 梁音等. 我国亚热带的水土流失与水土保持问题. 亚热带水土保持, 2005, 17(3): 1-5.]

[13] Zhou Fujian, Chen Minghua. The rainfall erosivity index in Fujian province. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995, 9(1): 13-18.
[周伏建, 陈明华. 福建省降雨侵蚀力指标R 值. 水土保持学报, 1995, 9(1): 13-18.]

[14] http://www.cqates.com/newstxt/ 重庆市耕地资源分等定级土种等级结果体系(旱作土).doc.

[15] Ni Jinren, Li Yingkui. Dynamic assessment of soil erosion based on land-use structure change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(5): 611-621.
[倪晋仁, 李英奎. 基于土地利用结构变化的水土流失动态评估. 地理学报, 2001, 56 (5): 611-621.]

[16] Fu Bojie, Qiu Yang, Wang Jun et al. Effect simulations of land use change on the runoff and erosion for a gully catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(6): 717-722.
[傅伯杰, 邱扬, 王军等. 黄土丘陵小流域土地利用变化对水土流失的影响. 地理学报, 2002, 57(6): 717-722.]

[17] Rai S C, Sharma E. Comparative assessment of runoff characteristics under different land use patterns within a Himalayan watershed. Hydrological Processes, 1998, 12: 2235-2248.

[18] Swanson F J, Kratze T K, Caine N. Landform effects on ecosystem patterns and processes. Bioscience, 1988, 38:92-98.

[19] Wear D N, Bolstad P. Land-use changes in southern Appalachian landscapes. Ecosystems, 1998, 1(6): 575-594.

[20] Shen Zehao, Zhang Quanfa, Yue Chao et al. The spatial pattern of land use/land cover in the water supplying area of the middle-route of the South-to-North Water Diversion (MR-SNWD) Project. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(6): 633-644.
[沈泽昊, 张全发, 岳超等. 南水北调中线水源区土地利用/ 土地覆被的空间格局. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6): 633-644.]

[21] Shi Minjun, Wang Tao. An application of bio-economic household model to analysis on man-land relationship behavior in ecologically fragile land of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(1): 165-174.
[石敏俊, 王涛. 中国生态脆弱带人地关系行为机制模型及应用. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 165-174.]

三峡库区重庆段水土流失的时空格局特征

Spatiotemporal Features of Soil and Water Loss in the Three Gorges Reservoir Areaof Chongqing

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王成, 何焱洲. 重庆市乡村生产空间系统脆弱性时空分异与差异化调控[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1680-1698.
[2]	梁鑫源, 李阳兵, 邵景安, 刘雁慧, 冉彩虹. 三峡库区山区传统农业生态系统转型[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1605-1621.
[3]	王开泳, 王甫园, 陈田. 行政区划调整的政区位势理论与模型构建——以重庆市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2495-2510.
[4]	汪洋,王力力,祁鹏卫,刘志海. 重庆市主体功能区识别的主导因素与空间稳定性约束机理[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 44-62.
[5]	梁鑫源,李阳兵. 三峡库区规模农地时空变化特征及其驱动机制[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1630-1646.
[6]	王圆圆, 郭徵, 李贵才, 郭兆迪. 基于广义加性模型估算1979-2014年三峡库区降水及其特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1207-1220.
[7]	钟建兵, 邵景安, 杨玉竹. 生计多样化背景下种植业非点源污染负荷演变[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1201-1214.
[8]	张引, 杨庆媛, 闵婕. 重庆市新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(5): 817-828.
[9]	邓华, 邵景安, 王金亮, 高明, 魏朝富. 多因素耦合下三峡库区土地利用未来情景模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(11): 1979-1997.
[10]	赵岩, 王治国, 孙保平, 张超, 纪强, 冯磊, 赵乾坤. 中国水土保持区划方案初步研究[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(3): 307-317.
[11]	刘春霞, 李月臣, 杨华, 闵婕, 王才军, 张虹. 三峡库区重庆段生态与环境敏感性综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(5): 631-642.
[12]	李广东, 邱道持, 王平. 三峡生态脆弱区耕地非市场价值评估[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(4): 562-575.
[13]	阎建忠, 卓仁贵, 谢德体, 张镱锂. 不同生计类型农户的土地利用——三峡库区典型村的实证研究[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(11): 1401-1410.
[14]	徐勇,杨波,刘国彬,刘普灵. 黄土高原作物产量及水土流失地形分异模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(11): 1218-1226.
[15]	王小丹,钟祥浩,范建容. 西藏水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异规律[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(2): 183-188.