广州城市空间结构与交通需求关系

doi:10.11821/xb200501015

地理学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 131-142.doi: 10.11821/xb200501015

广州城市空间结构与交通需求关系

周素红, 闫小培

中山大学城市与区域研究中心,广州 510275

收稿日期:2004-04-08 修回日期:2004-08-18 出版日期:2005-01-25 发布日期:2005-01-25
作者简介:周素红 (1976-), 女, 博士, 讲师, 中国地理学会会员, 主要研究方向为城市地理、城市交通与土地利用、 GIS应用等。E-mail: eeszsh@zsu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目 (40071034; 40401019); 广东省自然科学基金资助项目 (04300547)

The Relationship between Urban Structure and Traffic Demand in Guangzhou

ZHOU Suhong, YAN Xiaopei

Center for Urban & Regional Studies, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2004-04-08 Revised:2004-08-18 Online:2005-01-25 Published:2005-01-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40071034; No. 40401019; Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, No. 04300547

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在综述国内外相关研究的基础上,以广州为案例研究城市空间结构与交通需求的关系。结果表明,在城市形态与交通需求的关系方面,广州城市二维形态和三维形态与交通需求的空间分布之间具有一定的耦合性,二者存在一定互为因果的关系;交通方式的转化对城市形态的演化具有一定的驱动作用;城市形态引导着交通需求的总量和布局;同时,社会经济活动及其发展是城市形态与交通需求产生的原因和相互联系的纽带。在城市内部空间结构与交通需求的关系方面,模型分析表明,近年来广州城市内部居住与就业的空间均衡性增强,直接影响了交通需求的产生与分布和交通方式的选择,有利于居民就近选择就业,并使通勤交通的空间分布更加均衡;此外,居住与就业人口迁移先行,引导公共设施的发展也是近年来广州城市发展的主要特征之一;公共设施服务空间与交通需求之间存在需求作用型和供给作用型两种相互作用模式。

关键词: 城市空间结构, 城市地理, 城市土地利用, 广州, 交通需求

Abstract:

By using new techniques and model analysis, a case study on the relationship between urban structure and traffic demand in Guangzhou was carried out. The results show that there are certain relationships between the development of urban form and traffic demand. Firstly, the model of urban traffic ways is one of the reasons for shaping the urban forms. Secondly, the urban form directs the distribution of traffic demand. Finally, the factors of social and economic development have important impacts on both the urban forms and urban traffic demand, and their reciprocity. Meanwhile, there are also certain relationships between the urban structure and traffic demand. The balance of residents and industries is one of the factors affecting the selection of traffic ways and the distribution of traffic demand. At the same time, there are two models, e.g. demand oriented and supply oriented, concerning the relationship between urban commercial land use and traffic demand. The demand oriented one means that location is one of the most important factors affecting the commercial environment.

Key words: traffic demand, urban structure, urban geography, urban land use, Guangzhou

周素红, 闫小培. 广州城市空间结构与交通需求关系[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 131-142.

ZHOU Suhong, YAN Xiaopei. The Relationship between Urban Structure and Traffic Demand in Guangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(1): 131-142.

参考文献

[1] Peter Hall. Translated by Hong Qiang. American urban planning in the last 80 years. Urban Planning Overseas, 1991, (1).
[洪强译. 美国城市规划八十年回顾. 国外城市规划, 1991, (1).]

[2] Huang Yaping. Urban Space Theory and Space Analysis. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2002. 94.
[黄亚平. 城市空间理论与空间分析. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2002. 94.]

[3] Xu Xueqiang, Zhou Suhong. The review and new progress in China's urban geography since 1980. Economic Geography, 2003, 23(4): 433-440.
[许学强, 周素红. 20世纪80年代以来我国城市地理学研究的回顾与展望. 经济地理, 2003, 23(4): 433-440.]

[4] Zhou Suhong. The relationship between inner transportation demand and land use in compactly developing city. The PhD Thesis of Zhongshan University, 2003, 6.
[周素红. 城市内部交通需求与土地利用关系研究——以广州为例. 中山大学博士学位论文, 2003, 6.]

[5] Zhou Suhong, Yan Xiaopei. The discussion for the reformation of the study way of urban geography based on GIS. Economic Geography, 2001, 21(6): 700-704.
[周素红, 阎小培. 基于GIS的城市地理研究方法革新探讨. 经济地理, 2001, 21(6): 700-704.]

[6] Mackett R L. The systematic application of the LILT model to Dortmund, Leeds and Tokyo. Transportation Reviews, 1990, 10: 323-333.

[7] Mackett R L. Comparative analysis of modelling land-use transport interaction at the micro and macro levels. Environment and Planning, 1990, 22A: 459-475.

[8] Anas A. NYSIM (The New York Simulation Model): A Model of Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transportation Projects. New York: New York Regional Planning Association, 1992.

[9] Anas A. METROSIM. A unified economic model of transportation and land use. Pamphlet distributed at the Transportation Model Improvement Program's Land Use Modeling Conference, Dallas, Texas, February, 1995. 19-21.

[10] Mackett R L. MASTER Model (Micro-Analytical Simulation of Transport, Employment and Residence). Report SR 237. Crowthorne, England: Transport and Road Research Laboratory, 1990.

[11] Johnston R J. Translated by Cai Yunlong and Jiang Tao. Philosophy and Human Geography. 2nd edn. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2000. 13-14, 214.
[约翰斯顿著. 蔡运龙, 江涛译．哲学与人文地理学. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2000. 13-14, 214.]

[12] Wang Xingzhong. Urban Social Structure in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.

[13] Jan Veldhuisen, Harry Timmermans, Loek Kapoen. RAMBLS. Environment and Planning A, 2000, (3):

[14] Berechman J, Small K A. Modeling land use and transportation: an interpretive review for growth areas．Environment and Planning A, 1988, 20: 1285-1309.

[15] Calthorpe Peter. Pedestrian Pockets. Whole Earth Review, Spring 1988.

[16] Calthorpe Peter. Transit-Oriented Development. The Urban Ecologist, Fall 1993.

[17] Liang Henian. Urban ideal and perfect cities. City Planning Review, 1999, 23(7): 18-19.
[梁鹤年. 城市理想与理想城市. 城市规划, 1999, 23(7): 18-19.]

[18] Pushkarev B, Zupan J. Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, 1977.

[19] Messenger T. Transit-oriented development in the sun belt. Transportation Research Record 1552, 1996: 145-153.

[20] David Levinson. Accessibility and the journey to work. Journal of Transport Geography, 1992, 6(1): 11-21.

[21] Cevero R. America's Suburban Centers: The Land-use-Transportation Link. Unwin Hyman Inc., 1989.

[22] Ewing R. Beyond Density, Mode-choice, and Single-purpose Trips．Presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, January 1995.

[23] Frank L D, Pivo G. Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking. Transportation Research Record 1466, 1994: 44-52.

[24] Yang Tao, Wang Lin, Zhou Zhenghang et al. Study on decision psychology of inhabitant's selection for going out in Maanshan City. Urban Planning Forum, 1994, (4): 39-45.
[杨涛, 王琳, 周征航等. 马鞍山市居民出行选择决策心理研究. 城市规划汇刊, 1994, (4): 39-45.]

[25] Guo Xiucheng, Wang Wei．Method of light-rail volume forecast based on trip decision process of citizen. Journal of Southeast University, 1998, 28(4): 107-112.
[过秀成, 王炜. 基于居民出行决策的轻轨客流预测方法研究. 东南大学学报 (自然科学版), 1998, 28(4): 107-112.]

[26] Du Debin, Xu Jiangang. An analysis on location factors affecting the spatial distribution of Shanghai land value. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1997, 52(5): 403-411.
[杜德斌, 徐建刚. 影响上海市地价空间分布的区位因子分析. 地理学报, 1997, 52(5): 403-411.]

[27] Feng Jian. Spatial-temporal evolution of urban morphology and land use structure in Hangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(5): 343-353.
[冯健. 杭州城市形态和土地利用结构的时空演化. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 343-353.]

[28] The Editorial Board of Guangzhou Yearbook．Guangzhou Yearbook 1985. Guangzhou: Guangzhou Yearbook Press, 1985
[广州年鉴编撰委员会. 广州年鉴. 广州: 广州年鉴出版社, 1985.]

[29] Hu Huaying．The Cities, the Space, and the Development: the Case Study on Urban Structure in Guangzhou. Guangzhou: SunYat-sen University Press, 1993. 130.
[胡华颖. 城市. 空间. 发展——广州城市内部空间分析. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 1993. 130.]

[30] J S Adams. Residential structure of modern western cities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1970, 60: 56. In: Hanson S, The Geography of Urban Transportation (2nd edn.). New York: The Guilford Press, 1995. 25-51.

[31] Deng Maoying, Xie Li, Lin Xiaohua. Countermeasures of transportation development in Guangzhou based analysis on characteristic of the inhabitant trip. Economic Geography, 2000, 20(3): 109-114.
[邓毛颖, 谢理, 林小华. 基于居民出行特征分析的广州市交通发展对策探讨. 经济地理, 2000, 20(3): 109-114.]

[32] Yang Yinkai, Jin Fengjun. Transportation technique renewal and the urban spatial evolvement．Geography and Territorial Research, 1999, 15(1): 44-47.
[杨荫凯, 金凤君. 交通技术创新与城市空间形态的相应演变. 地理学与国土研究, 1999, 15(1): 44-47.]

[33] Xu Xueqiang, Zhou Yixing, Ning Yuemin. Urban Geography. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1997. 7, 187.
[许学强, 周一星, 宁越敏. 城市地理学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1997. 7. 187.]

广州城市空间结构与交通需求关系

The Relationship between Urban Structure and Traffic Demand in Guangzhou

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	龚健雅, 许刚, 焦利民, 秦昆. 城市标度律及应用[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 251-260.
[2]	冯健, 钟奕纯. 基于居住环境的常州城市居民生活质量空间结构[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1237-1255.
[3]	安宁,冯秋怡,朱竑. 基于报业话语的广州非裔社区的空间想象分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1650-1662.
[4]	林荣平, 周素红, 闫小培. 1978年以来广州市居民职住地选择行为时空特征与影响因素的代际差异[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 753-769.
[5]	杨莹,林琳,钟志平,欧莹莹,徐茜,蒙美昀,郝珊. 基于应对公共健康危害的广州社区恢复力评价及空间分异[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 266-284.
[6]	吴蓉,黄旭,刘晔,李志刚. 广州城市居民地方依恋测度与机理[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 379-393.
[7]	杨文越,曹小曙. 居住自选择视角下的广州出行碳排放影响机理[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(2): 346-361.
[8]	陈淳,袁振杰,朱竑. 城镇化背景下广州流动儿童对“家”空间的建构[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(12): 2440-2451.
[9]	李也, 龚咏喜, 张兆东, 冯长春. 基于矢量网格的城市土地利用邻里模式研究[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(11): 2236-2249.
[10]	周素红, 宋江宇, 宋广文. 广州市居民工作日小汽车出行个体与社区双层影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1444-1457.
[11]	匡文慧, 杨天荣, 颜凤芹. 河北雄安新区建设的区域地表本底特征与生态管控[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 947-959.
[12]	谭章智, 李少英, 黎夏, 刘小平, 陈逸敏, 李威贤. 城市轨道交通对土地利用变化的时空效应[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(5): 850-862.
[13]	傅辰昊, 周素红, 闫小培, 柳林, 陈蔚珊. 广州市零售商业中心的居民消费时空行为及其机制[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4): 603-617.
[14]	陶伟, 王绍续, 朱竑. 广州拾荒者的身体实践与空间建构[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(12): 2199-2213.
[15]	尹铎, 高权, 朱竑. 广州鳄鱼公园野生动物旅游中的生命权力运作[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(10): 1872-1885.