国家级自然保护区土地覆盖类型转换趋势

doi:10.11821/xb201212004

地理学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (12): 1623-1633.doi: 10.11821/xb201212004

国家级自然保护区土地覆盖类型转换趋势

范泽孟¹, 张轩^1,2, 李婧^1,2, 岳天祥¹, 刘纪远¹, 孙晓芳^1,2, 香宝³, 匡文慧¹

1. 中国科学院地理学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 中国环境科学研究院生态所, 北京 100012

收稿日期:2012-04-19 修回日期:2012-09-12 出版日期:2012-12-20 发布日期:2013-02-07
作者简介:范泽孟(1977-),男,云南镇雄人,副研/硕导,中国地理学会会员(S110007694M),研究方向为气候变化与生态系统响应、生态模型与系统模拟。E-mail:fanzm@lreis.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目 (41271406;40801150);国家杰出青年科学基金项目 (40825003);国家重点基础研究发展计划 (973计划)项目 (2009CB421105;2010CB950904);资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室青年人才培养基金项目

Transition Trends of Land-cover in National Nature Reserves of China

FAN Zemeng¹, ZHANG Xuan^1,2, LI Jing^1,2, YUE Tianxiang¹, LIU Jiyuan¹, SUN Xiaofang^1,2, XIANG Bao³, KUANG Wenhui¹

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2012-04-19 Revised:2012-09-12 Online:2012-12-20 Published:2013-02-07
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41271406;No.40801150;China National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, No.40825003;National Basic Research Program of China, No.2009CB421105;No.2010CB95090403;Youth Science Funds of State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System, CAS

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国家为了防止生态系统恶化、保护自然栖息地及其生物多样性,到2010年底已建立2588 个自然保护区,总面积达 149.44×10⁶hm²,超过中国陆地总面积的15%。土地覆盖变化作为导致生物多样性变化的首要因素,直接影响生态系统的结构和功能。本文选取180个国家级自然保护,总面积44.71×10⁶hm²,占自然保护区总面积的29.9%,全国陆地面积的4.7%,根据各保护区的生态系统特征和主要保护对象,将其划分为森林生态系统、草地生态系统、湿地生态系统、珍稀动物、珍稀植物、地质和古生物遗址、以及荒漠生态系统7类自然保护区类型,并在此基础上按东北、华北、华东、中南、西北及西南6个大区对其进行空间分析。论文构建土地覆盖类型转换方向判别指数模型,运用生态多样性模型和斑块连通性模型,对各大区内各类国家级自然保护区及其核心区、缓冲区和实验区的土地覆盖转换趋势进行计算。结果显示,在20世纪80年代后期-2005年时段内,180个国家级自然保护区的土地覆盖转换强度整体呈减缓趋势,西南地区的平均转换强度最大,而华东地区的平均转换强度最小。在各类国家级自然保护区中,除了森林生态系统保护区外,其他各类型保护区的土地覆盖都存在逆向转换,但逆向转换速率总体呈减缓趋势。国家级自然保护区的核心区土地覆盖逆向转换的速度平均为0.16%/10a减少,其土地覆盖景观格局相对于缓冲区的和实验区更为稳定。生态多样性指数和斑块连通性指数模型计算显示,国家级自然保护区土地覆盖景观格局的生态多样性和斑块连通性在1995-2005年总体呈上升趋势。另外,各大区国家级自然保护区与非保护区的土地覆盖转换强度对比显示,保护区土地覆盖转换强度整体上小于非保护区的土地覆盖转换强度。总之,分析结果表明,国家级自然保护区的土地覆盖转换处于良性变化趋势,尤其是在1995-2005年期间,保护区内的土地覆盖类型及分布逐渐趋于正向转换和稳定态势。

关键词: 国家级自然保护区, 土地覆盖转换方向判别指数, 变化趋势, 中国

Abstract: A large number of nature reserves have been established in China aiming to prevent ecosystem degradation, protect natural habitats and conserve the biodiversity within the habitats. By the end of 2010, a total of 2588 nature reserves has been established in China and their total area was 149.44 million hectares, covering over 15% of China's total land area. As the primary driver of biodiversity change, land-cover change has direct effect on ecosystem structures and functions. Thus, a quantitative analysis of changes in the land-cover of nature reserves is a critical step for evaluating the effectiveness and improving the management policies of nature reserves. In terms of the ecosystem characteristics and its major protected objects, 180 National Nature Reserves (NNRs) are chosen and classified into 7 types in this paper. A Land-cover Transform Direction Index (LTDI) is developed on the basis of the contribution of each land-cover type to maintaining the ecosystem stability. In Northeast China, North China, East China, South China, Central-southern China, Northwest and Southwest China, LTDI is used to calculate the transition trend of land-cover in the core zone, buffer zone and experimental zone of each NNRs type during the period from the late 1980s to 2005. The results show that the mean transition rate of all selected NNRs types has become lower during the two decades. The land-cover transform rate of Southwest China was the largest, while that of East China was the smallest among the six regions. The mean positive and negative transform rates of land-cover in all core zones decreased by 0.69% and 0.16% respectively. The landscape pattern of land-cover in the core zones was more stable than that in the buffer zones and the experimental zones. The land-cover transformed rate of NNRs was less than that of Non-NNRs in general. Furthermore, the ecological diversity and patch connectivity of land-cover in the whole selected area increased generally during the period 1995-2005. In summary, the land-cover of NNRs in China has a beneficial change trend after the NNRs were established, especially during the period from 1995 to 2005.

Key words: national nature reserves, land-cover transform direction index, transition trend, China

范泽孟, 张轩, 李婧, 岳天祥, 刘纪远, 孙晓芳, 香宝, 匡文慧. 国家级自然保护区土地覆盖类型转换趋势[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(12): 1623-1633.

FAN Zemeng, ZHANG Xuan, LI Jing, YUE Tianxiang, LIU Jiyuan, SUN Xiaofang, XIANG Bao, KUANG Wenhui. Transition Trends of Land-cover in National Nature Reserves of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(12): 1623-1633.

参考文献

[1] Dobson A P, Rodriguez J P, Roberts W M. Synoptic tinkering: integrating strategies for large-scale conservation. Ecology Application, 2001, 11(4): 1019-1026.

[2] Scott J M, Davis, F W, McGhie R G et al. Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity? Ecology Application, 2001, 11(4): 999-1007.

[3] Andelman S J, Willig M R. Present patterns and future prospects for biodiversity in the Western Hemisphere. Ecological Letters, 2003, 6: 818-824.

[4] Klorvuttimontara S, McClean C J, Hill J K. Evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas for conserving tropical forest butterflies of Thailand. Biological Conservation, 2011, 144: 2534-2540.

[5] United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2011. New York, 2011.

[6] Ervin J. Protected area assessments in perspective. BioScience, 2003, 53(9): 819-822.

[7] Bruner A G, Gullison R E, Rice R E et al. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 2001, 291: 125-128.

[8] Jamison E. Protected area assessments in perspective. BioScience, 2003, 53(9): 819-822.

[9] Vasconcelos M J P, MussáBiai J C, Araújo A et al. Land cover change in two protected areas of Guinea-Bissau (1956-1998). Applied Geography, 2002, 22: 139-156.

[10] Araújo M B, Alagador D, Cabeza M et al. Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology Letters, 2011, 14: 484-492.

[11] Liu J G, Linderman M, Ouyang Z Y et al. Ecological degradation in protected areas: The case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science, 2001, 292: 98-101.

[12] Chen Yahan, Tang Zhiyao, Fang Jingyun. Distribution of nature reserves and status of biodiversity protection in China. Biodiversity Science, 2009, 17(6): 664-674. [陈雅涵, 唐志尧, 方精云. 中国自然保护区分布现状及合理布局的探讨. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(6): 664-674.]

[13] Zhu Huiyi, Li Xiubin. Discussion on the index method of regional land use change. Acta Geographic Sinica, 2003, 58 (5): 643-650. [朱会义, 李秀彬. 关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 643-650]

[14] Shao Quanqin, Zhao Zhiping, Liu Jiyuan et al. The characteristics of land cover and macroscopical ecology changes in the source region of three rivers on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during last 30 years. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(8): 1439-1451. [邵全琴, 赵志平, 刘纪远等. 近 30 年来三江源地区土地覆被与宏观生态变化特征. 地理研究, 2010, 29 (8): 1439-1451.]

[15] Zhao Zhiping, Liu Jiyuan, Shao Quanqin. Characteristic analysis of land cover change in nature reserve of Three River's Source Regions. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(3): 415-420. [赵志平, 刘纪远, 邵全琴. 三江源自然保护区土地覆被变化特征分析. 地理科学, 2010, 30(3): 415-420.]

[16] Bing Longfei, Shao Quanqin, Liu Jiyuan. Characteristic of land cover changes in the Yellow River Headwaters Region over the past 30 years. Journal of Geo-information Sciences, 2011, 13(3): 289-296. [邴龙飞, 邵全琴, 刘纪远. 近30年黄河源头土地覆被变化特征分析. 地球信息科学学报, 2011, 13(3): 289-296.]

[17] Bolliger J, B ttig M, Gallati J et al. Landscape multifunctionality: A powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change. Regional Environment Change, 2011, 11: 203-206.

[18] Sala O E, Chapin F S, Armesto J J et al. Biodiversity biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 2000, 287: 1770-1774.

[19] Wiens J A, Anderson M G, Boucher T. Land cover and conservation: from protected areas to landscapes//Campbell J C, Jones K B, Smith J H et al. North American Land Cover Summit. Association of American Geographers, Washington D.C., 2008: 153-168.

[20] Wade A, Theobald D M, Laituri M J. A multi-scale assessment of local and contextual threats to existing and potential U.S. protected areas Alisa. Landscape Urban Plan, 2011, 101: 215-227.

[21] Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005, 309: 570-574.

[22] Chapin Ⅲ F S, Zavaleta E S, Eviner V T et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 2000, 405: 234-242.

[23] Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J et al. Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science, 1997, 277: 494-499.

[24] Yue T X, Fan Z M, Liu J Y. Scenarios of land cover in China. Global and Planetary Change, 2007, 55: 317-342.

[25] Fan Zemeng, Yue Tianxiang, Liu Jiyuan et al. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(6): 941-952. [范泽孟, 岳天祥, 刘纪远等. 中国土地覆盖时空变化未来情景分析. 地理学报, 2005, 60(6): 941-952.]

[26] Wiens J A. Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable conservation. Landscape Ecology, 2009, 24: 1053-1065.

[27] John A W, Nathaniel E S, Dennis J. Protected areas in climate space: What will the future bring? Biological Conservation, 2011, 144: 2119-2125.

[28] Figueroa F, Sánchez-Cordero V. Effectiveness of natural protected areas to prevent land use and land cover change in Mexico. Biodiversity Conservation, 2008, 17: 3223-3240.

[29] Liu Jiyuan, Zhang Zengxiang, Xu Xinliang et al. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China in the early 21st century. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(12): 1411-1420. [刘纪远, 张增祥, 徐新良等. 21世纪初中国土地利用变化的空间格局与驱动力分析. 地理学报, 2009, 64(12): 1411-1420.]

[30] Liu Jiyuan. The Macro Investigation and Dynamic Research of the Resource and Environment in China. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 1996. [刘纪远. 中国资源环境遥感宏观调查与动态研究. 北京: 中国科学出版社, 1996.]

[31] Yue T X. Surface Modeling: High Accuracy and High Speed Methods. New York: CRC Press, Talyor & Francis Group, 2010: 39-417.

[32] Yue T X, Fan Z M, Chen C F et al. Surface modelling of global terrestrial ecosystems under three climate change scenarios. Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222: 2342-2361.

国家级自然保护区土地覆盖类型转换趋势

Transition Trends of Land-cover in National Nature Reserves of China

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张学珍, 赵彩杉, 董金玮, 葛全胜. 1992-2017年基于荟萃分析的中国耕地撂荒时空特征[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 411-420.
[2]	陈峰, 李红波, 张安录. 基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 432-445.
[3]	王建邦, 赵军, 李传华, 朱钰, 康重阳, 高超. 2001-2015年中国植被覆盖人为影响的时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 504-519.
[4]	高江波, 焦珂伟, 吴绍洪. 1982-2013年中国植被NDVI空间异质性的气候影响分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 534-543.
[5]	赵梓渝,魏冶,杨冉,王士君,朱宇. 中国人口省际流动重力模型的参数标定与误差估算[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 203-221.
[6]	古恒宇,沈体雁,刘子亮,孟鑫. 基于空间滤波方法的中国省际人口迁移驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 222-237.
[7]	周春山,金万富,张国俊,黎明,王少剑. 中国国有建设用地供应规模时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 16-31.
[8]	任小丽,路倩倩,何洪林,张黎,牛忠恩. 中国东部南北样带森林生态系统蒸腾与蒸散比值（T/ET）时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 63-75.
[9]	程维明,高晓雨,马廷,徐新良,陈印军,周成虎. 基于地貌分区的1990-2015年中国耕地时空特征变化分析[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1613-1629.
[10]	杜勤勤,张明军,王圣杰,车存伟,邱雪,马转转. 中国气温变化对全球变暖停滞的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1748-1764.
[11]	张翼鸥,谷人旭. 中国城市知识复杂性的空间特征及影响研究[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1421-1432.
[12]	刘承良,管明明,段德忠. 中国城际技术转移网络的空间格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1462-1477.
[13]	周扬,郭远智,刘彦随. 中国县域贫困综合测度及2020年后减贫瞄准[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1478-1493.
[14]	张国俊,黄婉玲,周春山,曹永旺. 城市群视角下中国人口分布演变特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1513-1525.
[15]	安北江. 《中国行政区划通史·五代十国卷》评介[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1604-1605.