国家级自然保护区土地覆盖类型转换趋势

doi:10.11821/xb201212004

地理学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (12): 1623-1633.doi: 10.11821/xb201212004

国家级自然保护区土地覆盖类型转换趋势

范泽孟¹, 张轩^1,2, 李婧^1,2, 岳天祥¹, 刘纪远¹, 孙晓芳^1,2, 香宝³, 匡文慧¹

1. 中国科学院地理学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 中国环境科学研究院生态所, 北京 100012

收稿日期:2012-04-19 修回日期:2012-09-12 出版日期:2012-12-20 发布日期:2012-12-20
作者简介:范泽孟(1977-),男,云南镇雄人,副研/硕导,中国地理学会会员(S110007694M),研究方向为气候变化与生态系统响应、生态模型与系统模拟。E-mail:fanzm@lreis.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目 (41271406;40801150);国家杰出青年科学基金项目 (40825003);国家重点基础研究发展计划 (973计划)项目 (2009CB421105;2010CB950904);资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室青年人才培养基金项目

Transition Trends of Land-cover in National Nature Reserves of China

FAN Zemeng¹, ZHANG Xuan^1,2, LI Jing^1,2, YUE Tianxiang¹, LIU Jiyuan¹, SUN Xiaofang^1,2, XIANG Bao³, KUANG Wenhui¹

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2012-04-19 Revised:2012-09-12 Online:2012-12-20 Published:2012-12-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41271406;No.40801150;China National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, No.40825003;National Basic Research Program of China, No.2009CB421105;No.2010CB95090403;Youth Science Funds of State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System, CAS

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国家为了防止生态系统恶化、保护自然栖息地及其生物多样性,到2010年底已建立2588 个自然保护区,总面积达 149.44×10⁶hm²,超过中国陆地总面积的15%。土地覆盖变化作为导致生物多样性变化的首要因素,直接影响生态系统的结构和功能。本文选取180个国家级自然保护,总面积44.71×10⁶hm²,占自然保护区总面积的29.9%,全国陆地面积的4.7%,根据各保护区的生态系统特征和主要保护对象,将其划分为森林生态系统、草地生态系统、湿地生态系统、珍稀动物、珍稀植物、地质和古生物遗址、以及荒漠生态系统7类自然保护区类型,并在此基础上按东北、华北、华东、中南、西北及西南6个大区对其进行空间分析。论文构建土地覆盖类型转换方向判别指数模型,运用生态多样性模型和斑块连通性模型,对各大区内各类国家级自然保护区及其核心区、缓冲区和实验区的土地覆盖转换趋势进行计算。结果显示,在20世纪80年代后期-2005年时段内,180个国家级自然保护区的土地覆盖转换强度整体呈减缓趋势,西南地区的平均转换强度最大,而华东地区的平均转换强度最小。在各类国家级自然保护区中,除了森林生态系统保护区外,其他各类型保护区的土地覆盖都存在逆向转换,但逆向转换速率总体呈减缓趋势。国家级自然保护区的核心区土地覆盖逆向转换的速度平均为0.16%/10a减少,其土地覆盖景观格局相对于缓冲区的和实验区更为稳定。生态多样性指数和斑块连通性指数模型计算显示,国家级自然保护区土地覆盖景观格局的生态多样性和斑块连通性在1995-2005年总体呈上升趋势。另外,各大区国家级自然保护区与非保护区的土地覆盖转换强度对比显示,保护区土地覆盖转换强度整体上小于非保护区的土地覆盖转换强度。总之,分析结果表明,国家级自然保护区的土地覆盖转换处于良性变化趋势,尤其是在1995-2005年期间,保护区内的土地覆盖类型及分布逐渐趋于正向转换和稳定态势。

关键词: 国家级自然保护区, 土地覆盖转换方向判别指数, 变化趋势, 中国

Abstract: A large number of nature reserves have been established in China aiming to prevent ecosystem degradation, protect natural habitats and conserve the biodiversity within the habitats. By the end of 2010, a total of 2588 nature reserves has been established in China and their total area was 149.44 million hectares, covering over 15% of China's total land area. As the primary driver of biodiversity change, land-cover change has direct effect on ecosystem structures and functions. Thus, a quantitative analysis of changes in the land-cover of nature reserves is a critical step for evaluating the effectiveness and improving the management policies of nature reserves. In terms of the ecosystem characteristics and its major protected objects, 180 National Nature Reserves (NNRs) are chosen and classified into 7 types in this paper. A Land-cover Transform Direction Index (LTDI) is developed on the basis of the contribution of each land-cover type to maintaining the ecosystem stability. In Northeast China, North China, East China, South China, Central-southern China, Northwest and Southwest China, LTDI is used to calculate the transition trend of land-cover in the core zone, buffer zone and experimental zone of each NNRs type during the period from the late 1980s to 2005. The results show that the mean transition rate of all selected NNRs types has become lower during the two decades. The land-cover transform rate of Southwest China was the largest, while that of East China was the smallest among the six regions. The mean positive and negative transform rates of land-cover in all core zones decreased by 0.69% and 0.16% respectively. The landscape pattern of land-cover in the core zones was more stable than that in the buffer zones and the experimental zones. The land-cover transformed rate of NNRs was less than that of Non-NNRs in general. Furthermore, the ecological diversity and patch connectivity of land-cover in the whole selected area increased generally during the period 1995-2005. In summary, the land-cover of NNRs in China has a beneficial change trend after the NNRs were established, especially during the period from 1995 to 2005.

Key words: national nature reserves, land-cover transform direction index, transition trend, China

范泽孟, 张轩, 李婧, 岳天祥, 刘纪远, 孙晓芳, 香宝, 匡文慧. 国家级自然保护区土地覆盖类型转换趋势[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(12): 1623-1633.

FAN Zemeng, ZHANG Xuan, LI Jing, YUE Tianxiang, LIU Jiyuan, SUN Xiaofang, XIANG Bao, KUANG Wenhui. Transition Trends of Land-cover in National Nature Reserves of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(12): 1623-1633.

参考文献

[1] Dobson A P, Rodriguez J P, Roberts W M. Synoptic tinkering: integrating strategies for large-scale conservation. Ecology Application, 2001, 11(4): 1019-1026.

[2] Scott J M, Davis, F W, McGhie R G et al. Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity? Ecology Application, 2001, 11(4): 999-1007.

[3] Andelman S J, Willig M R. Present patterns and future prospects for biodiversity in the Western Hemisphere. Ecological Letters, 2003, 6: 818-824.

[4] Klorvuttimontara S, McClean C J, Hill J K. Evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas for conserving tropical forest butterflies of Thailand. Biological Conservation, 2011, 144: 2534-2540.

[5] United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2011. New York, 2011.

[6] Ervin J. Protected area assessments in perspective. BioScience, 2003, 53(9): 819-822.

[7] Bruner A G, Gullison R E, Rice R E et al. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 2001, 291: 125-128.

[8] Jamison E. Protected area assessments in perspective. BioScience, 2003, 53(9): 819-822.

[9] Vasconcelos M J P, MussáBiai J C, Araújo A et al. Land cover change in two protected areas of Guinea-Bissau (1956-1998). Applied Geography, 2002, 22: 139-156.

[10] Araújo M B, Alagador D, Cabeza M et al. Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology Letters, 2011, 14: 484-492.

[11] Liu J G, Linderman M, Ouyang Z Y et al. Ecological degradation in protected areas: The case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science, 2001, 292: 98-101.

[12] Chen Yahan, Tang Zhiyao, Fang Jingyun. Distribution of nature reserves and status of biodiversity protection in China. Biodiversity Science, 2009, 17(6): 664-674. [陈雅涵, 唐志尧, 方精云. 中国自然保护区分布现状及合理布局的探讨. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(6): 664-674.]

[13] Zhu Huiyi, Li Xiubin. Discussion on the index method of regional land use change. Acta Geographic Sinica, 2003, 58 (5): 643-650. [朱会义, 李秀彬. 关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 643-650]

[14] Shao Quanqin, Zhao Zhiping, Liu Jiyuan et al. The characteristics of land cover and macroscopical ecology changes in the source region of three rivers on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during last 30 years. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(8): 1439-1451. [邵全琴, 赵志平, 刘纪远等. 近 30 年来三江源地区土地覆被与宏观生态变化特征. 地理研究, 2010, 29 (8): 1439-1451.]

[15] Zhao Zhiping, Liu Jiyuan, Shao Quanqin. Characteristic analysis of land cover change in nature reserve of Three River's Source Regions. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(3): 415-420. [赵志平, 刘纪远, 邵全琴. 三江源自然保护区土地覆被变化特征分析. 地理科学, 2010, 30(3): 415-420.]

[16] Bing Longfei, Shao Quanqin, Liu Jiyuan. Characteristic of land cover changes in the Yellow River Headwaters Region over the past 30 years. Journal of Geo-information Sciences, 2011, 13(3): 289-296. [邴龙飞, 邵全琴, 刘纪远. 近30年黄河源头土地覆被变化特征分析. 地球信息科学学报, 2011, 13(3): 289-296.]

[17] Bolliger J, B ttig M, Gallati J et al. Landscape multifunctionality: A powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change. Regional Environment Change, 2011, 11: 203-206.

[18] Sala O E, Chapin F S, Armesto J J et al. Biodiversity biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 2000, 287: 1770-1774.

[19] Wiens J A, Anderson M G, Boucher T. Land cover and conservation: from protected areas to landscapes//Campbell J C, Jones K B, Smith J H et al. North American Land Cover Summit. Association of American Geographers, Washington D.C., 2008: 153-168.

[20] Wade A, Theobald D M, Laituri M J. A multi-scale assessment of local and contextual threats to existing and potential U.S. protected areas Alisa. Landscape Urban Plan, 2011, 101: 215-227.

[21] Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005, 309: 570-574.

[22] Chapin Ⅲ F S, Zavaleta E S, Eviner V T et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 2000, 405: 234-242.

[23] Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J et al. Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science, 1997, 277: 494-499.

[24] Yue T X, Fan Z M, Liu J Y. Scenarios of land cover in China. Global and Planetary Change, 2007, 55: 317-342.

[25] Fan Zemeng, Yue Tianxiang, Liu Jiyuan et al. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(6): 941-952. [范泽孟, 岳天祥, 刘纪远等. 中国土地覆盖时空变化未来情景分析. 地理学报, 2005, 60(6): 941-952.]

[26] Wiens J A. Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable conservation. Landscape Ecology, 2009, 24: 1053-1065.

[27] John A W, Nathaniel E S, Dennis J. Protected areas in climate space: What will the future bring? Biological Conservation, 2011, 144: 2119-2125.

[28] Figueroa F, Sánchez-Cordero V. Effectiveness of natural protected areas to prevent land use and land cover change in Mexico. Biodiversity Conservation, 2008, 17: 3223-3240.

[29] Liu Jiyuan, Zhang Zengxiang, Xu Xinliang et al. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China in the early 21st century. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(12): 1411-1420. [刘纪远, 张增祥, 徐新良等. 21世纪初中国土地利用变化的空间格局与驱动力分析. 地理学报, 2009, 64(12): 1411-1420.]

[30] Liu Jiyuan. The Macro Investigation and Dynamic Research of the Resource and Environment in China. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 1996. [刘纪远. 中国资源环境遥感宏观调查与动态研究. 北京: 中国科学出版社, 1996.]

[31] Yue T X. Surface Modeling: High Accuracy and High Speed Methods. New York: CRC Press, Talyor & Francis Group, 2010: 39-417.

[32] Yue T X, Fan Z M, Chen C F et al. Surface modelling of global terrestrial ecosystems under three climate change scenarios. Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222: 2342-2361.

国家级自然保护区土地覆盖类型转换趋势

Transition Trends of Land-cover in National Nature Reserves of China

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[2]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.
[3]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[4]	葛全胜, 朱会义. 两千年来中国自然与人文地理环境变迁及启示[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 3-14.
[5]	张兴航, 张百平, 王晶, 余付勤, 赵超, 姚永慧. 中国南北过渡带东段样带植被序列与气候分界问题[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 30-43.
[6]	李哲, 丁永建, 陈艾姣, 张智华, 张世强. 1960—2019年西北地区气候变化中的Hiatus现象及特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1845-1859.
[7]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 周亮, 王旭峰, 李振亚, 庞素菲, 颉斌斌. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1948-1965.
[8]	敖荣军, 常亮. 基于结构方程模型的中国县域人口老龄化影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1572-1584.
[9]	宋周莺, 祝巧玲. 中国边境地区的城镇化格局及其驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1603-1616.
[10]	马春玥, 买买提·沙吾提, 姚杰, 古丽努尔·依沙克. 1950—2015年中国棉花生产时空动态变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1699-1710.
[11]	郑景云, 张学珍, 刘洋, 郝志新. 过去千年中国不同区域干湿的多尺度变化特征评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1432-1450.
[12]	陶泽兴, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 1963—2018年中国垂柳和榆树开花始期积温需求的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1451-1464.
[13]	瞿诗进, 胡守庚, 李全峰. 中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553.
[14]	魏素豪, 李晶, 李泽怡, 宗刚. 中国农业竞争力时空格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300.
[15]	王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 史晨怡. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.