基于分形理论的灌溉水有效利用系数空间尺度变异

doi:10.11821/xb201209005

地理学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (9): 1201-1212.doi: 10.11821/xb201209005

基于分形理论的灌溉水有效利用系数空间尺度变异

王小军^1,2, 张强¹, 古璇清²

1. 中山大学水资源与环境系, 广州510275;
2. 广东省水利水电科学研究院, 广州510635

收稿日期:2012-05-09 修回日期:2012-06-15 出版日期:2012-09-20 发布日期:2012-11-09
通讯作者: 张强,男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事流域气象水文学研究、旱涝灾害机理、流域地表水文过程及其对气候变化的响应机制与机理以及流域生态需水等领域的研究工作。E-mail:zhangq68@mail.sysu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangq68@mail.sysu.edu.cn
作者简介:王小军(1979-),男,甘肃宁县人,在读博士,主要从事农业节水灌溉和水土保持研究。E-mail:wxj1999_2003@163.com
基金资助:
水利部公益性行业科研专项项目(200901074); 国家自然科学基金项目(41071020); 广东省水利厅资助项目联合资助

Fractal-based Effective Utilization Coefficient of Irrigation Water Space Scale Variability

WANG Xiaojun^1,2, ZHANG Qiang¹, GU Xuanqing²

1. Department of Water Resources and Environment, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
2. Guangdong Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Guangzhou 510610, China

Received:2012-05-09 Revised:2012-06-15 Online:2012-09-20 Published:2012-11-09
Supported by:
Ministry of Public Sector Research and Special Projects, No.200901074; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41071020; Project from Guangdong Hydraulic Bureau

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于2010 年度广东省75 处样点灌区的实测资料和遥感图像, 应用分形理论, 采用网格盒维数法计算了各样点灌区盒维数, 结果表明:广东省灌区具有明显的分形特征, 盒维数介于1.0004~1.675 之间, 分维数均值为1.308, 形状指数均值为0.335, 都随灌区规模呈同步减小趋势。不同规模灌区盒维数大型灌区(1.442) > 中型灌区(1.287) > 小型灌区(1.195)。灌溉水有效利用系数与空间分形特征诸因子中以非空网格对数值最高, 相关性达到0.941。基于此, 建立了不同网格尺度下的灌区面积与灌溉水有效利用系数和盒维数空间尺度变异函数。同时, 从影响灌溉水有效利用系数的众多因素中, 选取了工程评价值、盒子维数、灌区形状指数、参考作物蒸发蒸腾量ET0 和当年降水量5 项指标进行了空间格局影响因素分析, 结合灰关联计算结果表明:空间各影响因素中以工程评价因子的关联度最高, 达到0.8478, 其次为形态特征因子, 自然气象因子影响最小。尝试利用分形理论为不同面积尺度灌区灌溉水有效利用系数的空间变异规律分析和尺度转换提供一种新的思路, 该结果对于指导灌区投资改造和规划建设, 具有较强的理论和应用价值。

关键词: 灌溉水有效利用系数, 尺度, 分形理论, 盒维数, 空间变异

Abstract: Based on the measured data and remote sensing images of 75 sample irrigation areas of Guangdong province in 2010, grid box dimension method was used to analyze the box dimension of sample irrigation area. The results show that irrigation area of the province is subjected to fractal characteristics with the box dimension ranging from 1.0004 to 1.675, the mean of fractal dimension of 1.308 and mean shape index of 0.335, and shows a decreasing trend with the irrigation area scale. The box dimension of irrigation area at different scales is listed in the order of large-scale irrigation area (1.442) > medium-sized irrigation area (1.287) > small-scale irrigation area (1.195). The most significant factor is logarithm of non-empty grid with the correlation coefficient of 0.941. In this case, a variation function of spatial scale between irrigation district area, the effective utilization coefficient of irrigation water and the box dimension under different grid scales is achieved. Meanwhile, five indicators related to many influencing factors, the value of the project evaluation, box dimension, irrigation area shape index, the reference crop evapotranspiration ET₀ and precipitation are analyzed in this study. And the factors influencing the spatial pattern are also thoroughly investigated. The above-mentioned analysis and also those by the gray relational calculation show that the highest correlation of spatial influence factors is the engineering evaluation of 0.8478, followed by topographical features and meteorological factors.

Key words: the effective utilization coefficient of irrigation water, scale, fractal theory, box dimension, spatial variability

王小军, 张强, 古璇清. 基于分形理论的灌溉水有效利用系数空间尺度变异[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9): 1201-1212.

WANG Xiaojun, ZHANG Qiang, GU Xuanqing. Fractal-based Effective Utilization Coefficient of Irrigation Water Space Scale Variability[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(9): 1201-1212.

参考文献

[1] Mao Zhi. Irrigation water is the efficient utilization coefficient estimates to the main direction of analysis help tofurther clarify the agricultural water conservation. China Water Resources, 2009, (3): 11-14. [茆智. 灌溉用水有效利用系数测算分析有助于进一步明确农业节水的主攻方向. 中国水利, 2009, (3): 5-6.]

[2] Han Zhenzhong, Pei Yuansheng, Li Yuanhua et al. Estimation and analysis of effective utilization coefficient ofirrigated water. China Water Resources, 2009, (3): 11-14. [韩振中, 裴源生, 李远华等. 灌溉用水有效利用系数测算与分析. 中国水利, 2009, (3): 11-14.]

[3] Wallender W W, Grimmer M E. Irrigation hydrology: Crossing scales. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2002, 128(4): 203-211.

[4] Tuong T P, Bhuiyan S I. Increasing water-use efficiency in rice production: Farm-level perspectives. Agricultural WaterManagement, 1999, 40(1): 117-122.

[5] Gao Feng, Zhao Jingchengg, Xu Jianzhong et al. Study on measuring method of utilization coefficient of irrigationwater. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2004, (1): 14-20.[高峰, 赵竞成, 许建中等. 灌溉水利用系数测定方法研究.灌溉排水学报, 2004, (1): 14-20.]

[6] Wang Xiaojun, Gu Xuanqing, Deng Lan et al. Calculation analysis of irrigation water utilization efficient in GuangdongProvince. Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower, 2008, (8): 62-66. [王小军, 古璇清, 邓岚等. 广东省灌溉水利用率测算分析. 广东水利水电, 2008, (8): 62-66.]

[7] Molden D. Accounting for water use and productivity. SWIM Paper 1. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International WaterManagement Institute, 1997.

[8] Molden D, Sakthivadivel R. Water accounting to assess use and productivity of water. Water Resources Development,1999, 15(1/2): 55-71.

[9] Cui Yuanlai, Xiong Jia. Advances in assessment indicators of irrigation water use efficiency. Advances in WaterScience, 2009, (4): 590-598. [崔远来, 熊佳. 灌溉水利用效率指标研究进展. 水科学进展, 2009, (4): 590-598.]

[10 Hitomi T, Iwamoto Y, Miura A et al. Water-saving irrigation of paddy field to reduce nutrient runoff. J. Environ. Sci.(China), 2010, 22(6): 885-891.

[11] Kirkegaard J A, Hunt J R. Increasing productivity by matching farming system management and genotype inwater-limited environments. J Exp. Bot., 2010, 61(15): 4129-4143.

[12] Yang Xin, Tang Guoan, Liu Xuejun et al. Digital terrain analysis: Theory, method and application. Acta GeographicaSinica, 2009, 64(9): 1058-1070. [杨昕, 汤国安, 刘学军等. 数字地形分析的理论、方法与应用. 地理学报, 2009, 64(9): 1058-1070.]

[13] Cui Yuanlai, Li Yuanhua, Lu Chuiyu et al. Scale effect of effective utilization coefficient of irrigated water. ChinaWater Resources, 2009, (3): 18-21. [崔远来, 李远华, 陆垂裕. 灌溉用水有效利用系数尺度效应分析. 中国水利,2009, (3): 18-21.]

[14] Mandelbrot B B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1983: 167-168.

[15] Castro-Alvaredo O A, Doyon B. Entanglement entropy of highly degenerate states and fractal dimensions. Phys. Rev.Lett., 2012, 108(12): 120401.

[16] Liu Deping. The application of fractal theory in hydrologic process shape characteristic analysis. Journal of HydraulicEngineering, 1998, (2): 21-26. [刘德平. 分形理论在水文过程形态特征分析中的应用. 水利学报, 1998, (2): 21-26.]

[17] Qin Y C, Liu K. Advances in applied studies of fractal theory in geography in China. Journal of GeographicalSciences, 2004, 14(suppl. 1): 62-68.

[18] Moon B H, Seo G T, Jang D J et al. Size and fractal dimension of particles in the River Nakdong. Water Sci.Technol., 2007, 55(1/2): 113-120.

[19] Zhang Shaowen, Wang Wensheng, Ding Jing et al. Application of fractal theory to hydrology and water resources.Advances in Water Science, 2005, (1): 141-146. [张少文, 王文圣, 丁晶等. 分形理论在水文水资源中的应用. 水科学进展, 2005, (1): 141-146.]

[20] Bialowiec A, Randerson P F, Kopik M. Using fractal geometry to determine phytotoxicity of landfill leachate onwillow. Chemosphere, 2010, 79(5): 534-540.

[21] Scholz C H, Mandelbrot B B. Fractals in geophysics. Pure Appl. Geophys., 1989, 131(1/2): 313.

[22] Liu Feng, Chen Shenliang, Peng Jun et al. Multi-scale variability of flow discharge and sediment load of Yellow Riverto sea and its impacts on the estuary during the past 60 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(3): 313-323. [刘锋,陈沈良, 彭俊等. 近60 年黄河入海水沙多尺度变化及其对河口的影响. 地理学报, 2011, 66(3): 313-323.]

[23] Fang W, Mayama H, Tsujii K. Spontaneous formation of fractal structures on triglyceride surfaces with reference totheir super water-repellent properties. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111(3): 564-571.

[24] Zhang Fasheng, Liu Zuoxin. Fractal theory and its application in the analysis of soil spatial variability: A review.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(5): 1351-1358. [张法升, 刘作新. 分形理论及其在土壤空间变异研究中的应用. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(5): 1351-1358.]

[25] Xie Xianhong, Cui Yuanlai, Cai Xueliang. On fractal description of ponds distribution in irrigation system. Advancesin Water Science, 2007, (6): 858-863. [谢先红, 崔远来, 蔡学良. 灌区塘堰分布分形描述. 水科学进展, 2007, (6):858-863.]

[26] Wang Jinglei, Sun Jingsheng, Huang Xiuqiao et al. Fractal analysis of spatial structure of irrigation stations networkbased on crop water requirement in Henan Province. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2008, (2): 6-10. [王景雷, 孙景生, 黄修桥. 河南省灌溉试验站网空间结构的分形分析. 农业工程学报, 2008, (2):6-10.]

[27] Liu Bingjun, Shao Dongguo, Shen Xinping et al. Fractal features of irrigation canal system in irrigation district.Transactions of The Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, (12): 56-59. [刘丙军, 邵东国, 沈新平. 灌区灌溉渠系分形特征研究. 农业工程学报, 2005, (12): 56-59.]

[28] Skubalska-Rafajlowicz E. A new method of estimation of the box-counting dimension of multivariate objects usingspace-filling curves. Nonlinear Analysis 2005, 63(5-7): 1281-1287.

[29] Amer M E, Heo M S, Brooks S L et al. Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographsusing fractal and particles count analyses. Imaging Sci. Dent., 2012, 42(1): 5-12.

[30] Han Jie, Lu Guihua. Research on the vector box-counting algorithm in fractal dimension measurement. Journal ofImage and Graphics, 2008, (3): 525-530. [韩杰, 陆桂华. 测量分维的矢量计盒算法研究. 中国图象图形学报, 2008,(3): 525-530.]

[31] Zhu Yongqing, Li Zhanbin, Lu Kexin et al. Relationship between fractal dimensions of watershed topographycharacteristics and grid cell size. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2005, (3): 333-338. [朱永清, 李占斌, 鲁克新等.地貌形态特征分形信息维数与像元尺度关系研究. 水利学报, 2005, (3): 333-338.]

[32] Raff D A, Ramirez J A, Smith J L. Hill slope drainage development with time: A physical experiment.Geomorphology, 2004, 62(3/4): 169-180.

[1]	许志桦,刘开智. 回归后香港城市发展的尺度重组：以广深港高速铁路香港段项目的规划过程为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 253-265.
[2]	张结,周忠发,汪炎林,潘艳喜,薛冰清,张昊天,田衷珲. 短时间高强度旅游活动下洞穴CO₂的变化特征及对滴水水文地球化学的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1687-1701.
[3]	谢富胜,巩潇然. 资本积累驱动下不同尺度地理空间的不平衡发展——史密斯马克思主义空间理论探讨[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1407-1420.
[4]	刘思婧,李国旗,金凤君. 中国物流集群的量化甄别与发育程度评价[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1540-1555.
[5]	侯文娟,高江波,戴尔阜,彭韬,吴绍洪,王欢. 基于SWAT模型模拟乌江三岔河生态系统产流服务及其空间变异[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(7): 1268-1282.
[6]	陈永林,谢炳庚,张爱明,柴超前. 不同尺度下交通对空间流动性的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(6): 1162-1172.
[7]	胡宪洋,保继刚. 消费转型背景下度假型旅游地时空修复——基于三亚海棠湾的案例研究[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(12): 2452-2467.
[8]	李勤,张强,黄庆忠,史培军. 中国气象农业非参数化综合干旱监测及其适用性[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(1): 67-80.
[9]	张东良,兰波,杨运鹏. 不同时间尺度的阿尔泰山北部和南部降水对比研究[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(9): 1569-1579.
[10]	黄麟,郑瑜晗,肖桐. 中国县域尺度生态保护的地域分异及其适宜性[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1305-1315.
[11]	彭建,胡晓旭,赵明月,刘焱序,田璐. 生态系统服务权衡研究进展：从认知到决策[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 960-973.
[12]	王微恒,朱会义. 中国省域农户土地经营规模与地区专业化实证分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(2): 269-278.
[13]	王增利,刘学军,陆娟. 入室盗窃多尺度地理因子分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(2): 329-340.
[14]	戚伟,赵美风,刘盛和. 1982-2010年中国县市尺度流动人口核算及地域类型演化[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(12): 2131-2146.
[15]	董南,杨小唤,蔡红艳,黄栋. 人口密度格网尺度适宜性评价方法研究——以宣州区乡村区域为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(12): 2310-2324.

基于分形理论的灌溉水有效利用系数空间尺度变异

Fractal-based Effective Utilization Coefficient of Irrigation Water Space Scale Variability

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10