地理学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (2): 189-200.doi: 10.11821/xb201202005

• 城市与区域发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国大都市新移民的住房模式与影响机制

李志刚   

  1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院, 广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室, 广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-10 修回日期:2011-05-06 出版日期:2012-02-20 发布日期:2012-02-20
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(07JZD0025,11JZD028); 国家自然科学基金项目(40971095,41130747); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金; ESRC/DFID 项目(RES-167-25-0448)

Housing Conditions, Patterns and Mechanisms of Second Generation Migrants in Urban China: A Case Study of Six Large Cities

LI Zhigang   

  1. School of Geography and Planning, and Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • Received:2011-01-10 Revised:2011-05-06 Online:2012-02-20 Published:2012-02-20
  • Supported by:
    ThisArticle is Part of the Chinese Ministry of Education's Key Project for Philosophy and Social Science Research,No.07JZD0025, No.11JZD0028; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40971095, No.41130747;Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; ESRC/DFID, No.RES-167-25-0448

摘要: 利用在广州、东莞、沈阳、成都、杭州、郑州6 市进行配额抽样调查(2008-2009 年) 所获得的3168 份问卷,采用Logistic 回归分析等计量方法,研究快速城市化下中国大都市“新移民”的住房状况、模式与机制。研究表明,城市新移民已经成为一个日趋分化的复合群体,可分为劳力型移民、智力型移民、投资型移民三类,三类新移民住房状况存在较大差异。总体上,新移民人均住房面积为20.69 m2,其中智力型新移民的人均住房面积最高(24.87 m2/人),劳力型新移民的最低(16.26 m2/人)。就住房设施条件而言,新移民的设施指数为0.35,水平较低;其中投资型新移民的设施条件最好,智力型新移民的设施条件次之,劳力型新移民最差。经过多年市场化和户籍制度改革,社会经济要素对于新移民住房模式(购房或租房)的影响越来越大,但当前各类新移民的住房模式主要由制度因素(户口) 所决定,职业因素对新移民住房模式的影响尚不显著。不过,职业对新移民租房的类型选择具有较大影响。此外,影响新移民住房设施水平的主要因素包括户口、收入水平、教育水平、婚姻状况、年龄和新移民类型等多个方面,其中户口仍是决定性因素。

关键词: 新移民, 住房, 六市, 中国

Abstract: With a database based on 3168 copies of questionnaires collected from six Chinese cities of Guangzhou, Dongguan, Shenyang, Chengdu, Hangzhou and Zhengzhou, this study examines housing conditions, patterns and determinants of second-generation migrants of urban China. With a series of quantitative analysis, it is found that three types of Chinese new migrants, labor migrants, intellectual migrants, and investor migrants have different housing conditions. For instance, the average housing area of new migrants is about 20.69 sq. m., while that of the intellectual migrants is the biggest (24.87 sq. m.) and that of the labor migrants is the smallest (16.26 sq. m.). In terms of the quality of housing facilities, the score of the facility index for the new migrants in general is by no means high, about 0.35. Moreover, investor migrants hold the best facilities, while labor migrants hold the worst, and intellectual migrants is in between. It is indicated that housing conditions of new migrants are largely differentiated. Second, after three decades of market reform, housing conditions and patterns of new migrants are still mainly determined by institutional factors such as hukou. In addition, housing facility qualities are mainly influenced by such factors as hukou status, income, educational background, marriage, age and migrant types, and hukou is the major determinant for the housing facility quality of second generation migrants.

Key words: second generation migrants, housing, six large cities, China