中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制

doi:10.11821/xb201110008

地理学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10): 1379-1389.doi: 10.11821/xb201110008

中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制

刘彦随^1,2, 刘玉^1,2, 陈玉福^1,2

1. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2011-03-02 修回日期:2011-09-05 出版日期:2011-10-20 发布日期:2011-10-20
作者简介:刘彦随(1965-), 男, 汉族, 陕西绥德人, 研究员, 博士后, 博士生导师, 中国地理学会会员(S110005331M), 研究方向为土地利用、区域农业与农村发展。E-mail: liuys@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41130748; 41101162); 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCX2-EW-304)

Territorial Multi-functionality Evaluation and Decision-making Mechanism at County Scale in China

LIU Yansui^1,2, LIU Yu^1,2, CHEN Yufu^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2011-03-02 Revised:2011-09-05 Online:2011-10-20 Published:2011-10-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41130748; No.41101162; Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.KZCX2-EW-304

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地域功能具有明显的空间异质性和时间变异性。随着工业化、城镇化快速发展，地域空间的分异性与人地系统的多样性不断增强，地域功能及其发展定位呈现多元化趋势。本文通过构建地域多功能性评价指标体系与指数分析模型，开展了中国县域尺度经济发展、粮食生产、社会稳定、生态保育功能及其综合功能的分级评判研究。结果表明：经济发展功能一级区主要分布在珠江三角洲、长江三角洲、京津冀都市圈等东部沿海发达地区和中西部大城市周边地区；粮食生产功能一级区主要分布在东北平原、黄淮海平原、四川盆地、湖北中部及湖南东部等平原集中分布区；社会保障功能则大致由沿海到内地、由北到南逐渐减弱；生态保育功能一级区集中分布在东北地区和秦岭—淮河一线以南地区；将各单项功能进行县域尺度耦合，评价了各县域的综合功能强度，划分出综合功能强势区和弱势区，探讨了强化县域主导功能与优化生产要素配置的财政转移支付、生态补偿、政绩考核等创新机制和政策，为统筹区域发展和提升县域竞争力提供决策依据。

关键词: 地域多功能性, 主导功能, 决策机制, 县域绩效考核, 中国

Abstract: Territorial function in various regions has a significant spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability. With the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization as well as enhancement of geographic differentiation and diversity of man-earth areal system, territorial functions and regional development orientations has shown an increasingly strong trend towards diversification. Based on the definition of territorial dominant functions at the county level and the building of multi-functionality evaluation index system and index analysis model, this paper evaluates and grades the functions of economic development, food security, social stability, environmental protection and comprehensive function. The results are obtained as follows economy-oriented functional areas are mainly distributed in eastern coastal developed areas and peripheral areas of the metropolitan regions, such as Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta and Beijing-Tianjin-Ji region. Grain-oriented functional areas are mainly distributed in the Northeast China Plain, the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, Sichuan Basin, central Hubei, eastern Hunan and other regions covered by a large area of plain. The social security function indexes are gradually weakened from coastal to inland areas and from north to south; Eco-conservation areas are concentrated in the Northeast China and southern Qinling Mountain-Huaihe River Line. Then based on the coupling of each dominant function and the evaluation of composite function at the county level, study areas are divided into two types: areas with strong function and areas with weak function. Finally, this paper explores the innovation mechanisms and favorable policies to enhance the dominant function of each county and optimize the allocation of production factors, including the financial transfer payment, ecological compensation, and government performance assessment, which provide a scientific guidance for regional harmony development and sustainable growth of county competitive power.

Key words: territorial multifunctions, dominant function, development position, decision-making mechanism, achievement examining of county government, China

刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.

LIU Yansui, LIU Yu, CHEN Yufu. Territorial Multi-functionality Evaluation and Decision-making Mechanism at County Scale in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.

参考文献

[1] Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Zhen Lin et al. Objective, progress and methodology of spatial function zoning. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(3): 561-570. [谢高地, 鲁春霞, 甄霖等. 区域空间功能分区的目标、进展与方法. 地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 561-570.]

[2] Cai Yunlong, Wang Yong, Li Yuping. Study on changing relationship of demand and supply of cultivated land in China. China Land Science, 2009, 23(3): 11-18. [蔡运龙, 汪涌, 李玉平. 中国耕地供需变化规律研究. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(3): 11-18.]

[3] Long Hualou, Liu Yansui, Zou Jian. Assessment of rural development types and their rurality in eastern coastal China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 64(4): 426-434. [龙花楼, 刘彦随, 邹健. 中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 426-434.]

[4] Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Ceographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570. [刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.]

[5] Lu Dadao, Fan Jie. Regional Development in China in 2050. Beijing: Science Press, 2009. [陆大道, 樊杰. 2050: 中国的区域发展. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.]

[6] Wang Qiang, Wu Shidai, Li Yongshi et al. The application of major function oriented zoning in Fujian province. Acta Ceographica Sinica, 2009, 64(6): 725-735. [王强, 伍世代, 李永实等. 福建省域主体功能区划分实践. 地理学报, 2009, 64(6): 725-735.]

[7] Zhen Lin, Cao Shuyan, Wei Yunjie et al. Land use functions: Conceptual framework and application for China. Resources Science, 2009, 31(4): 544-551.[甄霖, 曹淑艳, 魏云洁等. 土地空间多功能利用: 理论框架及实证研究. 资源科学, 2009, 31(4): 544-551.]

[8] Liu Yanhua, Zheng Du, Ge Quansheng et al. Problems on the research of comprehensive regionalization in China. Geographical Research, 2005, 24(3): 311-329. [刘燕华, 郑度, 葛全胜等. 关于开展中国综合区划研究若干问题的认识. 地理研究, 2005, 24(3): 311-329.]

[9] Hu Xuwei. Evolution and prospect of China's regional planning. Acta Ceographica Sinica, 2006, 26(6): 585-592. [胡序威. 中国区域规划的演变与展望. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6): 585-592.]

[10] Fan Jie. The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China. Acta Ceographica Sinica, 2007, 62(4): 339-350. [樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础. 地理学报, 2007, 62(4): 339-350.]

[11] Liu Yansui, Zhang Fugang, Zhang Yingwen. Appraisal of typical rural development models during rapid urbanization in the eastern coastal region of China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2009, 19(5): 557-567.

[12] Fu B J, Zhao W W, Chen L D et al. Eco-hydrological effects of landscape pattern change. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2005, 1(1): 25-32.

[13] Zhu Chuangeng, Qiu Fangdao, Ma Xiaodong et al. The theories and methods of major function regionalization. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(2): 136-141. [朱传耿, 仇方道, 马晓冬等. 地域主体功能区划理论与方法的初步研究. 地理科学, 2007, 27(2): 136-141.]

[14] Chu Bo, Jin Fengjun. Integrated function zoning: Taking Northeast China as a case. Progress in Geography, 2007, 26 (6): 68-77. [楚波, 金凤君. 综合功能区划的区域实践: 以东北地区为例. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(6): 68-77.]

[15] Fang Zhongquan, Ding Sibao. Principal function area division and innovation of regional planning in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2008, 28(4): 483-487. [方忠权, 丁四保. 主体功能区划与中国区域规划创新. 地理科学, 2008, 28 (4): 483-487.]

[16] Xia Zhengnong, Chen Zhili, Chao Feng et al. Cihai. Shanghai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House, 2009. [夏征农, 陈至立, 巢峰等. 辞海. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 2009.]

[17] Liu Yansui, Chen Baiming. The study framework of land use/cover change based on sustainable development in China. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(3): 324-330. [刘彦随, 陈百明. 中国可持续发展问题与土地利用/覆被变化研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(3): 324-330.]

[18] Barkmann J, Helming K M. Multifunctional landscapes: towards an analytical framework for sustainability assessment of agriculture and forestry in Europe. Fifth Framework Programme, 1998-2002. Thematic Programme: Environment and Sustainable Development, 93.

[19] Hubert W, Dalchowa C, Glemnitz M et al. Indicators for multifunctional land use-Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecol. Indic., 2006, 6(1): 238-249.

[20] Peter K, Annandale D, Bailey J. Integrated economic and environmental planning in Asia: A review of progress and proposals for policy reform. Progr. Plann., 2003, 59(4): 233-315.

[21] Ding Sibao. Some basic theoretical issues faced with plan of essential function region system. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2009, 29(4): 587-592. [丁四保. 中国主体功能区划面临的基础理论问题. 地理科学, 2009, 29(4): 587-592.]

[22] Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Leng Yunfa et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(2): 189-196. [谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 189-196.]

[23] Costanza R, d'arge R, de Groot R et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and nature capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.

[24] Jia Yanhong, Zhao Jun, Nan Zhongren et al. The application of Entropy-right method to the study of ecological security evaluation of grassland: A case study at the ecological security evaluation of grassland to pastoral area of Gansu. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2007, 21(1): 17-21. [贾艳红, 赵军, 南忠仁等. 熵权法在草原生态安全评价研究中的应用: 以甘肃牧区为例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2007, 21(1): 17-21.]

[25] Ou Xiangjun, Zhen Feng, Qin Yongdong et al. Study on compression level and ideal impetus of regional urbanization: The case of Jiangsu Province. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(5): 993-1002. [欧向军, 甄峰, 秦永东等. 区域城市化水平综合测度及其理想动力分析: 以江苏省为例. 地理研究, 2008, 27(5): 993-1002.]

[26] Liu Dong, Feng Zhiming, Yang Yanzhao. Evaluation of China's material-based development using GIS: from county to province level. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(7): 1234-1245. [刘东, 封志明, 杨艳昭. 基于GIS 的中国物质积累基础评价:从分县到分省. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(7): 1234-1245.]

[27] LIU Yansui, LI Yurui. Spatio-temporal coupling relationship between farmland and agricultural labor changes at county level in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(12): 1607-1617. [刘彦随, 李裕瑞. 中国县域耕地与农业劳动力变化的时空耦合关系. 地理学报, 2010, 65(12): 1607-1617.]

[28] David M. An assessment of surface and zonal models of population. International Journal of Geographical Information . Systems, 1996, 10(8): 973-989.

[29] Ma Ronghua, Pu Yingxia, Ma Xiaodong. Spatial Association Patterns from GIS Database. Beijing: Science Press, 2007: 97. [马荣华, 蒲英霞, 马晓冬. GIS空间关联模式发现. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 97.]

中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制

Territorial Multi-functionality Evaluation and Decision-making Mechanism at County Scale in China

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[2]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.
[3]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[4]	葛全胜, 朱会义. 两千年来中国自然与人文地理环境变迁及启示[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 3-14.
[5]	张兴航, 张百平, 王晶, 余付勤, 赵超, 姚永慧. 中国南北过渡带东段样带植被序列与气候分界问题[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 30-43.
[6]	李哲, 丁永建, 陈艾姣, 张智华, 张世强. 1960—2019年西北地区气候变化中的Hiatus现象及特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1845-1859.
[7]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 周亮, 王旭峰, 李振亚, 庞素菲, 颉斌斌. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1948-1965.
[8]	敖荣军, 常亮. 基于结构方程模型的中国县域人口老龄化影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1572-1584.
[9]	宋周莺, 祝巧玲. 中国边境地区的城镇化格局及其驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1603-1616.
[10]	马春玥, 买买提·沙吾提, 姚杰, 古丽努尔·依沙克. 1950—2015年中国棉花生产时空动态变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1699-1710.
[11]	郑景云, 张学珍, 刘洋, 郝志新. 过去千年中国不同区域干湿的多尺度变化特征评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1432-1450.
[12]	陶泽兴, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 1963—2018年中国垂柳和榆树开花始期积温需求的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1451-1464.
[13]	瞿诗进, 胡守庚, 李全峰. 中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553.
[14]	魏素豪, 李晶, 李泽怡, 宗刚. 中国农业竞争力时空格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300.
[15]	王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 史晨怡. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.