Please wait a minute...
 
引用检索 快速检索 DOI 高级检索
地理学报  2011, Vol. 66 Issue (7): 953-960    DOI: 10.11821/xb201107008
  土壤与水文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
水电开发对河流水沙特性影响的综合评价方法
刘新有1,2, 何大明1
1. 云南大学亚洲国际河流中心、云南省国际河流与跨境生态安全重点实验室, 昆明 650091;
2. 云南省水文水资源局, 昆明 650106
A Comprehensive Assessment Method of Hydropower Development Impact on Runoff and Sediment Change
LIU Xinyou1,2, HE Daming1
1. Asian International Rivers Center, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China;
2. Yunnan Bureau of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Kunming 650106, China
全文: PDF(729 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 选取已连续25 年大规模水电开发的澜沧江为研究对象,建立了河流水沙特性受影响程度评价指标体系及指标回归还原模型,并采用层次分析法和因子分析法相结合的赋权方法确定指标权重;借鉴“边际效益”原理,结合基于河流水沙自然变幅确立的指标评价标准,建立了各指标受影响程度定量评价模型。利用所建立的方法与模型,综合定量评价了澜沧江水沙特性的受影响程度,结果表明:澜沧江水电开发以来(1986-2007 年),河流水沙特性总体受影响程度等级为很小的年数占72.7%,为较小的年数占18.2%,为一般的年数占9.1%,输沙受影响程度远大于径流;水沙特性受影响的变化过程呈“U”形,其主要原因是在漫湾水电站运行与大朝山水电站建设并存期,库区拦沙作用与电站施工增沙作用使输沙趋于平衡。本研究,为后续相关研究提供方法借鉴,为评估水电开发对澜沧江水沙特性影响提供新的依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 水电开发河流水沙特性评价方法澜沧江    
Abstract:The rivers in Southwest China are the major base for large-scale hydropower development, and its change and responses of sediment and runoff are quite complicated. The assessment of the change and response has been the focus topics for the cascade hydropower dams building. In this paper, the Lancang River, which has 25 years' large-scale hydropower development, was chosen as a study case for establishing the affected evaluation indexes system of runoff and sediment and the reduction model of indexes, determining the indexes weight by AHP and factor analysis method, and setting up the indexes affected level evaluation models using the "marginal efficiency" principle. After the assessment of runoff and sediment change under the cascade development in Lancang River based on these methods and the model mentioned above, the results are obtained as follows. (1) During the 30 years of the hydropower development from 1986 to 2007, the impact of sediment transport affected by the cascade development is much greater than that of runoff change; 72.7% of the years with "very low" impact level of sediment transport change, 18.2% with "low" level, and 9.1% with "average" level. (2) The change process of runoff and sediment level affected presents a "U"-shaped pattern of "high-low-high" under the disturbing Manwan dam running and Dachaoshan dam building, which indicates a balance of sediment change due to the joint effect resulting from sediment reduction by Manwan reservoir and sediment increase by the Dachaoshan dam building.
Key wordshydropower development    the features of runoff and sediment    evaluation method    Lancang River
收稿日期: 2011-03-02      出版日期: 2011-09-07
基金资助:

国家科技部科技基础性工作专项(2008FY110300)

通讯作者: 何大明, 教授,博导, 中国地理学会会员(S110000355M), 主要从事国际河流、跨境生态安全等研究。E-mail: dmhe@ynu.edu.cn     E-mail: dmhe@ynu.edu.cn
作者简介: 刘新有(1981-), 湖南邵阳人, 工程师, 博士生, 主要从事水文水资源与跨境生态安全研究。E-mail: lxy73320@163.com
引用本文:   
刘新有, 何大明. 水电开发对河流水沙特性影响的综合评价方法[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(7): 953-960.
LIU Xinyou, HE Daming. A Comprehensive Assessment Method of Hydropower Development Impact on Runoff and Sediment Change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(7): 953-960.
链接本文:  
http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/10.11821/xb201107008      或      http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/Y2011/V66/I7/953
[1] Zhang Guobao. Developing Green Energy and Facilitating Hydropower Development: The 100 Years of Hydropower inChina. Beijing: Chinese Electricity Press, 2010: Preface. [张国宝. 发展清洁能源, 加快水电发展: 中国水电100 年. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2010: 序.]



[2] Yu Xuezhong, Li Chong, Tang Wanlin. Green Hydropower and Low Impact Hydropower Certification Criteria. Beijing:Science Press, 2006: Preface. [禹雪中, 李翀, 唐万林. 绿色水电与低影响水电认证标准. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006: 前言.]



[3] Wang Guihua, Fang Qinhua, Zhang Luoping et al. Valuing the effects of hydropower development on watershed ecosystemservices. Coastal and Shelf Science, 2010, 86: 363-368.



[4] Liu Changming, Liu Xiaoyan. Healthy river: Essence and indicators. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(7): 683-692. [刘昌明, 刘晓燕. 河流健康理论初探. 地理学报, 2008, 63(7): 683-692.]



[5] He Daming, Feng Yan, Gan Shu et al. Transboundary hydrological effects of hydropower dam construction on the LancangRiver. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(suppl.): 16-24.



[6] Lu Xixi, Wang Jianjun, Carl Grundy-Warr. Are the Chinese dams to be blamed for the lower water levels in the LowerMekong?//Kummu M. Modern Myths of the Mekong. Helsinki:Water & Development Publications, 2008: 39-51.



[7] Kummu M, LU X X, Wang J J et al. Basin-wide sediment trapping efficiency of emerging reservoirs along the Mekong.Geomorphology, 2010, 119: 181-197.



[8] Matti Kummu, Olli Varis. Sediment-related impacts due to upstream reservoir trapping, the Lower Mekong River.Geomorphology, 2007, 85: 275-293.



[9] Lu X X, Siew R Y. Water discharge and sediment flux changes over the past decades in the Lower Mekong River: Possibleimpacts of the Chinese dams. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2006, 10: 181-195.



[10] Fu Kaidao, He Daming, Li Shaojuan. Response of downstream sediment to water resource development in mainstream ofthe Lancang River. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(suppl.): 119-126.



[11] Fu Kaidao, He Daming. Analysis and prediction of sediment trapping efficiencies of the reservoirs in the mainstream ofthe Lancang River. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(suppl.2): 134-140.



[12] Fu Kaidao, He Daming, Chen Wu et al. Impacts of dam constructions on the annual distribution of sediment inLancang-Mekong River basin. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(l): 14-21. [傅开道, 何大明, 陈武等. 电站建设对澜沧江—湄公河泥沙年内分配的影响. 地理学报, 2007, 62(1): 14-21.]



[13] Huang Ying, Liu Xinyou. Impact of hydropower development on annual runoff and sediment transport distribution.Advances inWater Science, 2010, 21(3): 385-391. [黄英, 刘新有. 水电开发对河流水沙年内分配的影响分析方法. 水科学进展, 2010, 21(3): 385-391.]



[14] Yao H R, Cui B S. The effect of Land use and its change on soil erosion of the Lancang River watershed in YunnanProvince. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2006, 26(8): 1362-1371. [姚华荣, 崔保山. 澜沧江流域云南段土地利用及其变化对土壤侵蚀的影响. 环境科学学报, 2006, 26(8): 1362-1371.]



[15] Zhou Huizhong. Microeconomics. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 1999: 110-120. [周惠中. 微观经济学.上海: 上海人民出版社, 1999: 110-120.]
[1] 宋静宜, 傅开道, 苏斌, 黄启胜, 黄江成, 张继来. 澜沧江水系底沙重金属含量空间分布及其污染评价[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(3): 389-397.
[2] 曾红伟, 李丽娟. 澜沧江及周边流域TRMM 3B43 数据精度检验[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(7): 994-1004.
[3] 顾世祥, 何大明, 崔远来, 李远华. 近50多年来澜沧江流域农业灌溉需水的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(11): 1355-1362.
[4] 段春青; 刘昌明; 陈晓楠; 柳文华; 郑红星. 区域水资源承载力概念及研究方法的探讨[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(1): 82-90.
[5] 傅开道, 何大明, 陈武, 叶长青, 李运刚. 电站建设对澜沧江—湄公河 泥沙年内分配的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(1): 14-21.
[6] 徐勇,田均良,沈洪泉,刘普灵. 生态重建模式的评价方法——以黄土丘陵区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 621-628.
[7] 陈丽晖, 何大明. 澜沧江-湄公河水电梯级开发的生态影响[J]. 地理学报, 2000, (5): 577-586.
[8] 甘淑,张军,张佩芳. 澜沧江流域山区土地覆盖多级遥感分类方法研究[J]. 地理学报, 1999, (S1): 133-138.
[9] 范业正. 澜沧江—湄公河次区域能源分布及配置[J]. 地理学报, 1999, (S1): 110-118.
[10] 李丽娟. 澜沧江水环境质量评价与成因分析[J]. 地理学报, 1999, (S1): 127-132.
[11] 唐海行. 澜沧江—湄公河流域资源环境与可持续发展[J]. 地理学报, 1999, (S1): 101-109.
[12] 黄勇. 江河流域开发模式与澜沧江可持续发展研究[J]. 地理学报, 1999, (S1): 119-126.
[13] 唐川,朱静. 澜沧江中下游滑坡泥石流分布规律与危险区划[J]. 地理学报, 1999, (S1): 84-92.
[14] 陈丽晖,何大明. 澜沧江—湄公河流域整体开发的前景与问题研究[J]. 地理学报, 1999, (S1): 55-64.
[15] 尤联元. 澜沧江流域河流泥沙发展趋势初步研究[J]. 地理学报, 1999, (S1): 93-100.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2013 《地理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发