小尺度环境地形认知与空间行为的关系分析——以南京大学浦口校区为例

doi:10.11821/xb201106011

地理学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (6): 821-830.doi: 10.11821/xb201106011

小尺度环境地形认知与空间行为的关系分析——以南京大学浦口校区为例

蒋志杰¹, 张捷¹, 李丽¹, 聂守宏²

1. 南京大学地理与海洋科学学院, 南京 210093;
2. 南京大学金陵学院, 南京 210089

收稿日期:2010-08-19 修回日期:2010-12-24 出版日期:2011-06-20 发布日期:2011-08-06
通讯作者: 张捷, 教授, 中国地理学会会员(S110001858M)。E-mail: jiezhang@nju.edu.cn E-mail:jiezhang@nju.edu.cn
作者简介:蒋志杰(1974), 博士生, 主要研究领域: 行为地理学。E-mail: jiangzhijie740219@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40871072)

Research on Interactive Relationship between Terrain Cognition and Spatial Behavior in Small-Scale Environment: A Case Study of Pukou Campus in Nanjing University

JIANG Zhijie¹, ZHANG Jie¹, LI Li¹, NIE Shouhong²

1. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
2. Jingling College, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210089, China

Received:2010-08-19 Revised:2010-12-24 Online:2011-06-20 Published:2011-08-06
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40871072

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地形认知与空间行为间的交互影响是重要的人地关系,也是行为地理学近期重视的课题,但相关研究甚少。为考察日常活动中的上述交互作用,文章选择南大浦口校园为案例区,在预研究基础上,采用分层比例抽样,分别抽取认知与行为样本,并运用言语描述和草图方法获得被试的认知与行为数据。随后,通过绘制公共地形认知与行为地图及地理环境编码等定性方法,同时使用空间叠置与缓冲区及偏相关定量分析方法,得到以下结论：① 被试在认知地图中已编码了地形高程的等级秩序,基本认知了研究区的地形空间格局。② 校园行为节点以必要性活动场所为主,自发性活动与社会性活动场所为次；必要性活动路径分布于校园南部,呈直线,两端连接生活区和教学区；而自发性活动路径离散分布,连接更多的运动场所和环境景点。③ 地形认知与空间行为存在交互影响,具体表现为：地形认知影响了行为的空间格局,但此影响受行为的动机和效率认知的调控；反之空间行为是影响地形认知的主要因素,其影响受行为的动机与持续时间的调控。④ 宿舍位置是影响地形认知与空间行为交互作用的主要因素,而性别与学科的影响不显著。最后探讨了研究不足及发展方向。

关键词: 地理环境认知, 地形认知, 空间行为, 交互作用, 认知地图, 探路, 人地关系

Abstract: Although the interactive relationship between terrain cognition and spatial behavior plays an important role in human-environment relationships, few studies have explored this issue which has been recently paid more attention in behavioral geography. To examine such relationship in daily activities, the Pukou Campus in Nanjing University is chosen as a study area. On the basis of pre-research, the stratified proportional sampling method is used to obtain the samples in the survey of the terrain cognition and spatial behavior respectively, while sketch mapping and verbal description methods are also employed to collect the data. Then the data were analyzed by using the coding method of the geographical elements and attributes, public maps of terrain cognition and spatial behavior, overlay and buffer analysis, bias correlation. Some conclusions can be drawn as follows: (1) The rank orders of elevation cognition of terrain have been coded in subject's cognitive map, and most parts of spatial pattern of terrain in the case area have been recognized. (2) Most major points of campus activities are correlated with requisite activities, while more minor points of campus activities are in relation to spontaneous activities and social activities. The routes of requisite activities which lined the living area and teaching area are straight-line and distributed in south of the campus. Moreover the routes of spontaneous activities which lined more stadium and landscape are scattered in campus. (3) There is interactive relationship between terrain cognition and spatial behavior. The spatial pattern of behavior is influenced by terrain cognition, but such influence is mediated by the motive and cognition of efficiency. The spatial behavior is among the dominant factors of terrain cognition and vise versa, and its effect is mediated by the motive and period of behavior. (4) It is the location of dorm instead of gender and subject that significantly influences the interactive relationship between terrain cognition and spatial behavior. Finally the insufficiency and future direction of research is discussed.

Key words: geographical environment cognition, terrain cognition, spatial behavior, interactive relationship, way finding, human-environment relationships

蒋志杰, 张捷, 李丽, 聂守宏. 小尺度环境地形认知与空间行为的关系分析——以南京大学浦口校区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(6): 821-830.

JIANG Zhijie, ZHANG Jie, LI Li, NIE Shouhong. Research on Interactive Relationship between Terrain Cognition and Spatial Behavior in Small-Scale Environment: A Case Study of Pukou Campus in Nanjing University[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(6): 821-830.

参考文献

[1] Chai Yanwei, Wang Maojun. Progress of geographical study on consumer behavior in Japan. Acta Geographica Sinica,2004, 59: 167-174. [柴彦威, 王茂军. 日本消费者行为地理学研究进展. 地理学报, 2004, 59: 167-174.]

[2] Nolan J M. "An inconvenient truth" increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases.Environment and Behavior, 2010, 42(5): 643-658.

[3] Basolo V, Steinberg L J, Burby R J. The effects of confidence in government and information on perceived and actualpreparedness for disasters, Joyce Levine, Ana Maria Cruz and Chihyen Huang. Environment and Behavior, 2009, 41(3):338-364.

[4] Meinhold J L, Malkus A J. Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make adifference? Environment and Behavior, 2005, 37(4): 511-532.

[5] Bai Kai, Ma Yaofeng, Li Tianshun et al. An association study on tourists' cognition, perceived value and behavior intentionbased on structural equation model (SEM): A case study of inbound tourists in Xi'an city. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(2): 244-255. [白凯, 马耀峰, 李天顺等. 西安入境旅游者认知和感知价值与行为意图. 地理学报, 2010, 65(2): 244-255.]

[6] Wang Xingzhong, Gao Li. Gentrification and spatial structure of recreational places in big cities. Human Geography, 2008,23(2): 49-55. [王兴中, 高丽. 大城市中产阶层化与商娱场所的空间结构. 人文地理, 2008, 23(2): 49-55.]

[7] Dennis R P, Bhalla M, Gossweile R et al. Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1995, 2(4):409-428.

[8] Creem S H, Gooch A A, Sahm C S et al. Perceiving virtual geographical slant :Action influences perception. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2004, 30(5): 811-821.

[9] Schnall S, Harber K D, Stefanucci J K et al. Social support and the perception of geographical slant. Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology , 2008, 44: 1246-1255.

[10] Huang Xueming. Pukou Campus plan and teaching building and dormitory design in Nanjing University. ArchitecturalJournal, 1996, (8): 34-37. [黄学明. 南京大学浦口校区规划与教学楼学生宿舍楼设计. 建筑学报, 1996, (8): 34-37.]

[11] Wang Haimeng. Landscape and garden environment, humanistic campus: Pukou Campus plan in Nanjing University.Central China Architetural Journal, 2002, 20(2): 76-78. [王海蒙. 山水园林环境. 人文校园——南京大学浦口校区规划.华中建筑, 2002, 20(2): 76-78.]

[12] Deng Zhu. Applied Experimental Psychology. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House, 2006: 45-46. [邓铸. 应用实验心理学. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2006: 112-113.]

[13] Shen Si, Xue Lulu, Liu Yu. Beijing resident's cognitive map distortion and sources analysis based on sketch mappingmethod. Acta Geogrphica Sinica, 2008, 63(6): 625-634. [申思, 薛露露, 刘瑜. 基于手绘草图的北京居民认知地图变形及因素分析. 地理学报, 2008, 63(6): 625-634.]

[14] Luo Changhai, Du Siyun. Study on the feminism perspective in university campus outdoor activity place planning.Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2010, (4): 37-41. [罗长海, 杜思赟. 高校户外活动场所规划中的女性主义视角. 中国园林, 2010, (4): 37-41.]

[15] Lynch K. The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960: 123-134.

[16] Tang Guo'an, Yang Xin. ArcGIS Spatial Analysis Experimental Course. Beijing: Science Press, 2006: 202-212. [汤国安,杨昕. ArcGIS地理信息系统空间分析实验教程. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006: 202-212.]

[17] Chai Yanwei, Yan Yaning, Okomoto Kohei. Development of behavioral geographical reseserch in western: Countries andits recent progress. Human Geography, 2006, 23(6): 49-55. [柴彦威, 颜亚宁, 冈本耕平. 西方行为地理学的研究历程及最新进展. 人文地理, 2006, 23(6): 49-55.]

[18] Peng Danling. General Psychology. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 2004: 212-226. [彭聃龄. 普通心理学. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2004: 212-226.]

[19] G?rling T, B??k A, Lindberg E et al. Is elevation encoding in cognitive maps? Journal of Environmental Psychology,1990, (10): 341-351.

[20] Qi Huangxiong, Chen Lizhang. Study of temporal and spatial characteristics of students'behavior in Hangzhou Xiashahigher education eastern park. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(7): 1281-1290. [祁黄雄, 陈立章.杭州下沙高教东区学生行为时空特征研究. 地理研究, 2010, 29(7): 1281-1290.]

[21] Kweon B, Ellis C D, Lee S W. Large-scale environmental knowledge: investigating the relationship between self-reportedand objectively measured physical environments. Environment and Behavior, 2006, 38(1): 72-91.

小尺度环境地形认知与空间行为的关系分析——以南京大学浦口校区为例

Research on Interactive Relationship between Terrain Cognition and Spatial Behavior in Small-Scale Environment: A Case Study of Pukou Campus in Nanjing University

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王玉明,王瑞康. 城市化时期郊区土地利用结构信息熵上升的原因[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1647-1657.
[2]	周扬,郭远智,刘彦随. 中国县域贫困综合测度及2020年后减贫瞄准[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1478-1493.
[3]	樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 597-607.
[4]	李小云,杨宇,刘毅. 中国人地关系演进及其资源环境基础研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(12): 2067-2088.
[5]	鲁政. 认知地图的空间句法研究[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(10): 1401-1410.
[6]	孙峰华. 基于易学与堪舆学的人地关系和谐论思辨[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(2): 266-282.
[7]	申思, 薛露露, 刘瑜. 基于手绘草图的北京居民认知地图变形及因素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(6): 625-634.
[8]	吴静, 王铮. 2000 年来中国人口地理演变的Agent 模拟分析[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 185-194.
[9]	宋阳, 刘连友, 严平. 风水复合侵蚀研究述评[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(1): 77-88.
[10]	石敏俊, 王涛. 中国生态脆弱带人地关系行为机制模型及应用[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 165-174.
[11]	方创琳. 中国人地关系研究的新进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(7s): 21-32.
[12]	张雷,刘毅. 中国东部沿海地带人地关系状态分析[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(2): 311-319.
[13]	魏明建. 丰富和完善地理学的时空理论——《环境变迁》评介[J]. 地理学报, 2001, 68(1): 113-113.
[14]	姚鲁烽. 中国人口、环境与可持续发展地图集的编制特点[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 67(6): 755-756.
[15]	陈浩. 黄土丘陵沟壑区流域系统侵蚀与产沙关系[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 67(3): 354-363.