三峡库区重庆段生态与环境敏感性综合评价

doi:10.11821/xb201105006

地理学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (5): 631-642.doi: 10.11821/xb201105006

三峡库区重庆段生态与环境敏感性综合评价

刘春霞¹, 李月臣^1,2,3, 杨华¹, 闵婕¹, 王才军¹, 张虹¹

1. 重庆师范大学地理科学学院, GIS应用研究重庆市高校重点实验室, 重庆 400047;
2. 重庆市气象科学研究所, 重庆 401147;
3. 重庆交通大学土木建筑学院, 重庆 400074

收稿日期:2010-11-14 修回日期:2011-02-22 出版日期:2011-05-20 发布日期:2011-05-20
通讯作者: 李月臣(1974-), 男, 博士, 教授。主要从事资源环境遥感与地理信息系统研究。E-mail: liyuechen@cqnu.edu.cn
作者简介:刘春霞(1975-), 女, 硕士, 讲师。主要从事资源环境与生态经济研究。E-mail: liuchunxia_2004@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40801077); 教育部重点项目(209100); 重庆市自然科学基金项目(CSTC,2008BB7367); 重庆市教委科技项目(KJ070811)

RS and GIS-based Assessment for Eco-environmental Sensitivity of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Chongqing

LIU Chunxia¹, LI Yuechen^1,2,3, YANG Hua¹, MIN Jie¹, WANG Caijun¹, ZHANG Hong¹

1. College of Geography Science, Key Laboratory of GIS Application, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, China;
2. Chongqing Institute of Meteorological Science, Chongqing 400047, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering Architecture and Construction, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400047, China

Received:2010-11-14 Revised:2011-02-22 Online:2011-05-20 Published:2011-05-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40801077; Key Scientific Research Projects of the Ministry of Education, No.209100; Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, No.CSTC, 2008BB7367; Science & Technology Research Project of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission, No.KJ070811

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在RS与GIS 技术的支持下，选择研究区比较突出的土壤侵蚀、石漠化、生境和酸雨4 个生态环境要素建立敏感性评价模型与方法，对三峡库区重庆段生态环境敏感性进行综合研究，定量揭示了研究区生态环境敏感性程度及其空间分布规律。研究结果表明：(1) 土壤侵蚀以高度敏感、中度敏感和极敏感为主；东北部是土壤侵蚀最为敏感的区域；土壤侵蚀现状与土壤侵蚀敏感性具有很好的对应关系。(2) 石漠化总体以不敏感为主，其次是高度敏感和中度敏感；高度以上敏感区主要分布东北部地区，中度以上石漠化与石漠化高度和极敏感区具有很好的对应关系。(3) 生境敏感性类型以不敏感为主，其次为高度敏感地区；东北部和南部生境敏感性高，而中西部地区生境敏感性低。(4) 酸雨高度敏感面积和比例最大，其次是中度敏感和轻度敏感区；极敏感区呈块状零星散布、高度敏感区和中度敏感区集中片状分布、轻度敏感和不敏感区沿江河带状分布，部分呈团块状散布。(5) 生态环境敏感性类型以高度敏感为主，其次为中度敏感区和不敏感区；东北部和南部生态环境敏感性高，中西部地区生态环境敏感性低。

关键词: 生态环境敏感性, 土壤侵蚀, 石漠化, 生境, 酸雨, 三峡库区, 重庆

Abstract: Four factors (soil erosion, rocky desertification, bio-inhabitation and acid deposition) are selected to establish the evaluation model of eco-environmental sensitivity by using the integrated approach of GIS and RS in the present study. This paper conducts an integrated research on the eco-environmental sensitivity and reveals its spatial features in a quantitative way. The results are shown as follows. (1) The strong, moderate and extreme sensitivities are the main types of soil erosion sensitivity. The northeastern part of the study area is the most sensitive area of soil erosion sensitivity. The proposed soil erosion sensitivities were found to be consistent with real soil erosion. (2) The proportion of insensitivity area dominates karst rocky desertification, followed by strong and moderate sensitivity. The northeastern and southern parts of the study area are the most sensitive area and the western-central part is not sensitive. The real karst rocky desertification accorded with karst rocky desertification sensitivity. (3) The insensitivity and strong sensitivity are the main types of the sensitivity of bio-inhabitation. The northeastern and southern parts of the study area are the most sensitive area. The bio-inhabitation sensitivities in the central and western parts of the study area are relatively low. (4) The area of strong sensitivity of acid deposition is the biggest, followed by moderate and slight sensitivities. The extremely sensitive areas spread fragmentarily. The moderate and strong sensitive areas are concentrated and present a massive distribution. The slight sensitive and insensitive areas of acid deposition are distributed along the rivers and streams in a belt-shaped pattern. (5) The slight sensitivity of integrated eco-environment sensitivity is the main type in the study area, the insensitivity and moderate sensitivity take a second place. The integrated eco-environment sensitivity in the northeastern and southern parts of the study area is high. The integrated eco-environment sensitivity in the central and western parts of the study area is low.

Key words: sensitivity of eco-environment, soil erosion, karst rocky desertification, habitat, acid deposition, the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing

刘春霞, 李月臣, 杨华, 闵婕, 王才军, 张虹. 三峡库区重庆段生态与环境敏感性综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(5): 631-642.

LIU Chunxia, LI Yuechen, YANG Hua, MIN Jie, WANG Caijun, ZHANG Hong. RS and GIS-based Assessment for Eco-environmental Sensitivity of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Chongqing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(5): 631-642.

参考文献

[1] China National Committee for Terms in Sciences and Technologies.Ecological environment. http://www.cnctst.gov.cn/pages/homepage/result.jsp#. [全国科学技术名词审定委员会.生态环境.http://www.cnctst.gov.cn/pages/homepage/result.jsp#.]

[2] The Natural Conservation Department of the Ministry of Environmental Conservation. Report of Ecological Problems inChina. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1999. [国家环境保护总局自然保护局. 中国生态问题报告. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1999.]

[3] Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke, Miao Hong. China's eco-environmental sensitivity and its spatial heterogeneity. ActaEcologica Sinica, 2000, 20(1): 9-12. [欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究. 生态学报,2000, 20(1): 9-12.]

[4] Liu Kang, Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke et al. Eco-environmental sensitivity and its spatial distribution in Gansu province.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(12): 2712-2718. [刘康, 欧阳志云, 王效科等. 甘肃省生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布. 生态学报, 2003, 23(12): 2712-2718.]

[5] Hornung M, Bull K R, Cresser M et al. The sensitivity of surface waters of Great Britain to acidification predicted fromcatchment characteristics. Environmental Pollution, 1995, 87: 207-214.

[6] Tao Fulu, Feng Zongwei. Terrestrial ecosystem sensitivity to acid deposition in South China. Water, Air & Soil Pollution,2000, 118: 231-243.

[7] Li Yuechen, Liu Chunxia, Zhao Chunyong et al. Assessment and spatial differentiation of sensitivity of soil erosion in theThree Gorges Reservoir Area of Chongqing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(2): 788-796. [李月臣, 刘春霞, 赵纯勇等. 三峡库区(重庆段) 土壤侵蚀敏感性评价及其空间分异特征. 生态学报, 2009, 29(2): 788-796.]

[8] Mitsch William J, Lu Jianjian, Yuan Xingzhong et al. Optimizing ecosystem services in China. Science, 2008, 322(5901):528.

[9] He Longhua, Yang Hongwei, Zhou Xiuping. Geographic information system and the estimation of ecosystem’s relativesensitivity to acid deposition. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 1998, 18(2): 177-180. [何隆华, 杨宏伟, 周修萍. 地理信息系统与生态系统对酸沉降相对敏感性评价. 环境科学学报, 1998, 18(2): 177-180.]

[10] Li Dongmei, Wu Xiaoqing, Yu Deyong et al. Evaluation on eco-environmental sensitivity of Yunnan province. ActaEcologica Sinica, 2008, 28(11): 5270-5278. [李东梅, 吴晓青, 于德永等. 云南省生态环境敏感性评价. 生态学报, 2008,28(11): 5270-5278.]

[11] Ye Xuemei, Hao Jiming, Duan Lei et al. Mopping sensitivity of surface waters to acidification in China. EnvironmentalScience, 2002, 23(1): 16-21. [叶雪梅, 郝吉明, 段雷等. 中国地表水酸化敏感性的区划.环境科学, 2002, 23(1): 16-21.]

[12] Jin Yinghua, Zhao Dongsheng, Yang Qingshan et al. A study on distribution and division of sensitivity to ecological environment in Jilin province. Journal of Northeast Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 2004, 36(2): 68-74. [靳英华, 赵东升, 杨青山等. 吉林省生态环境敏感性分区研究. 东北师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 36(2): 68-74.]

[13] Xiao Rongbo, Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke et al. Sensitivity of rocky desertification and its spatial distribution insouthwestern China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(5): 551-554. [肖荣波, 欧阳志云, 王效科等. 中国西南地区石漠化敏感性评价及其空间分析. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(5): 551-554.]

[14] Dai Huichao, Zheng Tiegang, Liu Defu. Effects of reservoir impounding on key ecological factors in the Three Gorgesregion. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010, 2: 15-24.

[15] Wei Xingping. Ecological safety evaluation of Three Gorges Reservoir Area in Chongqing with thePressure-State-Response model. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(9): 1095-1099. [魏兴萍. 基于PSR 模型的三峡库区重庆段生态安全动态评价. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(9): 1095-1099.]

[16] Jabbar M T, Shi Zhihua, Wang Tianwei. Vegetation change prediction with geo-information techniques in the ThreeGorges Area of China. Pedosphere, 2006, 16(4): 457-467.

[17] Fourniadis I G, Liu J G, Mason P J. Landslide hazard assessment in the Three Gorges Area, China, using ASTER imagery:Wushan-Badong. Geomorphology, 2007, 84: 126-144.

[18] Shao Tian, Zhang Hao, Wu Jinming et al. The ecosystem health assessment of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area(Chongqing section). Research of Environmental Sciences, 2008, 21(2): 99-104. [邵田, 张浩, 邬锦明等. 三峡库区(重庆段) 生态系统健康评价. 环境科学研究, 2008, 21(2): 99-104.]

[19] Rapport D J, Costanza R, McMichael A J. Assessing ecosystem health. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1998, 13:397-402.

[20] Dobson Andy P et al. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation ecology. Science, 1997, 233: 515-524.

[21] Academic Divisions of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The suggestions on strengthening the research on the problems ofecological environment in the Three Gorges Reservior Area. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008, 23(1):58-61. [中国科学院学部. 关于加强三峡库区生态与环境问题及对策研究的建议. 中国科学院院刊, 2008, 23(1):58-61.]

[22] Li Yuechen, Liu Chunxia, Zhao Chunyong et al. Spatialtemporal features of soil and water loss in the Three GorgesReservoir Area of Chongqing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(5): 502-513. [李月臣, 刘春霞, 赵纯勇等. 三峡库区重庆段水土流失的时空格局特征. 地理学报, 2008, 63(5): 502-513.]

[23] Chongqing Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Chongqing Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2008. [重庆市统计局. 重庆统计年鉴(2008). 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2008.]

[24] The Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. SL190-1996 Standards for Classification andGradation of Soil Erosion. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 1997. [中华人民共和国水利部. SL190-1996 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 1997.]

[25] Zhou Fujian, Chen Minghua, Lin Fuxing. The rainfall erosivity index in Fujian Province. Journal of Soil and WaterConservation, 1995, 9(1): 13-18. [周伏建, 陈明华, 林福兴. 福建省降雨侵蚀力指标R 值. 水土保持学报, 1995, 9(1):13-18.]

[26] Yang Zisheng. Soil erosibility factor of sloping cultivated land in the northeast mountain region of Yunnan Province.Journal of Mountain Science, 1999, 17(suppl.): 10-15. [杨子生. 滇东北山区坡耕地土壤可蚀性因子. 山地学报, 1999, 17(增刊): 10-15.]

[27] Yang Zisheng. Study on soil loss equation of cultivated slopeland in northeast mountain region of Yunnan Province.Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1999, 19(1): 1-9. [杨子生. 滇东北山区坡耕地土壤流失方程研究. 水土保持通报, 1999, 19(1): 1-9.]

[28] Zhao Yingshi. Theory and Method of Geo-analyses of Remote Sensing. Beijing: Science Press, 2003. [赵英时. 遥感应用分析原理与方法. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.]

[29] Ye Qiyan, Yang Shuhua, Lu Shugang et al. The analysis on biodiversity and the sensitivity of bioinhabitation in Yuxidistrict. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 13(6): 75-78. [叶其炎, 杨树华, 陆树刚等. 玉溪地区生物多样性及其生境敏感性分析. 水土保持研究, 2006, 13(6): 75-78.]

[30] Trivedi P R. Global Biodiversity. Delphi, India: Authors Press, 2000.

[31] Li Yuechen, Liu Chunxia, Wang Yang et al. The Analysis on the sensitivity of bio-inhabitation in Chongqing. Journal ofChongqing Normal University: Natural Science, 2009, 26(1): 30-34. [李月臣, 刘春霞, 汪洋等. 重庆市生境敏感性评价研究. 重庆师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 26(1): 30-34.]

[32] Zhou Xiuping. Study on the relative sensitivity of the ecosystems in East China to acidic deposition. RuralEco-Environment, 1996, 12(1): 1-5. [周修萍. 我国东部七省生态系统对酸雨沉降的相对敏感性. 农村生态环境, 1996,12(1): 1-5.]

[33] Gao Guodong, Lu Yurong, Li Huaijin. The calculation and distribution of the maximum possible evaporation in China.Acta Geographica Sinica, 1978, 33(2): 102-111. [高国栋, 陆渝蓉, 李怀瑾. 我国最大可蒸发量的计算和分布. 地理学报,1978, 33(2): 102-111.]

[34] Tang Xiaohua, Wang Chunju. Assessment of soil erosion sensitivity in Fujian Province. Journal of Fujian NormalUniversity: Natural Science Edition, 2006, 22(4): 1-4. [汤小华, 王春菊. 福建省土壤侵蚀敏感性评价. 福建师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 22(4): 1-4.]

三峡库区重庆段生态与环境敏感性综合评价

RS and GIS-based Assessment for Eco-environmental Sensitivity of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Chongqing

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱玲玲, 葛华, 董炳江, 杨成刚. 三峡水库175 m蓄水后库尾河段减淤调度控制指标研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 114-126.
[2]	王成, 何焱洲. 重庆市乡村生产空间系统脆弱性时空分异与差异化调控[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1680-1698.
[3]	张学儒, 周杰, 李梦梅. 基于土地利用格局重建的区域生境质量时空变化分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1): 160-178.
[4]	刘文超, 刘纪远, 匡文慧. 陕北地区退耕还林还草工程土壤保护效应的时空特征[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1835-1852.
[5]	梁鑫源, 李阳兵, 邵景安, 刘雁慧, 冉彩虹. 三峡库区山区传统农业生态系统转型[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1605-1621.
[6]	王正雄,蒋勇军,张远嘱,段世辉,刘九缠,曾泽,曾思博. 基于GIS与地理探测器的岩溶槽谷石漠化空间分布及驱动因素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 1025-1039.
[7]	王开泳, 王甫园, 陈田. 行政区划调整的政区位势理论与模型构建——以重庆市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2495-2510.
[8]	汪洋,王力力,祁鹏卫,刘志海. 重庆市主体功能区识别的主导因素与空间稳定性约束机理[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 44-62.
[9]	梁鑫源,李阳兵. 三峡库区规模农地时空变化特征及其驱动机制[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1630-1646.
[10]	王欢,高江波,侯文娟. 基于地理探测器的喀斯特不同地貌形态类型区土壤侵蚀定量归因[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1674-1686.
[11]	钱庆欢,王世杰,白晓永,周德全,田义超,李琴,吴路华,肖建勇,曾成,陈飞. 基于允许流失量和正负地形源汇理论的喀斯特关键带土壤侵蚀研究[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(11): 2135-2149.
[12]	王圆圆, 郭徵, 李贵才, 郭兆迪. 基于广义加性模型估算1979-2014年三峡库区降水及其特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1207-1220.
[13]	钟莉娜, 王军, 赵文武. 多流域降雨和土地利用格局对土壤侵蚀影响的比较分析——以陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 432-443.
[14]	钟建兵, 邵景安, 杨玉竹. 生计多样化背景下种植业非点源污染负荷演变[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1201-1214.
[15]	张引, 杨庆媛, 闵婕. 重庆市新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(5): 817-828.