地理学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (4): 535-548.doi: 10.11821/xb201104010

• 旅游地理 • 上一篇    下一篇

1980-2009 年国内外旅游研究比较

汪德根1,2,3, 陈田1, 王金莲3, 刘昌雪4   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101;
    2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京100049;
    3. 苏州大学旅游系, 苏州215021;
    4. 苏州职业大学教育与人文科学系, 苏州215019
  • 收稿日期:2010-06-21 修回日期:2010-12-24 出版日期:2011-04-20 发布日期:2011-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈田(1958-), 男, 研究员, 博导, 中国地理学会会员(S110005240M), 主要研究方向为旅游地理和城市地理。
  • 作者简介:汪德根(1973-), 男, 博士生, 副教授, 硕士生导师, 主要研究旅游地理和城市旅游。E-mail: wdg713@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC790245)

Comparison of Domestic and Overseas Tourism Research from 1980 to 2009

WANG Degen1,2,3, CHEN Tian1, WANG Jinlian3, LIU Changxue4   

  1. 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Tourism Department of Suzhou University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China;
    4. Education and Human Science Department of Suzhou Vocational University, Suzhou 215019, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2010-06-21 Revised:2010-12-24 Online:2011-04-20 Published:2011-04-20
  • Supported by:

    The Youth Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education, No.10YJC790245

摘要: 选取《地理学报》、《地理科学》、《地理研究》、《Annals of Tourism Research》、《Journal ofTravel Research》和《Tourism Management》6 种国内外权威核心刊物,从载文作者、研究领域、研究方法、研究区域4 个方面,对1980-2009 年国内外旅游研究现状进行比较分析。从1980-1989 年、1990-1999 年和2000-2009 年3 个阶段,比较国内外旅游研究演变特征,研究发现,国内外研究领域演变存在差异性,即国外研究领域演变特征主要表现为“四降四升”,国内则表现为“三降四升”的特征;而研究区域和研究方法的演变特征存在相似性:国内外旅游研究区域均表现为“沙漏型”演变规律,即从全球性的研究缩减到对单个区域的案例研究再扩展到跨区域性/全球性的研究;在研究方法上,国内外采用描述性的定性研究方法呈下降趋势,而采用数理统计和构造模型等定量研究方法呈上升趋势。最后,从研究领域、研究区域、研究方法以及研究挑战4 个方面展望国内旅游研究未来发展趋势。

关键词: 旅游研究, 比较分析, 演变, 国内外, 中国

Abstract: According to six major journals (domestic: Acta Geographica Sinica, Scientia Geographica Sinica, Geographical Research; overseas: Annals of Tourism Research, Journal of Travel Research, Tourism Management), this paper makes the comparison of the status tourism research at home and abroad from 1980 to 2009 based on the author, field of research, method of research and area of research. Then, it compares the evolution of tourism research during three phases (1980-1989, 1990-1999 and 2000-2009). It is shown that in the evolution of research field, there are four declines and four ascensions abroad while three declines and four ascensions domestically. However there is similarity in the evolution of method of research and area of research, indicating the evolution of Hourglass model in area of tourism research at home and abroad, namely, the field of research relates to the global firstly, then reduces to single region and extend to cross-regional or the global lastly. The qualitative method such as description is declining and the quantitative method such as the mathematical statistics and the structural model is ascending at home and abroad. Finally, the paper prospects the trends of tourism research at home and abroad in the future from 4 factors which are field of research, area of research, and method of research and challenge of research.

Key words: tourism research, comparison, evolution, domestic and overseas