国际贸易壁垒对全球生产网络的影响——以中加自行车贸易为例

doi:10.11821/xb201104005

地理学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (4): 477-486.doi: 10.11821/xb201104005

国际贸易壁垒对全球生产网络的影响——以中加自行车贸易为例

高菠阳^1,2, 刘卫东¹, GlenNorcliffe³, 杜超⁴

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所，中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京100101;
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京100049;
3. 约克大学, 多伦多M3J 1L2, 加拿大;
4. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院, 广州510275

收稿日期:2010-07-18 修回日期:2011-03-20 出版日期:2011-04-20 发布日期:2011-04-20
作者简介:高菠阳(1984-), 吉林长春人。中国地理学会会员(S110007732M), 主要从事经济地理与区域发展研究。E-mail: gaoby.06s@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程(KZCX2-YW-345)

Trade Barriers and the Global Production Network: A Case Study of Bicycle Trade between China and Canada

GAO Boyang^1,2, LIUWeidong¹, GLEN Norcliffe³, DU Chao⁴

1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. York University, Toronto M3J 1L2, Canada;
4. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2010-07-18 Revised:2011-03-20 Online:2011-04-20 Published:2011-04-20
Supported by:
Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.KZCX2-YW-345

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 全球生产网络的组织模式和空间特征具有复杂性。国际贸易壁垒作为经济全球化进程中的重要因素，对全球生产网络产生了极为重要的影响。本文以中加自行车贸易为例，结合对我国5 个地区23 家企业的调研资料，探讨了国际贸易壁垒如何影响了全球生产网络的组织模式和空间特征。研究结果显示，近年来关税、反倾销等壁垒对国际贸易影响显著。在国际贸易壁垒的作用下，第三方机构成为全球生产网络的核心组成部分之一，其介入为国际贸易提供了良好的平台和保障。全球生产网络各要素间的流动性也随着第三方机构的介入而不断增强，制造商的关注点逐渐由低成本控制向产品质量管理和劳动力管理等新方向转变。全球生产网络的空间组织形态呈现了新的特点。

关键词: 贸易壁垒, 全球生产网络, 组织模式, 空间特征, 中国, 加拿大

Abstract: In previous researches, the framework of global production network was established based on free trade and neo-liberalism. However, the globe is not flat. Trade barriers broadly exist and deeply influence the economic globalization. In this article, we explore the issue of trade barriers and its impacts on global production networks. We try to sketch a theoretical interpretation of the trading arrangements under trade barriers, and illustrate the argument with material gathered during our recent investigations into the production networks that connect the bicycle industry in China with Canada. Our research shows that: (1) with trade barriers, the traditional network pattern organized by producers and distributors has changed. Third parties, including trade agency, trade show, bank, and so on, took active part in the trading process and became one of the important poles of the global production networks. (2) Originally, the very metaphor of a network seems to allow more flexibility than a chain, although even so, the breaking of connections in a network often viewed as unfortunate in previous research. However, in our research, we found that the production networks linkage are very flexible. The linkages amongst the very actors in the trading systems are frequently negotiated and switched. At the same time, quality control and labor welfare have become more important than cost control. (3) The spatial organization of the global production network shows differently in two aspects. On one hand, the producers are more labor-oriented and market-oriented than before. On the other hand, the third parties intend to gather along financial clusters and services clusters.

Key words: trade barriers, global production network, organization, spatial distribution

高菠阳, 刘卫东, GlenNorcliffe, 杜超. 国际贸易壁垒对全球生产网络的影响——以中加自行车贸易为例[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(4): 477-486.

GAO Boyang, LIUWeidong, GLEN Norcliffe, DU Chao. Trade Barriers and the Global Production Network: A Case Study of Bicycle Trade between China and Canada[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(4): 477-486.

参考文献

[1] Dicken P. Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century. 4th ed. London: Sage, 2003.

[2] Porter M E. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press, 1980.

[3] Porter M E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press, 1985.

[4] Gereffi G. The organisation of buyer-driven global commodity chains: how US retailers shape overseas productionnetworks//Gereffi G, Korzeniewics M//Commodity Chains and Global Development.Westport: Praeger, 1994: 95-122.

[5] Gereffi G. Global production systems and third world development//Stallings B. Global Change, Regional Response: TheNew International Context of Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

[6] Gereffi G. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics,1999, 48: 37-70.

[6] Dicken P, Kelly P, Olds K et al. Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards an analytical framework for the globaleconomy. Global Networks, 2001, (1): 89-112.

[7] LiJian, Ning Yuemin, Wang Mingfeng. Global production networks of computer industry and its development in mainlandChina. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(4): 437-448. [李健, 宁越敏, 汪明峰. 计算机产业全球生产网络分析: 兼论其在中国大陆的发展. 地理学报, 2008, 63(4): 437-448.]

[8] Dicken P, Thrift N. The organization of production and the production of organization: Why business enterprises matter inthe study of geographical industrialization. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 1992, 17(3):279-291.

[9] Henderson J, Dicken P, Hess M et al. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review ofInternational Political Economy, 2002, 3: 436-464.

[10] Borrus M. Left for dead: Asian production networks and the revival of US electronics//The China Circle: Economics andElectronics in the PRC, Hong Kong and Taiwan,Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1997.

[11] Coe N, Hess M, Yeung H et al. Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactionsof the Institute of British Geographers, 2004, 29: 468-484.

[12] Ernst D, Kim L. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, 2002,(31): 1417-1429.

[13] Dicken P. Tangled webs: Transnational production networks and regional integration. Spatial Aspects Concerning: SpatialAspects Concerning Economic Structures, 2005-04.

[14] Coe N, Lee Y. The strategic localization of transnational retailers: The case of Samsung-Tesco in South Korea. EconomicGeography, 2006, 82(1): 61-88.

[15] Hess M. 'Spatial' relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography, 2004, 28(2):165-186.

[16] Wrigley N, Currah A. Globalizing retail and the 'new economy': The organizational challenge of e-commerce for the retailTNCs. Geoforum, 2006, 37(3): 340-351.

[17] Wrigley N, Coe N, Currah A. Globalizing retail: Conceptualizing the distribution-based transnational corporation (TNC).Progress in Human Geography, 2005, 29(4): 437-457.

[18] Heiner Depner, Harald Bathlt. Exporting the German model: The establishment of a new automobile industry cluster inShanghai. Economic Geography, 2005, 81: 53-81.

[19] Liu Weidong, Dicken P. Transnational corporations and 'obligated embeddedness': Foreign direct investment in China'sautomobile industry. Environment and Planning A, 2006, 38(4): 168-182.

[20] Hess M, Coe N. Making connections: Global production networks, standards, and embeddedness in themobile-telecommunications industry. Environment and Planning A, 2006, 38(7): 1205-1227.

[21] Liu Weidong, Peter Dicken, Henry Yeung. The impacts of new information and communication technologies on the spatialorganization of firms: A case study of the Xingwang Industrial Park in Beijing. Geographical Research, 2004, 23(6):833-844. [刘卫东, Peter Dicken, 杨伟聪. 信息技术对企业空间组织的影响: 以诺基亚北京星网工业园为例. 地理研究, 2004, 23(6): 833-844. ]

[22] Tong Xin, Wang Jici. An analysis on the global productive network of the information technology industry. Science andTechnology Review, 1999, (9): 14-16. [童昕, 王缉慈. 硅谷—新竹—东莞: 透视信息技术产业的全球生产网络. 科研管理, 1999, (9): 14-16. ]

[23] Xia Youfu. Technical trade barriers and contemporary international trade. China Industrial Economy, 2001, (5): 14-20. [夏友富. 技术性贸易壁垒体系与当代国际贸易. 中国工业经济, 2001, (5): 14-20.]

[24] www.wto.org/english

国际贸易壁垒对全球生产网络的影响——以中加自行车贸易为例

Trade Barriers and the Global Production Network: A Case Study of Bicycle Trade between China and Canada

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[2]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.
[3]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[4]	葛全胜, 朱会义. 两千年来中国自然与人文地理环境变迁及启示[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 3-14.
[5]	张兴航, 张百平, 王晶, 余付勤, 赵超, 姚永慧. 中国南北过渡带东段样带植被序列与气候分界问题[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 30-43.
[6]	李哲, 丁永建, 陈艾姣, 张智华, 张世强. 1960—2019年西北地区气候变化中的Hiatus现象及特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1845-1859.
[7]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 周亮, 王旭峰, 李振亚, 庞素菲, 颉斌斌. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1948-1965.
[8]	敖荣军, 常亮. 基于结构方程模型的中国县域人口老龄化影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1572-1584.
[9]	宋周莺, 祝巧玲. 中国边境地区的城镇化格局及其驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1603-1616.
[10]	马春玥, 买买提·沙吾提, 姚杰, 古丽努尔·依沙克. 1950—2015年中国棉花生产时空动态变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1699-1710.
[11]	郑景云, 张学珍, 刘洋, 郝志新. 过去千年中国不同区域干湿的多尺度变化特征评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1432-1450.
[12]	陶泽兴, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 1963—2018年中国垂柳和榆树开花始期积温需求的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1451-1464.
[13]	瞿诗进, 胡守庚, 李全峰. 中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553.
[14]	魏素豪, 李晶, 李泽怡, 宗刚. 中国农业竞争力时空格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300.
[15]	王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 史晨怡. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.