基于旅游流的城市群旅游地旅游空间网络结构分析——以珠江三角洲城市群为例

doi:10.11821/xb201102011

地理学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (2): 257-266.doi: 10.11821/xb201102011

基于旅游流的城市群旅游地旅游空间网络结构分析——以珠江三角洲城市群为例

陈浩^1,2, 陆林¹, 郑嬗婷³

1. 安徽师范大学国土资源与旅游学院，安徽师范大学旅游发展与规划研究中心，芜湖241003;
2. 安徽农业大学旅游管理系，合肥230036;
3. 合肥学院旅游系，合肥230601

收稿日期:2010-01-07 修回日期:2010-09-26 出版日期:2011-02-20 发布日期:2011-03-31
通讯作者: 陆林, 安徽芜湖人, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师, E-mail: llin@263.net E-mail:llin@263.net
作者简介:陈浩(1974-), 男, 安徽霍邱人, 博士研究生, 研究方向为旅游管理。E-mail: chenhao0508@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40771059)

The Spatial Network Structure of the Tourism Destinations in Urban Agglomerations Based on Tourist Flow:A Case Study of the Pearl River Delta

CHEN Hao^1,2, LU Lin¹, ZHENG Shanting³

1. Collede of Territorial Resources and Tourism of Anhui Normal University, Center for Tourism Planning and Research of Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241003, Anhui, China;
2. Tourism Management Department of Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei 230036, China;
3. Tourism Department of Hefei University, Hefei 230601, China

Received:2010-01-07 Revised:2010-09-26 Online:2011-02-20 Published:2011-03-31
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.40771059

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着城市化进程的逐步推进，城市群逐渐成为旅游发展赖以依存的区域主体，也必将成为一种特殊尺度类型的旅游目的地。文章基于相关文献的分析，界定了城市群旅游地的概念。在对珠三角旅行社区内线路、区内长途客运、国内(省外) 旅行社赴珠三角及港澳游客实际到达情况分析的基础上，运用网络理论和方法对珠三角城市群网络结构进行了定量研究。结果表明，广州的到达中心性、接近性、中间度数值均较高，也是国内(省外) 游客到珠三角的集散地，在网络中处于中心地位；深圳、珠海由于毗邻香港和澳门，是珠三角城市群区域重要的目的地，同时也是港澳游客进入内地特别是珠三角的重要集散地。其他城市如佛山、东莞两城市以商务旅游为主，惠州、肇庆以生态旅游为特色，而中山、江门则两者兼具的特点。最后构建了珠三角城市群旅游地空间网络结构模式，形成“三级旅游基地、三类旅游区域、三条主要旅游轴线”的空间模式。

关键词: 城市群旅游地, 网络结构, 珠江三角洲

Abstract: With the advance of urbanization process, urban agglomeration has become a regional subject of tourism development and will become a type of special scale tourist destination. Based on the analysis of relevant literature, the article defines the concept of urban agglomeration tourism destination. Besides, based on the analysis of the travel routes inner the Pearl River Delta region, local long-distance passenger transport, domestic (out of Guangdong) travel route to the Pearl River Delta, the actual number of tourists from Hong Kong and Macao into the Pearl River Delta, and using the network theory and method, the article conducts a quantitative research on the tourism network structure of the Pearl River Delta. The results show that the degree of the closeness, reach centrality and intermediate of Guangzhou is higher than those of the others, Guangzhou is also the distribution center of the domestic tourists in the Pearl River Delta, so Guangzhou is the tourism centre of the Pearl River Delta. Bordering Hong Kong and Macao, Shenzhen and Zhuhai are important tourism destinations of the Pearl River Delta, and also the distribution center of Hong Kong and Macao tourists reaching the Mainland. Other cities, such as Foshan and Dongguan are the business tourism destinations, while Huizhou and Zhaoqing are the eco-tourism destinations. Zhongshan and Jiangmen belong to the both types of destinations mentioned above. On this basis, the article builds the tourism network structure model of the Pearl River Delta, presenting the space layout of "three tourist bases, three types of tourism areas, and three main tourist axes".

Key words: tourism destination of urban agglomerations, tourism network structure, the Pearl River Delta

陈浩, 陆林, 郑嬗婷. 基于旅游流的城市群旅游地旅游空间网络结构分析——以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(2): 257-266.

CHEN Hao, LU Lin, ZHENG Shanting. The Spatial Network Structure of the Tourism Destinations in Urban Agglomerations Based on Tourist Flow:A Case Study of the Pearl River Delta[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(2): 257-266.

参考文献

[1] Ye Yuyao, Zhang Hong'ou, Luo Xiaoyun et al. Research progress and evaluation on urban group space. Urban Planning,2005, (4): 83-87. [叶玉瑶, 张虹鸥, 罗晓云等. 中外城镇群体空间研究进展与评述. 城市规划, 2005, (4): 83-87.]

[2] Chen Hao, Lu Lin. The analysis of the tourism spatial structure and optimizing for the Pearl River Delta cities cluster.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2008, 28(1): 113-118. [陈浩, 陆林. 珠江三角洲城市群旅游空间结构与优化分析. 地理科学, 2008, 28(1): 113-118.]

[3] Liu Jun. Social Network Analysis. Bejing: Social Science Academic Press (China), 2004. [刘军. 社会网络分析导论. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2004.]

[4] Luo Jiade. Social Network Analysis. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press (China), 2005. [罗家德. 社会网分析讲义.北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2005.]

[5] Francisco L V. Institutional reform and transboundary cooperation for environmental planning along the UnitedStates-Mexican border [D]. University of Michigan, 2002.

[6] Kathryn Pavlovich. The evolution and transformation of a tourism destination network:the Waitomo Caves, NewZealand. Tourism Management, 2003, 24: 203-216.

[7] Shih Hsin-Yu. Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: An application of network analysis in tourism.Tourism Mangement, 2006, 27: 1029-1039.

[8] Rodolfo Baggio. Network analysis of a tourism destination [D]. The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia,2008

[9] Migu′ensa J I L, Mendesb J F F. Travel and tourism: Into a complex network. Physica A, 2008, 387: 2963-2971.

[10] Dianne Dredge. Policy networks and local organisation of tourism. Tourism Management, 2006, 27: 269-280.

[11] Ross Tinsley, Paul Lynch. Small tourism business networks and destination development. Hospitality Management,2001, 20: 367-378.

[12] Rodolfo Baggio. What network analysis of the www can tell us about the organization of tourism destinations//17thAnnual Conference of the Council for Australian University Tourism and Hospitality education (CAUTHE), 2007:Tourism: Past Achievements, Future Challenges 11-14 February, 2007, Sydney, Australia.

[13] Christof Pforr. Tourism policy in the making: An Australian network study. Annals of Tourism Research, 2006, 33(1):87-108.

[14] Noel Scott, Rodolfo Baggioand, Chris Cooper. Network Analysis and Tourism: From Theory to Practice. ChannelView Publication, 2008.

[15] Chen Xiuqiong, Huang Fucai. Research on tourism spatial structure and its optimization: A network analysis.Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2006, 22(5): 75-80. [陈秀琼, 黄福才. 基于社会网络理论的旅游系统空间结构优化研究. 地理与地理信息科学, 2006, 22(5): 75-80.].

[16] Yang Xingzhu, Gu Chaolin, Wang Qun. Urban tourism flow network structure construction in Nanjing. ActaGeographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 609-620. [杨兴柱, 顾朝林, 王群. 南京市旅游流网络结构构建. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 609-620.]

[17] Yang Xiaozhong, Zhang Jie, Wu Tiehong. Social network analysis and model construction of cross-border tourist areacooperation: A case study of Tiantangzhai in Dabieshan. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(8): 978-988. [杨效忠, 张捷, 乌铁红. 跨界旅游区合作的社会网络分析与模型构建: 以大别山天堂寨为例. 地理学报, 2009, 64(8): 978-988.]

[18] Wu Xinzhi. A study on building the tourism circuit of Wuhan metropolis based on core-periphery theory. Journal ofBeijing International Studies University, 2008, (1): 55-58. [吴信值. 基于核心—边缘理论的武汉城市旅游圈构建研究. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2008, (1): 55-58.]

[19] Chen Xiushan, Zhang Keyun. Regional Economic Theory. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2003: 374-376. [陈秀山, 张可云. 区域经济理论. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003: 374-376.]

[20] Lu Dada. Formation and dynamics of the "Pole-Axis" spatial system. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2002, 22(1):1-6. [陆大道. 关于“点—轴”空间结构系统的形成机理分析. 地理科学, 2002, 22(1): 1-6.]

[21] Lu Dada. Regional Development and Spatial Structure. Beijing: Science Press, 1995: 157-164. [陆大道. 区域发展及其空间结构. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995: 157-164.]

[22] Gunn Clare A. Tourism Planning. New York: Crane Rusak, 1988

[23] Dredge Dianni. Destination place planning and design. Annals of Tourism Research, 1999, 26(4): 772-791.

[24] Johnston R G. Geography and Geographers. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1999. [约翰斯顿R G. 地理学与地理学家.北京: 商务印书馆, 1999.]

[25] Xiao Feng, Zhang Junjiang. Mode of urban groups economic operation. Urban Problems, 1990, (4): 8-12. [肖枫, 张俊江. 城市群体经济运行模式. 城市问题, 1990, (4): 8-12.]

[26] Wu Qiyan. On the characteristic of structure of urban denseregion and its developing mechanism: From urban clusterto megalopolis. Human Geography, 1999, 14(1): 11-16. [吴启焰. 城市密集区空间结构特征及演变机制: 从城市群到大都市带. 人文地理, 1999, 14(1); 11-16.]

[27] Yao Shimou et al. China's Urban Agglomeration. Hefei: China Science and Technology University Press, 1992. [姚士谋等. 中国城市群. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 1992.]

[28] Pearce D. Tourist district in Paris: Structure and functions. Tourism Mangement, 1998, 19(1): 49-65.

[29] Murphy P E. Tourism: A Community Approach. New York: Methuen, 1985: 78-102.

[30] Wall G. The status of recreation studies in Britain. Professional Geographer, 1973, 25(1): 48.

基于旅游流的城市群旅游地旅游空间网络结构分析——以珠江三角洲城市群为例

The Spatial Network Structure of the Tourism Destinations in Urban Agglomerations Based on Tourist Flow:A Case Study of the Pearl River Delta

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	杜志威,李郇. 珠三角快速城镇化地区发展的增长与收缩新现象[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(10): 1800-1811.
[2]	康蕾,马丽,刘毅. 珠江三角洲地区未来海平面上升及风暴潮增水的耕地损失预测[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(9): 1375-1389.
[3]	程佳佳, 王成金. 珠江三角洲集装箱港口体系演化及动力机制[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(8): 1256-1270.
[4]	陈浩, 陆林, 郑嬗婷. 珠江三角洲城市群旅游空间格局演化[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1427-1437.
[5]	杨效忠, 张捷, 乌铁红. 跨界旅游区的组织网络结构与合作模型——以大别山天堂寨为例[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(8): 978-988.
[6]	王开泳, 陈田. 珠江三角洲都市经济区地域构成的判别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(8): 820-828.
[7]	刘小平, 黎夏, 张啸虎, 陈刚强, 李少英, 陈逸敏. 人工免疫系统与嵌入规划目标的城市模拟及应用[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(8): 882-894.
[8]	曹小曙, 林强. 世界城市地铁发展历程与规律[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(12): 1257-1267.
[9]	杨兴柱, 顾朝林 , 王群. 南京市旅游流网络结构构建[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 609-620.
[10]	闫小培, 毛蒋兴, 普军. 巨型城市区域土地利用变化的人文因素分析——以珠江三角洲地区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6): 613-623.
[11]	钱乐祥, 丁圣彦. 珠江三角洲土地覆盖变化对地表温度的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(5): 761-770.
[12]	王姣娥, 金凤君. 中国铁路客运网络组织与空间服务系统优化[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(3): 371-380.
[13]	张文忠,王传胜,吕昕,樊杰. 珠江三角洲土地利用变化与工业化和城市化的耦合关系[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 677-685.
[14]	陈晓宏,陈永勤. 珠江三角洲网河区水文与地貌特征变异及其成因[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(4): 429-436.
[15]	曾凡棠, 林奎, 沈茜, 陈铣成, 谢国樑. 环境决策支持系统的设计及其在水质管理中的应用[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 67(6): 652-660.