城市湿地公园景观健康空间差异研究——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例

doi:10.11821/xb201011013

地理学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (11): 1429-1437.doi: 10.11821/xb201011013

• 生态与环境 • 上一篇

城市湿地公园景观健康空间差异研究——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例

李玉凤, 刘红玉, 曹晓, 郑囡

江苏省环境演变与生态建设重点实验室，南京师范大学地理科学学院，南京210046

收稿日期:2010-05-14 修回日期:2010-07-09 出版日期:2010-11-20 发布日期:2011-01-03
通讯作者: 刘红玉(1963-), 女, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事湿地景观研究 E-mail:pandalee_0826@163.com; Lhy8589@163.coma
作者简介:李玉凤(1985-), 女, 江苏仪征人, 博士研究生, 主要从事湿地生态评价与GIS应用研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40871084; 40701174); 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目; 南京师范大学研究生科研创新计划项

Spatial Differences of Landscape Health in Urban Wetland Parks: A Case Study of Xixi Wetland Park in Hangzhou

LI Yufeng, LIU Hongyu, CAO Xiao, ZHENG Nan

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction; College of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China

Received:2010-05-14 Revised:2010-07-09 Online:2010-11-20 Published:2011-01-03
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40871084;No.40701174; Postgraduates Research Innovation Program in Universities of Jiangsu Province and Nanjing Normal University

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

景观健康研究是生态系统健康的新研究方向，两者区别在于研究尺度的选择。景观健康的标准体现在景观能否可持续发展。作为城市湿地的西溪湿地公园，其可持续性表现在社会经济和生态保护的和谐发展。因此，本文从社会经济和生态保护两方面建立景观健康评价模型，运用GIS 技术使其空间化，揭示景观健康的空间差异性。结果显示：(1) 西溪湿地公园社会经济可持续性和生态可持续性的空间分异明显，社会经济可持续性较好区域主要分布在公园边界区域，占整个公园面积的2.18%，而生态保护可持续性较好的区域主要分布在公园内部，约占39.50%；(2) 公园景观健康较好的区域分布在公园内部区域，占公园面积的25.06%；较差的区域分布在公园周边区域，以公园南边界附近分布面积较大；(3) 景观健康状态与景观要素的功能特征及其空间分布格局息息相关。

关键词: 城市湿地, 景观, 景观健康, 空间差异, 西溪湿地

Abstract:

Landscape health was produced after ecosystem health and became a new research direction. The difference between landscape health and ecosystem health is their scales of study. The criterion of landscape health is to judge the maintenance of landscape. As the urban wetland park, it is important to keep sustainability of socio-economy and ecological protection. So the model of landscape health was established according to the coordination of social economy and ecological protection. The results showed that: (1) The maps clearly showed that the spatial differences obviously existed between socio-economy and ecological sustainability. Socio-economic sustainability and ecological sustainability with better grade covered 2.18% and 39.50% of the whole study area respectively. (2) Better landscape health area was distributed in the inner park and covered 25.06% of the park. (3) In this analysis, we found landscape health was closely related with landscape function and spatial distribution of the landscape.

Key words: landscape, landscape health, spatial differences, XixiWetland, urban wetland

李玉凤, 刘红玉, 曹晓, 郑囡. 城市湿地公园景观健康空间差异研究——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(11): 1429-1437.

LI Yufeng, LIU Hongyu, CAO Xiao, ZHENG Nan. Spatial Differences of Landscape Health in Urban Wetland Parks: A Case Study of Xixi Wetland Park in Hangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(11): 1429-1437.

参考文献

[1] Cui Baoshan, Yang Zhifeng. Research review on wetland ecosystem health. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2001, 20(3): 31-36.

[崔保山, 杨志峰. 湿地生态系统健康研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2001, 20(3): 31-36.]

[2] Rapport D J. Evolution of indicators of ecosystem health//Daniel H. Ecological Indicators. Barking: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 1992: 121-134.

[3] Mageau M T, Costanza R, Ulanowicz R E. The development and initial testing of a quantitative assessment of ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health, 1995, 1: 201-213.

[4] Rapport D J, Gaudett C, Karr J R. Evaluating landscape health. Journal of Environmental Management, 1998, 53(1): 1-15.

[5] Bertollo P. Assessing landscape health. Environmental Management, 2001, 27(3): 349-365.

[6] Cao Yu, Khasbagan, Song Dongmei. A review on the concept, characteristic and assessment of landscape health. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(11): 1511-1515.

[曹宇, 哈斯巴根, 宋冬梅. 景观健康概念、特征及其评价. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(11): 1511-1515.]

[7] Cao Yu, Ouyang Hua. Landscape health assessment on Ejin natural oasis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(6): 1117-1121.

[曹宇, 欧阳华. 额济纳天然绿洲景观健康评价. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(6): 1117-1121.]

[8] Yu Yajuan, Guo Huaicheng, Liu Yong et al. Syndromic city illnesses diagnosis and urban ecosystem health assessment. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4): 1736-1747.

[郁亚娟, 郭怀成, 刘永等. 城市病诊断与城市生态系统健康评价. 生态学报, 2008, 28(4): 1736-1747.]

[9] Liu Gengyuan, Yang Zhifeng, Chen Bin et al. Energy-based urban ecosystem health assessment: A case study of Baotou city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4):1720-1728.

[刘耕源, 杨志峰, 陈彬等. 基于能值分析的城市生态系统健康评价: 以包头市为例. 生态学报, 2008, 28(4): 1720-1728.]

[10] Mai Shaozhi, Xu Songjun, Pan Yingjun. Application of the PSR model to the evaluation of wetland ecosystem health. Tropical Geography, 2005, 25(4): 317-321.

[麦少芝, 徐颂军, 潘颖君. PSR模型在湿地生态系统健康评价中的应用. 热带地理, 2005, 25(4): 317-321.]

[11] Chen Peng. Ecological health assessment at the landscape scale based on RS and GIS. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(10): 1744-1752.

[陈鹏. 基于遥感和GIS 的景观尺度的区域生态健康评价. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(10): 1744-1752.]

[12] Shen Qi, Liu Ke, Li Shiyu et al. Relationships of plant composition, water level and solar radiation in Xixi wetland, Hangzhou, China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(1): 114-122.

[沈琪, 刘珂, 李世玉等. 杭州西溪湿地植物组成及其与水位光照的关系. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(1): 114-122.]

[13] Jiang Yiyi, Wang Yanglin. Preliminary research on patterns of the tourism landscape ecosystem. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(2): 910-915.

[蒋依依, 王仰麟. 旅游景观生态系统格局. 生态学报, 2009, 29(2): 910-915.]

[14] Deng Yi. The Methods of Urban Ecological Park Planning and Design. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2007: 126-187.

[邓毅. 城市生态公园规划设计方法. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2007: 126-187.]

[15] Herzele A V, Wiedemann T. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 63: 109-126.

[16] Talen E, Anselin L. Assessing spatial equity. Environment and Planning A, 1998, 30: 595-613.

[17] Luo W, Wang F. Measures of spatial accessibility to healthcare in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in Chicago region. Environment and Planning B, 2003, 30(6): 865-884.

[18] Chen Liding, Fu Bojie. Study on land use change in a small typical catchment in loess hilly area. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2001, 21(1): 46-51.

[陈利顶, 傅伯杰. 黄土丘陵区典型小流域土地利用变化研究. 地理科学, 2002, 21(1): 46-51.]

[19] Wu Jianguo. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Structure and Scale. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000: 99-109.

[邬建国. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 99-109.]

[20] Forman R T T, Gordron M. Landscape Ecology. New York: JohnWiley and Sons, 1986.

[21] Forman R T T, Gordon M. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience, 1981, 31(10): 733-740.

[22] Forman R T T. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology, 1995, 10(3): 133-142.

[23] Hagget P, Cliff A D, Fry A. Locational Analysis in Human Geography. New York:Wiley, 1977.

[24] Li Yufeng, Liu Hongyu. Assessment of wetland disturbance based on hydrogeomorphic classification. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2008, 24(1): 15-19.

[李玉凤, 刘红玉. 基于水文地貌分类的湿地干扰评价研究. 生态与农村环境学报, 2008, 24(1): 15-19.]

[25] Gao Zhiqiang, Liu Jiyuan, Zhuang Dafang. An analysis of eco-environmental quality conditions of China's land resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 1999, 14(1): 93-96.

[高志强, 刘纪远, 庄大方. 中国土地资源生态环境质量状况分析. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(1): 93-96.]

[26] Wang Bo, Yang Zhiqiang, Li Huiying et al. Identification of the Songhua River water quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation and GIS approach. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2008, 21(6): 124-129.

[王博, 杨志强, 李慧颖等. 基于模糊数学和GIS的松花江流域水环境质量评价研究. 环境科学研究, 2008, 21(6): 124-129.]

[27] State Forestry Administration, P. R. China. Assessment Standard of National Wetland Park. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2008.

[国家林业局. 国家湿地公园评估标准. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.]

[28] Li Yufeng, Liu Hongyu, Sun Xianbin et al. Assessment of ecological functions for coastal wetlands based on hydrogeomorphic units, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(7): 1718-1724.

[李玉凤, 刘红玉, 孙贤斌等. 基于水文地貌分类的滨海湿地生态功能评价. 生态学报2010, 30(7): 1718-1724.]

城市湿地公园景观健康空间差异研究——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例

Spatial Differences of Landscape Health in Urban Wetland Parks: A Case Study of Xixi Wetland Park in Hangzhou

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	乔治, 黄宁钰, 徐新良, 孙宗耀, 吴晨, 杨俊. 2003-2017年北京市地表热力景观时空分异特征及演变规律[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 475-489.
[2]	张扬,白红英,苏凯,黄晓月,孟清,郭少壮. 1960-2013年秦岭陕西段南北坡极端气温变化空间差异[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(7): 1296-1308.
[3]	曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,吴健生. 景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架: ESRISK[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 843-855.
[4]	林雄斌,杨家文,陶卓霖,宋金平,任颋. 交通投资、经济空间集聚与多样化路径——空间面板回归与结构方程模型视角[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1970-1984.
[5]	曹诗颂,胡德勇,赵文吉,陈姗姗,程庆文. 不透水地表盖度视角下中美城市群空间结构对比——以“京津冀”与“波士华”为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 1017-1031.
[6]	杨俊,国安东,席建超,葛全胜,李雪铭. 城市三维景观格局时空分异特征研究——以大连市中山区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4): 646-656.
[7]	吴健生,张朴华. 城市景观格局对城市内涝的影响研究——以深圳市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 444-456.
[8]	乔琨,朱文泉,胡德勇,郝明,陈姗姗,曹诗颂. 北京市不同功能区不透水地表时空变化差异[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(11): 2018-2031.
[9]	张郴,黄震方,张捷,葛军莲. 基于机器学习的南京市旅游地个性及其文化景观表征[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(10): 1886-1903.
[10]	王少剑,王洋,蔺雪芹,张虹鸥. 中国县域住宅价格的空间差异特征与影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(8): 1329-1342.
[11]	李梦桃,周忠学. 西安市城市景观的正负生态系统服务测算及空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1215-1230.
[12]	褚玉杰,赵振斌,张铖,陈诚,陈幺. 旅游社区多群体态度差异和冲突倾向的空间特征——以西安汤峪镇为例[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(6): 1045-1058.
[13]	薛德升,曾献君. 中国人口城镇化质量评价及省际差异分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(2): 194-.
[14]	李广东,方创琳. 城市生态--生产--生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 49-65.
[15]	刘永超,李加林,袁麒翔,史小丽,浦瑞良,杨磊,卢雪珠. 人类活动对港湾岸线及景观变迁影响的比较研究----以中国象山港与美国坦帕湾为例[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 86-103.