城市湿地公园景观健康空间差异研究——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例

doi:10.11821/xb201011013

地理学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (11): 1429-1437.doi: 10.11821/xb201011013

• 生态与环境 • 上一篇

城市湿地公园景观健康空间差异研究——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例

李玉凤, 刘红玉, 曹晓, 郑囡

江苏省环境演变与生态建设重点实验室，南京师范大学地理科学学院，南京210046

收稿日期:2010-05-14 修回日期:2010-07-09 出版日期:2010-11-20 发布日期:2010-11-20
通讯作者: 刘红玉(1963-), 女, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事湿地景观研究
作者简介:李玉凤(1985-), 女, 江苏仪征人, 博士研究生, 主要从事湿地生态评价与GIS应用研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40871084; 40701174); 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目; 南京师范大学研究生科研创新计划项

Spatial Differences of Landscape Health in Urban Wetland Parks: A Case Study of Xixi Wetland Park in Hangzhou

LI Yufeng, LIU Hongyu, CAO Xiao, ZHENG Nan

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction; College of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China

Received:2010-05-14 Revised:2010-07-09 Online:2010-11-20 Published:2010-11-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40871084;No.40701174; Postgraduates Research Innovation Program in Universities of Jiangsu Province and Nanjing Normal University

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

景观健康研究是生态系统健康的新研究方向，两者区别在于研究尺度的选择。景观健康的标准体现在景观能否可持续发展。作为城市湿地的西溪湿地公园，其可持续性表现在社会经济和生态保护的和谐发展。因此，本文从社会经济和生态保护两方面建立景观健康评价模型，运用GIS 技术使其空间化，揭示景观健康的空间差异性。结果显示：(1) 西溪湿地公园社会经济可持续性和生态可持续性的空间分异明显，社会经济可持续性较好区域主要分布在公园边界区域，占整个公园面积的2.18%，而生态保护可持续性较好的区域主要分布在公园内部，约占39.50%；(2) 公园景观健康较好的区域分布在公园内部区域，占公园面积的25.06%；较差的区域分布在公园周边区域，以公园南边界附近分布面积较大；(3) 景观健康状态与景观要素的功能特征及其空间分布格局息息相关。

关键词: 城市湿地, 景观, 景观健康, 空间差异, 西溪湿地

Abstract:

Landscape health was produced after ecosystem health and became a new research direction. The difference between landscape health and ecosystem health is their scales of study. The criterion of landscape health is to judge the maintenance of landscape. As the urban wetland park, it is important to keep sustainability of socio-economy and ecological protection. So the model of landscape health was established according to the coordination of social economy and ecological protection. The results showed that: (1) The maps clearly showed that the spatial differences obviously existed between socio-economy and ecological sustainability. Socio-economic sustainability and ecological sustainability with better grade covered 2.18% and 39.50% of the whole study area respectively. (2) Better landscape health area was distributed in the inner park and covered 25.06% of the park. (3) In this analysis, we found landscape health was closely related with landscape function and spatial distribution of the landscape.

Key words: landscape, landscape health, spatial differences, XixiWetland, urban wetland

李玉凤, 刘红玉, 曹晓, 郑囡. 城市湿地公园景观健康空间差异研究——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(11): 1429-1437.

LI Yufeng, LIU Hongyu, CAO Xiao, ZHENG Nan. Spatial Differences of Landscape Health in Urban Wetland Parks: A Case Study of Xixi Wetland Park in Hangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(11): 1429-1437.

参考文献

[1] Cui Baoshan, Yang Zhifeng. Research review on wetland ecosystem health. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2001, 20(3): 31-36.

[崔保山, 杨志峰. 湿地生态系统健康研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2001, 20(3): 31-36.]

[2] Rapport D J. Evolution of indicators of ecosystem health//Daniel H. Ecological Indicators. Barking: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 1992: 121-134.

[3] Mageau M T, Costanza R, Ulanowicz R E. The development and initial testing of a quantitative assessment of ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health, 1995, 1: 201-213.

[4] Rapport D J, Gaudett C, Karr J R. Evaluating landscape health. Journal of Environmental Management, 1998, 53(1): 1-15.

[5] Bertollo P. Assessing landscape health. Environmental Management, 2001, 27(3): 349-365.

[6] Cao Yu, Khasbagan, Song Dongmei. A review on the concept, characteristic and assessment of landscape health. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(11): 1511-1515.

[曹宇, 哈斯巴根, 宋冬梅. 景观健康概念、特征及其评价. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(11): 1511-1515.]

[7] Cao Yu, Ouyang Hua. Landscape health assessment on Ejin natural oasis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(6): 1117-1121.

[曹宇, 欧阳华. 额济纳天然绿洲景观健康评价. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(6): 1117-1121.]

[8] Yu Yajuan, Guo Huaicheng, Liu Yong et al. Syndromic city illnesses diagnosis and urban ecosystem health assessment. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4): 1736-1747.

[郁亚娟, 郭怀成, 刘永等. 城市病诊断与城市生态系统健康评价. 生态学报, 2008, 28(4): 1736-1747.]

[9] Liu Gengyuan, Yang Zhifeng, Chen Bin et al. Energy-based urban ecosystem health assessment: A case study of Baotou city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4):1720-1728.

[刘耕源, 杨志峰, 陈彬等. 基于能值分析的城市生态系统健康评价: 以包头市为例. 生态学报, 2008, 28(4): 1720-1728.]

[10] Mai Shaozhi, Xu Songjun, Pan Yingjun. Application of the PSR model to the evaluation of wetland ecosystem health. Tropical Geography, 2005, 25(4): 317-321.

[麦少芝, 徐颂军, 潘颖君. PSR模型在湿地生态系统健康评价中的应用. 热带地理, 2005, 25(4): 317-321.]

[11] Chen Peng. Ecological health assessment at the landscape scale based on RS and GIS. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(10): 1744-1752.

[陈鹏. 基于遥感和GIS 的景观尺度的区域生态健康评价. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(10): 1744-1752.]

[12] Shen Qi, Liu Ke, Li Shiyu et al. Relationships of plant composition, water level and solar radiation in Xixi wetland, Hangzhou, China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(1): 114-122.

[沈琪, 刘珂, 李世玉等. 杭州西溪湿地植物组成及其与水位光照的关系. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(1): 114-122.]

[13] Jiang Yiyi, Wang Yanglin. Preliminary research on patterns of the tourism landscape ecosystem. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(2): 910-915.

[蒋依依, 王仰麟. 旅游景观生态系统格局. 生态学报, 2009, 29(2): 910-915.]

[14] Deng Yi. The Methods of Urban Ecological Park Planning and Design. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2007: 126-187.

[邓毅. 城市生态公园规划设计方法. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2007: 126-187.]

[15] Herzele A V, Wiedemann T. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 63: 109-126.

[16] Talen E, Anselin L. Assessing spatial equity. Environment and Planning A, 1998, 30: 595-613.

[17] Luo W, Wang F. Measures of spatial accessibility to healthcare in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in Chicago region. Environment and Planning B, 2003, 30(6): 865-884.

[18] Chen Liding, Fu Bojie. Study on land use change in a small typical catchment in loess hilly area. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2001, 21(1): 46-51.

[陈利顶, 傅伯杰. 黄土丘陵区典型小流域土地利用变化研究. 地理科学, 2002, 21(1): 46-51.]

[19] Wu Jianguo. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Structure and Scale. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000: 99-109.

[邬建国. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 99-109.]

[20] Forman R T T, Gordron M. Landscape Ecology. New York: JohnWiley and Sons, 1986.

[21] Forman R T T, Gordon M. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience, 1981, 31(10): 733-740.

[22] Forman R T T. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology, 1995, 10(3): 133-142.

[23] Hagget P, Cliff A D, Fry A. Locational Analysis in Human Geography. New York:Wiley, 1977.

[24] Li Yufeng, Liu Hongyu. Assessment of wetland disturbance based on hydrogeomorphic classification. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2008, 24(1): 15-19.

[李玉凤, 刘红玉. 基于水文地貌分类的湿地干扰评价研究. 生态与农村环境学报, 2008, 24(1): 15-19.]

[25] Gao Zhiqiang, Liu Jiyuan, Zhuang Dafang. An analysis of eco-environmental quality conditions of China's land resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 1999, 14(1): 93-96.

[高志强, 刘纪远, 庄大方. 中国土地资源生态环境质量状况分析. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(1): 93-96.]

[26] Wang Bo, Yang Zhiqiang, Li Huiying et al. Identification of the Songhua River water quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation and GIS approach. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2008, 21(6): 124-129.

[王博, 杨志强, 李慧颖等. 基于模糊数学和GIS的松花江流域水环境质量评价研究. 环境科学研究, 2008, 21(6): 124-129.]

[27] State Forestry Administration, P. R. China. Assessment Standard of National Wetland Park. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2008.

[国家林业局. 国家湿地公园评估标准. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.]

[28] Li Yufeng, Liu Hongyu, Sun Xianbin et al. Assessment of ecological functions for coastal wetlands based on hydrogeomorphic units, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(7): 1718-1724.

[李玉凤, 刘红玉, 孙贤斌等. 基于水文地貌分类的滨海湿地生态功能评价. 生态学报2010, 30(7): 1718-1724.]

城市湿地公园景观健康空间差异研究——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例

Spatial Differences of Landscape Health in Urban Wetland Parks: A Case Study of Xixi Wetland Park in Hangzhou

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	齐贵增, 白红英, 赵婷, 孟清, 张善红. 秦岭陕西段南北坡植被对干湿变化响应敏感性及空间差异[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 44-56.
[2]	史娜娜, 韩煜, 王琦, 汉瑞英, 高晓奇, 赵志平, 刘高慧, 肖能文. 新疆南部地区风沙扩散风险评价及景观格局优化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 73-86.
[3]	袁玉, 方国华, 陆承璇, 颜敏. 基于景观生态学的城市化背景下洪灾风险评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1921-1933.
[4]	高晓路, 吴丹贤, 颜秉秋. 北京城市老年贫困人口识别与空间分布[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1557-1571.
[5]	刘焱序, 傅伯杰, 王帅, 赵文武, 李琰. 空间恢复力理论支持下的人地系统动态研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 891-903.
[6]	胡最, 邓运员, 刘沛林, 彭惠军. 传统聚落文化景观基因的符号机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 789-803.
[7]	欧阳晓, 朱翔. 中国城市群城市用地扩张时空动态特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(3): 571-588.
[8]	刘春腊, 徐美, 刘沛林, 曾凡超. 传统村落文化景观保护性补偿模型及湘西实证[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 382-397.
[9]	张杰, 史培军, 杨静, 龚道溢. 北京地区景观城市化进程对暴雨过程的影响——以“7·21”暴雨为例[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1): 113-125.
[10]	刘立程, 刘春芳, 王川, 李鹏杰. 黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937.
[11]	李青圃,张正栋,万露文,杨传训,张杰,叶晨,陈裕婵. 基于景观生态风险评价的宁江流域景观格局优化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1420-1437.
[12]	张行,梁小英,刘迪,史琴琴,陈海. 生态脆弱区社会—生态景观恢复力时空演变及情景模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1450-1466.
[13]	张生瑞, 王英杰, 张桐艳, 曹瑞昌. 基于跨省界自然地理实体地名空间格局的行政管理优化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 797-813.
[14]	乔治, 黄宁钰, 徐新良, 孙宗耀, 吴晨, 杨俊. 2003-2017年北京市地表热力景观时空分异特征及演变规律[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 475-489.
[15]	李广东, 戚伟. 中国建设用地扩张对景观格局演化的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2572-2591.