福建省工业用地效率分析与集约利用评价

doi:10.11821/xb200904010

地理学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (4): 479-486.doi: 10.11821/xb200904010

福建省工业用地效率分析与集约利用评价

黄大全, 洪丽璇, 梁进社

北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院, 北京100875

收稿日期:2008-09-30 修回日期:2009-01-19 出版日期:2009-04-25 发布日期:2009-04-25
通讯作者: 梁进社(1957-), 男, 教授, 主要从事经济地理学、自然资源与环境经济学的教学和研究。 E-mail: liangjs@bnu.edu.cn
作者简介:黄大全(1971-), 男, 博士, 讲师, 主要从事城市与区域规划、土地评价与土地管理、GIS 应用的教学和研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40635026)

Analysis and Evaluation of Industrial Land Efficiency and Intensive Use in Fujian Province

HUANG Daquan, HONG Lixuan, LIANG Jinshe

School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2008-09-30 Revised:2009-01-19 Online:2009-04-25 Published:2009-04-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40635026

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在中国, 城乡居民点用地有规范的人均指标, 招标拍卖已成为获取经营性用地的主要方式, 交通和水利设施用地主要受政府和区域重大政策影响, 而工业用地既缺乏相应的用地标准, 土地获取的市场透明度又不够。因此, 如何提高工业用地效率是土地规划和管理的重要内容。已有的研究多采用指标体系的综合评价方法来评价土地集约利用程度, 但缺少经济学原理, 应用于具体的规划编制、管理和实施的局限性较大。结合中国福建省案例, 提出全要素生产率方法来分析和度量之, 既能测算土地集约度, 也能说明要素的利用效率, 具有简单可操作的优势。文中不知劳动所得比重值情况下的用地效率和集约评价方法也是有效可行的, 虽不能排列出要素利用效率的顺序, 但可同时给出资本与劳动的投入结构以及对它们利用的效率在各个地区之间的差异情况。案例研究还表明, 福建其他地区随着与厦门和福州距离的增加, 其投入和产出总的趋势在下降。福州与厦门可与杜能孤立国中的城市类比, 而其他地区类似于孤立国中的郊区。因此要考虑土地区位对集约度的影响, 但找出其参考点是关键。

关键词: 工业用地, 集约, 效率, 全要素生产率, 福建

Abstract:

In China, there are standard per capita indicators for the land used for urban and rural settlements. Tender auction has been the major access to the acquirement of operating sites. Land used for transport facilities and water conservancy facilities is mainly influenced by important governmental and regional policies. However, there are neither corresponding standards for industrial land nor adequate mark transparency for its procurement. Therefore, how to improve the efficiency of industrial land use is of prime importance for land use planning and governance. We found that most of the existing research papers introduce a weighted indicator to evaluate land intensive use, without the guidance of economic principles. The exiting method cannot be well applied for the compilation of land use planning and the process of management and implementation. We propose a means named total factor productivity, simple and practical, to evaluate the economic efficiency of industrial land use and compare the effects of intensive use in different cities of Fujian province in China. Also, a variant TPF method is feasible in the absence of labor incomes ratio. It is unable to arrange the order of factor use efficiency, but it could indicate the input structures of capital and labor and regional differences of their use efficiencies. Furthermore, the case study shows that the longer distance from Xiamen and Fuzhou, the lower inputs and outputs the other cities of Fujian province have. It seems that Xiamen and Fuzhou analogize the city in Thunen's isolate country while other cities like the suburbs in the book. Therefore it is necessary to consider the impacts of location on land intensive use, and finding the reference atlas is the crux.

Key words: industrial land, intensive, efficiency, TFP, Fujian Provinc

黄大全, 洪丽璇, 梁进社. 福建省工业用地效率分析与集约利用评价[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 479-486.

HUANG Daquan, HONG Lixuan, LIANG Jinshe. Analysis and Evaluation of Industrial Land Efficiency and Intensive Use in Fujian Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 479-486.

参考文献

[1] Shao Xiaomei, Liu Qing, Zhang Yanyu. Advances and expectations of intensive land use researches. Progress in Geography, 2006, 25(2): 85-95.
[邵晓梅, 刘庆, 张衍毓. 土地集约利用的研究进展及展望. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25 (2): 85-95.]

[2] Wang Jing, Shao Xiaomei. Methodologies of intensive land use research: Issues and trend. Progress in Geography, 2008, 27(3): 68-74.
[王静, 邵晓梅. 土地节约集约利用技术方法研究: 现状,问题与趋势. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(3): 68-74.]

[3] Wang Shengang, Zhang Rui. Theory and practice on intensive land use in China and abroad. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Natural Science), 2006, 21(1): 90-93.
[王慎刚, 张锐. 中外土地集约利用理论与实践. 山东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 21(1): 90-93.]

[4] Chapin F S, Kaiser E J. Urban Land Use Planning (3rd edn.).University of Illinois Press, 1967.

[5] Liu Shenghe. Western urban land use study of theories and methods. Urban Planning Overseas, 2001, (1): 17-19.
[刘盛和. 西方城市土地利用研究的理论与方法. 国外城市规划, 2001, (1): 17-19.]

[6] Stull W J. Land zoning in urban economy. The American Economic Review, 1974, 64: 337-347.

[7] Eric Kades. The Dark Side of Efficiency: Johnson v. M'Intosh and the expropriation of American Indian lands. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, 148(4): 1065-1190.

[8] Berliant Marcus, Fujita Masahisa. Alonso's discrete population model of land use: Efficiency allocations and competitive equilibrium. International Economic Review, 1992, 33(3): 535-566.

[9] Ding Chengri. Urban Economic and Urban Policy. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2008.
[丁成日. 城市经济与城市政策. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2008.]

[10] Numan M Y, Almaziad F A, Al-Khaja W A. Architectural and urban design potentials for residential building energy saving in the gulf region. Applied Energy, 1999, 64: 401-410.

[11] Michael J Woldenberg. An allometric analysis of urban land use in the United States. Ekistics, 1973, 215.

[12] Lee Y. An allometric analysis of the US urban system: 1960-1980. Environment and Planning A, 1989, 21: 463-476.

[13] Zhang Tingwei. Constructing planning regulations in the 21st century: The growing smart legislative guidebook. City Planning Review, 2003, 27(3): 49-52.
[张庭伟. 构筑21 世纪城市规划法规:介绍当代美国精明增长的城市规划立法指南. 城市规划, 2003, 27(3): 49-52.]

[14] Anne Vernez Moudon, Michael Hubner. Monitoring Land Supply with Geographic Information Systems Theory, Practice, and Parcel-Based Approaches. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.

[15] Long Hualou, Cai Yunlong, Wan Jun. Sustainability evaluation of land use in development zone: The case of Kunshan. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(6): 719-728.
[龙花楼, 蔡运龙, 万军. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价: 以江苏昆山经济技术开发区为例. 地理学报, 2000, 55(6): 719-728.]

[16] Zhou Feng, Pu Lijie, Peng Buzhuo. Analysis on land use change and its effectiveness in Su-Xi-Chang area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(3): 392-400.
[周峰, 濮励杰, 彭补拙. 苏锡常地区土地利用变化及其绩效分析. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3): 392-400.]

[17] Ban Maosheng, Fang Chuanglin, Liu Haiyan et al. Comprehensive evaluation of land use performance of Beijing high-tech industrial zone. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.
[班茂盛, 方创琳, 刘海燕等. 北京高新技术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.]

[18] Denhise Dipasquale, William C. Wheaton Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.

[19] Fan Yaobang, Dong Liming. Beijing Real Estate Development and Macro-control. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1996.
[范耀邦, 董黎明. 北京房地产业的发展和宏观调控. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1996.]

[20] Huang Daquan, Lin Jian, Mao Juan et al. Research on the index system of industrial land in Beijing development areas. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2005, 21(5): 17-20.
[黄大全,林坚, 毛娟等. 北京经济技术开发区工业用地指标研究. 地理与地理信息科学, 2005, 21(5): 17-20.]

[21] Lin Qingsong. Study on the efficiency change of industry section in China and the influencing factors. Economic Research Journal, 1995, (10): 27-34.
[林青松. 改革以来中国工业部门的效率变化及其影响因素分析. 经济研究, 1995, (10): 27-34.]

[22] State Economic and Trade Finance Division, Industry and Transportation Division of National Bureau of Statistics. Weighted Evaluation Index System for Industrial Enterprises. Beijing: China Economic Press, 1996.
[国家经贸委财金司, 国家统计局工交司. 工业企业综合评价指标体系. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 1996.]

[23] Liang Jinshe. Efficiency comparison of resources use in the framework of interrelationship. Resources Science, 1998, 20 (4): 1-7.
[梁进社. 相互依存关系中的资源利用效率的比较. 资源科学, 1998, 20(4): 1-7.]

[24] Wheeler J O, Muller P O, Grant Ian Thrall et al. Economic Geography. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.

福建省工业用地效率分析与集约利用评价

Analysis and Evaluation of Industrial Land Efficiency and Intensive Use in Fujian Province

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	廖柳文, 高晓路, 龙花楼, 汤礼莎, 陈坤秋, 马恩朴. 基于农户利用效率的平原和山区耕地利用形态比较[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 471-486.
[2]	方世敏, 黄琰. 长江经济带旅游效率与规模的时空演化及耦合协调[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1757-1772.
[3]	王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 史晨怡. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.
[4]	孙才志, 马奇飞, 赵良仕. 基于GWR模型的中国水资源绿色效率驱动机理[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 1022-1035.
[5]	岳文泽, 吴桐, 刘学, 张琳琳, 吴次芳, 叶艳妹, 郑国轴. 中国大城市蔓延指数的开发[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2730-2743.
[6]	李汝资, 刘耀彬, 王文刚, 谢德金. 中国城市土地财政扩张及对经济效率影响路径[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2126-2145.
[7]	王向东, 刘小茜, 裴韬, 王振波. 基于技术效率测算的京津冀城市土地集约利用潜力评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1853-1865.
[8]	李双双, 延军平, 武亚群, 汪成博. 秦岭—淮河南北供暖格局变化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1866-1877.
[9]	周亮, 车磊, 周成虎. 中国城市绿色发展效率时空演变特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2027-2044.
[10]	周侃, 刘宝印, 樊杰. 汶川Ms 8.0地震极重灾区的经济韧性测度及恢复效率[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2078-2091.
[11]	任小丽,路倩倩,何洪林,张黎,牛忠恩. 中国东部南北样带森林生态系统蒸腾与蒸散比值（T/ET）时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 63-75.
[12]	周麟,田莉,张臻,李薇. 基于空间句法视角的民国以来北京老城街道网络演变[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1433-1448.
[13]	金贵,邓祥征,赵晓东,郭柏枢,杨俊. 2005-2014年长江经济带城市土地利用效率时空格局特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(7): 1242-1252.
[14]	崔学刚, 方创琳, 张蔷. 山东半岛城市群高速交通优势度与土地利用效率的空间关系[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(6): 1149-1161.
[15]	熊鹰,陈云,李静芝,阎晓静. 基于土地集约利用的长株潭城市群建设用地供需仿真模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3): 562-577.