杭州城市蔓延评估体系及其治理对策

doi:10.11821/xb200904004

地理学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (4): 417-425.doi: 10.11821/xb200904004

杭州城市蔓延评估体系及其治理对策

刘卫东, 谭韧骠

浙江大学公共管理学院, 杭州310029

收稿日期:2008-03-25 修回日期:2008-11-25 出版日期:2009-04-25 发布日期:2009-04-25
作者简介:刘卫东(1962-), 男, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要研究方向为: 城市与区域发展，土地规划与利用。 E-mail: trbiao@gmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40471055); 国家发改委国土整治事业费公开征集研究项目(200819)

Evaluation System and Control Mechanism of Urban Sprawl: A Case Study of Hangzhou

LIU Weidong, TAN Renbiao

College of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China

Received:2008-03-25 Revised:2008-11-25 Online:2009-04-25 Published:2009-04-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40471055; Special Fund from the Land Remediation Expenditure of National Development and Reform Commission, No.200819

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在快速城市化中, 中国的城市蔓延现象日益突出。在分析城市蔓延的概念和基本特征的基础上, 探究了中国城市蔓延与西方城市蔓延的区别, 并发现城市蔓延与经济社会的发展息息相关。因此, 先从传统的空间形态角度, 在借鉴和综合多种西方城市蔓延评估方法的基础上, 利用层次分析法来初步构建城市蔓延的评估体系, 再从经济社会的角度, 运用主成分分析和模糊数学法求出经济发展和社会生活之间的协调度, 利用有关协调度的函数来对评估体系的进行修正。然后, 具体以杭州市为例进行了实际测算, 结果表明杭州的城市蔓延处于较严重的等级, 这与从空间形态图上的判断基本一致。最后, 在分析杭州城市蔓延产生原因和结合我国实际的基础上, 对城市蔓延问题的治理机制进行了初步探讨, 从经济增长模式、投资模式、征地补偿、城市交通和规划制定与实施等多个方面提出了相应的政策建议。

关键词: 城市蔓延, 评估体系, 治理对策, 杭州

Abstract:

In the rapid urbanization of China, the phenomenon of urban sprawl is becoming more and more obvious. Firstly, this paper introduces the basic concept and characteristics of Western urban sprawl. Then it explains the difference of urban sprawl between Occident and China, which is closely linked with economic and social development. So it establishes an urban sprawl evaluation system with AHP on the basis of western experiences and approaches from the traditional perspective of spatial pattern. Then the coordinating degree between economy and society is used to amend the evaluation system. In order to get the value of the coordinating degree, a synthesized index system of economy and society which contains 10 indexes is built. In addition, the method of principal component analysis and fuzzy math is applied in the assessment process. In order to demonstrate the whole evaluation system, the data of Hangzhou city are used to conduct an actual assessment and analysis. The result indicates that the degree of urban sprawl is relatively great, which is accordant with the judgement from the spatial form of Hangzhou. Based on the result, we discuss the control mechanism of urban sprawl and some proposals are put forward from many aspects.

Key words: urban sprawl, evaluation system, control method, Hangzhou cit

刘卫东, 谭韧骠. 杭州城市蔓延评估体系及其治理对策[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 417-425.

LIU Weidong, TAN Renbiao. Evaluation System and Control Mechanism of Urban Sprawl: A Case Study of Hangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 417-425.

参考文献

[1] Galster G, Hanson R, Ratcliffe M R. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 2001, 12(4): 681-717.

[2] Ding Chengri, Meng Xiaochen. Smart growth in USA and its implications to rapid urban spatial development in China. Urban Studies, 2007, 14(4): 120-126.
[丁成日, 孟晓晨. 美国城市理性增长理念对中国快速城市化的启示. 城市发展研究, 2007, 14(4): 120-126.]

[3] Harvey R O, Clark W A V. The nature and economics of urban sprawl. A Quarterly Journal of Planning, Housing & Public Utilities, 1965, 12(1): 1-10.

[4] Frank J E. The costs of alternative development patterns: A review of the literature. Washington. DC: Urban Land Lnstitute, 1989.

[5] Ewing R. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 1997, 63(1): 107-126.

[6] Li Qiang, Yang Kaizhong. Urban Sprawl. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press, 2007.
[李强, 杨开忠. 城市蔓延. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2007.]

[7] Peiser R B. Density and urban sprawl. Land Economics, 1989, 65(3): 193-203.

[8] Hess G R, Daley S, Derrison B K. Just what is sprawl, anyway? Carolina Planning, 2001, 26(2): 11-26.

[9] Yeh A G, Li X. Measurement and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapidly growing region using entropy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2001, 67(1): 83-90.

[10] Ewing R. Measuring urban sprawl and its impacts. www.smartgrowthamerica.org; http://www.smartgrowthamerica. rg/sprawlindex/sprawlindex.html.

[11] Tsai Y H. Quantifying urban form: Compactness versus 'sprawl'. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(1): 141-161.

[12] Frenkel A, Ashkenazi M. The integrated sprawl index: Measuring the urban landscape in Israel
[EB/OL]. http://www.springerlink.com/content/ru326k3w12734v82.

[13] Lopez R, Hynes H P. Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, distribution and trends. Urban Affair Review, 2003, 38(3): 325-355.

[14] Lin Bingyao. The measurement methods and evaluation of urban spatial form. Urban Planning Forum, 1998, (3): 42-45.
[林炳耀. 城市空间形态的计量方法及其评价. 城市规划汇刊, 1998, (3): 42-45.]

[15] Zheng Xinqi. The Theory, Methods, Techniques, Evidence of the Urban Land Optimal Allocation and Intensive evaluation. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
[郑新奇. 城市土地优化配置与集约利用评价理论, 方法, 技术, 实证. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.]

[16] Li Yan, Zeng Zhenxiang, Wu Youxi. Study and application of evaluation method of coordinated development of economy-environment system. System Engineering: Theory & Practice, 2003, (5): 54-58.
[李艳, 曾珍香, 武优西. 经济环境系统协调发展评价方法研究及应用. 系统工程理论与实践, 2003, (5): 54-58.]

[17] Wang Weiguo. Research on the coordination coefficient system of the national economy. Statistical Research, 1995, (4): 66-68.
[王维国. 论国民经济协调系数体系的建立. 统计研究, 1995, (4): 66-68.]

[18] Jiang Fang, Liu Shenghe, Yuan Hong. Measuring urban sprawl in Beijing with geo-spatial indices. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 649-658.
[蒋芳, 刘盛和, 袁弘. 北京城市蔓延的测度与分析. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 649-658.]

[19] Yang Donglang, An Xiaoli. Colligation evaluation of Xi'an urban land intensive use. Economic Geography, 2007, 27 (3): 470-475.
[杨东朗, 安晓丽. 西安市城市土地集约利用评价. 经济地理, 2007, 27(3): 470-475.]

[20] Tom D. Smart growth: A new American approach to regional planning. Planning Practice & Research, 2001, 16(3): 271-279.

[21] Yu Li. Thinking of compact city. Urban Planning Forum, 2007, (1): 87-90.
[于立. 关于紧凑式城市的思考. 城市规划学刊, 2007, (1): 87-90.]

[22] Wang Hao, Mo Fei. Sprawl trend of Beijing suburbanization from the perspective of Neo-urbanism. Urban Planning International, 2005, (6): 44-48.
[王昊, 莫飞. 从美国新城市主义的角度看北京的郊区化趋势. 国际城市规划, 2005, (6): 44-48.]

杭州城市蔓延评估体系及其治理对策

Evaluation System and Control Mechanism of Urban Sprawl: A Case Study of Hangzhou

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	岳文泽, 吴桐, 刘学, 张琳琳, 吴次芳, 叶艳妹, 郑国轴. 中国大城市蔓延指数的开发[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2730-2743.
[2]	刘浩龙, 戴君虎, 闫军辉, 何凡能, 葛全胜, 牟重行. 基于杭州偏晚终雪记录的南宋（1131-1270年）气候再推断[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 382-396.
[3]	章伟艳, 张霄宇, 金海燕, 冯旭文, 姚旭莹, 高为利, 张富元, 高爱根. 长江口—杭州湾及其邻近海域沉积动力环境及物源分析[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(5): 640-650.
[4]	吴一洲, 吴次芳, 贝涵璐. 转型期杭州城市写字楼空间分布特征及其机制[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(8): 973-982.
[5]	任丽燕, 吴次芳,岳文泽,刘勇, 陆张维. 环杭州湾城市规划及产业发展对湿地保护的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(10): 1055-1063.
[6]	蒋芳, 刘盛和, 袁弘. 北京城市蔓延的测度与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 649-658.
[7]	李加林,刘闯,张殿发,童亿勤,杨晓平,李伟方,. 土地利用变化对土壤发生层质量演化的影响——以杭州湾南岸滨海平原为例[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(4): 378-388.
[8]	苏建忠, 魏清泉, 郭恒亮. 广州市的蔓延机理与调控[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(4): 626-636.
[9]	王伟武. 杭州城市生活质量的定量评价[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 151-157.
[10]	冯健. 杭州城市形态和土地利用结构的时空演化[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(3): 343-353.
[11]	邵虚生. 潮沟成因类型及其影响因素的探讨[J]. 地理学报, 1988, 43(1): 35-43.
[12]	吴维棠. 中国稻作农业的起源和传播[J]. 地理学报, 1985, 40(1): 29-36.
[13]	吴维棠. 从新石器时代文化遗址看杭州湾两岸的全新世古地理[J]. 地理学报, 1983, 38(2): 113-127.
[14]	王传琛, 刘际松. 杭州城市气候[J]. 地理学报, 1982, 37(2): 164-173.