特枯水情对长江中下游悬浮泥沙的影响

doi:10.11821/xb200801006

地理学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (1): 50-64.doi: 10.11821/xb200801006

特枯水情对长江中下游悬浮泥沙的影响

刘红,何青,徐俊杰,戴志军,陈吉余

华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室, 上海200062

收稿日期:2007-09-23 修回日期:2007-11-06 出版日期:2008-01-25 发布日期:2008-01-25
通讯作者: 何青, 教授, 博导。E-mail：qinghe@sklec.ecnu.edu.cn
作者简介:刘红(1978-), 男, 湖北宜昌人, 博士研究生, 主要从事河口海岸水动力和泥沙运动研究。 E-mail: liuhg007@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
上海市科委重点项目(062512076); 国家973 项目(2002GB412403); 教育部创新团队资助项目(IRT0427); 创新研究群体科学基金(40721004)

The Effect of the Exceptionally Low Water Discharge on Sediment Characteristics of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River

LIU Hong,HE Qing,XU Junjie,DAI Zhijun,CHEN Jiyu

State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Received:2007-09-23 Revised:2007-11-06 Online:2008-01-25 Published:2008-01-25
Supported by:
Shanghai Science and Technology Foundation, No.062512076; National 973 Project, No.2002GB412403; Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University, No.IRT0427; Science Foundation for Innovative Research Team, No.40721004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于长江中下游气象资料、历史水沙资料和2006 年10 月现场水沙观测资料, 分析了典型枯水年大通站的月均径流量和输沙率特征、2006 年特枯水情产生的气候背景以及对长江中下游含沙量和悬沙粒径产生的影响。分析表明, 枯水年长江干流输沙量有显著的减少, 2006 年特枯水情下大通站汛期输沙量仅占多年平均值(1985-2000 年) 的19.8%。在特枯水情和三峡工程蓄水的背景下, 2006 年10 月长江中下游含沙量平均为0.057 kg/m³, 只占 2003-2005 年10 月平均值的20.6%。2006 年10 月长江中下游悬沙中值粒径平均为4.8 µm, 悬沙中值粒径只占多年平均值的26.3%, 占近期平均值的41.8%。含沙量、悬沙粒度和中游河床冲淤特性的综合分析表明, 城陵矶—湖口河段水沙垂向交换强, 是三峡兴建以后近期河道调整频繁的河段。洞庭湖和鄱阳湖对长江干流含沙量的贡献较大, 尤以鄱阳湖的贡献最大, 长江中下游其他支流对长江干流含沙量的贡献较小。汉江和巢湖对长江中下游悬沙粒径的影响相对较大, 而洞庭湖和鄱阳湖则对悬沙粒径的影响相对较小。

关键词: 长江, 特枯水情, 含沙量, 悬沙粒径

Abstract:

Based on meteorologic data, historical sediment data and current & sediment data collected in October 2006 in the Yangtze River Basin, the analyses of monthly mean water and sediment discharge characteristics, meteorologic characteristics and the effect on suspended sediment concentration and suspended sediment grain diameter under the exceptionally low water discharge were carried out. The results showed that the sediment discharge decreased remarkably in the year of low water discharge, and the sediment discharge of flood season at Datong Hydrographic Gauging Station is only 19.8% of the mean value from 1985 to 2000. The mean suspended sediment concentration in October 2006 was 0.057 kg/m³ in the middle and lower Yangtze River, being only 20.6% of the mean value in October from 2003 to 2005. The mean suspended sediment median diameter in October 2006 was 4.8 µm, being only 26.3% of the mean value of historic records and 41.8% of the annual mean value recently. The synthetic analysis of suspended sediment concentration, suspended sediment diameter and scouring/silting characteristics showed that the vertical water and sediment exchange was intense in the reach from Chenglingji to Hukou, where the channel adjustment has taken place frequently in recent years. Under the background of the exceptionally low water discharge and the completion of the Three Gorges Project, the contribution of the suspended sediment concentration from Dongting and Poyang lakes to the main stream was greater than that of any other lakes and tributaries, and the contribution of Poyang Lake was greater than that of Dongting Lake. The influence of the suspended sediment diameter from the Hanjiang River and Chaohu Lake to the main stream was greater than that of any other lakes and tributaries, while the influence of Dongting and Poyang lakes was relatively small.

Key words: Yangtze River, exceptionally low water discharge, suspended sediment concentration, suspended sediment diameter

刘红,何青,徐俊杰,戴志军,陈吉余. 特枯水情对长江中下游悬浮泥沙的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(1): 50-64.

LIU Hong,HE Qing,XU Junjie,DAI Zhijun,CHEN Jiyu. The Effect of the Exceptionally Low Water Discharge on Sediment Characteristics of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(1): 50-64.

参考文献

[1] Yi Yu. The exceptional low water discharge analysis of the upper Yangtze River in 1994. Yangtze River, 1995, 26(5): 28-31.
[易瑜. 长江上游1994 年汛期特枯水情分析. 人民长江, 1995, 26(5): 28-31.]

[2] Jing Yuanshu, Miao Qilong, Yang Wengang. Climate change effect on runoff of main area for Changjiang River. Resources and Enuironment in the Yangtze Basin, 1998, 7(4): 337-340.
[景元书, 缪启龙, 杨文刚. 气候变化对长江干流区径流量的影响. 长江流域资源与环境, 1998, 7(4): 337-340.]

[3] Chen Xiqing, Zhang Erfeng, Xu Jiangang. Large and episodic decrease of water discharge from the Yangtze River to the sea during the dry season. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2002, 47(1): 41-48.

[4] Zhang Erfeng, Chen Xiqing. Changes of water discharge between Datong and the Changjiang Estuary during the dry season. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(2): 231-238.
[张二凤, 陈西庆. 长江大通- 河口段枯季径流量变化. 地理学报, 2003, 58(2): 231-238.]

[5] Qiu Jinhui, Chen Jianxun. Runoff characteristics and long-term forecast of dry season in the upper Yangtze River. Yangtze River, 2003, 34(10): 37-38.
[邱进辉, 陈建勋. 长江上游地区枯期径流特征及其长期预报. 人民长江, 2003, 34(10): 37-38.]

[6] Wang Hui, Xiang Zuwei, Chen Hui. Analysis of runoff in the Three Gorges area during dry season under the effect of large hydraulic engineering in the upper Yangtze River. Yangtze River, 2006, 37(12): 21-23.
[王辉, 项祖伟, 陈晖. 长江上游大型水利工程对三峡枯水径流影响分析. 人民长江, 2006, 37(12): 21-23.]

[7] Huang Wei, Chen Jin. Study on water allocation in dry season in estuarial areas along main stem of Yangtze River. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2006, 37(10): 3-6.
[黄薇, 陈进. 长江干流河口地区枯水季水量分配研究. 水利水电技术, 2006, 37(10): 3-6.]

[8] Qian Ning, Wan Zhaohui. Mechanics of Sediment Transport. Beijing: Science Press, 1983. 125-129, 298-343.
[钱宁, 万兆惠. 泥沙运动力学. 北京: 科学出版社, 1983. 125-129, 298-343.]

[9] Xu Jiongxin. Variation in grain size of suspended load in upper Changjiang River and its tributaries by human activities. Journal of Sediment Research, 2005, (3): 8-16.
[许炯心. 近40 年来长江上游干支流悬移质泥沙粒度的变化及其与人类活动的关系. 泥沙研究, 2005, (3): 8-16.]

[10] Xu Jiongxin. Influence of variations in suspended sediment concentration and grain size on sediment deposition of Yichang-Hankou reach of Yangtze River. Advances in Water Science, 2006, 17(1): 67-73.
[许炯心. 含沙量和悬沙粒径变化对长江宜昌- 汉口河段年冲淤量的影响. 水科学进展, 2006, 17(1): 67-73.]

[11] Folk R L, Ward W C, Brazos river bar: A study in the signification of grain size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1957, 27: 3-27.

[12] Shepard F P. Nomenclature based on sand-silt-clay ratios. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1954, 24: 151-158

[13] http://www.cjh.com.cn/singleSubject.asp?filetype=da

[14] The Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China. Chinese River Sediment Bulletin. Beijing: China WaterPower Press, 2002. 2-12.
[ 中华人民共和国水利部. 中国河流泥沙公报. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2002. 2-12.]

[15] The Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China. Chinese River Sediment Bulletin. Beijing: China WaterPower Press, 2003. 2-10.
[ 中华人民共和国水利部.中国河流泥沙公报. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2003. 2-10.]

[16] The Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China. Chinese River Sediment Bulletin. Beijing: China WaterPower Press, 2004. 2-12.
[ 中华人民共和国水利部.中国河流泥沙公报. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2004. 2-12.]

[17] The Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China. Chinese River Sediment Bulletin. Beijing: China WaterPower Press, 2005. 2-12.
[ 中华人民共和国水利部.中国河流泥沙公报. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2005. 2-12.]

[18] The Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China. Chinese River Sediment Bulletin. Beijing: China WaterPower Press, 2006. 8.
[中华人民共和国水利部.中国河流泥沙公报. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2006. 8.]

[19] http://www.hwcc.com.cn/newsdisplay/newsdisplay.asp?Id=156158

[20] http://weather.people.com.cn/BIG5/37079/4749766.html

特枯水情对长江中下游悬浮泥沙的影响

The Effect of the Exceptionally Low Water Discharge on Sediment Characteristics of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	柴元方, 邓金运, 杨云平, 孙昭华, 李义天, 朱玲玲. 长江中游荆江河段同流量—水位演化特征及驱动成因[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 101-113.
[2]	方世敏, 黄琰. 长江经济带旅游效率与规模的时空演化及耦合协调[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1757-1772.
[3]	杨霄. 1570—1971年长江镇扬河段江心沙洲的演变过程及原因分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1512-1522.
[4]	刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 党素珍. 黄土丘陵区雨强对水流含沙量的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1723-1732.
[5]	华凯,程和琴,郑树伟. 长江口横沙通道近岸冲刷地貌形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1363-1373.
[6]	严鑫,孙昭华,谢翠松,夏军强. 基于经验模型的长江口南支上段压咸临界流量[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 935-947.
[7]	姚振兴, 陈庆强, 杨钦川. 20世纪50年代中期以来崇明岛东部盐沼发育对长江入海泥沙的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 572-585.
[8]	陈雯,王珏,孙伟. 基于成本—收益的长三角地方政府的区域合作行为机制案例分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 312-322.
[9]	李一鸣,张国安,游博文,李占海. 长江河口河槽近期沉积特征及影响因子分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 178-190.
[10]	唐见,曹慧群,陈进. 生态保护工程和气候变化对长江源区植被变化的影响量化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 76-86.
[11]	金贵,邓祥征,赵晓东,郭柏枢,杨俊. 2005-2014年长江经济带城市土地利用效率时空格局特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(7): 1242-1252.
[12]	陈瑞,李凤全,王天阳,朱丽东,叶玮,周国成. 长江中游新石器时代遗址规模的分布特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3): 474-486.
[13]	张云峰, 张振克, 任航, 高磊, 丁海燕. 近百年来长江口启东嘴潮滩沉积物质来源及定量估算[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(11): 2105-2116.
[14]	陆大道. 长江大保护与长江经济带的可持续发展——关于落实习总书记重要指示,实现长江经济带可持续发展的认识与建议[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1829-1836.
[15]	闪丽洁,张利平,张艳军,佘敦先,夏军. 长江中下游流域旱涝急转事件特征分析及其与ENSO的关系[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(1): 25-40.