中国农村宅基地转型的理论与证实

doi:10.11821/xb200610009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

土地利用转型是土地利用变化的表现形式之一,也是由IGBP和IHDP联合发起的全球土地研究计划 (GLP) 的重要研究内容。目前土地利用/覆被变化 (LUCC) 研究仍然有待进一步理论化,在学科综合与集成基础上提出的假设对土地变化科学显得尤为重要。土地利用转型研究需要寻求一种综合的方法,来对社会和环境变化的时间尺度和历史背景进行整合。通过分析特定时期内中国农村建房的影响因素及相应的管理政策,在了解中国农村建房发展过程的基础上,提出了中国农村宅基地转型趋势的理论假设：随着社会经济的发展,农村宅基地在增加的建设用地总量中所占比例将由高逐渐降低,直到这一比例趋向于一个固定值。最后运用长江沿线样带农村宅基地转型研究结果验证了该理论假设。

关键词: 土地利用转型, 土地变化科学, 农村宅基地, 理论, 证实, 中国

Abstract:

This paper develops a theoretical framework for rural housing land transition in China. Land use transition refers to the changes in land-use morphology over time, and it usually corresponds to a particular socio-economic development phase. Land use transition is also one of the major research contents of Global Land Project (GLP), a joint research agenda of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP) to improve the understanding of land system dynamics. Although our understanding of land-use and land-cover change (LUCC) has improved through carrying out a lot of studies on land system, it seems that LUCC research still remains under-theorized. Research on land use transition needs new methods to incorporate the historical aspects and timescales of social and environmental changes. The discipline which in principle should be most able to meet the demands is geography. There is tremendous scope for this kind of study, which needs the knowledge concerning physical geography as well as human geography. By understanding the change process of rural housing in China, theoretical hypothesis on rural housing land transition was put forward. It is assumed that rural housing in China will undergo specific stages-the proportion of rural housing in the increase of total construction land will decline gradually with the development of the local economy, and the end of the transition corresponds to a kind of equilibrium between rural housing and other construction activities. Henceforth, the research results of rural housing land transition in the transect of the Yangtze River were used to verify the above hypothesis.

Key words: land use transition, land-change science, rural housing land, theory, verification, China

龙花楼. 中国农村宅基地转型的理论与证实[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1093-1100.

LONG Hualou. Rural Housing Land Transition in China: Theory and Verification[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(10): 1093-1100.

参考文献

[1] Global Land Project (GLP). Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report No.53/IHDP Report No.19. Stockholm: IGBP, 2005. 64pp.

[2] Long Hualou. Land use transition: a new integrated approach of land use/cover change study. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2003, 19(1): 87-90.
[龙花楼. 土地利用转型: 土地利用/覆被变化综合研究的新途径. 地理与地理信息科学, 2003, 19(1): 87-90.]

[3] Grainger A. National land use morphology: patterns and possibilities. Geography, 1995, 80(3): 235-245.

[4] Long Hualou, Li Xiubin. Analysis of regional land use transition: a case study in the transect of the Yangtse River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(2): 144-149.
[龙花楼, 李秀彬. 区域土地利用转型分析: 以长江沿线样带为例. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(2): 144-149.]

[5] Sargeson S. Subduing "the rural house-building craze": attitudes towards housing construction and land-use controls in four Zhejiang villages. China Quarterly, 2002, 172: 927-955.

[6] Weng Q H. Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 64(3): 273-284.

[7] Tan M H, Li X B, Xie H et al. Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Land Use Policy, 2005, 22: 187-196.

[8] Tian Guangjin, Liu Jiyuan, Zhuang Dafang. The spatio-temporal characteristics of rural residential land in China in the 1990s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(5): 651-658.
[田光进, 刘纪远, 庄大方. 近10年来中国农村居民点用地时空特征. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 651-658.]

[9] Long H L, Heilig G K, Li X B et al. Socio-economic development and land-use change: analysis of rural housing land transition in the transect of the Yangtse River, China. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(1): 141-153.

[10] Guidelines of PRC's 11th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2006.
[中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十一个五年规划纲要. 北京: 人民出版社, 2006.］

[11] Harvey D. Explanation in Geography. London: Edward Arnold Ltd., 1971.
[大卫·哈维著; 高泳源, 刘立华, 蔡运龙译. 地理学中的解释. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1996.]

[12] Arayama Y, Miyoshi K. Regional diversity and sources of economic growth in China. World Economy, 2004, 27(10): 1583-1607.

[13] Heilig G K. Sustainable Regional and Rural Development in China: Where Do We Stand? IIASA Interim Report IR-03-026, Laxenburg, 2003.

[14] Xu W. The changing dynamics of land-use change in rural China: a case study of Yuhang, Zhejiang Province. Environment and Planning A, 2004, 36(9): 1595-1615.

[15] Yang H, Li X B. Cultivated land and food supply in China. Land Use Policy, 2000, 17: 73-88.

[16] Rindfuss R R, Walsh S J, Turner II B L et al. Developing a science of land change: challenges and methodological issues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, 101(39): 13976-13981.

[17] Walker R, Solecki W. Theorizing land-cover and land-use change: the case of the Florida Everglades and its degradation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2004, 94: 311-328.

[18] Ni Shaoxiang. Some issues in the study on land use/cover change. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005, 20(6): 932-937.
[倪绍祥. 土地利用/覆被变化研究的几个问题. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(6): 932-937.]

[19] Pontius G R. Validation methods for modeling land-use/cover change. LUCC Newsletter, 2004, 10: 9.

[20] Dinda S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics, 2004, 49(4): 431-455.

[21] Zhong Maochu. The unreality of environmental Kuznets Curves and its impacts on sustainable development. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2005, 15(5): 1-6.
[钟茂初. 环境库兹涅茨曲线的虚幻性及其对可持续发展的现实影响. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2005, 15(5): 1-6.]

[22] Northam R M. Urban Geography. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.

[23] Li Xiubin. Explanation of land use changes. Progress in Geography, 2002, 21(3): 195-203.
[李秀彬. 土地利用变化的解释. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(3): 195-203.]

[24] Cai Yunlong, Lu Dadao, Zhou Yixing et al. Chinese progress and international trends of geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(6): 803-810.
[蔡运龙, 陆大道, 周一星等. 地理科学的中国进展与国际趋势. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6): 803-810.]

[25] Rediscovery Geography Committee. Rediscovering Geography: New Relevance for Science and Society. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1997.
[重新发现地理学委员会编; 黄润华译. 重新发现地理学: 与科学和社会的新关联. 北京: 学苑出版社, 2002.]

[26] Massey D. Space-time, 'science' and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1999, 24(3): 261-276.

[27] Liu Aiyu. Analysis of China's regional economic disparities in the process of society transition. Journal of Zhejiang, 2000, (2): 10-15.
[刘艾玉. 社会转型过程中的地区经济差距探析. 浙江学刊, 2000, (2): 10-15.]

[28] Lin Yifu, Cai Fang, Li Zhou. Analysis of China's regional disparities in the period of economy transition. Economic Research, 1998, (6): 3-10.
[林毅夫, 蔡昉, 李周. 中国经济转型时期的地区差距分析. 经济研究, 1998, (6): 3-10.]

[29] Li Xiubin. Visulizing spatial equality of development. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1999, 19(3): 254-257.
[李秀彬. 地区发展均衡性的可视化测度. 地理科学, 1999, 19(3):254-257.]

[30] Cai Yunlong. Geographical study on sustainable agriculture and rural development. Advance in Earth Sciences, 1999, 14(6): 602-606.
[蔡运龙. 农业与农村可持续发展的地理学研究. 地球科学进展, 1999, 14(6): 602-606.]

[31] Li Shantong, Hou Yongzhi. The distinctiveness of China's various economic growth stages and the main targets of industrial development during the 10th five-year plan. Management World, 2001, (2): 95-101.
[李善同, 侯永志. 我国经济发展阶段特征与"十五"时期产业发展的主要任务. 管理世界, 2001, (2): 95-101.]

[32] Chen Guojie, Wang Qing. Theoretical model and trend analysis on mountainous economic development stages in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(2): 303-310.
[陈国阶, 王青. 中国山区经济发展阶段的理论模型与预测. 地理学报, 2004, 59(2): 303-310.]

[33] Li Juanwen, Wang Qifang. The development phases theory about regional economy and analysis of development phases about contemporary China's regional economy. Economic Geography, 2000, 20(4): 6-9.
[李娟文, 王启仿. 区域经济发展阶段理论与我国区域经济发展阶段现状分析. 经济地理, 2000, 20(4): 6-9.]

[34] Bicík I, Jelecek L, Stěpánek V. Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Policy, 2001, 18: 65-73.

[35] Krausmann F, Haberl H, Schulz N B et al. Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria (Part I): driving forces of land-use change: 1950-1995. Land Use Policy, 2003, 20: 1-20.

[36] Haberl H, Batterbury S, Moran E. Using and shaping the land: a long-term perspective. Land Use Policy, 2001, 18: 1-8.

[37] Liu Yansui, Chen Baiming. The study framework of land use/cover change based on sustainable development in China. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(3): 324-330.
[刘彦随, 陈百明. 中国可持续发展问题与土地利用/覆被变化研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(3): 324-330.]

[38] Heilig G K. Anthropogenic factors in land-use change in China. Population and Development Review, 1997, 23(1): 139-168.

[39] Liu Shenghe, Li Xiubin, Zhang Ming. Scenario analysis on urbanization and rural-urban migration in China. IIASA Interim Report IR-03-036, Laxenburg, 2003.

[40] Cai Yunlong. A paradigm of the research on man-earth relationship: global positivist study. Human Geography, 1996, 11(3): 3-8.
[蔡运龙. 人地关系研究范型: 全球实证. 人文地理, 1996, 11(3): 3-8.]

[41] Kanbur R, Zhang X. Which regional inequality? The evolution of rural-urban and inland-coastal inequality in China from 1983 to 1995. Journal of Comparative Economics, 1999, 27: 686-701.

[42] World Bank. China: Overcoming Rural Poverty. Washington D C: World Bank, 2001.

[43] Walker R T. Urban sprawl and natural areas encroachment: linking land cover change and economic development in the Florida Everglades. Ecological Economics, 2001, 37(3): 357-369.

[44] Long Hualou, Li Xiubin. Rural housing land transition in the transect of the Yangtse River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(2): 179-188.
[龙花楼, 李秀彬. 长江沿线样带农村宅基地转型. 地理学报, 2005, 60(2): 179-188.]