巩乃斯河流域游憩景观生态评价及持续利用

doi:10.11821/xb200504013

地理学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 645-655.doi: 10.11821/xb200504013

巩乃斯河流域游憩景观生态评价及持续利用

王云才

同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,上海200092

收稿日期:2004-09-01 修回日期:2005-03-30 出版日期:2005-07-25 发布日期:2005-07-25
作者简介:王云才 (1967-), 男, 陕西勉县人, 博士, 副教授, 主要从事景观生态规划、游憩景观规划设计等理论与实践研究。主编和参编专著5部, 公开发表论文70多篇。E-mail: wyc1967@sina.com
基金资助:
国家十五科技攻关课题(2002BA807B10)

Recreation-Scape Ecological Suitability Evaluation and Landscape Resources Sustainable Development:A Case Study of Kunes River Basin in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

WANG Yuncai

Department of Landscape Architecture and Tourism, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2004-09-01 Revised:2005-03-30 Online:2005-07-25 Published:2005-07-25
Supported by:
Key Technologies R & D Program, No.2002BA807B10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

流域是重要的景观生态空间和游憩景观建设空间。游憩景观生态适宜性评价与规划是合理利用流域资源,建立流域协调景观体系,促进流域可持续发展的重要环节。以巩乃斯河流域景观空间为依托,以游憩景观生态适宜性评价为核心,通过景观旷奥度和相容度的核心评价和综合评价,研究了巩乃斯河流域游憩景观生态适宜性特征,探讨了巩乃斯河流域游憩景观生态保护、游憩景观资源可持续利用的重点途径。

关键词: 景观生态评价, 游憩景观, 景观资源, 持续利用, 巩乃斯河

Abstract:

River basin is an important landscape ecology and recreation-scape construction region. Recreation-scape ecological evaluation and planning are the key points for rationally utilizing river basin natural and human resources, establishing coordinated landscape system and promoting sustainable development. The Kunes is a branch of Yili River in Xinjiang, which is topographically characteristized by mountains, grassland and valley with beautiful sceneries for recreational purpose. This paper, taking landscape space of the Kunes river basin as a base, studies the suitability characteristics of the recreation-scape of the basin. Landscapes in the Kunes river basin mainly consist of broadness landscape, which occupies 38.5% of the total basin's area, the concealment landscape, which is 16.3% of the total area and transitional zone between the two types of landscapes, which is 45.2%. The evaluation of the recreation-scape suitability was carried out on seven landscape areas and 31 kinds of behaviors. The suitability of stockbreeding is 27.94%, particularly suiting plain grassland with a suitability of 62.6% and mountain grassland with a suitability of 60%. The suitability of manufacturing and processing industry as a whole is low, being only 4.13%, and with a relatively high suitability of 22.2% in small towns, but unsuitable to the other six types of landscapes. The suitability of the infrastructure construction is relatively low, being 9.92% owing to its great limitations. The suitability of towns and villages is better, being 61.1%. The social public activities are the unique human landscape of minority nationalities with a high suitability 27.8% of the total landscape. The suitability of recreation-scape behaviors is 22.59%, a moderate one with limitations to landscape. From the viewpoint of sustainable landscape resources utilization, recreational behaviors are most suitable to landscape of towns and villages, plain grassland and mountain grassland, and other landscapes are less or unsuitable to visitors, which should be conserved originally.

Key words: Kunes river, landscape ecological evaluation, recreation-scape, landscape resources, sustainable utilization

王云才. 巩乃斯河流域游憩景观生态评价及持续利用[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(4): 645-655.

WANG Yuncai. Recreation-Scape Ecological Suitability Evaluation and Landscape Resources Sustainable Development:A Case Study of Kunes River Basin in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(4): 645-655.

参考文献

[1] Ian L McHarg. Design with Nature. Philadelphia: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1971. 68-81.

[2] John O Simonds. Earthscape: Guide to Environment Planning. McGraw-Hill Professional, 1997. 231-345.

[3] Philip H Lewis. Tomorrow by Design: A Regional Design Process for Sustainability. Philadelphia: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998. 89-156.

[4] Xiao Duning. Ecological principles of landscape classification and assessment. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, (2): 217-221.
[肖笃宁. 景观分类与评价的生态原则. 应用生态学报, 1998, (2): 217-221.]

[5] Fu Bojie. Landscape diversity types and their ecological significance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(5): 454-462.
[傅伯杰. 景观多样性的类型及其生态意义. 地理学报, 1996, 51(5): 454-462.]

[6] Wang Yanglin. Ecological planning and design of agriculture landscape. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2000, (2): 265-269.
[王仰麟. 农业景观的生态规划与设计. 应用生态学报, 2000, (2): 265-269.]

[7] Wang Yanglin. The application of landscape ecology on agritourism planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(suppl.): 21-27.
[王仰麟. 论景观生态学在观光农业规划设计中的应用. 地理学报, 1998, 53(增刊): 21-27.]

[8] Riuchard T, T Forman. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 231-245.

[9] Zube E H. Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions and Resources. Halsted Press, 1975. 123-213.

[10] Turner M G. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, 1997. 251-267.

[11] Li Zhen et al. The impact of tourism development on the vegetation cover of Mount Danxia, Guangdong. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(6): 554-561.
[李贞等. 旅游开发对丹霞山植被的影响研究. 地理学报, 1998, 53(6): 554-561.]

[12] Dai Fan, Bao Jigang. The social impacts of tourism: a case study in Dali, Yunnan province. Chinese Geographical Sciences, 1996.

[13] Zev Naveh. Landscape Ecology. Philadelphia: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992. 113-187.

[14] Wang Jun. The principles and methods of landscape ecology planning. Resources Science, 1999, 19(2): 71-76.
[王军. 景观生态规划的原理和方法. 资源科学, 1999, 19(2): 71-76.]

[15] Niu Yafei. Sustainable tourism, eco-tourism and projects. Geographical Research, 1999, 18(2): 179-184.
[牛亚菲. 可持续旅游.生态旅游及实施方案(J). 地理研究, 1999, 18(2): 179-184.]

[16] Yu Kongjian. Bio-diversity conservation as a way of landscapes planning. Biodiversity Science, 1998, 6(3): 205-212.
[俞孔坚. 生物多样性保护的景观规划途径. 生物多样性, 1998, 6(3): 205-212.]

[17] Wang Yuncai. The study on recreation-scape planning and landscape ecological protection of urban-rural fringe. Geographical Research, 2003, 22(2): 324-334.
[王云才. 论大都市郊区游憩景观规划与景观生态保护——以北京市郊区游憩景观规划为例. 地理研究, 2003, 22(2): 324-334.]

[18] Wang Yuncai. The Theory and Practice of Landscape and Tourism Planning and Design in Countryside. Beijing: Science Press, 2004. 41-60.
[王云才. 乡村景观旅游规划设计的理论与实践. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004. 41-60.]

[19] Wang Yuncai. The image and landscape design of ecology and agritourism valley. Journal of Mountain Science, 2002, 20(2): 141-149.
[王云才. 沟谷综合经济区创意与景观规划设计. 山地学报, 2002, 20(2): 141-149.]

[20] Wang Yuncai. Mountain landscape ecosystem construction and landscape planning of western Beijing area. Journal of Mountain Science, 2003, 21(3): 265-271.
[王云才. 北京市西部山地景观生态整治与景观规划. 山地学报, 2003, 21(3): 265-271.]

[21] Wang Yuncai. Modern Landscape and Tourism Planning and Design in Countryside. Qingdao: Qingdao Press, 2003. 79-101.
[王云才. 现代乡村景观旅游规划设计. 青岛: 青岛出版社, 2003. 79-101.]

[22] America's National Parks, Frederick Law Olmsted National Historical Site. Washington: Eastern National, 2000. 112-145.

[23] Wu Bihu. Formation and spatial structure of ReBAM: a case study of Shanghai city. A presentation to the international conference on urban tourism, Zhuhai, 1999. 156-163.

巩乃斯河流域游憩景观生态评价及持续利用

Recreation-Scape Ecological Suitability Evaluation and Landscape Resources Sustainable Development:A Case Study of Kunes River Basin in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.
[2]	王佳丽, 黄贤金, 钟太洋, 陈志刚. 盐碱地可持续利用研究综述[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(5): 673-684.
[3]	彭建,王仰麟,刘松,吴健生,李卫锋. 海岸带土地持续利用景观生态评价[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(3): 363-371.
[4]	秦明周, 赵杰. 城乡结合部土壤质量变化特点与可持续性利用对策——以开封市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 55(5): 545-554.