20世纪90年代中国城市效率的时空变化

doi:10.11821/xb200504010

地理学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 615-625.doi: 10.11821/xb200504010

20世纪90年代中国城市效率的时空变化

李郇¹, 徐现祥², 陈浩辉³

1. 中山大学城市与区域研究中心,广州 510275;
2. 中山大学岭南学院,广州 510275;
3. 中山大学地理与规划学院,广州 510275

收稿日期:2005-01-04 修回日期:2005-05-10 出版日期:2005-07-25 发布日期:2010-09-09
作者简介:李郇 (1964-), 男, 江西南昌人, 副教授, 经济学博士, 主要从事经济地理、城市地理、经济增长领域的研究。E-mail: lixun23@126.com
基金资助:
国家"985工程"GIS与遥感的地学应用科技创新平台项目 (105203200400006);桐山基金青年项目和广东省重点研究基地重大项目 (03JDXM79002)

Temporal and Spatial Changes of Urban Efficiency in the 1990s

LI Xun¹, XU Xianxiang², CHEN Haohui³

1. The Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
2. Lingnan College, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
3. School of Geographical Sciences and Planning, Zhongshan University,Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2005-01-04 Revised:2005-05-10 Online:2005-07-25 Published:2010-09-09
Supported by:
'985 Project' of GIS and Remote Sensing for Geosciences from the Ministry of Education of China, No.105203200400006; Kiriyama Foundation, Key Research Center of Guangdong Fundation, No.03JDXM79002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

尝试采用DEA测评中国202个地级及其以上城市的效率,进而探索中国城市效率在1990~2000年间的时空变化,结果发现：目前中国城市效率较低,而且呈现与三大地带经济发展格局和城市行政等级相一致的空间格局。另外,进一步把城市效率分解为规模效率、利用效率和纯技术效率,发现中国城市的利用效率和纯技术效率普遍较高,但规模效率是影响中国城市效率空间格局和时空变化的主要因素;正是由于规模效率在1990~2000年的下降抵消了利用效率、纯技术效率上升所带来的影响,造成目前中国城市效率普遍较低。因此,从规模效率的角度看中国城市目前还具有很大的发展潜力。

关键词: 数据包络法, 城市效率, 城市规模效率, 20世纪90年代, 中国

Abstract:

Based on the data from 23 cities in 1983 and 1984, Charnes (1989) the first to employ DEA to evaluate the urban efficacy in China. Surprisingly, the corresponding Chinese literature has been in dark, even though scholars have highly recognized DEA and frequently used DEA in economic management and analysis. We, therefore, attempt to employ DEA to evaluate all the cities efficiency. Based on the data from 202 cities through 1990 to 2000, we find that the urban efficiency is relatively low, and diminishing from the east to the west, which coincides with the spatial pattern of economic development in China at present. Decomposing the urban efficiency into scale efficiency, congestion efficiency and pure technical efficiency, we further find it is the scale efficiency that determines the temporal and spatial patterns of urban efficiency. Specifically, both the congestion efficiency and the pure technical efficiency are high, and uniformly distributed across provinces. Scale efficiency, however, is low, and the principal factor among the three decompositions results in the low urban efficiency in China. The findings shed some highlights on how to implement the coordinated development of cities in China at present.

Key words: DEA, urban efficiency, urban scale efficiency, China

李郇, 徐现祥, 陈浩辉. 20世纪90年代中国城市效率的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(4): 615-625.

LI Xun, XU Xianxiang, CHEN Haohui. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Urban Efficiency in the 1990s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(4): 615-625.

参考文献

[1] Zhou Yixing. The relationship between level of industrial output and city scale in Chinese cities. Economic Study, 1988, (5): 74-78.
[周一星. 中国城市工业产出水平与城市规模的关系. 经济研究, 1988, (5): 74-78.]

[2] Charnes Abraham, William Wager Cooper, Susan X Li. Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency in the economic performance of Chinese cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1989, 23: 325-344.

[3] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2: 429-444.

[4] Wei Quanling. Effective Methods on Evaluating Relative Efficiency. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1998. 6-131.
[魏权龄. 评价相对效率的有效的方法. 北京: 人民出版社, 1998. 6-131.]

[5] Qin Wanshun, Ouyang Jun. The market structure, efficiency and performance of commercial banking in China. Economic Science, 2001, (4): 34-45.
[秦宛顺, 欧阳俊. 中国商业银行业市场结构、效率和绩效. 经济科学, 2001, (4): 34-45.]

[6] Chen Song. The research on evaluating the university-run-school benefit with DEA method. Forecast, 2000, (1): 77-79.
[陈嵩. 用DEA法评价高校办学效益的研究. 预测, 2000, (1): 77-79.]

[7] Shi Jian, Wei Songling. The application of DEA method in health economics. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2004, 34(4): 59-66.
[史健, 魏松龄. DEA方法在卫生经济学中的应用. 数学的实践与认识, 2004, 34(4): 59-66.]

[8] Zheng Xinqi, Wang Xiaoming. DEA analysis for the efficiency of land use structure in cities and towns. China Land Science, 2004, 18(2): 34-39.
[郑新奇, 王筱明. 城镇土地利用结构效率数据包络分析. 中国土地科学, 2004, 18(2): 34-39.]

[9] Shi Xiaojun. Institutional efficiency and scale efficiency evaluation of China national software bases: DEA method. Economic Geography, 2003, 23(5): 597-600.
[石晓军. 国家软件产业基地制度效率与规模效率评价——基于DEA的方法. 经济地理, 2003, 23(5): 597-600.]

[10] Feng Zhenhuan, Zhao Guojie. Evaluate the efficiency of China's regional investment by DEA and broad sense BCG model. Economic Geography, 2000, 20(4): 10-15.
[冯振环, 赵国杰. 基于DEA 和广义BCG模型的中国区域投资有效性评价. 经济地理, 2000, 20(4): 10-15.]

[11] Yang Kaizhong, Xie Xie. The analysis about DEA-efficiency of China cities' input-output. Geography and Territorial Research, 2002, (3):45-47.
[杨开忠, 谢燮. 中国城市投入产出有效性的数据包络分析. 地理学与国土研究, 2002, (3): 45-47.]

[12] Yu Yanshan. Research on fairly city-size and its efficiency of scale in China's citied & towns. Economic Geography, 2000, 20(2): 84-89.
[俞燕山. 我国城镇的合理规模及其效率研究. 经济地理, 2000, 20(2): 84-89.]

[13] Ye Shiqi, Mo Jianfang. Efficiency analysis on macroeconomics invest-production of four special economic zones. Journal of Jinan University (Natural Science), 2002, (6): 15-19.
[叶世绮, 莫剑芳. 四个经济特区宏观经济投入产出有效性分析. 暨南大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, (6): 15-19.]

[14] F?re R S, Grosskopf M Norris, Zhongyang Zhang. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 1994, 84: 66-83.

[15] Lu Dadao, Liu Yi, Fan Jie. The regional policy effects and regional development states in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(6): 496-508.
[陆大道, 刘毅, 樊杰. 我国区域政策实施效果与区域发展的基本态势. 地理学报, 1999, 54(6): 496-508.]

[16] Zhou Yixing, Sun Zexin. Rediscussion on China's urban function classification. Geographical Research, 1997, 16(1): 11-22.
[周一星, 孙则昕. 再论中国城市的职能分类. 地理研究, 1997, 16(1): 11-22.]

[17] Chen Wen. An approach to the policy of urban development. Geographical Research, 1996, 15(3): 16-23.
[陈雯. 论我国城市发展的方针. 地理研究, 1996, 15(3): 16-23.]

[18] Cui Gonghao, Laurence C Ma. Urbanization from below in China: its development and mechanisms. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(2): 106-115.
[崔功豪, 马润潮. 中国自下而上城市化的发展及其机制. 地理学报, 1999, 54(2): 106-115.]

[19] Xu Xianxiang, Shu Yuan. Provincial coordinate development in China: a new framework. Management World, 2005 (2): 27-35.
[徐现祥, 舒元. 协调发展: 一个新的分析框架. 管理世界, 2005, (2): 27-35.]

[20] Padulah. The era of ERU. Urban Age, 1998, (2): 6.
[帕杜拉. 欧元时代. 城市时代, 1998, (2): 6.]

20世纪90年代中国城市效率的时空变化

Temporal and Spatial Changes of Urban Efficiency in the 1990s

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张学珍, 赵彩杉, 董金玮, 葛全胜. 1992-2017年基于荟萃分析的中国耕地撂荒时空特征[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 411-420.
[2]	陈峰, 李红波, 张安录. 基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 432-445.
[3]	高江波, 焦珂伟, 吴绍洪. 1982-2013年中国植被NDVI空间异质性的气候影响分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 534-543.
[4]	赵梓渝,魏冶,杨冉,王士君,朱宇. 中国人口省际流动重力模型的参数标定与误差估算[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 203-221.
[5]	古恒宇,沈体雁,刘子亮,孟鑫. 基于空间滤波方法的中国省际人口迁移驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 222-237.
[6]	周春山,金万富,张国俊,黎明,王少剑. 中国国有建设用地供应规模时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 16-31.
[7]	任小丽,路倩倩,何洪林,张黎,牛忠恩. 中国东部南北样带森林生态系统蒸腾与蒸散比值（T/ET）时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 63-75.
[8]	程维明,高晓雨,马廷,徐新良,陈印军,周成虎. 基于地貌分区的1990-2015年中国耕地时空特征变化分析[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1613-1629.
[9]	杜勤勤,张明军,王圣杰,车存伟,邱雪,马转转. 中国气温变化对全球变暖停滞的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1748-1764.
[10]	张翼鸥,谷人旭. 中国城市知识复杂性的空间特征及影响研究[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1421-1432.
[11]	刘承良,管明明,段德忠. 中国城际技术转移网络的空间格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1462-1477.
[12]	周扬,郭远智,刘彦随. 中国县域贫困综合测度及2020年后减贫瞄准[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1478-1493.
[13]	张国俊,黄婉玲,周春山,曹永旺. 城市群视角下中国人口分布演变特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1513-1525.
[14]	安北江. 《中国行政区划通史·五代十国卷》评介[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1604-1605.
[15]	邓铭江. 中国西北“水三线”空间格局与水资源配置方略[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(7): 1189-1203.