Palmer干旱指数、地表湿润指数与降水距平的比较

doi:10.11821/xb20037s014

地理学报 ›› 2003, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (7s): 117-124.doi: 10.11821/xb20037s014

Palmer干旱指数、地表湿润指数与降水距平的比较

卫捷¹, 马柱国²

1. 中国科学院大气物理研究所，北京 100029；
2. 中国科学院东亚区域气候-环境重点实验室，中国科学院大气物理研究所东亚中心，北京 100029

收稿日期:2003-02-17 修回日期:2003-07-20 出版日期:2003-12-25 发布日期:2003-12-25
作者简介:卫捷 (1966-), 女, 助研。 E-mail: wjie@mail.iap.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(G1999043405)；中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目 (ZKCX2-SW-210)

Comparison of Palmer Drought Severity Index, Percentage of Precipitation Anomaly and Surface Humid Index

WEI Jie¹, MA Zhuguo²

1. Institute of Atmospheric Physics, CAS, Beijing 100029, China;
2. Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment Research for Temperate East Asia, START Regional Center for East Asia, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, CAS, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2003-02-17 Revised:2003-07-20 Online:2003-12-25 Published:2003-12-25
Supported by:
National Key Planning Development for Basic Research, No.G1999043405; Knowlege Innovation Project of CAS, No ZKCX2-SW-210

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用中国气象局整编的1951年1月～1999年12月中国160站气温、降水月平均资料，计算了我国160站近49年逐月帕尔默干旱指数、地表湿润指数和降水距平百分率。对比研究表明：PDSI指数和地表湿润指数能抓住降水是干旱最重要的决定因素这一特征，并且，能反映出干旱过程具有更大的时空尺度。在实际蒸发较大的地区，PDSI指数比降水距平百分率描述干旱强度更准确。对于华北地区，在20世纪80年代以前，降水偏多，气温偏低，最大潜在蒸发较小，处于相对湿润的时段；80年代以后，降水偏少，加之气温的升高，华北的干旱越来越严重。

关键词: Palmer干旱指数, 地表湿润指数, 降水距平百分率, 中国

Abstract:

The monthly PDSI, surface moisture index and percentage of precipitation anomaly are calculated for the past 49 years with data from 160 stations in China. The result shows that PDSI and surface moisture index can grasp rainfall, a decisive factor of drought. Moreover, they reflect the process of drought on a greater space and time scale. In the region with more actual evaporation, PDSI describes the severity of drought more precisely than percentage of precipitation anomaly. In North China, before the 1980s, the rainfall was more sufficient, the temperature was higher and the potential evaporation was lower. It was a relatively moist period. Since the 1980s, the rainfall has been less sufficient together with higher temperature, the drought in North China has become more and more severe.

Key words: Palmer drought severity index, percentage of precipitation anomaly, surface humid index, China

卫捷,马柱国. Palmer干旱指数、地表湿润指数与降水距平的比较[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(7s): 117-124.

WEI Jie, MA Zhuguo. Comparison of Palmer Drought Severity Index, Percentage of Precipitation Anomaly and Surface Humid Index[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(7s): 117-124.

参考文献

[1] Ye Duzheng, Huang Ronghui. Investigation on Laws and Causes of Droughts and Floods in the Yellow and Yangtze River Valleys of China. Jinan: Shandong Science and Technology Press, 1996.
[叶笃正, 黄荣辉. 长江黄河流域旱涝规律和成因研究. 济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 1996.]

[2] Ye Duzheng, Huang Ronghui (eds.). The Climate Research of Drought and Flood. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 1990.
[叶笃正, 黄荣辉主编. 旱涝气候研究进展. 北京: 气象出版社, 1990.]

[3] Sun Shuqing. A study on the features of driught and flood in north China in recent 50 years and relations between them and global changes. Plateau Meteorology, 1999, 18(4): 541-551.
[孙淑清. 近50年来华北地区旱涝特征与全球变化的研究及对未来趋势的探讨. 高原气象, 1999, 18(4): 541-551.]

[4] Van Rooy M P. A rainfall anomaly index independent of time and space. Notos, 1965, (14): 43.

[5] Bhalme H N, D A Mooley. Large-scale drought/floods and monsoon circulation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 1980, 108: 1197-1211.

[6] N B Guttman. Comparing the Palmer drought index and the standardized precipitation index. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998, 34: 113-121.

[7] Palmer W C. Meteorological Drought. U. S. Weather Bureau. Res. Pap., 1965, 45: 1-58.

[8] Shafer B A, L E Dezman. Development of a surface water supply index (SWSI) to assess the severity of drought conditions in snow pack runoff areas. Proc. Western Snow Conf., 1982. 164-175.

[9] Weghorst K M. The reclamation drought index: guidelines and practical applications. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver. CO 1996. 6.

[10] Byun Hi-Ryong, Donald A Wilhith. Objective quantification of drought severity and duration. J. Climate, 1999, 12: 2747-2755.

[11] Ma Zhuguo, Fu Congbin. Trend of surface humid index in the arid area of northern China. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2001, 59(6): 737-746.
[马柱国, 符淙斌. 中国北方干旱区地表湿润状况的趋势分析. 气象学报, 2001, 59(6): 737-746.]

[12] Cook E R et al. Drought reconstructions for continental United States. J. Climate, 1999, 12: 1145-1163.

[13] Aiguo Dai, Kevin E Trenberth, Thomas R Karl. Global variations in droughts and wet spells. Geophysical Research Letters, 1998, 25(17): 3367-3370.

[14] An Shunqing, Xing Jiuxing. Modification of Palmer drought severity model. Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Press, 1986, 1(1): 75-82.
[安顺清, 邢久星. 帕尔默旱度模式的修正. 气象科学研究院院刊, 1986, 1(1): 75-82.]

[15] Alley W M. The Palmer severity drought index: limitations and assumptions. J. Climiate Appl. Meteor., 1984, 23: 1100-1109.

Palmer干旱指数、地表湿润指数与降水距平的比较

Comparison of Palmer Drought Severity Index, Percentage of Precipitation Anomaly and Surface Humid Index

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[2]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.
[3]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[4]	葛全胜, 朱会义. 两千年来中国自然与人文地理环境变迁及启示[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 3-14.
[5]	张兴航, 张百平, 王晶, 余付勤, 赵超, 姚永慧. 中国南北过渡带东段样带植被序列与气候分界问题[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 30-43.
[6]	李哲, 丁永建, 陈艾姣, 张智华, 张世强. 1960—2019年西北地区气候变化中的Hiatus现象及特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1845-1859.
[7]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 周亮, 王旭峰, 李振亚, 庞素菲, 颉斌斌. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1948-1965.
[8]	敖荣军, 常亮. 基于结构方程模型的中国县域人口老龄化影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1572-1584.
[9]	宋周莺, 祝巧玲. 中国边境地区的城镇化格局及其驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1603-1616.
[10]	马春玥, 买买提·沙吾提, 姚杰, 古丽努尔·依沙克. 1950—2015年中国棉花生产时空动态变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1699-1710.
[11]	郑景云, 张学珍, 刘洋, 郝志新. 过去千年中国不同区域干湿的多尺度变化特征评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1432-1450.
[12]	陶泽兴, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 1963—2018年中国垂柳和榆树开花始期积温需求的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1451-1464.
[13]	瞿诗进, 胡守庚, 李全峰. 中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553.
[14]	魏素豪, 李晶, 李泽怡, 宗刚. 中国农业竞争力时空格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300.
[15]	王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 史晨怡. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.