地理学报 ›› 2003, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (6): 917-926.doi: 10.11821/xb200306015

• 城市地理 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京城市社会区分析

顾朝林1, 王法辉2, 刘贵利3   

  1. 1. 南京大学城市与资源学系,南京210093;
    2. 美国北伊利诺伊大学地理系,DeKalb, IL 60115-2854, USA;
    3. 中国城市规划设计研究院,北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2003-06-20 修回日期:2003-08-26 出版日期:2003-11-25 发布日期:2003-11-25
  • 作者简介:顾朝林 (1958-), 男, 教授、博士生导师, 中国地理学会理事。主要从事城市与区域规划研究。 E-mail: Gucl2002@nju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家杰出青年基金项目(40025102);国家自然科学基金项目(49831031)

Study on Urban Social Areas in Beijing

GU Chaolin1, Fahui WANG2, LIU Guili3   

  1. 1. Department of Urban and Resource Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
    2. Department of Geography, Northern Illinois University, U.S.A.;
    3. Regional Institute, Chinese Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2003-06-20 Revised:2003-08-26 Online:2003-11-25 Published:2003-11-25
  • Supported by:

    National Outstanding Youth Foundation of China, No. 40025102; Natural Natural Science Foundation of China, No.49831031

摘要:

自从1984年中国实施城市改革以来,城市土地市场和住房市场建立已经对城市的社会空间结构产生重要影响。作者利用1998年北京街道一级调查数据进行城市社会区分析。结果显示,经济社会和种族状况具有一定的影响,但并没有发挥重要的作用。土地利用强度在形成新的城市社会空间结构过程中发挥了关键的作用。与家庭状况相关的流动人口状况也表现为非常强劲的影响。北京的社会区表明:土地利用强度分布呈同心圆模型,家庭分布形态具有扇形结构的特征;社会经济状态因子分布形态既表现了同心圆的特征,也具有扇形结构的特点;种族因子的空间分布形成了一种多核空间结构。

关键词: 社会区分析, 同心圆与扇形结构, 北京

Abstract:

The urban reforms in China in 1984 introduced an urban land market and a housing market to Chinese cities and had profound impacts on urban structures. Using data from a 1998 survey and other sources in Beijing at the subdistrict level, this research found that differentiations of social areas were taking place in Beijing. Unlike western cities with the socioeconomic status and the family status as dominant forces in forming social areas, Beijing just began to experience the impact of differentiation of socioeconomic status, and the family structure factor was ineffective in Beijing due to decades of family planning. Factor analysis revealed four factors that underlay the social spatial structure in Beijing: (1) land use intensity as the dominant factor displaying a concentric zonal pattern; (2) neighborhood dynamics, mainly composed of the floating population ratio, featuring a sectoral pattern; (3) socioeconomic status exhibiting a combination of sectoral and zonal patterns, and (4) ethnicity resembling a multiple nuclei pattern. Superimposing the four factors generated a complex urban mosaic in Beijing.

Key words: social area analysis, zonal and sectoral patterns, Beijing