黄土丘陵林地土壤侵蚀与土壤性质变化

doi:10.11821/xb200303017

地理学报 ›› 2003, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3): 464-469.doi: 10.11821/xb200303017

黄土丘陵林地土壤侵蚀与土壤性质变化

查小春¹, 唐克丽²

1．陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院，西安 710062; 2．中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所，杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2002-10-09 修回日期:2002-12-05 出版日期:2003-05-25 发布日期:2003-05-25
作者简介:查小春 (1972-), 男, 讲师, 主要从事土壤侵蚀环境演变与调控。E-mail: xiaochzh@163.net
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(19832060)

Change about Soil Erosion and Soil Properties in Reclaimed Forestland of Loess Hilly Region

ZHA Xiaochun¹, TANG Keli²

1．College of Tourism and Environment Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China; 2．Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China

Received:2002-10-09 Revised:2002-12-05 Online:2003-05-25 Published:2003-05-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.19832060

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以黄土丘陵子午岭土壤侵蚀和生态环境观测站1989~1998年的观测资料为基础，研究分析了林地开垦10年内土壤侵蚀与生态环境变化的相互效应关系。分析指出：林地开垦人为改变侵蚀环境，引起的人为加速侵蚀速率为自然侵蚀速率的1000倍以上；以单位降雨侵蚀力引起的侵蚀量作为衡量指标，指出林地开垦地土壤侵蚀强度随侵蚀年限增长呈递增加剧趋势；通过分析土壤物理力学性质表明，林地开垦侵蚀10年土壤粘粒和物理性粘粒比林地分别减少2.74%和3.01%，土壤向粗骨化趋势发展，>0.25 mm水稳性团粒含量减少58.7%，土壤容重增大，抗剪强度下降，抵抗径流冲刷能力减弱，造成土壤侵蚀更易发生；应用相关分析表明，>0.25 mm水稳性团粒含量的改变对土壤侵蚀强度影响最大，其偏相关系数为0.9728，其次是土壤的粗粉粒和抗剪强度，偏相关系数分别为0.8879和0.6020；分析>0.25 mm水稳性团粒含量和抗剪强度与土壤侵蚀强度关系表明，林地开垦后侵蚀1年和侵蚀7年为土壤侵蚀加剧的转折年限，说明退化的侵蚀土壤和退化的生态环境加剧了土壤侵蚀的发生和发展。

关键词: 黄土丘陵区, 林地开垦, 土壤侵蚀, 土壤物理力学性质

Abstract:

Based on the data observed from 1989 to 1998 in Ziwuling, the change of soil erosion and soil physico-mechanical properties was studied after forestland reclamation. When the man-induced factors changed the eco-environment by reclaiming forestlands, the intensity of man-made soil erosion in reclaimed lands was 1000 times more than that of the natural erosion to forestlands. From the analysis of soil physical mechanics properties, the clay content and physical clay content decreased 2.74% and 3.01% respectively, and the > 0.25 mm water stable aggregate content also decreased 58.7%, the soil unit weight increased and the soil shear strength decreased, all of which were easier to cause soil erosion. The results of the correlation analysis showed that > the 0.25 mm water stable aggregate content was the maximum affecting factor to soil erosion, the partial correlated coefficient was 0.9728, and then were soil coarse grain and soil shear strength, the partial correlated coefficients were 0.8879 and 0.6020 respectively. The relation between the >0.25 mm water stable aggregate content, the soil sheer strength and the soil erosion intensity were analyzed.

Key words: Loess, reclaimed forestland, soil erosion, soil physico-mechanical properties

查小春,唐克丽. 黄土丘陵林地土壤侵蚀与土壤性质变化[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(3): 464-469.

ZHA Xiaochun, TANG Keli. Change about Soil Erosion and Soil Properties in Reclaimed Forestland of Loess Hilly Region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(3): 464-469.

参考文献

[1] Tang Keli. Change about Runoff and Sediment and Erosion of Yellow River Watershed. Beijing: Science Press, 1993. 91-149.
[唐克丽. 黄河流域的侵蚀与径流泥沙变化. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993. 91-149.]

[2] Tang Keli. Natural erosion and man-made accelerated erosion in the Ziwuling forest area. In: Memoir of Northwestern Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Academia Sinica and Ministry of Water Resources, Vol.17, 1993. 17-28.
[唐克丽. 子午岭林区自然侵蚀和人为加速侵蚀剖析. 见: 中国科学院西北水土保持研究所集刊, 第17集, 1993. 17-28.]

[3] Zha Xuan. The impact of vegetation on soil characteristic and soil erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1992, 6(2): 52-58.
[查轩. 植被对土壤特性及土壤侵蚀的影响. 水土保持学报, 1992, 6(2): 52-58.]

[4] Shi Yanxi. Soil nutrient degradation under influence of forest land acceleration erosion. J of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation, 1996, 2(2): 26-32.
[史衍玺. 林地开垦加速侵蚀下土壤养分退化的研究. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1996, 2(2): 26-32.]

[5] Tang Keli. A study of soil loss and degradation on the Loess Plateau. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1987, 7(6): 12-17.
[唐克丽. 黄土高原的水土流失与土壤退化的研究. 水土保持通报, 1987, 7(6): 12-17.]

[6] Tang Keli. Relationship between soil erosion and eco-environment in Ziwuling. In: Memoir of NW Inst. of Soil and Water Conservation, Academia Sinica and Ministry of Water Resources, Vol.17, 1993. 3-11.
[唐克丽. 子午岭林区土壤侵蚀与生态环境关系的研究内容与方法. 见: 中国科学院西北水土保持研究所集刊, 第17集, 1993. 3-11.]

[7] Nanjing Institute of Soil Science, CAS. Analysis of Soil Physics and Chemistry. Shanghai: Shanghai Science Press, 1980.
[中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析. 上海: 上海科学出版社, 1980.]

[8] Xu Mingxiang. Variation of soil characters in small catchment of loess hilly areas. Bull. of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 20(1): 21-23.
[许明祥. 黄土丘陵小流域土壤特性的时空动态变化研究. 水土保持通报, 2000, 20(1): 21-33.]

[9] Wischmeier W H A. Rainfall erosion index for a universed soil erosion equation. Proc. Soil Sci. Am., 1959, 23: 246-249.

[10] Jiang Zhongshan. Study on the characteristic of raindrops in loess area. Soil and Water Conservation of China, 1983, 3(18): 32-36.
[江忠善. 黄土地区天然降雨雨滴特性研究. 中国水土保持, 1983, 3(18): 32-36.]

[11] Pan Jianjun, Ir E Bergsma. Determination of soil erosion class using soil infiltration rate and soil shear resistance. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995, 9(2): 93-96.
[潘剑君, Ir E Bergsma. 利用土壤入渗速率和土壤抗剪力确定土壤侵蚀等级. 水土保持学报, 1995, 9(2): 93-96.]

[1]	刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 党素珍. 黄土丘陵区雨强对水流含沙量的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1723-1732.
[2]	刘文超, 刘纪远, 匡文慧. 陕北地区退耕还林还草工程土壤保护效应的时空特征[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1835-1852.
[3]	刘立程, 刘春芳, 王川, 李鹏杰. 黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937.
[4]	王欢,高江波,侯文娟. 基于地理探测器的喀斯特不同地貌形态类型区土壤侵蚀定量归因[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1674-1686.
[5]	钱庆欢,王世杰,白晓永,周德全,田义超,李琴,吴路华,肖建勇,曾成,陈飞. 基于允许流失量和正负地形源汇理论的喀斯特关键带土壤侵蚀研究[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(11): 2135-2149.
[6]	钟莉娜, 王军, 赵文武. 多流域降雨和土地利用格局对土壤侵蚀影响的比较分析——以陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 432-443.
[7]	高海东, 李占斌, 李鹏, 贾莲莲, 徐国策, 任宗萍, 庞国伟, 赵宾华. 基于土壤侵蚀控制度的黄土高原水土流失治理潜力研究[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(9): 1503-1515.
[8]	查良松, 邓国徽, 谷家川. 1992-2013年巢湖流域土壤侵蚀动态变化[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(11): 1708-1719.
[9]	杨晓楠, 李晶, 秦克玉, 李婷, 刘婧雅. 关中—天水经济区生态系统服务的权衡关系[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(11): 1762-1773.
[10]	熊康宁, 李晋, 龙明忠. 典型喀斯特石漠化治理区水土流失特征与关键问题[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(7): 878-888.
[11]	谢云, 段兴武, 刘宝元, 刘刚, 冯艳杰, 高晓飞. 东北黑土区主要黑土土种的容许土壤流失量[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(7): 940-952.
[12]	刘春霞, 李月臣, 杨华, 闵婕, 王才军, 张虹. 三峡库区重庆段生态与环境敏感性综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(5): 631-642.
[13]	李勉, 姚文艺, 陈江南, 丁文峰, 杨剑锋, 李莉, 杨春霞. 坡面草被覆盖对坡沟侵蚀产沙过程的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(5): 725-732.
[14]	甘枝茂, 岳大鹏, 甘锐, 查小春. 陕北黄土丘陵区乡村聚落土壤水蚀观测分析[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(3): 519-525.
[15]	徐勇,田均良,沈洪泉,刘普灵. 生态重建模式的评价方法——以黄土丘陵区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 621-628.

黄土丘陵林地土壤侵蚀与土壤性质变化

Change about Soil Erosion and Soil Properties in Reclaimed Forestland of Loess Hilly Region

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价