国家自然科学基金视角下地理科学融合发展路径探索

doi:10.11821/dlxb202208001

地理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 77 ›› Issue (8): 1839-1850.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202208001

• 学科建设 • 下一篇

国家自然科学基金视角下地理科学融合发展路径探索

熊巨华¹(), 高阳¹^,², 吴浩¹^,³, 孙维君¹^,⁴, 刘小茜¹^,⁵, 刘建宝¹^,⁶, 杨刚¹^,⁷, 张中浩¹^,⁸, 毛德华¹^,⁹

1.国家自然科学基金委员会地球科学部,北京 100085
2.中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院,北京 100193
3.华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院,武汉 430079
4.山东师范大学地理与环境学院,济南 250014
5.北京联合大学应用文理学院,北京 100191
6.中国科学院青藏高原研究所,北京 100101
7.宁波大学地理与空间信息技系,宁波 315211
8.上海师范大学环境与地理科学学院,上海 200234
9.中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,长春 130102

收稿日期:2021-12-08 修回日期:2022-05-25 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-10-25
作者简介:熊巨华(1966-), 男, 湖北天门人, 博士, 研究员, 主要从事自然科学基金管理工作。E-mail: xiongjh@nsfc.gov.cn

Exploring the integrative development paths of geographic sciences from the perspective of National Natural Science Foundation of China

XIONG Juhua¹(), GAO Yang¹^,², WU Hao¹^,³, SUN Weijun¹^,⁴, LIU Xiaoqian¹^,⁵, LIU Jianbao¹^,⁶, YANG Gang¹^,⁷, ZHANG Zhonghao¹^,⁸, MAO Dehua¹^,⁹

1. Department of Earth Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing 100085, China
2. College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
3. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
4. College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
5. College of Applied Arts and Science, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
6. Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
7. Department of Geography and Spatial Information Techniques, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China
8. School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
9. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, CAS, Changchun 130102, China

Received:2021-12-08 Revised:2022-05-25 Published:2022-08-25 Online:2022-10-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着整体科学的进步和国家社会的发展,地理科学已迈入跨学科交叉融合发展的新阶段。通过学科间和领域间的深度融合寻求新发展路径,完善知识体系,充分发挥服务国家社会之功能,是当前地理科学发展的当务之急。本文基于自然科学基金视角,分析了中国地理科学融合发展的现状与问题,认为其与国际前沿未充分接轨,研究的全球政治、经济、文化影响力有待加强,认为地理科学融合国家重大需求进行理论与技术创新的能力有待提升,认为学科内部体系要根据知识融合需求进一步优化。在此基础上,提出了资助政策引导下地理科学面向世界科技前沿的学科交叉融合、面向国家重大战略的多领域交叉融合和面向申请代码优化布局的分支学科交叉三大融合发展路径与相应政策工具。未来国家自然科学基金委员会将立足于保持学科发展的持续性和稳定性,通过政策创新来激励地理科学与其它学科、领域的交叉融合,以建设更具有活力与创新性的学术生态系统。

关键词: 地理科学, 融合发展, 自然科学基金, 学科发展

Abstract:

With the progress of holistic science and human society, development of geographical sciences has entered a new stage of interdisciplinary integration. Under this context, geographical sciences urgently needs to seek new paths through the deep integration of disciplines to better improve the knowledge system and contribute to the country and society development effectively. Based on the perspective of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), this paper firstly deeply analyzes the current status and problems of the integration and development of geographical sciences in China, and points out that it is not fully integrated with the frontier of international geographical sciences, and the global political, economic and cultural influence of geographical research in China needs to be strengthened; considers that the ability of Geographic Sciences integrating national major practical needs for theoretical and technological innovation should be improved; suggests that the internal discipline system of geographical sciences in China should be further optimized according to the needs of knowledge integration. Then, this paper proposes three paths for the integrated development of geographical sciences under the guidance of funding policies, that is, the interdisciplinary integration facing the frontiers of science and technology in the world, the multiple fields integration facing the major national development strategies, and inner-discipline integration facing the optimized application codes of NSFC. In future, based on maintaining the continuity and stability of the development of disciplines, the NSFC will encourage the integration of geographical sciences with other disciplines and fields through the improvement and innovation, so as to promote and build a healthier and more innovative system.

Key words: geographical sciences, integrated development, National Natural Science Foundation of China, discipline development

熊巨华, 高阳, 吴浩, 孙维君, 刘小茜, 刘建宝, 杨刚, 张中浩, 毛德华. 国家自然科学基金视角下地理科学融合发展路径探索[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(8): 1839-1850.

XIONG Juhua, GAO Yang, WU Hao, SUN Weijun, LIU Xiaoqian, LIU Jianbao, YANG Gang, ZHANG Zhonghao, MAO Dehua. Exploring the integrative development paths of geographic sciences from the perspective of National Natural Science Foundation of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(8): 1839-1850.

图/表 1

参考文献 32

[1]	Xi Jinping. Speech at a meeting conflating the general assemblies of the members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering, and the National Congress of the China Association for Science and Technology. The People's Daily, 2021-05-29(2).
	[ 习近平. 在中国科学院第二十次院士大会、中国工程院第十五次院士大会、中国科协第十次全国代表大会上的讲话. 人民日报, 2021-05-29(2).]
[2]	Li Jinghai. Issues should be focused in development of Chinese science and technology. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(10): 1119-1120.
	[ 李静海. 中国科学技术发展应重视的几个问题. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(10): 1119-1120.]
[3]	Han Qide. What determines the success or failure of interdisciplinary research. China Awards for Science and Technology, 2020(5): 6-7.
	[ 韩启德. 是什么决定学科交叉研究成败. 中国科技奖励, 2020(5): 6-7.]
[4]	National Natural Science Foundation of China. Project Guide of National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2021. Beijing: Science Press, 2021.
	[ 国家自然科学基金委员会. 2021年度国家自然科学基金项目指南. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.]
[5]	Zhou Xinyu, Chen Qin. Review on the geography discipline and cross disciplinary research. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science), 2015, 32(4): 136-145.
	[ 周欣雨, 陈琴. 地理学学科融合与学科交叉研究综述. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 32(4): 136-145.]
[6]	Fu Bojie. Geography: From knowledge, science to decision making support. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(11): 1923-1932. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201711001
	[ 傅伯杰. 地理学: 从知识、科学到决策. 地理学报, 2017, 72(11): 1923-1932.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201711001
[7]	Ye Chao, Yin Liangming, Yin Qingmei, et al. Is geography a vulnerable discipline? Reflections on the elimination of geography at Harvard University. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(3): 312-319. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.03.002
	[ 叶超, 尹梁明, 殷清眉, 等. 地理学是一门脆弱的学科吗? 哈佛大学撤销地理系事件及其反思. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 312-319.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.03.002
[8]	Metzger N, Zare R N. Interdisciplinary research: From belief to reality. Science, 1999, 283(5402): 642-643. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5402.642
[9]	Hernandez-Aguilera J N, Anderson W, Bridges A L, et al. Supporting interdisciplinary careers for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(5): 374-375. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00679-y
[10]	Nature. Why interdisciplinary research matters. Nature, 2015, 525(7569): 305. DOI: 10.1038/525305a. doi: 10.1038/525305a
[11]	Heisenberg W. Physics and Philosophy.Fan Dainian, trans trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1999.
	[ 维尔纳·海森伯. 物理学和哲学. 范岱年, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1999.]
[12]	Lu Huayu. Progress in geomorphology and future study: A brief review. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(1): 8-15. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.002
	[ 鹿化煜. 试论地貌学的新进展和趋势. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 8-15.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.002
[13]	Fu Xudong, Zhang Guibin, Pan Shaoqi. Trends in geomorphology and its construction on new textbook contents. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2015, 40(10): 171-174.
	[ 付旭东, 张桂宾, 潘少奇. 地貌学研究趋向与教材内容构建. 测绘科学, 2015, 40(10): 171-174.]
[14]	Baumann F. The next frontier-Human development and the Anthropocene: UNDP Human Development Report 2020. Environment:Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 2021, 63(3): 34-40.
[15]	Engels F. Complete Works of Marx and Engels: Volume 39. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1974.
	[ 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集:第39卷. 北京: 人民出版社, 1974.]
[16]	Fu Bojie. Geography for global sustainable development. Science & Technology Review, 2018, 36(2): 1.
	[ 傅伯杰. 面向全球可持续发展的地理学. 科技导报, 2018, 36(2): 1.]
[17]	Jiang Wei. Funding pattern of the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft in the area of geosciences and its inspirations. World Sci-Tech R&D, 2022, 44(1): 128-134.
	[ 姜维. 德国研究基金会在地球科学领域的资助布局及其启示. 世界科技研究与发展, 2022, 44(1): 128-134.]
[18]	National Science Foundation. A Vision for NSF Earth Sciences 2020-2030: Earth in Time. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2020.
[19]	National Science Foundation. Meet TIP-technology, innovation and partnerships: A new directorate at the U.S. National Science Foundation. 2021. https://beta.nsf.gov/tip/latest .
[20]	Chen Fahu, Li Xin, Wu Shaohong, et al. Disciplinary structure of geographic science in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(9): 2069-2073. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202109001
	[ 陈发虎, 李新, 吴绍洪, 等. 中国地理科学学科体系浅析. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2069-2073.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202109001
[21]	Fan Jie, Zhao Pengjun, Zhou Shangyi, et al. Disciplinary structure and development strategy of human geography in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(9): 2083-2093. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202109003
	[ 樊杰, 赵鹏军, 周尚意, 等. 人文地理学学科体系与发展战略要点. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2083-2093.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202109003
[22]	Lu Dadao. The changing humanistic and economic geography in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(5): 641-650. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.05.001
	[ 陆大道. 变化发展中的中国人文与经济地理学. 地理科学, 2017, 37(5): 641-650.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.05.001
[23]	Fan Jie. The progress and characteristics of Chinese human geography over the past 70 years. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2019, 49(11): 1697-1719.
	[ 樊杰. 中国人文地理学70年创新发展与学术特色. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2019, 49(11): 1697-1719.]
[24]	Ye Chao, Yu Jie, Zhang Qingyuan, et al. From governance to rural-urban co-governance: Research frontiers, trends, and the Chinese paths. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 15-27. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002
	[ 叶超, 于洁, 张清源, 等. 从治理到城乡治理: 国际前沿、发展态势与中国路径. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 15-27.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002
[25]	Xiong Juhua, Wang Jia, Shi Yunfei, et al. Adjustment and optimization of geographical sciences application code of NSFC. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(11): 2283-2297.
	[ 熊巨华, 王佳, 史云飞, 等. 国家自然科学基金地理科学申请代码的调整优化. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2283-2297.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202011001
[26]	White Paper Research Group on Earth Science Development Strategy. Earth Science Development Strategy 2021-2030: Past, Present and Future of Livable Earth. Beijing: Science Press, 2021.
	[ 地球科学发展战略白皮书研究组. 2021—2030地球科学发展战略:宜居地球的过去、现在与未来. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.]
[27]	Chen Fahu, Wu Shaohong, Liu Hongyan, et al. Disciplinary structure and development strategy of physical geography in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(9): 2074-2082. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202109002
	[ 陈发虎, 吴绍洪, 刘鸿雁, 等. 自然地理学学科体系与发展战略要点. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2074-2082.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202109002
[28]	Nature Editorial Board. Meet the challenge of interdisciplinary science. Nature, 2016, 534(7609): 589-590.
[29]	Blainey P C. Funding: Interdisciplinary challenges. Nature Microbiology, 2016, 1: 16118. DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.118. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.118 pmid: 27573117
[30]	Zhao Yin. From science and technology management to science and technology governance. People's Tribune, 2019(7): 86-87.
	[ 赵胤. 从科技管理走向科技治理. 人民论坛, 2019(7): 86-87.]
[31]	Li Guang. Time waits for no man to speed up the modernization process of China's scientific and technological governance capacity. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(3): 387-388.
	[ 李光. 加快我国科技治理能力现代化进程时不我待. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(3): 387-388.]
[32]	Wu Jinxi, Sun Rui, Ma Lei. Modernization of science and technology governance system: Concept, characteristics and challenges. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2015, 36(8): 3-9.
	[ 吴金希, 孙蕊, 马蕾. 科技治理体系现代化: 概念、特征与挑战. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(8): 3-9.]

国家自然科学基金视角下地理科学融合发展路径探索

Exploring the integrative development paths of geographic sciences from the perspective of National Natural Science Foundation of China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	方创琳. 城乡融合发展机理与演进规律的理论解析[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(4): 759-776.
[2]	陈发虎, 李新, 吴绍洪, 樊杰, 熊巨华, 张国友. 中国地理科学学科体系浅析[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2069-2073.
[3]	龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.
[4]	刘昌明, 郑度, 崔鹏, 葛全胜, 刘纪远, 吴绍洪, 汤秋鸿, 宋献方, 杨林生. 自然地理学创新发展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2547-2569.
[5]	欧阳竹, 邓祥征, 孙志刚, 龙花楼, 张林秀, 李发东, 金贵. 面向国民经济主战场的区域农业研究[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2636-2654.
[6]	葛全胜, 廖小罕, 高星, 封志明, 刘卫东, 廖晓勇, 诸云强. 地理科学与资源研究所80年回顾及展望[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2537-2546.
[7]	熊巨华, 王佳, 史云飞, 李飞, 张新林, 耿豪鹏, 张晴, 官冬杰, 王天富. 国家自然科学基金地理科学申请代码的调整优化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2283-2297.
[8]	陈明星, 梁龙武, 王振波, 张文忠, 余建辉, 梁宜. 美丽中国与国土空间规划关系的地理学思考[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2467-2481.
[9]	鲁莎莎, 刘彦随, 秦凡. 环渤海地区农业地域功能演进及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2011-2026.
[10]	张朝林,郑袁明,范闻捷,傅伯杰. 国家自然科学基金地理学科申请代码的历史沿革与发展[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 191-198.
[11]	黄耿志,冷疏影. 国家自然科学基金推动下的中国人文地理学发展[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3): 578-594.
[12]	王淑强, 青秀玲, 王晶, 陈卉, 崔璟, 王绍强, 裴韬, 佟学思, 刘啸, 赵航, 杜涛. 基于文献计量方法的国际地理科学研究机构竞争力分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(9): 1702-1716.
[13]	程维明, 刘樯漪, 申元村. 国家自然科学基金项目资助的地貌学研究现状与效应[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1255-1261.
[14]	宋涛, 陆大道, 梁宜, 王倩. 近20年国际地缘政治学的研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(4): 551-563.
[15]	陆大道. 地理科学的价值与地理学者的情怀[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(10): 1539-1551.