生态系统服务权衡与协同视角下的重点生态功能区保护特征

doi:10.11821/dlxb202205016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

重点生态功能区提供着源源不断的生态系统服务,在保障国家生态安全和社会可持续发展方面,有着不可或缺的基础作用。但是,以生态系统服务权衡与协同关系为视角,进而探讨分析重点生态功能区保护特征的研究案例相对较少。本文以秦巴重点生态功能区为评估分析区域,选择自然地理条件相似度极高的秦巴山区为参照单元,以生态系统供给服务与调节服务为核心内容,在定量分析2000—2019年期间的生态空间变化特征基础上,分析评估生态系统服务权衡与协同关系。结果表明：秦巴山区生态状况逐渐变好,重点生态功能区划定之后,生态系统趋于稳定;重点生态功能区服务能力呈逐渐增强的趋势,平均净初级生产力、土壤保持总量和水源涵养总量比重点生态功能区外分别高出了25.95 gC/m²、5.81亿t和24.95亿m³;土壤保持服务和生态系统供给服务的协同关系与生态状况改善呈正相关;由于受到降水的影响,2010年之后的水源涵养服务与生态系统供给服务的协同关系变差。总体来看,秦巴重点生态功能区的划定带动了区域生态空间“量的增长”和生态系统服务“质的提升”,但生态系统服务之间关系的“协调性”仍然不足,甚至从“协同”转为“权衡”关系,这要求未来国家需要制定更有针对性的生态系统保护管理决策,提高生态系统总体效益,支撑区域生态系统服务的可持续供给。

关键词: 秦巴山区, 重点生态功能区, 生态系统服务, 权衡与协同

Abstract:

Key ecological functional zones provide continuous ecosystem services and play an indispensable role in ensuring national ecological security and social sustainable development. From the perspective of ecosystem service trade-off and synergy, this paper discusses and analyzes the protection characteristics of key ecological functional areas. The data includes multi-source datasets such as ecosystem types, meteorological data, elevation data and soil data from 2000 to 2019. Methods of the dynamic degree of ecological spatial change, ecosystem service model and partial correlation coefficient were used for evaluation and analysis. This research selects the Qinling-Daba (Qinba) Mountains region with high similarity of natural and geographical conditions as the reference unit, takes ecosystem supply services and regulation services as the core content, and analyzes the trade-off and synergy relationship of ecosystem services based on the quantitative analysis of the characteristics of ecological spatial changes from 2000 to 2019. The results showed that the ecological status of the study area gradually improved, and the ecosystem tended to be stable after the delimitation of key ecological functional zones. The service capacity of key ecological functional zones is gradually increasing, and the average net primary productivity, total soil conservation and total water conservation are higher than those outside the key ecological functional zones by 25.95 gC/m², 5.81×10⁸ t and 24.95×10⁸ m³, respectively. The synergy between soil conservation services and ecosystem supply services was positively correlated with the improvement of ecological status. Due to the impact of precipitation, the synergistic relationship between water conservation services and ecosystem supply services after 2010 became worse. Overall, the designation of key ecological functional areas in the Qinba Mountains has driven the "quantitative growth" of regional ecological space and the "qualitative improvement" of ecosystem services. However, the "synergy" of the relationship between ecosystem services is not obvious, and even changed to "trade-off", which requires the country to make more targeted ecosystem protection and management decisions in the future, and improve the overall benefits of ecosystem and support the sustainable supply of regional ecosystem services.

Key words: Qinba Mountains region, key ecological function zone, ecosystem services, trade-off and synergies

祝汉收, 翟俊, 侯鹏, 王桥, 陈妍, 金点点, 王永财. 生态系统服务权衡与协同视角下的重点生态功能区保护特征[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(5): 1275-1288.

ZHU Hanshou, ZHAI Jun, HOU Peng, WANG Qiao, CHEN Yan, JIN Diandian, WANG Yongcai. The protection characteristics of key ecological functional zones from the perspective of ecosystem service trade-off and synergy[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(5): 1275-1288.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 45

[1]	Hou Peng, Wang Qiao, Shen Wenming, et al. Progress of integrated ecosystem assessment: Concept, framework and challenges. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(10): 1809-1823. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201510001
	[侯鹏, 王桥, 申文明, 等. 生态系统综合评估研究进展:内涵、框架与挑战. 地理研究, 2015, 34(10): 1809-1823.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201510001
[2]	Daily G C. Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington: Island Press, 1997: 412.
[3]	Costanza R, D'Arge R, Groot R D, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(15): 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[4]	Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke, Miao Hong. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(5): 3-5.
	[欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 3-5.]
[5]	Huang Run, Wang Shengtang, Ni Jianhua, et al. Ecosystem service functions of the five reservoirs in Dabie mountain, west Anhui province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(10): 1270-1274.
	[黄润, 王升堂, 倪建华, 等. 皖西大别山五大水库生态系统服务功能价值评估. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1270-1274.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.010.1270
[6]	Wang Ailing, Zhu Wenquan, Li Jing, et al. Measurement of ecosystem service value based on remote sensing: A case study in Inner Mongolia, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(3): 325-330.
	[王爱玲, 朱文泉, 李京, 等. 内蒙古生态系统服务价值遥感测量. 地理科学, 2007, 27(3): 325-330.]
[7]	Li Shujuan, Gao Lin. Ecosystem service values for 4 periods and ecological function zoning of coastal wetlands on north shore of Jiaozhou Bay. Wetland Science, 2020, 18(2): 129-140.
	[李淑娟, 高琳. 胶州湾北岸滨海地区4个时期生态系统服务价值和生态功能区划分研究. 湿地科学, 2020, 18(2): 129-140.]
[8]	Zhang Yumeng, Li Jing, Zeng Li, et al. Optimal protected area selection: Based on multiple attribute decision making method and ecosystem service research: Illustrated by Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region section of the Weihe River basin. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(12): 2114-2127.
	[张渝萌, 李晶, 曾莉, 等. 基于OWA多属性决策的生态系统服务最优保护区选择研究: 以渭河流域(关天段)为例. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(12): 2114-2127.]
[9]	Zhu Ping, Liu Xin, Zheng Yuhan, et al. Tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in key ecological function zones in northern China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(23): 8694-8706.
	[祝萍, 刘鑫, 郑瑜晗, 等. 北方重点生态功能区生态系统服务权衡与协同. 生态学报, 2020, 40(23): 8694-8706.]
[10]	Li Qi, Zhu Jianhua, Xiao Wenfa. Relationships and trade-offs between, and management of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 2655-2666.
	[李奇, 朱建华, 肖文发. 生物多样性与生态系统服务: 关系、权衡与管理. 生态学报, 2019, 39(8): 2655-2666.]
[11]	Shui Wei, Du Yong, Wang Yanan, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics and scenarios simulation of trade-offs between ecosystem services in Min Delta urban agglomeration. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(14): 5188-5197.
	[税伟, 杜勇, 王亚楠, 等. 闽三角城市群生态系统服务权衡的时空动态与情景模拟. 生态学报, 2019, 39(14): 5188-5197.]
[12]	Wang Shihao, Huang Lin, Xu Xinliang, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution of ecosystem services and its trade-offs and synergies in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(23): 8403-8416.
	[王世豪, 黄麟, 徐新良, 等. 粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务时空演化及其权衡与协同特征. 生态学报, 2020, 40(23): 8403-8416.]
[13]	Bao Rui, Liu Feng, Zhang Jianping, et al. Multi-objective linear programming-based trade-off and optimization of the ecosystem services in Jiajiyu small watershed in the Loess Plateau, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(3): 812-828.
	[包蕊, 刘峰, 张建平, 等. 基于多目标线性规划的甲积峪小流域生态系统服务权衡优化. 生态学报, 2018, 38(3): 812-828.]
[14]	Ning Shan, Zhang Zhengyong, Zhou Hongwu, et al. Optimization of land use structure based on ecological service value in Manas River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(14): 5208-5217.
	[宁珊, 张正勇, 周红武, 等. 基于生态服务价值的玛纳斯河流域土地利用结构优化. 生态学报, 2019, 39(14): 5208-5217.]
[15]	Nelson E, Mendoza J, Regetz J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7(1): 4-11. doi: 10.1890/080023
[16]	Benra F, Nahuelhual L, Gaglio M, et al. Ecosystem services tradeoffs arising from non-native tree plantation expansion in southern Chile. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 190: 103589. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103589. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103589
[17]	Lan Jie, Lei Xiangdong, Zhang Yutao. Analysis on trade-offs and synergies of multiple functions of picea schrenkiana forests in central Tianshan mountains. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 9-18.
	[兰洁, 雷相东, 张毓涛. 天山中部雪岭云杉林多功能权衡与协同关系. 林业科学, 2019, 55(11): 9-18.]
[18]	Liu Jingping, Xu Xibao. Simulating the effects of different management modes on the ecosystem services of agroecosystems: A case study of the Taihu Lake basin, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(24): 9314-9324.
	[刘静萍, 徐昔保. 不同管理模式对农田生态系统服务的影响模拟研究: 以太湖流域为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24): 9314-9324.]
[19]	Zhong Juntao, Wang Bei, Mi Wenbao, et al. Spatial trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services for grazing-prohibited grassland in agro-pasture ecotone. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(12): 268-275.
	[仲俊涛, 王蓓, 米文宝, 等. 农牧交错带禁牧草地生态系统服务空间权衡与协同关系. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(12): 268-275.]
[20]	Hou Peng, Yang Min, Zhai Jun, et al. Discussion about natural reserve and construction of national ecological security pattern. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 420-428. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703002
	[侯鹏, 杨旻, 翟俊, 等. 论自然保护地与国家生态安全格局构建. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 420-428.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703002
[21]	Hou Peng, Gao Jixi, Wan Huawei, et al. Progress and some scientific issues on effectiveness assessment of terrestrial ecosystem conservation and restoration. Environmental Ecology, 2021, 3(4): 1-7.
	[侯鹏, 高吉喜, 万华伟, 等. 陆地生态系统保护修复成效评估研究进展及主要科学问题. 环境生态学, 2021, 3(4): 1-7.]
[22]	Hou Peng, Wang Qiao, Yang Min, et al. China's ecological protection redlines: Evaluation framework and method of protection effect. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(10): 1927-1937. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201810004
	[侯鹏, 王桥, 杨旻, 等. 生态保护红线成效评估框架与指标方法. 地理研究, 2018, 37(10): 1927-1937.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201810004
[23]	Hou Peng, Zhai Jun, Cao Wei, et al. Evaluation on ecosystem changes and protection of the national key ecological function zones in mountainous areas of central Hainan Island. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(3): 429-441. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201803004
	[侯鹏, 翟俊, 曹巍, 等. 国家重点生态功能区生态状况变化与保护成效评估: 以海南岛中部山区国家重点生态功能区为例. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3): 429-441.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201803004
[24]	Chen Yan, Hou Peng, Wang Yuan, et al. Evaluation of protection effect of coordinated management of different kinds of nature reserves. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(4): 779-787. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200403
	[陈妍, 侯鹏, 王媛, 等. 生态保护地协同管控成效评估. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 779-787.]
[25]	Li Guoping, Li Hongwei. Evaluation of green poverty reduction in national key ecological functional areas. Soft Science, 2018, 32(12): 93-98.
	[李国平, 李宏伟. 绿色发展视角下国家重点生态功能区绿色减贫效果评价. 软科学, 2018, 32(12): 93-98.]
[26]	Li Guoping, Yang Lei, Liu Shengsheng. Study on spatial spillover effect of eco-environmental quality in counties of national key ecological function areas. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 16(1): 10-19.
	[李国平, 杨雷, 刘生胜. 国家重点生态功能区县域生态环境质量空间溢出效应研究. 中国地质大学学报: 社会科学版, 2016, 16(1): 10-19.]
[27]	Zhang Wenbin, Li Guoping. Dynamic incentive effect analysis of transfer payment in national key ecological function zone. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(10): 125-131.
	[张文彬, 李国平. 国家重点生态功能区转移支付动态激励效应分析. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(10): 125-131.]
[28]	Gong Guoli, Yao Ling, Ren Lixia, et al. Effects of ecological protection and construction project on windbreak and sand fixation service function in Beijing-Tianjin area. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 181-188, 2.
	[巩国丽, 要玲, 任丽霞, 等. 京津风沙源区生态保护与建设工程对防风固沙服务功能的影响. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(5): 181-188, 2.]
[29]	Shao Quanqin, Fan Jiangwen, Liu Jiyuan, et al. Assessment on the effects of the first-stage ecological conservation and restoration project in Sanjiangyuan region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1): 3-20. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601001
	[邵全琴, 樊江文, 刘纪远, 等. 三江源生态保护和建设一期工程生态成效评估. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 3-20.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601001
[30]	Shao Quanqin, Liu Jiyuan, Huang Lin, et al. Integrated assessment on the effectiveness of ecological conservation in Sanjiangyuan National Nature Reserve. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(9): 1645-1656. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201309007
	[邵全琴, 刘纪远, 黄麟, 等. 2005-2009年三江源自然保护区生态保护和建设工程生态成效综合评估. 地理研究, 2013, 32(9): 1645-1656.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201309007
[31]	Luo Xinping. Spatial-temporal changes of NDVI and the response to the regional climate in the Qinling-Daba mountains for 25 years[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2009.
	[雒新萍. 近25a来秦巴山区植被NDVI时空变化及其对区域气候的响应[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2009.]
[32]	Liu Jiyuan, Kuang Wenhui, Zhang Zengxiang, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(1): 3-14.
	[刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥, 等. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 3-14.]
[33]	Liu Jiyuan, Ning Jia, Kuang Wenhui, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010-2015. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 789-802.
	[刘纪远, 宁佳, 匡文慧, 等. 2010-2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 789-802.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201805001
[34]	Yan Huimin, Zhen Lin, Li Fengying, et al. Measurement method of reasonable consumption for ecosystem productivity supply service: A case study of Inner Mongolia grassland transect. Resources Science, 2012, 34(6): 998-1006.
	[闫慧敏, 甄霖, 李凤英, 等. 生态系统生产力供给服务合理消耗度量方法: 以内蒙古草地样带为例. 资源科学, 2012, 34(6): 998-1006.]
[35]	Yu T, Sun R, Xiao Z Q, et al. Estimation of global vegetation productivity from global land surface satellite data. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(2): 327. DOI: 10.3390/rs10020327. doi: 10.3390/rs10020327
[36]	Cui T X, Wang Y J, Sun R, et al. Estimating vegetation primary production in the Heihe River Basin of China with multi-source and multi-scale data. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11(4). DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone. 0153971. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone. 0153971
[37]	Liu Jiyuan, Liu Wenchao, Kuang Wenhui, et al. Remote sensing-based analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of built-up area across China based on the plan for major function-oriented zones. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(3): 355-369.
	[刘纪远, 刘文超, 匡文慧, 等. 基于主体功能区规划的中国城乡建设用地扩张时空特征遥感分析. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 355-369.]
[38]	Wu Dan, Zou Changxin, Lin Naifeng, et al. Characteristic analysis of ecological status in the Yangtze River economic belt based on the plan for major function-oriented zones. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(8): 1676-1682.
	[吴丹, 邹长新, 林乃峰, 等. 基于主体功能区规划的长江经济带生态状况变化. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(8): 1676-1682.]
[39]	Shi Xiaoliang, Zhang Ying. Review of forest water conservation. Resource Development & Market, 2015, 31(3): 332-336.
	[石小亮, 张颖. 森林涵养水源研究综述. 资源开发与市场, 2015, 31(3): 332-336.]
[40]	Jiang Wenlai. Theory and method to accounting value of forest water conservative. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2003, 17(2): 34-36, 40. doi: 10.5958/2455-7145.2018.00005.X
	[姜文来. 森林涵养水源的价值核算研究. 水土保持学报, 2003, 17(2): 34-36, 40.]
[41]	Cao Wei, Liu Lulu, Wu Dan, et al. Spatial and temporal variations and the importance of hierarchy of ecosystem functions in the Three-River-Source National Park. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 1361-1374.
	[曹巍, 刘璐璐, 吴丹, 等. 三江源国家公园生态功能时空分异特征及其重要性辨识. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4): 1361-1374.]
[42]	Wischmeier W H, Johnson C B, Cross B V. A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1971, 26: 189-193.
[43]	Cai Chongfa, Ding Shuwen, Shi Zhihua, et al. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(2): 19-24.
	[蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华, 等. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(2): 19-24.]
[44]	Xiao Yu, Xie Gaodi, An Kai. The function and economic value of soil conservation of ecosystems in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(11): 2367-2378.
	[肖玉, 谢高地, 安凯. 青藏高原生态系统土壤保持功能及其价值. 生态学报, 2003, 23(11): 2367-2378.]
[45]	Fu Bojie, Yu Dandan. Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 1-9.
	[傅伯杰, 于丹丹. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 1-9.]

年份	农业空间		城镇空间		生态空间
年份	功能区内	功能区外	功能区内	功能区外	功能区内	功能区外
1980s—2010	-0.013	-0.040	0.566	0.754	0.002	0.006
2010—2019	-0.007	-0.014	0.296	0.332	0.001	-0.001