地理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 77 ›› Issue (4): 888-899.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202204008
收稿日期:
2020-11-11
修回日期:
2021-10-13
出版日期:
2022-04-25
发布日期:
2022-06-20
通讯作者:
朱竑(1968-), 男, 甘肃临夏人, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师, 研究方向为文化地理与旅游地理。E-mail: zhuhong@gzhu.edu.cn作者简介:
尹铎(1990-), 男, 内蒙古鄂尔多斯人, 博士, 副教授, 研究方向为旅游地理与社会文化地理。E-mail: yinduo@m.scnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
YIN Duo1,2,3(), ZHU Hong1,2,3(
)
Received:
2020-11-11
Revised:
2021-10-13
Published:
2022-04-25
Online:
2022-06-20
Supported by:
摘要:
农业扶贫是乡村发展与贫困减缓最为关键且重要的研究内容之一。西南山区孕育着独特的自然生态与社会文化,承载了中国传统人地互动的经典实践,同时也是观测国家发展计划实施后人地关系变迁的关键地方。本文以云南丽江高寒山区的玛咖种植与西双版纳热带山地的普洱茶生产为案例,分析并回溯两种特色农业扶贫计划实施的机制与过程,力图呈现并比较特色产业扶贫带来的乡村发展效应。研究发现:① 农业扶贫项目的选择与确立,需要符合“国家—地方”这一对多元尺度层级的社会文化语境与政治经济管治框架。各类经济作物被引进成为山地乡村的产业扶贫项目,得益于中国地缘政治战略、“内地—边疆”的社会文化分异以及地方多元行动者之间的复杂互动;② 农业扶贫使得山地乡村实现了资本下乡、土地利用有效转型,从而达到不同程度的经济资本积累与文化再造,使所在地方农民经历了从市场竞争的被动接受者到主动的市场主体的身份转型;③ 农业扶贫中“扶贫”与“产业”所表征的政治逻辑与市场逻辑之间并非互相矛盾与掣肘,二者在中国乡村发展语境之下得到了有效、协调的互促与兼容。本文为产业扶贫研究提供了来自地理学的新兴视角与反思,对西南边疆地区立足特色产业提振乡村经济亦具有一定的参考价值。
尹铎, 朱竑. 云南典型山地乡村农业扶贫的机制与效应研究——以特色经济作物种植为例[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(4): 888-899.
YIN Duo, ZHU Hong. The mechanism and comprehensive effect of poverty alleviation with characteristic agriculture in typical mountainous rural areas of Yunnan Province: A case study on the production of special cash crops[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(4): 888-899.
[1] |
Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Li Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12):2511-2528.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007 |
[ 刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12):2511-2528.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007 |
|
[2] |
Guo Yuanzhi, Zhou Yang, Liu Yansui. Targeted poverty alleviation and rural revitalization in poverty-stricken areas: Internal logic and mechanism. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(12):2819-2832.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190644 |
[ 郭远智, 周扬, 刘彦随. 贫困地区的精准扶贫与乡村振兴: 内在逻辑与实现机制. 地理研究, 2019, 38(12):2819-2832.]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190644 |
|
[3] | Liu Yansui, Cao zhi. Supply-side structural reform and its strategy for targeted poverty alleviation in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(10):1066-1073. |
[ 刘彦随, 曹智. 精准扶贫供给侧结构及其改革策略. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(10):1066-1073.] | |
[4] |
Gomersall K. Imposition to agonism: Voluntary poverty alleviation resettlement in rural China. Political Geography, 2020, 82:102250. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102250.
doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102250 |
[5] | Geall S, Shen W, Gongbuzeren. Solar energy for poverty alleviation in China: State ambitions, bureaucratic interests, and local realities. Energy Research & Social Science, 2018, 41:238-248. |
[6] | Liang chen, Yu Chenglong. An analysis of the decision-making process of industrial poverty alleviation from the perspective of bounded rationality and uncertainty: A case study based on the village shi in southern Henan province. Journal of Public Management, 2020, 17(3):88-99, 171. |
[ 梁辰, 余成龙. 有限理性与不确定性视域下基层产业扶贫的决策过程分析: 基于豫南石村的个案研究. 公共管理学报, 2020, 17(3):88-99, 171.] | |
[7] |
Liu Yansui, Li Jintao. Geographic detection and optimizing decision of the differentiation mechanism of rural poverty in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1):161-173.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701013 |
[ 刘彦随, 李进涛. 中国县域农村贫困化分异机制的地理探测与优化决策. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1):161-173.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701013 |
|
[8] | Xiong Chunwen, Sang Kun. Crop structure, livelihood system and effective mechanism of industrial poverty alleviation: Based on an empirical study of a county in East China. Yunnan Social Sciences, 2020(3):75-85. |
[ 熊春文, 桑坤. 作物结构、生计体系与产业扶贫的有效性机制: 基于华东一个县域的经验研究. 云南社会科学, 2020(3):75-85.] | |
[9] | Wang Wei, Xiang Deping. Research on the risk prevention and control of industrial poverty alleviation from the perspective of risk society theory. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 48(5):50-61. |
[ 王维, 向德平. 风险社会视域下产业扶贫的风险防控研究. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 48(5):50-61.] | |
[10] | Zhang Mei, Wang Xiao, Yan Hua. Path choice of poverty alleviation of farmers cooperatives and its impact on income of poor households. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2019, 18(4):530-538. |
[ 张梅, 王晓, 颜华. 农民合作社扶贫的路径选择及对贫困户收入的影响研究. 农林经济管理学报, 2019, 18(4):530-538.] | |
[11] | Lin Yanli, Yang Tongshu. An evolutionary game analysis of behaviors of enterprises, poor households and local governments in industrial precision poverty alleviation. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 2020, 22(1):40-48. |
[ 林艳丽, 杨童舒. 产业精准扶贫中企业、贫困户和地方政府行为的演化博弈分析. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(1):40-48.] | |
[12] |
Su Zhilong, Yin Duo, Tang Xueqiong. A cultural economy perspective on the reconstruction of the Shankang Tea Ancestor Festival of the Bulang people in Mangjing Village of Jingmai Mountain. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(2):286-297.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.02.010 |
[ 苏志龙, 尹铎, 唐雪琼. 文化经济视角下景迈山芒景村布朗族山康茶祖节的重构. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2):286-297.]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.02.010 |
|
[13] |
Qi Wenping, Wang Yanhui, Wan Yuan, et al. Multi-objective development evaluation of poverty-stricken households based on G-TOPSIS model: A case study from Fugong County, Yunnan Province. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(6):1024-1036.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.06.012 |
[ 齐文平, 王艳慧, 万圆, 等. 基于G-TOPSIS模型的贫困农户多目标发展评价: 以云南福贡县为例. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6):1024-1036.]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.06.012 |
|
[14] | Münster D. "Ginger is a gamble": Crop booms, rural uncertainty, and the neoliberalization of agriculture in South India. Focaal, 2015, 71:100-113. |
[15] |
Hall D. Where the streets are paved with prawns. Critical Asian Studies, 2011, 43(4):507-530.
doi: 10.1080/14672715.2011.623518 |
[16] |
Baxter R E, Calvert K E. Estimating available abandoned cropland in the United States: Possibilities for energy crop production. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2017, 107(5):1162-1178.
doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1298985 |
[17] | West P. From Modern Production to Imagined Primitive: The Social World of Coffee from Papua New Guinea. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012. |
[18] |
Marley B J. The coal crisis in Appalachia: Agrarian transformation, commodity frontiers and the geographies of capital. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2016, 16(2):225-254.
doi: 10.1111/joac.12104 |
[19] |
Campling L. The tuna 'commodity frontier': Business strategies and environment in the industrial tuna fisheries of the Western Indian Ocean. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2012, 12(2‐3):252-278.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00354.x |
[20] |
Latt S, Roth R. Agrarian change and ethnic politics: Restructuring of Hmong and Shan labour and agricultural production in Northern Thailand. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2015, 15(2):220-238.
doi: 10.1111/joac.12081 |
[21] |
Hall R, Edelman M, Borras S M, et al. Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions 'from below'. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2015, 42(3-4):467-488.
doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746 |
[22] |
Li T M. Centering labor in the land grab debate. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2011, 38(2):281-298.
doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559009 |
[23] |
Fox J, Castella J C. Expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Mainland Southeast Asia: What are the prospects for smallholders? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2013, 40(1):155-170.
doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.750605 |
[24] |
Cramb R, Manivong V, Newby J C, et al. Alternatives to land grabbing: Exploring conditions for smallholder inclusion in agricultural commodity chains in Southeast Asia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2017, 44(4):939-967.
doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1242482 |
[25] |
Marley B J. The coal crisis in Appalachia: Agrarian transformation, commodity frontiers and the geographies of capital. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2016, 16(2):225-254.
doi: 10.1111/joac.12104 |
[26] | Li T M. Land's End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Durham: Duke University Press, 2014. |
[27] | Yeh E T, Lama K T. Following the caterpillar fungus: Nature, commodity chains, and the place of Tibet in China's uneven geographies. Social & Cultural Geography, 2013, 14(3):318-340. |
[28] |
Galipeau B A. Balancing income, food security, and sustainability in Shangri-La: The dilemma of monocropping wine grapes in rural China. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 2015, 37(2):74-83.
doi: 10.1111/cuag.12054 |
[29] |
Sturgeon J C. Cross-border rubber cultivation between China and Laos: Regionalization by Akha and Tai rubber farmers. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 2013, 34(1):70-85.
doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12014 |
[30] |
Yin D, Qian J X, Zhu H. Frontier development in the midst of ecological civilization: Unravelling the production of maca in Yunnan, China. Geoforum, 2019, 106:144-154.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.005 |
[31] | Oakes T. Looking out to look in: The use of the periphery in China's geopolitical narratives. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2012, 53(3):315-326. |
[32] |
Klein J A. Everyday approaches to food safety in Kunming. The China Quarterly, 2013, 214:376-393.
doi: 10.1017/S0305741013000325 |
[1] | 刘玉洁, 吕硕, 陈洁, 张婕, 邱双娟, 胡一帆, 葛全胜. 青藏高原农业现代化时空分异及其驱动机制[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(1): 214-227. |
[2] | 吴瑶瑶, 江耀, 郭浩, 王静爱. 农业旱灾综合风险防范多主体共识定量研究——以湖南鼎城区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1778-1791. |
[3] | 郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村发展进程与乡村振兴路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421. |
[4] | 戈大专, 陆玉麒. 面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437. |
[5] | 杨忍, 潘瑜鑫. 中国县域乡村脆弱性空间特征与形成机制及对策[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454. |
[6] | 周扬, 李寻欢, 童春阳, 黄晗. 中国村域贫困地理格局及其分异机理[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 903-920. |
[7] | 李智, 刘劲松. 冀南平原典型农业村落转型特征及成长机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 939-954. |
[8] | 吴海江, 粟晓玲, 张更喜. 基于Meta-Gaussian模型的中国农业干旱预测研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 525-538. |
[9] | 杨忍. 珠三角地区典型淘宝村重构过程及其内在逻辑机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(12): 3076-3089. |
[10] | 黄孟勤, 李阳兵, 冉彩虹, 李明珍. 三峡库区腹地山区农业景观格局动态变化与转型[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2749-2764. |
[11] | 曹智, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞, 王永生. 中国专业村镇空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1647-1666. |
[12] | 刘彦随. 中国乡村振兴规划的基础理论与方法论[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1120-1133. |
[13] | 戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286. |
[14] | 魏素豪, 李晶, 李泽怡, 宗刚. 中国农业竞争力时空格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300. |
[15] | 屠爽爽, 郑瑜晗, 龙花楼, 万诗梦, 梁小丽, 王炜. 乡村发展与重构格局特征及振兴路径——以广西为例[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 365-381. |