论乡村空间治理与乡村振兴战略

doi:10.11821/dlxb202204002

地理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 77 ›› Issue (4): 777-794.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202204002

论乡村空间治理与乡村振兴战略

戈大专(), 陆玉麒, 孙攀

南京师范大学地理科学学院江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023

收稿日期:2021-09-08 修回日期:2022-01-12 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-06-20
作者简介:戈大专(1987-), 男, 江苏新沂人, 副教授, 硕士生导师, 中国地理学会会员(S110011568M), 主要从事乡村空间治理与土地利用转型研究。E-mail: gedz@njnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41901204);中国博士后科学基金项目(2019M660109);中国博士后科学基金项目(2021T140303);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20190717);江苏省社会科学基金项目(19GLC002);江苏省高校自然科学研究项目(19KJB170018);江苏省自然资源科技项目(2021008)

The logic of rural spatial governance and revitalization

GE Dazhuan(), LU Yuqi, SUN Pan

Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2021-09-08 Revised:2022-01-12 Published:2022-04-25 Online:2022-06-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No(41901204);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No(2019M660109);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No(2021T140303);Jiangsu Provincial Science Foundation, No(BK20190717);Jiangsu Provincial Social Science Foundation, No(19GLC002);Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, No(19KJB170018);Natural Resources and Technology Program of Jiangsu Province, No(2021008)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

新时期乡村振兴挑战与空间利用问题密不可分,基于空间治理建构乡村振兴的理论体系和实践路径具有现实意义。本文基于“诉求→效应→路径→策略”解构方案,探讨了基于空间治理的乡村振兴可行性和内在逻辑体系。结果表明：① 乡村价值重构是确保乡村振兴目标实现的关键环节,乡村空间管控和发展权利配置可从乡村空间治理寻找突破口;乡村空间治理从物质空间治理、空间组织治理、空间权属治理入手,重构物质空间结构功能,重组空间组织关系,重塑空间价值分配体系;② 空间治理振兴乡村的效应从城乡互动关系优化、乡村内生动力激发、基层组织能力强化等层面加以呈现。③ 乡村空间治理推动城乡融合发展、激活乡村内生发展、保障组织机制,是落实乡村振兴的有效路径。④ “上下结合型”乡村空间治理有利于落实空间开发权利的合理配置;多元主体参与空间治理的渠道、能力与效应,推动空间发展目标落地和公平权益体系建设;“权利共享型”空间治理可在城乡共享、主体共享和区域共享中落实乡村振兴目标。研究结论可为完善乡村空间治理科学体系和落实乡村振兴战略提供参考。

关键词: 乡村空间治理, 城乡融合, 内生发展, 空间权利, 多元主体

Abstract:

The rural vitalization in the new era and space development and utilization are closely related. It is meaningful to construct a theoretical system and practical path of rural vitalization based on rural spatial governance. Based on the deconstruction framework of "demand→effect→path→strategy", this paper discusses the internal logic relationship between rural vitalization and spatial governance. The results show the following: (1) The reconstruction of rural value is the key to ensure the realization of rural vitalization; rural spatial governance can be a good way to realize the rights allocation and effective control of rural space; rural spatial governance includes material spatial governance, organization spatial governance, and ownership spatial governance; through spatial governance, the structure and function of physical space can be reconstructed, the organization relationship can be reorganized, and the value distribution can be reshaped. (2) The effect of spatial governance on rural vitalization is presented from the optimization of the urban-rural interaction, as well as the stimulation and strengthening of rural endogenous power, and the capabilities of grassroots organizations. (3) Rural spatial governance is an effective path to implement rural vitalization by promoting the urban-rural integration development, activating rural endogenous development, and ensuring the organizations mechanism. (4) The rural spatial governance system combines "top-down" and "bottom-up" forms to implement rational allocation of spatial development power. The channels, capabilities, and effects of multiple subjects participating in spatial governance will promote the realization of space development and the establishment of a system with equitable rights and interests. The "right-sharing" spatial governance can implement the rural revitalization strategy in urban-rural sharing, subject and regional sharing. In summary, the research will provide references for improving the scientific system of rural spatial governance and implementing the rural revitalization strategy.

Key words: rural spatial governance, urban-rural integration, endogenous development, spatial rights, multiple subjects

戈大专, 陆玉麒, 孙攀. 论乡村空间治理与乡村振兴战略[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(4): 777-794.

GE Dazhuan, LU Yuqi, SUN Pan. The logic of rural spatial governance and revitalization[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(4): 777-794.

图/表 5

参考文献 45

[1]	Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4):637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[ 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4):637-650.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[2]	Ge Dazhuan, Lu Yuqi. Rural spatial governance for territorial spatial planning in China: Mechanisms and path. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6):1422-1437. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106008
	[ 戈大专, 陆玉麒. 面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6):1422-1437.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106008
[3]	Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Li Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12):2511-2528. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
	[ 刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12):2511-2528.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
[4]	Long Hualou, Zhang Yingnan, Tu Shuangshuang. Land consolidation and rural vitalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(10):1837-1849. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201810002
	[ 龙花楼, 张英男, 屠爽爽. 论土地整治与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10):1837-1849.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201810002
[5]	Ge Dazhuan, Long Hualou. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6):1272-1286. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006013
	[ 戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6):1272-1286.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006013
[6]	Zhou Guohua, Dai Liuyan, He Yanhua, et al. Rural multifunctional evolution and rural settlements transformation. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(19):242-251.
	[ 周国华, 戴柳燕, 贺艳华, 等. 论乡村多功能演化与乡村聚落转型. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(19):242-251.]
[7]	Long Hualou, Chen Kunqiu. Urban-rural integrated development and land use transitions: A perspective of land system science. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2):295-309. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102004
	[ 龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2):295-309.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102004
[8]	Zhang Yingnan, Long Hualou, Ma Li, et al. Research progress of urban-rural relations and its implications for rural revitalization. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3):578-594. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180880
	[ 张英男, 龙花楼, 马历, 等. 城乡关系研究进展及其对乡村振兴的启示. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3):578-594.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180880
[9]	He Renwei. Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11):2127-2140. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201811001
	[ 何仁伟. 城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11):2127-2140.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201811001
[10]	Yang Ren. Spatial differentiation and mechanisms of typical rural areas in the suburbs of a metropolis: A case study of Beicun Village, Baiyun District, Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8):1622-1636.
	[ 杨忍. 广州市城郊典型乡村空间分化过程及机制. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8):1622-1636.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908010
[11]	Cejudo E, Navarro F. Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.
[12]	MacKinnon D. Rural governance and local involvement: Assessing state community relations in the Scottish Highlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 2002, 18:307-324. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00048-1
[13]	Shucksmith M, Brown D L. Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies. New York: Routledge, 2016.
[14]	Ye Chao, Yu Jie, Zhang Qingyuan, et al. From governance to rural-urban co-governance: Research frontiers, trends, and the Chinese paths. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1):15-27. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002
	[ 叶超, 于洁, 张清源, 等. 从治理到城乡治理: 国际前沿、发展态势与中国路径. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1):15-27.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002
[15]	Yue Wenze, Wang Tianyu. Rethinking on the basic issues of territorial and spatial use control in China. China Land Science, 2019, 33(8):8-15.
	[ 岳文泽, 王田雨. 中国国土空间用途管制的基础性问题思考. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(8):8-15.]
[16]	Huang Xianjin. The reform of the natural resource property rights system and the innovation in territorial spatial governance. Urban Planning Forum, 2021(2):53-57.
	[ 黄贤金. 自然资源产权改革与国土空间治理创. 城市规划学刊, 2021(2):53-57.]
[17]	Zhang Jingxiang, Chen Hao. Spatial governance: Political economy of China's urban and rural planning transformation. City Planning Review, 2014, 38(11):9-15.
	[ 张京祥, 陈浩. 空间治理:中国城乡规划转型的政治经济学. 城市规划, 2014, 38(11):9-15.]
[18]	Ge Dazhuan, Sun Pan, Zhou Guipeng, et al. Grain production transformation mechanism and the security effects in traditional farming areas: The perspective of rural spatial governance. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(6):1588-1601. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210618
	[ 戈大专, 孙攀, 周贵鹏, 等. 传统农区粮食生产转型机制及其安全效应: 基于乡村空间治理视角. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(6):1588-1601.]
[19]	Li Yuheng, Yan Jiayu, Song Chuanyao. Rural revitalization and sustainable development: Typical case analysis and its enlightenments. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3):595-604. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180879
	[ 李玉恒, 阎佳玉, 宋传垚. 乡村振兴与可持续发展: 国际典型案例剖析及其启示. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3):595-604.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180879
[20]	Cao Zhi, Li Yurui, Chen Yufu. Approaches to rural transformation and sustainable development in the context of urban-rural integration. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12):2560-2571.
	[ 曹智, 李裕瑞, 陈玉福. 城乡融合背景下乡村转型与可持续发展路径探析. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12):2560-2571.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912010
[21]	Fan Jie. High-quality Development of national territory space governance and regional economic layout during 14th five-year plan in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(7):796-805.
	[ 樊杰. 我国“十四五”时期高质量发展的国土空间治理与区域经济布局. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(7):796-805.]
[22]	Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang. Rural restructuring: Theory, approach and research prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4):563-576. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704001
	[ 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 论乡村重构. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4):563-576.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704001
[23]	Guo Yuanzhi, Liu Yansui. The process of rural development and paths for rural revitalization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6):1408-1421. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
	[ 郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村发展进程与乡村振兴路径. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6):1408-1421.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
[24]	Yang Ren, Liu Yansui, Long Hualou, et al. Research progress and prospect of rural transformation and reconstruction in China: Paradigms and main content. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(8):1019-1030.
	[ 杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼, 等. 中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望: 逻辑主线与内容框架. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(8):1019-1030.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.08.009
[25]	Chen Kunqiu, Long Hualou, Ma Li, et al. China's rural land reform and rural vitalization. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9):1424-1434. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.015
	[ 陈坤秋, 龙花楼, 马历, 等. 农村土地制度改革与乡村振兴. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9):1424-1434.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.015
[26]	Fang Yangang, Liu Jisheng. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2):257-270. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
	[ 房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2):257-270.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
[27]	Long H L. Land Use Transitions and Rural Restructuring in China. Singapore: Springer, 2020.
[28]	Woods M. Rural. New York: Routledge, 2011.
[29]	Liu Yansui. Modern human-earth relationship and human-earth system science. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(8):1221-1234. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.001
	[ 刘彦随. 现代人地关系与人地系统科学. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8):1221-1234.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.001
[30]	He Yanhua, Wu Jianguo, Zhou Guohua, et al. Discussion on rural sustainability and rural sustainability science. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4):736-752. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202004006
	[ 贺艳华, 邬建国, 周国华, 等. 论乡村可持续性与乡村可持续性科学. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4):736-752.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202004006
[31]	Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6):563-570.
	[ 刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6):563-570.]
[32]	Wang Cheng, He Yanzhou. Spatio-temporal differentiation and differentiated regulation of the vulnerability of rural production space system in Chongqing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8):1680-1698. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008009
	[ 王成, 何焱洲. 重庆市乡村生产空间系统脆弱性时空分异与差异化调控. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8):1680-1698.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008009
[33]	Li Yuheng, Yan Jiayu, Liu Yansui. The cognition and path analysis of rural revitalization theory based on rural resilience. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(10):2001-2010. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910004
	[ 李玉恒, 阎佳玉, 刘彦随. 基于乡村弹性的乡村振兴理论认知与路径研究. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10):2001-2010.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910004
[34]	Chen Yangfen, Liu Yu, Li Yurui. Agricultural development status and industrial prosperity path under the background of rural revitalization in China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3):632-642. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181026
	[ 陈秧分, 刘玉, 李裕瑞. 中国乡村振兴背景下的农业发展状态与产业兴旺途径. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3):632-642.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181026
[35]	Yang Ren, Pan Yuxin. Spatial patterns, formation mechanism and coping strategies of rural vulnerability in China at the county level. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6):1438-1454.
	[ 杨忍, 潘瑜鑫. 中国县域乡村脆弱性空间特征与形成机制及对策. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6):1438-1454.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106009
[36]	Li Hongbo, Hu Xiaoliang, Zhang Xiaolin, et al. On the analysis of rural space. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5):591-600. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.003
	[ 李红波, 胡晓亮, 张小林, 等. 乡村空间辨析. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5):591-600.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.003
[37]	Ge D Z, Zhou G P, Qiao W F, et al. Land use transition and rural spatial governance: Mechanism, framework and perspectives. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(8):1325-1340. doi: 10.1007/s11442-020-1784-x
[38]	Long Hualou. Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8):1019-1028.
	[ 龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8):1019-1028.]
[39]	Long Hualou, Ge Dazhuan, Wang Jieyong. Progress and prospects of the coupling research on land use transitions and rural transformation development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12):2547-2559.
	[ 龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇. 土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12):2547-2559.]
[40]	Tang Chengli, He Yanhua, Zhou Guohua, et al. The research on optimization mode of spatial organization of rural settlements oriented by life quality. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(10):1459-1472. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410006
	[ 唐承丽, 贺艳华, 周国华, 等. 基于生活质量导向的乡村聚落空间优化研究. 地理学报, 2014, 69(10):1459-1472.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410006
[41]	Qiao Jiajun, Ma Yuling. Research on dynamic model of urban-rural interface. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(12):2283-2297. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201612008
	[ 乔家君, 马玉玲. 城乡界面动态模型研究. 地理研究, 2016, 35(12):2283-2297.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201612008
[42]	Zhang Jingxiang, Xia Tianci. The change and reconstruction of spatial planning system under the goal of modern national governance. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(10):2040-2050. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191002
	[ 张京祥, 夏天慈. 治理现代化目标下国家空间规划体系的变迁与重构. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10):2040-2050.]
[43]	Zhou Guohua, Liu Chang, Tang Chengli, et al. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of quality of life in rural areas of Hunan province. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(12):2475-2489. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201812009
	[ 周国华, 刘畅, 唐承丽, 等. 湖南乡村生活质量的空间格局及其影响因素. 地理研究, 2018, 37(12):2475-2489.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201812009
[44]	Wen Qi, Zheng Dianyuan, Shi Linna. Themes evolution of rural revitalization and its research prospect in China from 1949 to 2019. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9):1272-1281.
	[ 文琦, 郑殿元, 施琳娜. 1949—2019年中国乡村振兴主题演化过程与研究展望. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9):1272-1281.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.001
[45]	Li Xiaojian, Hu Xueyao, Shi Yanwen, et al. The role of rural settlements in rural revitalization: Perspective of economic geography. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1):3-14. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.001
	[ 李小建, 胡雪瑶, 史焱文, 等. 乡村振兴下的聚落研究: 来自经济地理学视角. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1):3-14.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.001

论乡村空间治理与乡村振兴战略

The logic of rural spatial governance and revitalization

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 45

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	方创琳. 城乡融合发展机理与演进规律的理论解析[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(4): 759-776.
[2]	马晨, 王宏卫, 谈波, 周璟, 代芯妍, 王晓琴. 新疆典型绿洲城乡聚落规模体系特征及空间重构 ——以渭干河—库车河三角洲绿洲为例[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(4): 852-868.
[3]	龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.
[4]	刘彦随, 龙花楼, 李裕瑞. 全球乡城关系新认知与人文地理学研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(12): 2869-2884.
[5]	戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.
[6]	李裕瑞,曹智,龙花楼. 发展乡村科学,助力乡村振兴——第二届乡村振兴与乡村科学论坛综述[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1482-1486.
[7]	龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇. 土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2546-2559.
[8]	曹智, 李裕瑞, 陈玉福. 城乡融合背景下乡村转型与可持续发展路径探析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2560-2571.
[9]	鲁莎莎, 刘彦随, 秦凡. 环渤海地区农业地域功能演进及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2011-2026.
[10]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.
[11]	吴一凡,刘彦随,李裕瑞. 中国人口与土地城镇化时空耦合特征及驱动机制[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1865-1879.