地理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 77 ›› Issue (2): 395-410.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202202009
穆学英1,2,3(), 崔璨1,2,3(
), 崔军茹4, 王洁晶5
收稿日期:
2021-01-11
修回日期:
2021-11-17
出版日期:
2022-02-25
发布日期:
2022-04-25
通讯作者:
崔璨(1987-), 女, 安徽合肥人, 研究员, 博导, 研究方向为城市地理、社会地理。E-mail: ccui@geo.ecnu.edu.cn作者简介:
穆学英(1992-), 女, 山东潍坊人, 博士生, 研究方向为城市地理、人口地理。E-mail: muxueying823@sina.com
基金资助:
MU Xueying1,2,3(), CUI Can1,2,3(
), CUI Junru4, WANG Jiejing5
Received:
2021-01-11
Revised:
2021-11-17
Published:
2022-02-25
Online:
2022-04-25
Supported by:
摘要:
妥善解决流动人口在流入城市的住房问题是实现流动人口市民化和提高新型城镇化发展质量的关键。本文基于2017年全国流动人口动态监测调查数据,揭示了流动人口的跨等级流动格局,并探讨了跨等级流动对流动人口在流入城市住房选择的影响。研究发现:① 流动人口以跨等级向上流动为主,其中向上跨三级、两级流动的比例较大;② 不同流出地的流动人口在流入城市的住房选择存在显著差异,流出城市的人均GDP和平均房价越高,流动人口在流入城市获得住房产权的概率越大;③ 流入城市的平均房价越高,流动人口获得商品房的概率越低,随着流入城市人均GDP的增加,流动人口购买商品房的概率先增后降,而购买不完全产权房的概率则恰恰相反;④ 随着流动人口跨越城市等级的增加,其获得住房产权的概率降低,而租赁正规住房的可能性增大。研究结果有助于深化理解流动人口在流入城市住房选择的地理根源,对进一步优化面向流动人口的住房政策具有参考意义。
穆学英, 崔璨, 崔军茹, 王洁晶. 中国流动人口的跨等级流动及其对流入城市住房选择的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 395-410.
MU Xueying, CUI Can, CUI Junru, WANG Jiejing. Hierarchical migration patterns of China's floating population and their impact on the housing choices[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(2): 395-410.
表1
样本基本情况(N = 98992)
变量名称 | 百分比(%)/均值 | 变量名称 | 百分比(%)/均值 |
---|---|---|---|
住房类型 | 家庭月收入(元) | 7584.04 | |
租赁非正规住房 | 12.83 | 单位性质 | |
租赁正规住房 | 55.81 | 其他 | 93.12 |
自购不完全产权房 | 3.52 | 公有制 | 6.88 |
自购商品房 | 27.84 | 宅基地 | |
社会经济属性 | 有宅基地 | 55.27 | |
性别 | 无宅基地 | 44.73 | |
女性 | 49.72 | 流动特征 | |
男性 | 50.28 | 共同居住的家庭成员数(人/户) | 3.11 |
世代 | 离开流出地的时长(a) | 12.00 | |
老生代 | 37.23 | 迁移次数(次) | 1.96 |
新生代 | 62.77 | 迁移距离 | |
户口性质 | 省内迁移 | 54.70 | |
农业户口 | 80.43 | 跨省迁移 | 45.30 |
非农业户口 | 19.57 | 过客心理与社会交往 | |
婚姻状况 | 社会交往 | ||
未婚、离异或丧偶 | 18.61 | 与本地人交往 | 35.42 |
已婚 | 81.39 | 户口迁到本地的同乡 | 6.24 |
教育水平 | 户口在老家的同乡 | 10.91 | |
小学及以下 | 11.86 | 其他外来人口 | 25.55 |
初中 | 41.04 | 很少与人交往 | 21.88 |
高中及中专 | 24.42 | 长期居留意愿 | 42.53 |
大专及以上 | 22.68 | 地理因素 | |
职业类型 | 城市属性 | ||
国家机关负责人或公务员 | 2.33 | 流出城市人均GDP(元) | 22821.85 |
专业技术人员 | 9.04 | 流出城市平均房价(元/m2) | 8273.25 |
商业服务人员 | 56.12 | 流入城市人均GDP(元) | 62815.75 |
农业及产业工人 | 14.56 | 流入城市平均房价(元/m2) | 18302.82 |
无固定职业者、其他 | 3.71 | 跨等级流动类型 | |
无工作者 | 14.24 | 同级流动 | 31.27 |
承包地 | 向上跨一级流动 | 12.95 | |
没有承包地 | 51.14 | 向上跨两级流动 | 18.16 |
有承包地但没流转 | 36.88 | 向上跨三级流动 | 18.29 |
有承包地且流转 | 6.34 | 向上跨四或五级流动 | 9.49 |
不清楚 | 5.64 | 向下流动 | 9.84 |
表2
流动人口在流入城市获得住房产权的Logistic模型结果
自变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 自变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
地理因素 | 单位性质为公有制(参考组:其他) | 1.135*** | 1.150*** | ||
城市属性 | 家庭月收入(对数) | 2.007*** | 1.735*** | ||
流出城市人均GDP(对数) | 1.082*** | 承包地(参考组:没有) | |||
流出城市平均房价(对数) | 1.183*** | 有承包地但没流转 | 1.282*** | 1.317*** | |
流入城市人均GDP(对数) | 1.501* | 有承包地且流转 | 1.576*** | 1.635*** | |
流入城市人均GDP(对数)的平方项 | 1.501* | 不清楚 | 0.997 | 0.981 | |
流入城市平均房价(对数) | 0.514** | 有宅基地(参考组:无宅基地) | 0.585*** | 0.564*** | |
流入城市平均房价(对数)的平方项 | 1.002 | 流动特征 | |||
跨等级流动类型(同级流动) | 共同居住的家庭成员数(人/户) | 1.140*** | 1.159*** | ||
向上跨一级流动 | 0.714*** | 离开流出地的时长(a) | 1.039*** | 1.035*** | |
向上跨两级流动 | 0.740*** | 迁移次数(次) | 0.841*** | 0.849*** | |
向上跨三级流动 | 0.599*** | 迁移距离(参考组:省内迁移) | |||
向上跨四或五级流动 | 0.460*** | 跨省迁移 | 0.746*** | 0.674*** | |
向下流动 | 0.971 | 过客心理与社会交往 | |||
社会经济属性 | 社会交往(参考组:与本地人交往) | ||||
男性(参考组:女性) | 0.950*** | 0.971* | 户口迁到本地的同乡 | 1.009 | 0.964 |
新生代(参考组:老生代) | 0.852*** | 0.862*** | 户口在老家的同乡 | 0.594*** | 0.529*** |
非农业户口(参考组:农业户口) | 1.049* | 1.041 | 其他外来人口 | 0.514*** | 0.479*** |
已婚(参考组:未婚、离异或丧偶) | 2.117*** | 2.150*** | 很少与人交往 | 0.703*** | 0.666*** |
教育水平(参考组:小学及以下) | 长期居留意愿 | 4.107*** | 3.884*** | ||
初中 | 1.408*** | 1.385*** | 常数项 | 0.001*** | 0.001*** |
高中及中专 | 1.753*** | 1.685*** | 样本数 | 98992 | 98992 |
大专及以上 | 2.640*** | 2.465*** | Pseudo R2 | 0.236 | 0.225 |
职业类型(参考组:国家机关负责人或公务员) | Log likelihood | -47022.174 | -47690.186 | ||
专业技术人员 | 0.822*** | 0.805*** | 准确预测的比率(%) | 76.71 | 76.21 |
商业服务人员 | 0.666*** | 0.685*** | Wald 检验(chi2) | 29084.31 | 27748.28 |
农业及产业工人 | 0.769*** | 0.778*** | |||
无固定职业者、其他 | 0.883* | 0.880* | |||
无工作 | 1.342*** | 1.367*** |
表3
流动人口在流入城市住房类型选择的多项Logistic模型结果(参考组: 租赁非正规住房)
模型1 | 模型2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
租赁正规住房 | 不完全产权房 | 自购商品房 | 租赁正规住房 | 不完全产权房 | 自购商品房 | |
地理因素 | ||||||
城市属性 | ||||||
流出城市人均GDP(对数) | 0.958*** | 1.056* | 1.042** | |||
流出城市平均房价(对数) | 0.943* | 0.970 | 1.143*** | |||
流入城市人均GDP(对数) | 1.431 | 0.319** | 2.567*** | |||
流入城市人均GDP(对数)的平方项 | 0.986 | 1.072*** | 0.957*** | |||
流入城市平均房价(对数) | 1.807* | 0.030*** | 1.667 | |||
流入城市平均房价(对数)的平方项 | 0.967* | 1.149*** | 0.942*** | |||
跨等级流动类型(同级流动) | ||||||
向上跨一级流动 | 1.099*** | 0.778*** | 0.773*** | |||
向上跨两级流动 | 1.051 | 0.835*** | 0.766*** | |||
向上跨三级流动 | 1.137*** | 0.698*** | 0.665*** | |||
向上跨四或五级流动 | 1.060 | 0.562*** | 0.475*** | |||
向下流动 | 0.838*** | 0.844** | 0.840*** | |||
社会经济属性 | ||||||
男性(参考组:女性) | 1.052** | 0.901** | 1.001 | 1.057*** | 0.927* | 1.027 |
新生代(参考组:老生代) | 0.932*** | 0.931 | 0.787*** | 0.934*** | 0.952 | 0.797*** |
非农业户口(参考组:农业户口) | 1.016 | 0.950 | 1.080* | 1.009 | 0.934 | 1.065 |
已婚(参考组:未婚、离异或丧偶) | 1.481*** | 2.631*** | 2.947*** | 1.487*** | 2.716*** | 2.994*** |
教育水平(参考组:小学及以下) | ||||||
初中 | 1.179*** | 1.337*** | 1.679*** | 1.175*** | 1.289*** | 1.650*** |
高中及中专 | 1.345*** | 1.724*** | 2.360*** | 1.331*** | 1.592*** | 2.257*** |
大专及以上 | 1.174*** | 1.892*** | 3.230*** | 1.151*** | 1.696*** | 2.973*** |
职业类型(参考组:国家机关负责人或公务员) | ||||||
专业技术人员 | 1.138 | 1.023 | 0.905 | 1.135 | 1.018 | 0.882 |
商业服务人员 | 1.020 | 0.701** | 0.674*** | 1.028 | 0.720** | 0.699*** |
农业及产业工人 | 1.110 | 1.171 | 0.803** | 1.115 | 1.212 | 0.815** |
无固定职业者、其他 | 0.962 | 1.111 | 0.824* | 0.963 | 1.141 | 0.819* |
无工作 | 1.092 | 1.814*** | 1.393*** | 1.100 | 1.891*** | 1.425*** |
单位性质为公有制(参考组:其他) | 1.142*** | 1.582*** | 1.236*** | 1.137*** | 1.609*** | 1.247*** |
家庭月收入(对数) | 1.364*** | 1.306*** | 2.833*** | 1.327*** | 1.104** | 2.392*** |
承包地(参考组:没有) | ||||||
有承包地但没流转 | 0.942** | 1.273*** | 1.213*** | 0.945** | 1.306*** | 1.250*** |
有承包地且流转 | 1.072 | 1.797*** | 1.655*** | 1.078 | 1.903*** | 1.721*** |
不清楚 | 1.024 | 0.926 | 1.028 | 1.016 | 0.887 | 1.010 |
有宅基地(参考组:无宅基地) | 0.965 | 0.515*** | 0.578*** | 0.957* | 0.470*** | 0.557*** |
流动特征 | ||||||
共同居住的家庭成员数(人/户) | 1.058*** | 1.276*** | 1.185*** | 1.065*** | 1.306*** | 1.211*** |
离开流出地的时长(a) | 0.997** | 1.049*** | 1.034*** | 0.996** | 1.047*** | 1.030*** |
迁移次数(次) | 0.961*** | 0.805*** | 0.816*** | 0.962*** | 0.800*** | 0.825*** |
迁移距离(参考组:省内迁移) | ||||||
跨省迁移 | 0.952** | 0.545*** | 0.741*** | 0.950** | 0.518*** | 0.663*** |
过客心理与社会交往 | ||||||
社会交往(参考组:与本地人交往) | ||||||
户口迁到本地的同乡 | 0.978 | 0.728*** | 1.025 | 0.975 | 0.721*** | 0.974 |
户口在老家的同乡 | 0.870*** | 0.521*** | 0.529*** | 0.854*** | 0.480*** | 0.461*** |
其他外来人口 | 0.878*** | 0.430*** | 0.465*** | 0.870*** | 0.408*** | 0.429*** |
很少与人交往 | 0.975 | 0.619*** | 0.698*** | 0.966 | 0.590*** | 0.655*** |
长期居留意愿 | 1.061** | 4.549*** | 4.285*** | 1.051** | 4.314*** | 4.011*** |
常数项 | 0.004*** | 2.065e+08*** | 0.000*** | 0.237*** | 0.022*** | 0.000*** |
样本数 | 98992 | 98992 | ||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.150 | 0.143 | ||||
Log likelihood | -89390.46 | -90131.94 | ||||
AIC | 1.810 | 1.825 | ||||
BIC | -957787.182 | -956304.222 | ||||
Wald 检验(chi2) | 31599.78 | 30116.82 |
[1] | Department of Migrant Population, National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China. 2018 Report on China's Migrant Population Development. Beijing: China Population Publishing House, 2018. |
[国家卫生和计划生育委员会流动人口司. 中国流动人口发展报告2018. 北京: 中国人口出版社, 2018.] | |
[2] |
Ma Zhifei, Yin Shanggang, Zhang Yu, et al. Spatial distribution, flowing rules and forming mechanism of inter-cities floating population in China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(4): 926-936.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180280 |
[ 马志飞, 尹上岗, 张宇, 等. 中国城城流动人口的空间分布、流动规律及其形成机制. 地理研究, 2019, 38(4): 926-936.] | |
[3] |
Wang Guoxia, Qin Zhiqin, Cheng Lilin. Spatial distribution of population migration in China in the 1990s'. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(3): 273-281.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.03.273 |
[ 王国霞, 秦志琴, 程丽琳. 20世纪末中国迁移人口空间分布格局: 基于城市的视角. 地理科学, 2012, 32(3): 273-281.] | |
[4] |
Mu X Y, Yeh A G O, Zhang X H, et al. Moving down the urban hierarchy: Turning point of China's internal migration caused by age structure and Hukou system. Urban Studies, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/00420980211007796.
doi: 10.1177/00420980211007796 |
[5] | Li Zhigang, Liu Ye. Beyond spatial segregation: Neo-migrants and their social networks in Chinese cities. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(6): 785-795. |
[ 李志刚, 刘晔. 中国城市“新移民”社会网络与空间分异. 地理学报, 2011, 66(6): 785-795.] | |
[6] |
Lin Liyue, Zhu Yu, Ke Wenqian, et al. The impact of migrants' access to urban public services on their urban settlement intentions: A study from the perspective of different-sized cities. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(4): 737-752.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201904009 |
[ 林李月, 朱宇, 柯文前, 等. 基本公共服务对不同规模城市流动人口居留意愿的影响效应. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 737-752.] | |
[7] |
Gu Hengyu, Meng Xin, Shen Tiyan, et al. Spatial variation of the determinants of China's urban floating population's settlement intention. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 240-254.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202002003 |
[ 古恒宇, 孟鑫, 沈体雁, 等. 中国城市流动人口居留意愿影响因素的空间分异特征. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 240-254.] | |
[8] | Mu Xueying, Cui Can, Xu Wei. A literature review of recent progress on western urban housing behavior: Implications for China's housing studies. Human Geography, 2020, 35(5): 8-17. |
[ 穆学英, 崔璨, 徐伟. 西方城市居住行为研究进展及其对中国的启示. 人文地理, 2020, 35(5): 8-17.] | |
[9] |
Lin Liyue, Zhu Yu, Liang Pengfei, et al. The spatial patterns of housing conditions of the floating population in China based on the sixth census data. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(5): 887-898.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201405008 |
[ 林李月, 朱宇, 梁鹏飞, 等. 基于六普数据的中国流动人口住房状况的空间格局. 地理研究, 2014, 33(5): 887-898.] | |
[10] |
Cui C. Housing career disparities in urban China: A comparison between skilled migrants and locals in Nanjing. Urban Studies, 2020, 57(3): 546-562.
doi: 10.1177/0042098018800443 |
[11] |
Jiang L W. Living conditions of the floating population in urban China. Housing Studies, 2006, 21(5): 719-744.
doi: 10.1080/02673030600807431 |
[12] | Yang Juhua. Housing source of migrants and its associated factors. Population Research, 2018, 42(1): 60-75. |
[ 杨菊华. 制度要素与流动人口的住房保障. 人口研究, 2018, 42(1): 60-75.] | |
[13] |
Fang Y P, Zhang Z X. Migrant household homeownership outcomes in large Chinese cities: The sustained impact of Hukou. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2016, 57(2): 203-227.
doi: 10.1080/15387216.2016.1228075 |
[14] | Pan Jing, Yang Yang. The determinants of housing inequality in urban household: Hukou, endowment or urban characteristic? Based on generalized ordered model and Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2020, (6): 64-74. |
[ 潘静, 杨扬. 城市家庭住房不平等:户籍、禀赋还是城市特征? 基于广义有序模型与Oaxaca-Blinder分解. 贵州财经大学学报, 2020, (6): 64-74.] | |
[15] |
Tang S S, Feng J X, Li M Y. Housing tenure choices of rural migrants in urban destinations: A case study of Jiangsu province, China. Housing Studies, 2017, 32(3): 361-378.
doi: 10.1080/02673037.2016.1210096 |
[16] |
Wu L L, Zhang W. Rural migrants' homeownership in Chinese urban destinations: Do institutional arrangements still matter after Hukou reform? Cities, 2018, 79: 151-158.
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.004 |
[17] | Long Cuihong, Bai Yilin, Liu Pei. The housing pattern selection and impact mechanism of the new generation of migrant workers. Journal of Social Sciences, 2019(11): 14-29. |
[ 龙翠红, 柏艺琳, 刘佩. 新生代农民工住房模式选择及影响机制. 社会科学, 2019(11): 14-29.] | |
[18] |
Sharkey P. The acute effect of local homicides on children's cognitive performance. PNAS, 2010, 107(26): 11733-11738.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000690107 |
[19] |
Galster G, Sharkey P. Spatial foundations of inequality: A conceptual model and empirical overview. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2017, 3(2): 1-33. DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2017.3.2.01.
doi: 10.7758/rsf.2017.3.2.01 |
[20] |
Bosquet C, Overman H G. Why does birthplace matter so much? Journal of Urban Economics, 2019, 110: 26-34.
doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2019.01.003 |
[21] | Lu Yilong. Does Hukou still matter? The household registration system and its impact on social stratification and mobility in China. Social Sciences in China, 2008, (1): 149-162, 207-208. |
[ 陆益龙. 户口还起作用吗: 户籍制度与社会分层和流动. 中国社会科学, 2008, (1): 149-162, 207-208.] | |
[22] | Yang Juhua. Research on the assimilation of the floating population in China. Social Sciences in China, 2015, (2): 61-79, 203-204. |
[ 杨菊华. 中国流动人口的社会融入研究. 中国社会科学, 2015, (2): 61-79, 203-204.] | |
[23] |
Huang Y Q, Tao R. Housing migrants in Chinese cities: Current status and policy design. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2015, 33(3): 640-660.
doi: 10.1068/c12120 |
[24] |
Cui J R, Cui C, Mu X Y, et al. Home in the big city: Does place of origin affect homeownership among the post-80s generation in Shanghai. Housing Studies, 2020: 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1853070.
doi: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1853070 |
[25] | Borjas G J. The economics of immigration. Journal of Economic Literature, 1994, 32(4): 1667-1717. |
[26] |
Bosquet C, Overman H G. Why does birthplace matter so much?. Journal of Urban Economics, 2019, 110: 26-34.
doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2019.01.003 |
[27] | Wang Yixuan. Urban residential order and spatial segregation from the perspective of spatial capital difference: A comparative study based on two types of communities. Urban Problems, 2020(3): 13-19, 94. |
[ 王艺璇. 空间资本差异视角下的城市居住秩序和空间区隔: 基于两类社区的比较研究. 城市问题, 2020(3): 13-19, 94.] | |
[28] |
Lin Liyue, Zhu Yu, Ke Wenqian, et al. The characteristics and determinants of the floating population's housing investment in the places of origin: Evidence from a survey in Fujian province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(3): 401-408.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.03.008 |
[ 林李月, 朱宇, 柯文前, 等. 流动人口流出地住房投资特征及影响因素: 基于福建省的调查. 地理科学, 2020, 40(3): 401-408.] | |
[29] | Blau P M, Duncan O D. The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1967. |
[30] |
Blalock H M, Blau P M, Duncan O D, et al. The American occupational structure. American Sociological Review, 1968, 33(2): 296.
doi: 10.2307/2092399 |
[31] |
Hao P, Tang S S. Migration destinations in the urban hierarchy in China: Evidence from Jiangsu. Population, Space and Place, 2018, 24(2): e2083. DOI: 10.1002/psp.2083.
doi: 10.1002/psp.2083 |
[32] |
Flippen C. Relative deprivation and internal migration in the United States: A comparison of black and white men. American Journal of Sociology, 2013, 118(5): 1161-1198.
doi: 10.1086/668691 |
[33] | Wang Ning. Place stratification, mobility of talents, and attractive power of cities: A theoretical exploration of the relationship between geographical mobility and social mobility. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Section), 2014, 25(6): 47-55, 109. |
[ 王宁. 地方分层、人才流动与城市人才吸引力: “地理流动与社会流动”理论探究之二. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 25(6): 47-55, 109.] | |
[34] | Dong Linan, Lin Liyue, Zhu Yu, et al. The effects of local factors on the housing purchase intention of floating population in cities. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 35(4): 103-109. |
[ 董立男, 林李月, 朱宇, 等. 地方性因素对流动人口流入地购房意愿的影响. 福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 35(4): 103-109.] | |
[35] | Plane D A, Henrie C J, Perry M J. Migration up and down the urban hierarchy and across the life course. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(43): 15313-15318. |
[36] | Huang Yuming. Spatial differentiation of housing price growth in China and its impact mechanism. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(12): 88-95. |
[ 黄禹铭. 中国城市住房价格增长的空间差异及其影响机制. 经济地理, 2019, 39(12): 88-95.] | |
[37] | Han Xue. Study on the influencing factors and the heterogeneity of floating population's housing rental and purchase choice[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2020. |
[ 韩雪. 流动人口住房租购选择的影响因素及其异质性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2020.] | |
[38] |
Li Yonghui, Liu Nannan, Li Xiaoqin. Farmland circulation, housing choice and peasant-workers' citizenization. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(11): 165-174.
doi: 10.2307/142509 |
[ 李勇辉, 刘南南, 李小琴. 农地流转、住房选择与农民工市民化意愿. 经济地理, 2019, 39(11): 165-174.] | |
[39] | Yang Xue, Fan Mingjun. The flow direction selection of the new generation highly educated floating population and the influence mechanism of the selection. Population Journal, 2019(6): 64-77. |
[ 杨雪, 樊洺均. 新生代高学历流动人口的流向选择及影响机制. 人口学刊, 2019(6): 64-77.] | |
[40] |
Fielding T. Migration and the metropolis: An empirical and theoretical analysis of inter-regional migration to and from South East England. Progress in Planning, 1993, 39: 75-166.
doi: 10.1016/0305-9006(93)90006-F |
[41] |
Gordon I R. Ambition, human capital acquisition and the metropolitan escalator. Regional Studies, 2015, 49(6): 1042-1055.
doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799767 |
[42] | Xu Zhening. The impact of urban development on the life satisfaction of young people. Youth Studies, 2020(5): 1-13, 94. |
[ 徐浙宁. 城市发展对青年生活满意度的影响. 青年研究, 2020(5): 1-13, 94.] | |
[43] | Wang Fenglong, He Shenjing. Spatial patterns of marriage matching and marriage migration among Chinese labour. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2014(3): 88-94, 127-128. |
[ 王丰龙, 何深静. 中国劳动力婚姻匹配与婚姻迁移的空间模式研究. 中国人口科学, 2014(3): 88-94, 127-128.] | |
[44] |
Feng Changchun, Li Tianjiao, Cao Guangzhong, et al. Housing outcomes of family migrants at the place of destination. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(4): 633-646.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201704003 |
[ 冯长春, 李天娇, 曹广忠, 等. 家庭式迁移的流动人口住房状况. 地理研究, 2017, 36(4): 633-646.] | |
[45] | Lu Wanjun, Zhao Jingjing, Li Fang. Housing property, residential location and migrants' assimilation in China. Lanzhou Academic Journal, 2020(9): 69-83. |
[ 陆万军, 赵晶晶, 李放. 住房属性、居住区位与流动人口城市融入. 兰州学刊, 2020(9): 69-83.] | |
[46] |
Gu Hengyu, Liu Ziliang, Shen Tiyan. Spatial pattern and influencing mechanism of interprovincial migration's Hukou transfer intention in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(11): 1702-1710.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.11.003 |
[ 古恒宇, 刘子亮, 沈体雁. 中国省际流动人口户籍迁移意愿的空间格局及影响机制分析. 地理科学, 2019, 39(11): 1702-1710.] | |
[47] |
Lu P, Zhou T. Housing for rural migrant workers: Consumption characteristics and supply policy. Urban Policy and Research, 2008, 26(3): 297-308.
doi: 10.1080/08111140802301757 |
[48] | Wang Yujun, Yang Wenhui, Liu Zhilin. Determinants of changes in housing sources for migrant workers in urban China: An empirical study based on a twelve-city migrant survey. Population Research, 2014, 38(4): 63-74. |
[ 王玉君, 杨文辉, 刘志林. 进城务工人员的住房变动及其影响因素: 基于十二城市问卷调查的实证分析. 人口研究, 2014, 38(4): 63-74.] | |
[49] | Fang Changchun, Feng Xiaotian. Social origins and educational attainment: A historical analysis based on 70 birth cohorts from CGSS datasets. Sociological Studies, 2018, 33(2): 140-163, 245. |
[ 方长春, 风笑天. 社会出身与教育获得: 基于CGSS 70个年龄组数据的历史考察. 社会学研究, 2018, 33(2): 140-163, 245.] | |
[50] | Du Peng, Zhang Wenjuan. On the laddering migration of China's floating population. Population Journal, 2010, 32(3): 25-29. |
[ 杜鹏, 张文娟. 对中国流动人口“梯次流动”的理论思考. 人口学刊, 2010, 32(3): 25-29.] | |
[51] | Liu Tao, Zhuo Yunxia, Wang Jiejing. How multi-proximity affects destination choice in onward migration: A nested logit model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(12): 2716-2729. |
[ 刘涛, 卓云霞, 王洁晶. 邻近性对人口再流动目的地选择的影响. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2716-2729.] |
[1] | 杨宇. 中国与全球能源网络的互动逻辑与格局转变[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 295-314. |
[2] | 朱晟君, 杨博飞, 刘逸. 经济全球化变革下的世界经济地理与中国角色[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 315-330. |
[3] | 刘承良, 闫姗姗. 中国跨国城际技术通道的空间演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 331-352. |
[4] | 李广东. 全球土地覆被时空变化与中国贡献[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 353-368. |
[5] | 叶超, 杨东阳, 赵江南. 中国超大城市户籍人口转化的实证研究[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 369-380. |
[6] | 刘涛, 彭荣熙, 卓云霞, 曹广忠. 2000—2020年中国人口分布格局演变及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 381-394. |
[7] | 柯文前, 朱宇, 陈晨, Guy J. Abel, 林李月, 林洁. 1995—2015年中国人口迁移的时空变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 411-425. |
[8] | 赵梓渝, 韩钟辉, 魏冶, 王士君. 中国人口流动管控应对COVID-19疫情效应评估[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 426-442. |
[9] | 王博云, 刘天禹, 李露凝, 李强, 贾鹏飞, 陈晋. 中国COVID-19疫情扩散的时空模式及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 443-456. |
[10] | 王强, 周侃, 林键. 中国城乡家庭能源平等变化特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 457-473. |
[11] | 贺灿飞, 余昌达. 多维邻近性、贸易壁垒与中国—世界市场的产业联系动态演化[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(2): 275-294. |
[12] | 陈之端, 张晓霞, 胡海花, 牛艳婷, 叶建飞, 张虔, 刘赟, 赵莉娜, 卢杉, 鲁丽敏, 路安民. 中国植物地理学研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(1): 120-132. |
[13] | 李振亚, 魏伟, 周亮, 刘春芳, 郭泽呈, 庞素菲, 张静. 中国陆地生态敏感性时空演变特征[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(1): 150-163. |
[14] | 吴健生, 何海珊, 胡甜. 地表温度“源—汇”景观贡献度的影响因素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(1): 51-65. |
[15] | 刘振, 刘盛和, 戚伟, 金浩然. 青藏高原流动人口居留意愿及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2142-2156. |