博台线作为中国区域发展均衡线的佐证分析——以城市温室气体排放为例

doi:10.11821/dlxb202112015

地理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (12): 3090-3102.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202112015

博台线作为中国区域发展均衡线的佐证分析——以城市温室气体排放为例

方恺¹^,²^,³(), 何坚坚¹, 张佳琪¹

1.浙江大学公共管理学院,杭州 310058
2.浙江大学区域协调发展研究中心,杭州 310058
3.浙江大学民生保障与公共治理研究中心,杭州 310058

收稿日期:2020-11-16 修回日期:2021-07-15 出版日期:2021-12-25 发布日期:2022-02-25
作者简介:方恺(1986-), 男, 浙江杭州人, 博士, 研究员, 博士生导师, 中国地理学会会员(S110010745M), 主要从事环境管理与区域可持续发展研究。E-mail: fangk@zju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(72074193);国家自然科学基金项目(71704157);浙江省重点研发计划项目(2022C03154);浙江省杰出青年科学基金项目(LR19G030001);浙江大学生态文明计划自主研究项目

Analysis of the Bole-Taipei Line as the divide for regional coordinated development: Evidence from greenhouse gas emissions of Chinese cities

FANG Kai¹^,²^,³(), HE Jianjian¹, ZHANG Jiaqi¹

1. School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2. Research Center for Regional Coordinated Development, Hangzhou 310058, China
3. Center for Social Welfare and Governance, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2020-11-16 Revised:2021-07-15 Published:2021-12-25 Online:2022-02-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(72074193);National Natural Science Foundation of China(71704157);Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province(2022C03154);Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province for Distinguished Young Scholars(LR19G030001);Ecological Civilization Project of Zhejiang University

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

国际政治经济形势正在发生深刻变化,实现区域协调均衡发展对于形成以国内大循环为主的新发展格局至关重要。方创琳于2020年2月提出垂直于胡焕庸线的博台线可以表征中国区域发展的均衡格局。本文通过对中国338个地级市的温室气体排放水平进行分析,旨在论证博台线作为中国区域发展均衡线的合理性和可能性。结果显示：① 2015年二氧化碳（CO₂）、甲烷（CH₄）、氧化亚氮（N₂O）和含氟温室气体总量以博台线为界呈南北对称的空间分布格局,且博台线两侧各类温室气体的排放强度和人均排放量分布基本均衡,各产业部门CO₂排放强度和人均排放量的区域差异均较小;② 博台线西南半壁和东北半壁内各类温室气体排放在GDP和人口维度上总体呈均衡分布态势,且各部门CO₂排放强度和人均排放量的空间分布也较为均衡。总体而言,博台线两侧表征人类活动强度的温室气体排放水平较为均衡,一定程度上反映出其作为中国区域发展战略均衡线的科学性与合理性。

关键词: 博台线, 温室气体, 均衡性, 泰尔指数, 基尼系数, 城市

Abstract:

As the international political and economic situation has been undergoing profound changes, achieving regional coordinated development is essential for China to form a new development pattern dominated by the domestic economic cycle. The Bole-Taipei Line, which is perpendicular to the Hu Huanyong Line and is proposed by Professor Fang Chuanglin in February 2020, has the potential to be an appropriate representative of the coordinated and balanced line of China's regional development. By investigating the spatio-temporal distribution of greenhouse gas emissions among 338 Chinese cities from 2005 to 2015, and making use of the Theil index and the Gini coefficient that are appropriate for measuring the spatial equality on both sides of the Bole-Taipei Line and within the southwest and northeast parts, respectively, this paper attempts, for the first time, to underpin the scientific basis of the Bole-Taipei Line as China's regional coordinated development line. We find that: (1) Overall emissions of the carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O) and fluorinated greenhouse gas show a balanced distribution on both sides of the Bole-Taipei Line, and there are small regional differences in sectoral CO₂ emission intensity and per capita CO₂ emissions. (2) There is a generally balanced distribution of greenhouse gas emission intensity and per capita emissions, as well as the sectoral CO₂ emission intensity and per capita emissions within the southwest and northeast parts of the Bole-Taipei Line. The industrial and agricultural sectors serve as the major emitters of greenhouse gases and therefore require a low-carbon transition towards a more balanced distribution of greenhouse gas emissions on both sides of the Bole-Taipei Line. In conclusion, the greenhouse gas emissions as a measure of the magnitude of human activities on both sides of the Bole-Taipei Line are relatively balanced, which has justified the scientific robustness and rationality of the Bole-Taipei Line as a strategic line for socioeconomic development, and provided novel insights into China's regional coordinated development.

Key words: Bole-Taipei Line, greenhouse gas emissions, spatial equality, Theil index, Gini coefficient, city level

方恺, 何坚坚, 张佳琪. 博台线作为中国区域发展均衡线的佐证分析——以城市温室气体排放为例[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(12): 3090-3102.

FANG Kai, HE Jianjian, ZHANG Jiaqi. Analysis of the Bole-Taipei Line as the divide for regional coordinated development: Evidence from greenhouse gas emissions of Chinese cities[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(12): 3090-3102.

图/表 9

图1

表1

图2

图3

表2

图4

图5

表3

图6

参考文献 39

[1]	Lu Dadao. Geographical conditions and national strategies. Advances in Earth Science, 2020, 35(3): 221-230.
	[陆大道. 地理国情与国家战略. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(3): 221-230.]
[2]	Fan Jie, Wang Yafei, Liang Bo. The evolution process and regulation of China's regional development pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2437-2454.
	[樊杰, 王亚飞, 梁博. 中国区域发展格局演变过程与调控. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2437-2454.]
[3]	Feng Changchun, Zeng Zanrong, Cui Nana. The economic disparities and their spatio-temporal evolution in China since 2000. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(2): 234-246. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201502004
	[冯长春, 曾赞荣, 崔娜娜. 2000年以来中国区域经济差异的时空演变. 地理研究, 2015, 34(2): 234-246.]
[4]	Hu Huanyong. Population distribution in China: Statistical tables and density maps are attached. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1935, 2(2): 33-74. doi: 10.11821/xb193502002
	[胡焕庸. 中国人口之分布: 附统计表与密度图. 地理学报, 1935, (2): 33-74.]
[5]	Wang Zheng, Le Qun, Xia Haibin, et al. China 2050: Climate scenarios and stability of Hu-line. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2016, 46(11): 1505-1514, 1-6. doi: 10.1360/N072014-00514
	[王铮, 乐群, 夏海斌, 等. 中国2050: 气候情景与胡焕庸线的稳定性中国科学: 地球科学, 2016, 46(11): 1505-1514, 1-6.]
[6]	Lu Dadao, Wang Zheng, Feng Zhiming, et al. Academic debates on Hu Huanyong population line. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(5): 805-824. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201605001
	[陆大道, 王铮, 封志明, 等. 关于“胡焕庸线能否突破”的学术争鸣. 地理研究, 2016, 35(5): 805-824.]
[7]	Chen Mingxing, Li Yang, Gong Yinghua, et al. The population distribution and trend of urbanization pattern on two sides of Hu Huanyong population line: A tentative response to Premier Li Keqiang. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(2): 179-193. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201602001
	[陈明星, 李扬, 龚颖华, 等. 胡焕庸线两侧的人口分布与城镇化格局趋势: 尝试回答李克强总理之问. 地理学报, 2016, 71(2): 179-193.]
[8]	Fang Chuanglin. Bole-Taipei Line: The important function and basic conception as a line for regional balanced development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 211-225. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202002001
	[方创琳. 博台线—中国区域发展均衡线的重要功能与建设构想. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 211-225.]
[9]	Li Jiaming, Lu Dadao, Xu Chengdong, et al. Spatial heterogeneity and its changes of population on the two sides of Hu Line. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 148-160. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701012
	[李佳洺, 陆大道, 徐成东, 等. 胡焕庸线两侧人口的空间分异性及其变化. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 148-160.]
[10]	Wang Kaiyong, Deng Yu. Can new urbanization break through the Hu Huanyong Line? Further discussion on the geographical connotations of the Hu Huanyong Line. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(5): 825-835. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201605002
	[王开泳, 邓羽. 新型城镇化能否突破“胡焕庸线”兼论: “胡焕庸线”的地理学内涵. 地理研究, 2016, 35(5): 825-835.]
[11]	Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2014. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[12]	Davis S J, Lewis N S, Shaner M, et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science, 2018, 360(6396): 1-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.aas9793. doi: 10.1126/science.aas9793
[13]	Gupta J. Negotiating challenges and climate change. Climate Policy, 2012, 12(5): 630-644. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2012.693392
[14]	Prell C, Feng K S. The evolution of global trade and impacts on countries' carbon trade imbalances. Social Networks, 2016, 46: 87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2016.03.001
[15]	Zhang Mei, Huang Xianjin, Chuai Xiaowei, et al. Urban construction lands and their carbon emission differences east and west of the Hu Huanyong Line. Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1262-1273.
	[张梅, 黄贤金, 揣小伟, 等. 胡焕庸线两侧城镇建设用地变化及其碳排放差异. 资源科学, 2019, 41(7): 1262-1273.]
[16]	Fang K, Tang Y Q, Zhang Q F, et al. Will China peak its energy-related carbon emissions by 2030? Lessons from 30 Chinese provinces. Applied Energy, 2019, 255: 113852. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113852. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113852
[17]	Zhao Rongqin, Li Zhiping, Han Yuping, et al. The coupling interaction mechanism of regional water-land-energy-carbon system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(9): 1613-1628. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201609012
	[赵荣钦, 李志萍, 韩宇平, 等. 区域“水—土—能—碳”耦合作用机制分析. 地理学报, 2016, 71(9): 1613-1628.]
[18]	Fang Kai, Duan Zheng. An integrated assessment of national environmental sustainability by synthesizing carbon, water and land footprints and boundaries. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(4): 539-548.
	[方恺, 段峥. 全球主要国家环境可持续性综合评估: 基于碳、水、土地的足迹—边界整合分析. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(4): 539-548.]
[19]	Millar R J, Fuglestvedt J S, Friedlingstein P, et al. Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C. Nature Geoscience, 2017, 10(10): 741-747. doi: 10.1038/ngeo3031
[20]	Wu Hong. China's provincial carbon emission reduction: Spatio-temporal pattern, evolution mechanism and policy recommendations. Management World, 2015(11): 3-10.
	[武红. 中国省域碳减排: 时空格局、演变机理及政策建议: 基于空间计量经济学的理论与方法. 管理世界, 2015(11): 3-10.]
[21]	Shan Y L, Guan D B, Liu J H, et al. Methodology and applications of city level CO₂ emission accounts in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161: 1215-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.075
[22]	Clarke-Sather A, Qu J S, Wang Q, et al. Carbon inequality at the subnational scale: A case study of provincial-level inequality in CO₂ emissions in China 1997-2007. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(9): 5420-5428. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.021
[23]	Cao L B, Tang Y Q, Cai B F, et al. Was it better or worse? Simulating the environmental and health impacts of emissions trading scheme in Hubei Province, China. Energy, 2021, 217: 119427. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119427. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119427
[24]	Yang Qinglin, Zhao Rongqin, Xing Yue, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of carbon emissions in China's cities. Journal of Environmental Economics, 2017, 2(1): 70-81.
	[杨青林, 赵荣钦, 邢月, 等. 中国城市碳排放的空间分布特征研究. 环境经济研究, 2017, 2(1): 70-81.]
[25]	Wang Shaojian, Huang Yongyuan. Spatial spillover effect and driving forces of carbon emission intensity at city level in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(6): 1131-1148. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201906005
	[王少剑, 黄永源. 中国城市碳排放强度的空间溢出效应及驱动因素. 地理学报, 2019, 74(6): 1131-1148.]
[26]	Su Y X, Chen X Z, Li Y, et al. China׳s 19-year City-level carbon emissions of energy consumptions, driving forces and regionalized mitigation guidelines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 35: 231-243. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.015
[27]	Wang J N, Cai B F, Zhang L X, et al. High resolution carbon dioxide emission gridded data for China derived from point sources. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(12): 7085-7093. doi: 10.1021/es405369r
[28]	Cai Bofeng, Wang Jinnan. Yang Shuying, et al. China city CO₂ emission dataset: Based on the China high resolution emission gridded data. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(2): 1-4.
	[蔡博峰, 王金南, 杨姝影, 等. 中国城市CO₂排放数据集研究: 基于中国高空间分辨率网格数据. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(2): 1-4.]
[29]	Theil H. Economics and Information Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1967.
[30]	Zhang Chengming, Weng Shixiu, Bao Jigang. The geographical pattern of China's tourism development since the reform and opening-up in 1978. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(10): 1980-2000. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910003
	[张城铭, 翁时秀, 保继刚. 1978年改革开放以来中国旅游业发展的地理格局. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 1980-2000.]
[31]	Gini C W. Variability and mutability, contribution to the study of statistical distributions and relations. Studi Economico-Giuridici della R. Universita de Cagliari, 1912.
[32]	The People's Republic of China. The People's Republic of China Initial National Communication on Climate Change. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2004: 18-19.
	[中华人民共和国. 中华人民共和国气候变化初始信息通报. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2004: 18-19.]
[33]	Xu Runong, Wu Yuming. The convergence of provincial energy intensity in China. Statistics & Decision, 2019, 35(22): 122-126.
	[徐如浓, 吴玉鸣. 中国省域能源强度的趋同性研究. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(22): 122-126.]
[34]	Zhong Shuiying, Li Qiangyi, Xu Fei. Spatial inequality and distributional dynamics of the development level of agricultural modernization in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(7): 145-152.
	[钟水映, 李强谊, 徐飞. 中国农业现代化发展水平的空间非均衡及动态演进. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(7): 145-152.]
[35]	Aye G C, Edoja P E. Effect of economic growth on CO₂ emission in developing countries: Evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Economics & Finance, 2017, 5(1): 1379239. DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2017.1379239. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2017.1379239
[36]	Zheng X Q, Lu Y L, Yuan J J, et al. Drivers of change in China's energy-related CO₂ emissions. PNAS, 2020, 117(1): 29-36. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908513117
[37]	Zhong Yunyun. The Chinese provincial regional differences and space-time evolution characteristics of energy consumption carbon emissions. Ecological Economy, 2018, 34(4): 30-33, 39.
	[仲云云. 中国省际能源消费碳排放的区域差异与时空演变特征. 生态经济, 2018, 34(4): 30-33, 39.]
[38]	Deng Xiangzheng, Liang Li, Wu Feng, et al. Chinese balanced regional development strategy from the perspective of development geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 261-276. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102002
	[邓祥征, 梁立, 吴锋, 等. 发展地理学视角下中国区域均衡发展. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 261-276.]
[39]	Fang K, Wang S Q, He J J, et al. Mapping the environmental footprints of nations partnering the Belt and Road Initiative. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 164: 105068. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105068. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105068

温室气体类型	强度泰尔指数	人均泰尔指数
CO₂	0.0346	0.0484
CH₄	0.0040	0.0008
N₂O	0.0029	0.0004
含氟温室气体	0.0163	0.0262

年份	强度泰尔指数	人均泰尔指数
2005	0.0072	0.0304
2012	0.0151	0.0424
2015	0.0346	0.0484

部门	强度泰尔指数	人均泰尔指数
农业	0.0009	0.0000
工业过程	0.0386	0.0260
工业能源	0.0117	0.0053
服务业	0.0675	0.0504
交通	0.0487	0.0344
城镇生活	0.0594	0.0434
农村生活	0.0016	0.0000

博台线作为中国区域发展均衡线的佐证分析——以城市温室气体排放为例

Analysis of the Bole-Taipei Line as the divide for regional coordinated development: Evidence from greenhouse gas emissions of Chinese cities

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	樊杰, 赵鹏军, 周尚意, 邓祥征, 王琛. 人文地理学学科体系与发展战略要点[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2083-2093.
[2]	邓楚雄, 赵浩, 谢炳庚, 李忠武, 李科. 土地资源错配对中国城市工业绿色全要素生产率的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1865-1881.
[3]	王哲, 郑法川. 中国近代城市体系的位序规模特征——基于1936年《中华民国邮政舆图》的分析[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1910-1923.
[4]	谌丽, 许婧雪, 张文忠, 解扬洋, 党云晓, 湛东升. 居民城市公共安全感知与社区环境——基于北京大规模调查问卷的分析[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1939-1950.
[5]	陈明星, 先乐, 王朋岭, 丁子津. 气候变化与多维度可持续城市化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1895-1909.
[6]	周亮, 党雪薇, 周成虎, 王波, 魏伟. 中国建设用地的坡谱演化规律与爬坡影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1747-1762.
[7]	曹广忠, 陈思创, 刘涛. 中国五大城市群人口流入的空间模式及变动趋势[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1334-1349.
[8]	孙平军, 王柯文. 中国东北三省城市收缩的识别及其类型划分[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1366-1379.
[9]	魏石梅, 潘竟虎. 中国地级及以上城市网络结构韧性测度[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1394-1407.
[10]	方远平, 毕斗斗, 陈宏洋, 彭婷. 知识密集型服务业集聚对城市群旅游创新影响的空间效应[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1521-1536.
[11]	郭向阳, 穆学青, 丁正山, 秦东丽. 长三角多维城市化对PM_2.5浓度的非线性影响及驱动机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(5): 1274-1293.
[12]	朱政, 朱翔, 李霜霜. 长江中游城市群空间结构演变历程与特征[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 799-817.
[13]	黄晓东, 马海涛, 苗长虹. 基于创新企业的中国城市网络联系特征[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 835-852.
[14]	王录仓, 刘海洋, 刘清. 基于腾讯迁徙大数据的中国城市网络研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 853-869.
[15]	刘清, 杨永春, 蒋小荣, 曹宛鹏, 刘笑杰. 基于全球价值链的全球化城市网络分析——以苹果手机供应商为例[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 870-887.