1990—2018年土地利用/覆盖变化研究的特征和进展

doi:10.11821/dlxb202111010

地理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (11): 2730-2748.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202111010

1990—2018年土地利用/覆盖变化研究的特征和进展

何春阳¹^,²(), 张金茜¹^,², 刘志锋¹^,², 黄庆旭¹^,²

1.北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室人与环境系统可持续研究中心,北京 100875
2.北京师范大学地理科学学部自然资源学院土地资源与区域发展研究中心,北京 100875

收稿日期:2020-05-28 修回日期:2021-05-07 出版日期:2021-11-25 发布日期:2022-01-25
作者简介:何春阳(1975-), 男, 四川射洪人, 教授, 主要从事综合自然地理学、土地利用/覆盖变化和城市景观可持续性研究。E-mail: hcy@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41971270);第二次青藏高原综合考察研究(2019QZKK0405)

Characteristics and progress of land use/cover change research during 1990-2018

HE Chunyang¹^,²(), ZHANG Jinxi¹^,², LIU Zhifeng¹^,², HUANG Qingxu¹^,²

1. Center for Human-Environment System Sustainability (CHESS), State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology (ESPRE), Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. School of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2020-05-28 Revised:2021-05-07 Published:2021-11-25 Online:2022-01-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971270);Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program(2019QZKK0405)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

土地利用/覆盖变化（LUCC）是地表综合集成研究的一个学科基础和前沿领域。本文利用定性与定量相结合的方法对1990—2018年的LUCC研究进展进行了系统综述。在回顾LUCC研究历程的基础上,结合文献分析,详细总结了不同LUCC研究阶段的基本特征和主要进展。进而阐述了当前LUCC研究面临的主要挑战,提出了未来LUCC研究的主要发展方向。1990年以来LUCC研究关注度不断提升,相关英文论文发文量和引文量呈指数增长趋势。LUCC研究正从1990—2004年间的过程研究阶段和2005—2013年间的影响研究阶段迈向2014年以后的可持续性研究阶段。当前LUCC研究正面临着如何借鉴可持续科学框架、整合新兴技术和支撑国土空间规划等挑战。未来LUCC研究需要与景观可持续科学和地理设计紧密结合,积极面向国土空间规划主战场,为建设美丽中国和落实联合国可持续发展目标服务。

关键词: 土地利用/覆盖变化, 过程, 影响, 可持续性, 国土空间规划

Abstract:

Land use/cover change (LUCC) is the foundation and frontier for integrating multiple??land surface processes. This paper aims to systematically review LUCC research from 1990 to 2018. Based on qualitative and quantitative analyses, we delineated the history of LUCC research and summarized their characteristics and major progress at different stages. We also identified main challenges and proposed future directions for LUCC research. We found that the number of publications on LUCC research and their total citations grew exponentially. The research foci shifted from the process of LUCC during 1990-2004 to the impact of LUCC during 2005-2013, and then to the sustainability of LUCC from 2014 onwards. Currently, LUCC research is facing theoretical, methodological and practical challenges ranging from integrating the framework of sustainability science, adopting emerging technologies to supporting territorial spatial planning. To move forward, LUCC research should be closely integrated with landscape sustainability science and geodesign, and take the leading role in territorial spatial planning to achieve the related Sustainable Development Goals.

Key words: land use/cover change, process, impact, sustainability, territorial spatial planning

何春阳, 张金茜, 刘志锋, 黄庆旭. 1990—2018年土地利用/覆盖变化研究的特征和进展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2730-2748.

HE Chunyang, ZHANG Jinxi, LIU Zhifeng, HUANG Qingxu. Characteristics and progress of land use/cover change research during 1990-2018[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(11): 2730-2748.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 123

[1]	Meyer W B, TurnerⅡ B L. Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[2]	Zuo Dakang. A Dictionary of Modern Geography. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1990.
	[左大康, 主编. 现代地理学辞典. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1990.]
[3]	Global Land Project(GLP). Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. Stockholm: IGBP Secretariat, 2005.
[4]	Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 2009, 461:472-475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
[5]	Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 2015, 347:736-747.
[6]	Lambin E F, Turner II B L, Geist H J, et al. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 2001, 11:261-269. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
[7]	Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P, et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005, 309(5734):570-574. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772
[8]	Verburg P H, Crossman N, Ellis E C, et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: A global land project perspective. Anthropocene, 2015, 12:29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ancene.2015.09.004
[9]	Long H L, Qu Y. Land use transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective. Land Use Policy, 2018, 74:111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.021
[10]	Liu Y S, Li J T, Yang Y Y. Strategic adjustment of land use policy under the economic transformation. Land Use Policy, 2018, 74:5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.005
[11]	Li Xiubin. A review of the international researches on land use/land cover change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(6):553-558. doi: 10.11821/xb199606009
	[李秀彬. 全球环境变化研究的核心领域: 土地利用/土地覆被变化的国际研究动向. 地理学报, 1996, 51(6):553-558.]
[12]	Cai Yunlong. A study on land use/cover change: The need for a new integrated approach. Geographical Research, 2001, 20(6):645-652.
	[蔡运龙. 土地利用/土地覆被变化研究: 寻求新的综合途径. 地理研究, 2001, 20(6):645-652.]
[13]	Tang Huajun, Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, et al. Recent progresses of land use and land cover change (LUCC) models. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4):456-468.
	[唐华俊, 吴文斌, 杨鹏, 等. 土地利用/土地覆被变化(LUCC)模型研究进展. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4):456-468.]
[14]	Liu Jiyuan, Deng Xiangzheng. Progress of the research methodologies on the temporal and spatial process of LUCC. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54(21):3251-3258.
	[刘纪远, 邓祥征. LUCC时空过程研究的方法进展. 科学通报, 2009, 54(21):3251-3258.]
[15]	Fu Bojie, Zhang Liwei. Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4):441-446. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
	[傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4):441-446.]
[16]	Fan Jie. "Territorial System of Human-environment Interaction": A theoretical cornerstone for comprehensive research on formation and evolution of the geographical pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4):597-607.
	[樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4):597-607.]
[17]	Fu Bojie, Liu Yanxu. The theories and methods for systematically understanding land resource. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2019, 64(21):2172-2179.
	[傅伯杰, 刘焱序. 系统认知土地资源的理论与方法. 科学通报, 2019, 64(21):2172-2179.]
[18]	Lambin E F, Baulies X, Bockstael N, et al. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Implementation Strategy. Stockhdm and Bonn: Scientific Steering Committee and International Project Office of LUCC, 1999.
[19]	Turner II B L, Lambin E F, Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. PNAS, 2007, 104(52):20666-20671. pmid: 18093934
[20]	Verburg P H, Erb K H, Mertz O, et al. Land system science: Between global challenges and local realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(5):433-437. pmid: 24851141
[21]	Future Earth. Future earth initial design: Report of the transition team. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU), 2013.
[22]	Wu J G. Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28:999-1023. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9
[23]	Hansen M C, DeFries R S, Townshend J R G, et al. Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2000, 21(6-7):1331-1364. doi: 10.1080/014311600210209
[24]	Loveland T R, Reed B C, Brown J F, et al. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2000, 21(6-7):1303-1330. doi: 10.1080/014311600210191
[25]	Roy P S, Agrawal S, Joshi P, et al. The land cover map for Southern Asia for the year 2000: GLC2000 database. European Commision Joint Research Centre, 2003.
[26]	Friedl M A, McIver D K, Hodges J C F, et al. Global land cover mapping from MODIS: Algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 83(1):287-302. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00078-0
[27]	Bicheron P, Leroy M, Brockmann C, et al. GlobCover: A 300 m Global Land Cover Product for 2005 Using ENVISAT MERIS Time Series. Valencia: Publishing Services, University of Valencia, 2006.
[28]	ESA. CCI-LC Product User Guide v2.4, 2014.
[29]	Bai Wanqi, Zhao Shidong. An analysis on driving force system of land use changes. Resources Science, 2001, 23(3):39-41.
	[摆万奇, 赵士洞. 土地利用变化驱动力系统分析. 资源科学, 2001, 23(3):39-41.]
[30]	Fischer G, Ermoliev Y, Keyzer M A, et al. Simulating the socio-economic and biogeophysical driving forces of land-use and land-cover change: The IIASA land-use change model. WP-96-010. Laxenburg: IIASA, 1996.
[31]	Muller M R, Middleton J. A Markov model of land-use change dynamics in the Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 1994, 9(2):151-157.
[32]	Portela R, Rademacher I. A dynamic model of patterns of deforestation and their effect on the ability of the Brazilian Amazonia to provide ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 2001, 143(1-2):115-146. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00359-3
[33]	Parker D C, Manson S M, Janssen M A, et al. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003, 93(2):314-337. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.9302004
[34]	Valbuena D, Verburg P H, Bregt A K, et al. An agent-based approach to model land-use change at a regional scale. Landscape Ecology, 2010, 25(2):185-199. doi: 10.1007/s10980-009-9380-6
[35]	Li Xia, Ye Jia'an. Cellular automata for simulating complex land use systems using neural networks. Geographical Research, 2005, 24(1):19-27.
	[黎夏, 叶嘉安. 基于神经网络的元胞自动机及模拟复杂土地利用系统. 地理研究, 2005, 24(1):19-27.]
[36]	Verburg P H, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, et al. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: The CLUE-S model. Environmental Management, 2002, 30(3):391-405. pmid: 12148073
[37]	He Chunyang, Shi Peijun, Chen Jin, et al. Land use scenario model study based on system dynamics model and cellular automata model. Science in China: Series D, 2005, 35(5):464-473.
	[何春阳, 史培军, 陈晋, 等. 基于系统动力学模型和元胞自动机模型的土地利用情景模型研究. 中国科学(D辑), 2005, 35(5):464-473.]
[38]	Boissau S, Castella J C. Constructing a common representation of local institutions and land use systems through simulation-gaming and multiagent modeling in rural areas of northern Vietnam: The SAMBA-week methodology. Simulation & Gaming, 2003, 34(3):342-357.
[39]	Fischer J, Lindenmayer D B. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: A synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2007, 16(3):265-280. doi: 10.1111/geb.2007.16.issue-3
[40]	Ellis E C, Klein Goldewijk K, Siebert S, et al. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2010, 19(5):589-606.
[41]	Cardinale B J, Duffy J E, Gonzalez A, et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 2012, 486(7401):59-67. doi: 10.1038/nature11148
[42]	Schipper J, Chanson J S, Chiozza F, et al. The status of the world's land and marine mammals: Diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science, 2008, 322(5899):225-230. doi: 10.1126/science.1165115 pmid: 18845749
[43]	Böhm M, Collen B, Baillie J E M, et al. The conservation status of the world's reptiles. Biological Conservation, 2013, 157:372-385. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.015
[44]	Powers R P, Jetz W. Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios. Nature Climate Change, 2019, 9(4):323-329. doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0406-z
[45]	Sala O E, Chapin III F S, Armesto J J, et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 2000, 287(5459):1770-1774. pmid: 10710299
[46]	Snyder P K, Delire C, Foley J A. Evaluating the influence of different vegetation biomes on the global climate. Climate Dynamics, 2004, 23:279-302. doi: 10.1007/s00382-004-0430-0
[47]	Dirmeyer P A, Niyogi D, de Noblet-Ducoudré N, et al. Impacts of land use change on climate. International Journal of Climatology, 2010, 30(13):1905-1907. doi: 10.1002/joc.2157
[48]	Kishtawal C M, Niyogi D, Tewari M, et al. Urbanization signature in the observed heavy rainfall climatology over India. International Journal of Climatology, 2010, 30(13):1908-1916. doi: 10.1002/joc.v30:13
[49]	Kim M, Kim S K. Quantitative estimates of warming by urbanization in South Korea over the past 55 years (1954-2008). Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(32):5778-5783. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.028
[50]	Kume A, Charles K, Berehane Y, et al. Magnitude and variation of traffic air pollution as measured by CO in the city of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 2010, 24(3):156-166.
[51]	Batlle-Aguilar J, Brovelli A, Porporato A, et al. Modelling soil carbon and nitrogen cycles during land use change. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2011, 31(2):251-274. doi: 10.1051/agro/2010007
[52]	Geissen V, Sánchez-Hernández R, Kampichler C, et al. Effects of land-use change on some properties of tropical soils-An example from Southeast Mexico. Geoderma, 2009, 151(3/4):87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.011
[53]	Houghton R A. Carbon emissions and the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2012, 4(6):597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.06.006
[54]	Thampi S G, Raneesh K Y, Surya T V. Influence of scale on SWAT model calibration for streamflow in a river basin in the humid tropics. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(15):4567-4578. doi: 10.1007/s11269-010-9676-y
[55]	Manson S M. Agent-based modeling and genetic programming for modeling land change in the Southern Yucatán Peninsular region of Mexico. Agriculture Ecoystems & Environment, 2005, 111(1-4), 47-62.
[56]	The Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Engineering. Water Loss and Soil Erosion and Ecological Security of China: The Loess Plateau. Beijing: Science Press, 2010: 28-59.
	[水利部, 中国科学院, 中国工程院. 中国水土流失防治与生态安全(西北黄土高原区卷). 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 28-59.]
[57]	Yao Wenyi, Ran Dachuan, Chen Jiangnan. Recent changes in runoff and sediment regimes and future projections in the Yellow River basin. Advances in Water Science, 2013, 24(5):607-616.
	[姚文艺, 冉大川, 陈江南. 黄河流域近期水沙变化及其趋势预测. 水科学进展, 2013, 24(5):607-616.]
[58]	Bradshaw C J A, Sodhi N S, Peh K S H, et al. Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world. Global Change Biology, 2007, 13(11):2379-2395. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2007.13.issue-11
[59]	Laurance W F. Forests and floods. Nature, 2007, 449(7161):409-410. doi: 10.1038/449409a
[60]	Sterling S M, Ducharne A, Polcher J. The impact of global land-cover change on the terrestrial water cycle. Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3(4):385-390. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1690
[61]	Hurkmans R T W L, Terink W, Uijlenhoet R, et al. Effects of land use changes on streamflow generation in the Rhine basin. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45:W06405. DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007574. doi: 10.1029/2008WR007574
[62]	Gleick P H. Water use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2003, 28:275-314. doi: 10.1146/energy.2003.28.issue-1
[63]	Grafton R Q. Addressing China's water scarcity: Recommendations for selected water resource management issues. Asian Pacific Economic Literature, 2009, 23(2):124-125.
[64]	Yu C Q, Gong P, Yin Y Y. China's water crisis needs more than words. Nature, 2011, 470(7334):307. doi: 10.1038/470307a
[65]	Ouyang Y, Nkedi-Kizza P, Wu Q T, et al. Assessment of seasonal variations in surface water quality. Water Research, 2006, 40(20):3800-3810. pmid: 17069873
[66]	Ongley E D, Zhang X L, Yu T. Current status of agricultural and rural non-point source pollution assessment in China. Environmental Pollution, 2010, 158(5):1159-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.10.047 pmid: 19931958
[67]	Calvin K, Bond-Lamberty B. Integrated human-earth system modeling-state of the science and future directions. Environmental Research Letters, 2018, 13(6):063006. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac642. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac642
[68]	Reilly J, Paltsev S, Strzepek K, et al. Valuing climate impacts in integrated assessment models: The MIT IGSM. Climatic Change, 2013, 117(3):561-573. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0635-x
[69]	Leng G Y, Tang Q H. Modeling the impacts of future climate change on irrigation over China: Sensitivity to adjusted projections. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2014, 15(5):2085-2103. doi: 10.1175/JHM-D-13-0182.1
[70]	Thornton P E, Calvin K, Jones A D, et al. Biospheric feedback effects in a synchronously coupled model of human and Earth systems. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(7):496-500. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3310
[71]	Yang S L, Dong W J, Chou J M, et al. A brief introduction to BNU-HESM1.0 and its earth surface temperature simulations. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2015, 32(12):1683-1688. doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-5050-6
[72]	Voldoire A, Eickhout B, Schaeffer M, et al. Climate simulation of the twenty-first century with interactive land-use changes. Climate Dynamics, 2007, 29(2-3):177-193. doi: 10.1007/s00382-007-0228-y
[73]	Bahn O, Drouet L, Edwards N R, et al. The coupling of optimal economic growth and climate dynamics. Climatic Change, 2006, 79(1-2):103-119. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9108-4
[74]	Collins W D, Craig A P, Truesdale J E, et al. The integrated Earth system model version 1: Formulation and functionality. Geoscientific Model Development, 2015, 8(7):2203-2219. doi: 10.5194/gmd-8-2203-2015
[75]	Calvin K, Bond-Lamberty B, Jones A, et al. Characteristics of human-climate feedbacks differ at different radiative forcing levels. Global and Planetary Change, 2019, 180:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.06.003
[76]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment(MA). Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.
[77]	Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services(IPBES). The global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Summary for policymakers. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat, 2019. [2019-11-22]. https://ipbes.net/system/tdf/inline/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf?file=1&ty pe=node&id=36213.
[78]	Keating B A, Herrero M, Carberry P S, et al. Food wedges: Framing the global food demand and supply challenge towards 2050. Global Food Security, 2014, 3(3-4):125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2014.08.004
[79]	Grundy M J, Bryan B A, Nolan M, et al. Scenarios for Australian agricultural production and land use to 2050. Agricultural Systems, 2016, 142:70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.008
[80]	Fischer R A, Byerlee D, Edmeades G O. Crop yields and global food security: Will yield increase continue to feed the world? ACIAR Monograph No. 158. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 2014.
[81]	Springer N P, Duchin F. Feeding nine billion people sustainably: Conserving land and water through shifting diets and changes in technologies. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(8):4444-4451. doi: 10.1021/es4051988
[82]	Odegard I Y R, van der Voet E. The future of food-scenarios and the effect on natural resource use in agriculture in 2050. Ecological Economics, 2014, 97:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.005
[83]	Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC). Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems 2019. [2019-09-16]. https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/summaryfor-policymakers.
[84]	Simmons C T, Matthews H D. Assessing the implications of human land-use change for the transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 2016, 11(3):035001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035001. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035001
[85]	Davies-Barnard T, Valdes P J, Singarayer J S, et al. Full effects of land use change in the representative concentration pathways. Environmental Research Letters, 2014, 9:114014. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114014. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114014
[86]	Boysen L R, Brovkin V, Arora V K, et al. Global and regional effects of land-use change on climate in 21st century simulations with interactive carbon cycle. Earth System Dynamics, 2014, 5(2):309-319. doi: 10.5194/esd-5-309-2014
[87]	Vauhkonen J, Packalen T. Uncertainties related to climate change and forest management with implications on climate regulation in Finland. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 33:213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.011
[88]	Edwards D P, Socolar J B, Mills S C, et al. Conservation of tropical forests in the Anthropocene. Current Biology, 2019, 29(19):R1008-R1020. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.026
[89]	Li Shuangcheng, et al. The Geography of Ecosystem Services. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
	[李双成, 等. 生态系统服务地理学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.]
[90]	Wang Z M, Mao D H, Li L, et al. Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992-2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 514:119-130. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.007
[91]	Kragt M E, Robertson M J. Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices. Ecological Economics, 2014, 102(2):147-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.001
[92]	Wang X C, Dong X B, Liu H M, et al. Linking land use change, ecosystem services and human well-being: A case study of the Manas River Basin of Xinjiang, China. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 27:113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.013
[93]	Xu Y, Tang H P, Wang B J, et al. Effects of land-use intensity on ecosystem services and human well-being: A case study in Huailai County, China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(5):416-426. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-5103-2
[94]	Wu Jianguo, Guo Xiaochuan, Yang Jie, et al. What is sustainability science? Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(1):1-11. pmid: 24765835
	[邬建国, 郭晓川, 杨劼, 等. 什么是可持续性科学? 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(1):1-11.] pmid: 24765835
[95]	Leviston Z, Walker I, Green M, et al. Linkages between ecosystem services and human wellbeing: A Nexus Webs approach. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 93:658-668. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.052
[96]	Wu X T, Wang S, Fu B J, et al. Land use optimization based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Yanhe watershed. Land Use Policy, 2018, 72:303-312. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.003
[97]	Zhang D, Huang Q X, He C Y, et al. Planning urban landscape to maintain key ecosystem services in a rapidly urbanizing area: A scenario analysis in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 96:559-571. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.030
[98]	Wu J G. A landscape approach for sustainability science//Weinstein M, Turner R. Sustainability Science. New York: Springer, 2012. 59-77.
[99]	Bai Yan, Feng Min. Data fusion and accuracy evaluation of multi-source global land cover datasets. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(11):2223-2235.
	[白燕, 冯敏. 全球尺度多源土地覆被数据融合与评价研究. 地理学报, 2018, 73(11):2223-2235.]
[100]	Song Hongli, Zhang Xiaonan, Chen Yijin. Land cover mapping using multi-sources data based on Dempster-Shafer theory. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(14):132-139.
	[宋宏利, 张晓楠, 陈宜金. 基于证据理论的多源遥感产品土地覆被分类精度优化. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(14):132-139.]
[101]	Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, Shibasaki R, et al. Agent-based model for land use/cover change: A review. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(4):573-578.
	[吴文斌, 杨鹏, 柴崎亮介, 等. 基于Agent的土地利用/土地覆盖变化模型的研究进展. 地理科学, 2007, 27(4):573-578.]
[102]	Robinson D T, Vittorio A D, Alexander P, et al. Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system. Earth System Dynamics, 2018, 9(2):895-914. doi: 10.5194/esd-9-895-2018
[103]	Agarwala M, Atkinson G, Fry B P, et al. Assessing the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem services: A review of frameworks. Conservation & Society, 2014, 12(4):437-449.
[104]	Kates R W, Clark W C, Corell R, et al. Environment and development: Sustainability science. Science, 2001, 292(5517):641-642. pmid: 11330321
[105]	United Nations(UN). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Seventieth Session of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1. New York: UN, 2015.
[106]	Gao L, Bryan B A. Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability. Nature, 2017, 544(7649):217-222. doi: 10.1038/nature21694
[107]	Mayer-Svhönberger V, CuKier K. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, 2013.
[108]	Guo Huadong, Wang Lizhe, Chen Fang, et al. Scientific big data and Digital Earth. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2014, 59(12):1047-1054.
	[郭华东, 王力哲, 陈方, 等. 科学大数据与数字地球. 科学通报, 2014, 59(12):1047-1054.]
[109]	Runting R K, Phinn S, Xie Z Y, et al. Opportunities for big data in conservation and sustainability. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1):1-4. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7
[110]	Bergen K J, Johnson P A, de Hoop M V, et al. Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience. Science, 2019, 363(6433):1299.
[111]	Lv Guonian. Geographic analysis-oriented virtual geographic environment: Framework, structure and functions. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 2011, 41(4):549-561.
	[闾国年. 地理分析导向的虚拟地理环境: 框架、结构与功能. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2011, 41(4):549-561.]
[112]	Lin Hui, Hu Mingyuan, Chen Min. Research progress and prospect of Virtual Geographic Environments (VGEs). Journal of Geomatics Science and Technology, 2013, 30(4):361-368.
	[林珲, 胡明远, 陈旻. 虚拟地理环境研究与展望. 测绘科学技术学报, 2013, 30(4):361-368.]
[113]	Wu Cifang, Ye Yanmei, Wu Yuzhe, et al. Spatial Planning of National Territory. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2019.
	[吴次芳, 叶艳妹, 吴宇哲, 等. 国土空间规划. 北京: 地质出版社, 2019.]
[114]	Chen Mingxing, Liang Longwu, Wang Zhenbo, et al. Geographical thinking on the relationship between beautiful China and land spatial planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12):2467-2481. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912004
	[陈明星, 梁龙武, 王振波, 等. 美丽中国与国土空间规划关系的地理学思考. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12):2467-2481.]
[115]	Fan Jie. Spatial organization pathway for territorial function-structure: Discussion on implementation of major function zoning strategy in territorial spatial planning. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(10):2373-2387. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190865
	[樊杰. 地域功能—结构的空间组织途径: 对国土空间规划实施主体功能区战略的讨论. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2373-2387.]
[116]	Zhen Feng, Zhang Shanqi, Qin Xiao, et al. From informational empowerment to comprehensive empowerment: Exploring the ideas of smart territorial spatial planning. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(10):2060-2072. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191004
	[甄峰, 张姗琪, 秦萧, 等. 从信息化赋能到综合赋能: 智慧国土空间规划思路探索. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10):2060-2072.]
[117]	Wu J G. Linking landscape, land system and design approaches to achieve sustainability. Journal of Land Use Science, 2019, 14(2):173-189. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2019.1602677
[118]	Steinitz C. A Framework for Geodesign. California: Esri Press, 2012.
[119]	Ma Jinwu. An introduction to geodesign: Concept, framework and practice. Landscape Architecture, 2013, 1:26-32.
	[马劲武. 地理设计简述: 概念、框架及实例. 风景园林, 2013(1):26-32.]
[120]	Huang L, Xiang W N, Wu J G, et al. Integrating geodesign with landscape sustainability science. Sustainability, 2019, 11:833-849. doi: 10.3390/su11030833
[121]	Zhang Yuan, Jin Xianfeng, Zhang Zelie, et al. Geodesign Theory, Technology and Practice. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
	[张远, 金贤锋, 张泽烈, 等. 地理设计理论、技术与实践. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.]
[122]	Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4):637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4):637-650.]
[123]	Fang Chuanglin, Wang Zhenbo, Liu Haimeng. Exploration on the theoretical basis and evaluation plan of Beautiful China construction. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(4):619-632. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201904001
	[方创琳, 王振波, 刘海猛. 美丽中国建设的理论基础与评估方案探索. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4):619-632.]

1990—2018年土地利用/覆盖变化研究的特征和进展

Characteristics and progress of land use/cover change research during 1990-2018

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 123

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴仕海, 阎建忠, 张镱锂, 彭婷, 苏康传. 喜马拉雅地区传统贸易通道演变过程及动力机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2157-2173.
[2]	徐志伟, 鹿化煜. 毛乌素沙地风沙环境变化研究的理论和新认识[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2203-2223.
[3]	王灵恩, 郭嘉欣, 冯凌, 罗艳华, 张宪洲, 范玉枝, 成升魁. 青藏高原“一江两河”农区居民食物消费结构与特征[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2104-2117.
[4]	王洋, 吴康敏, 张虹鸥. 广州中心城区住宅租金差异的核心影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1924-1938.
[5]	袁媛, 陈玉洁, 刘晔, 丁凯丽. 广州社区绿化环境对居民自评健康的邻里影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1965-1975.
[6]	龚胜生, 李孜沫, 谢海超, 王晓伟, 张涛, 石国宁, 陈发虎. 中国3000年疫灾流行的时空特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1976-1996.
[7]	赵赞, 陆林, 任以胜. 非线性视角下的上海旅游地复杂系统演化过程及动力学特征[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 2032-2047.
[8]	韩博, 金晓斌, 孙瑞, 李寒冰, 梁鑫源, 周寅康. 基于冲突—适配视角的土地利用可持续性评价[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1763-1777.
[9]	高培超, 程昌秀, 叶思菁, 沈石, 张红. 空间玻尔兹曼熵的研究进展与应用[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1579-1590.
[10]	戈大专, 陆玉麒. 面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437.
[11]	胡畔, 陈波, 史培军. 中国暴雨洪涝灾情时空格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(5): 1148-1162.
[12]	高海东, 吴曌. 黄河头道拐—潼关区间植被恢复及其对水沙过程影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(5): 1206-1217.
[13]	郭向阳, 穆学青, 丁正山, 秦东丽. 长三角多维城市化对PM_2.5浓度的非线性影响及驱动机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(5): 1274-1293.
[14]	吴锋, 刘桂君, 郭纳良, 李志慧, 邓祥征. COVID-19疫情对中国区域经济及产业的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 1034-1048.
[15]	郭付友, 佟连军, 仇方道, 李一鸣. 黄河流域生态经济走廊绿色发展时空分异特征与影响因素识别[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 726-739.