土地资源错配对中国城市工业绿色全要素生产率的影响

doi:10.11821/dlxb202108004

地理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (8): 1865-1881.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202108004

土地资源错配对中国城市工业绿色全要素生产率的影响

邓楚雄¹(), 赵浩¹, 谢炳庚¹, 李忠武¹, 李科²()

1.湖南师范大学地理科学学院,长沙 410081
2.湖南师范大学数学与统计学院,长沙 410081

收稿日期:2020-08-28 修回日期:2021-07-08 出版日期:2021-08-25 发布日期:2021-10-25
通讯作者: 李科(1980-), 男, 湖南隆回人, 教授, 博导, 研究方向为资源与环境经济学。E-mail: likekent1208@163.com
作者简介:邓楚雄(1974-), 男, 湖南衡阳人, 教授, 博导, 研究方向为资源评价与区域经济。E-mail: dcxppd@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(U19A2047);国家自然科学基金项目(71773028);湖南省教育厅重点项目(18A044)

The impacts of land misallocation on urban industrial green total-factor productivity in China

DENG Chuxiong¹(), ZHAO Hao¹, XIE Binggeng¹, LI Zhongwu¹, LI Ke²()

1. School of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
2. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Received:2020-08-28 Revised:2021-07-08 Published:2021-08-25 Online:2021-10-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(U19A2047);National Natural Science Foundation of China(71773028);Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China(18A044)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于价格扭曲效应拓展资源错配模型,使用中国285个城市2004—2017年的工业投入产出数据,测算土地资源错配导致的城市工业绿色全要素生产率（GTFP）损失,并分析其时空变化。结果表明：① 土地资源错配对中国城市工业GTFP损失的年均贡献率为10.05%,已与能源错配并列成为继资本错配之后城市工业GTFP损失的重要贡献者。② 土地资源错配导致中国城市工业GTFP损失呈现“先小幅下降,再大幅上升,后较大幅度下降”的时序变化特征,但总体趋于上升,损失值介于1.10%~2.48%之间,纠正土地资源错配,中国现有城市的工业GTFP有望实现年均2%左右的再增加;东、中部地区土地资源错配导致的城市工业GTFP损失呈现出与全国层面类似的变化特征,西部地区的城市工业GTFP损失整体保持高位,总体稍有下降,东部地区是中国城市工业发展的主要阵地,其土地资源错配导致的城市工业GTFP损失主导着全国层面的城市工业GTFP损失变化。③ 土地资源错配导致中国城市工业GTFP损失的空间格局呈连片集聚化的发展特征,城市工业GTFP损失较高和高等级省份的数量有所增加,逐渐集中到以黄河流域为主的北方地区,损失低和中等等级省份的数量相应减少,逐渐集中到长江流域及东部沿海地区;土地资源错配导致中国城市工业GTFP损失的总差异呈缩小态势,三大地区内城市工业用地配置效率不均衡是土地资源错配导致中国城市工业GTFP损失差异的根本原因,其中西部地区内城市工业用地配置效率不均衡是主要原因,近年来的区域协同发展有利于三大地区间城市工业用地配置效率差距的缩小。

关键词: 土地资源错配, 城市工业, 绿色全要素生产率, 工业用地, 时空变化, 中国

Abstract:

This paper expands the resource misallocation model based on the effect of price distortion. It measures the green total-factor productivity (GTFP) loss of urban industry due to land misallocation and analyzes its spatial and temporal changes by using the industrial input-output data of 285 cities in China from 2004 to 2017. The main results are as follows: (1) Capital misallocation still plays the most important role in the urban industrial GTFP loss, followed by land misallocation (10.5%) and energy misallocation. (2) The characteristics of industrial GTFP loss in Chinese cities induced by land misallocation can be summarized as "initially a small decline, then a large increase, and finally a large decline". Overall, the urban industrial GTFP loss increased, ranging from 1.10% to 2.48%. A correction in land misallocation is expected to bring about a 2% increase of industrial GTFP among Chinese cities. The characteristics of urban industrial GTFP loss due to land misallocation in the eastern and central regions are similar as that at the national level, while the loss in the western region maintains a high value with a slight overall decline. The eastern region is at the forefront of China's urban industrial development, and its industrial GTFP loss due to land misallocation dominates changes at the national level. (3) The spatial pattern of urban industrial GTFP loss in China due to land misallocation is characterized by contiguous clustering. The number of provinces with higher- and high-grade urban industrial GTFP loss has increased, gradually clustering in the northern region, mainly in the Yellow River basin. The number of provinces with low- and medium-grade loss has decreased and are mainly concentrated in the Yangtze River basin and the eastern coastal region. The total variation in urban industrial GTFP loss due to land misallocation among Chinese cities has been narrowed. The unbalanced allocation efficiency of urban industrial land in the three regions is the fundamental cause for the contrasting loss in urban industrial GTFP from land misallocation. In particular, the unbalanced allocation efficiency of urban industrial land in the western region is the main reason. The collaborative regional development in recent years is conducive to bridging the gap in the allocation efficiency of urban industrial land among the three regions.

Key words: land misallocation, urban industry, green total-factor productivity (GTFP), industrial land, spatio-temporal changes, China

邓楚雄, 赵浩, 谢炳庚, 李忠武, 李科. 土地资源错配对中国城市工业绿色全要素生产率的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1865-1881.

DENG Chuxiong, ZHAO Hao, XIE Binggeng, LI Zhongwu, LI Ke. The impacts of land misallocation on urban industrial green total-factor productivity in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(8): 1865-1881.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 39

[1]	Xie Hualin, Wang Wei, Yao Guanrong, et al. Spatial and temporal differences and convergence of China's main economic zones. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(8):1327-1338. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201508011
	[ 谢花林, 王伟, 姚冠荣, 等. 中国主要经济区城市工业用地效率的时空差异和收敛性分析. 地理学报, 2015, 70(8):1327-1338.]
[2]	Zhao X F, Zhang L, Huang X J, et al. Evolution of the spatiotemporal pattern of urban industrial land use efficiency in China. Sustainability, 2018, 10(7):2174. DOI: 10.3390/su10072174. doi: 10.3390/su10072174
[3]	Yang Haiquan, Hu Yi, Wang Qiuxiang. Evaluation of land use efficiency in three major urban agglomerations of China in 2001-2012. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(9):1095-1100. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.09.1095
	[ 杨海泉, 胡毅, 王秋香. 2001—2012年中国三大城市群土地利用效率评价研究. 地理科学, 2015, 35(9):1095-1100.]
[4]	Huang Z H, Du X J. Government intervention and land misallocation: Evidence from China. Cities, 2017, 60:323-332. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.006
[5]	Xia Fangzhou, Li Yangyu, Yan Jinming. The relationship between land finance and economic growth under the industrial structure perspective: Based on dynamic panel data analysis with SYS-GMM methods. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(12):85-92.
	[ 夏方舟, 李洋宇, 严金明. 产业结构视角下土地财政对经济增长的作用机制: 基于城市动态面板数据的系统GMM分析. 经济地理, 2014, 34(12):85-92.]
[6]	Needham B, Louw E, Metzemakers P. An economic theory for industrial land policy. Land Use Policy, 2013, 33:227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.01.005
[7]	Sun Y F, Ma A B, Su H R, et al. Does the establishment of development zones really improve industrial land use efficiency? Implications for China's high-quality development policy. Land Use Policy, 2020, 90:104265. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104265. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104265
[8]	Wu Dewen, Mao Hanying, Zhang Xiaolei, et al. Assessment of urban land use efficiency in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(8):1111-1121.
	[ 吴得文, 毛汉英, 张小雷, 等. 中国城市土地利用效率评价. 地理学报, 2011, 66(8):1111-1121.]
[9]	He Haojun, Peng Chong. The spatial-temporal evolution and the interactive effect between urban industrial structure transformation and land use efficiency. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(7):1271-1282. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201707007
	[ 何好俊, 彭冲. 城市产业结构与土地利用效率的时空演变及交互影响. 地理研究, 2017, 36(7):1271-1282.]
[10]	Tao R, Su F B, Liu M X, et al. Land leasing and local public finance in China's regional development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities. Urban Studies, 2010, 47:2217-2236. doi: 10.1177/0042098009357961
[11]	Wu Y Z, Zhang X L, Skitmore M, et al. Industrial land price and its impact on urban growth: A Chinese case study. Land Use Policy, 2014, 36:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.015
[12]	Huang Z J, Wei Y D, He C F, et al. Urban land expansion under economic transition in China: A multi-level modeling analysis. Habitat International, 2015, 47:69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.007
[13]	Yu Yongze, Song Chenchen, Rong Kaijian. Land resource misallocation and environmental pollution. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2018(9):43-51.
	[ 余泳泽, 宋晨晨, 容开建. 土地资源错配与环境污染. 财经问题研究, 2018(9):43-51.]
[14]	Xie H L, Chen Q R, Lu F C, et al. Spatial-temporal disparities, saving potential and influential factors of industrial land use efficiency: A case study in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Land Use Policy, 2018, 75:518-529. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.027
[15]	Xie H L, Chen Q R, Lu F C, et al. Spatial-temporal disparities and influencing factors of total-factor green use efficiency of industrial land in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 207:1047-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.087
[16]	Huang Maoxing, Ye Qi. The Marxist green development concept and green development in contemporary China: Comment on incompatibility theory between environment and development. Economic Research Journal, 2017, 52(6):17-30.
	[ 黄茂兴, 叶琪. 马克思主义绿色发展观与当代中国的绿色发展:兼评环境与发展不相容论. 经济研究, 2017, 52(6):17-30.]
[17]	Macias-Fauria M. Satellite images show China going green. Nature, 2018, 553(7689):411-413. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-00996-5
[18]	Zhou Liang, Che Lei, Zhou Chenghu. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(10):2027-2044. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910006
	[ 周亮, 车磊, 周成虎. 中国城市绿色发展效率时空演变特征及影响因素. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10):2027-2044.]
[19]	Chen Yongwei, Hu Weimin. Distortions, misallocation and losses: Theory and application. China Economic Quarterly, 2011, 10(4):1401-1422.
	[ 陈永伟, 胡伟民. 价格扭曲、要素错配和效率损失: 理论和应用. 经济学(季刊), 2011, 10(4):1401-1422.]
[20]	Hsieh C T, Klenow P J. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124(4):1403-1448. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1403
[21]	Brandt L, Tombe T, Zhu X D. Factor market distortions across time, space and sectors in China. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2013, 16:39-58. doi: 10.1016/j.red.2012.10.002
[22]	Zhu Xi, Shi Qinghua, Ge Qingen. Factor market distortions across time, space and sectors in China. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2013, 16: 39-58. Misallocation and TFP in rural China. Economic Research Journal, 2011, 46(5):86-98.
	[ 朱喜, 史清华, 盖庆恩. 要素配置扭曲与农业全要素生产率. 经济研究, 2011, 46(5):86-98.]
[23]	Chen Shiyi, Chen Dengke. Dynamic evolution of resource allocation efficiency in China: A new approach incorporating energy factors. Social Sciences in China, 2017(4):67-83,206-207.
	[ 陈诗一, 陈登科. 中国资源配置效率动态演化: 纳入能源要素的新视角. 中国社会科学, 2017(4):67-83,206-207.]
[24]	Restuccia D, Santaeulalia-Llopis R. Land misallocation and productivity. NBER Working Paper, 2017: 1-45.
[25]	Adamopoulos T, Brandt L, Leight J, et al. Misallocation, selection and productivity: A quantitative analysis with panel data from China. NBER Working Paper, 2015: 1-59.
[26]	Gai Qing'en, Zhu Xi, Cheng Mingwang, et al. Land misallocation and aggregate labor productivity. Economic Research Journal, 2017, 52(5):117-130.
	[ 盖庆恩, 朱喜, 程名望, 等. 土地资源配置不当与劳动生产率. 经济研究, 2017, 52(5):117-130.]
[27]	Li Lixing, Huang Peiyuan, Ma Guangrong. Land resource misallocation and productivity difference of industrial enterprises in China. Management World, 2016(8):86-96.
	[ 李力行, 黄佩媛, 马光荣. 土地资源错配与中国工业企业生产率差异. 管理世界, 2016(8):86-96.]
[28]	Zhang Xiong, Zhang Anlu, Deng Chao. Study on land resources distorted allocation and economic efficiency loss. China Population Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(3):170-176.
	[ 张雄, 张安录, 邓超. 土地资源错配及经济效率损失研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(3):170-176.]
[29]	Yang Zhenbing, Shao Shuai, Yang Lili. The optimal path choice of green industry reform in China: The perspective of factor technology progress. Economic Perspectives, 2016(1):76-89.
	[ 杨振兵, 邵帅, 杨莉莉. 中国绿色工业变革的最优路径选择: 基于技术进步要素偏向视角的经验考察. 经济学动态, 2016(1):76-89.]
[30]	Gong Guan, Hu Guanliang. Efficiency of resource allocation and manufacturing total factor productivity in China. Economic Research Journal, 2013, 48(4):4-15, 29.
	[ 龚关, 胡关亮. 中国制造业资源配置效率与全要素生产率. 经济研究, 2013, 48(4):4-15, 29.]
[31]	Cai Guowei, Yang Hao. Can FDI reduce China's factor market distortions. China Industrial Economics, 2019(10):42-60.
	[ 才国伟, 杨豪. 外商直接投资能否改善中国要素市场扭曲. 中国工业经济, 2019(10):42-60.]
[32]	Brandt L, Zhu X D. Accounting for China's growth. IZA Discussion Paper, 2010: 1-34.
[33]	Broda C, Weinstein D E. Globalization and the gains from variety. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2006, 121(2):541-585. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541
[34]	Hendel I, Nevo A. Measuring the implications of sales and consumer inventory behavior. Econometrica, 2006, 74:1637-1673. doi: 10.1111/ecta.2006.74.issue-6
[35]	Tu Zhengge. The shadow price of industrial SO₂ emission: A new analytic framework. China Economic Quarterly, 2010, 9(1):259-282.
	[ 涂正革. 工业二氧化硫排放的影子价格: 一个新的分析框架. 经济学(季刊), 2010, 9(1):259-282.]
[36]	Wu Yanrui. The role of productivity in China's growth: New estimates. China Economic Quarterly, 2008, 7(3):827-842.
	[ 吴延瑞. 生产率对中国经济增长的贡献: 新的估计. 经济学(季刊), 2008, 7(3):827-842.]
[37]	Hsieh C T, Song Z M. Grasp the large, let go of the small: The transformation of the state sector in China. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2016, 2015(1):295-366.
[38]	Li Jing, Hu Bixia, Kuang Bing, et al. Measuring of urban land use efficiency and its dynamic development in China. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(8):162-167.
	[ 李菁, 胡碧霞, 匡兵, 等. 中国城市土地利用效率测度及其动态演进特征. 经济地理, 2017, 37(8):162-167.]
[39]	Xia Siyou, Zhao Yuan, Xu Xin, et al. Spatiotemporal pattern and driving factors of grain production in Jiangsu province. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(12):166-175.
	[ 夏四友, 赵媛, 许昕, 等. 江苏省粮食生产时空格局及其驱动因素. 经济地理, 2018, 38(12):166-175.]

变量	均值	标准误	最小值	最大值
工业总产值(亿元)	1227.447	3067.595	0.591	35492.740
资本存量(亿元)	640.755	1168.131	0.946	13324.490
劳动力数量(万人)	11.297	21.500	0.040	260.925
工业用地面积(km²)	25.520	51.168	0.010	736.800
能源消耗量(万t标准煤)	288.206	471.147	0.741	4219.451
SO₂排放量(万t)	0.966	4.213	0.000	59.333

土地资源错配对中国城市工业绿色全要素生产率的影响

The impacts of land misallocation on urban industrial green total-factor productivity in China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋昌耀, 李涛, 李国平. 地理距离对中国民营企业银行贷款的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1835-1847.
[2]	赵梓渝, 王士君, 陈肖飞. 模块化生产下中国汽车产业集群空间组织重构——以一汽-大众为例[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1848-1864.
[3]	王哲, 郑法川. 中国近代城市体系的位序规模特征——基于1936年《中华民国邮政舆图》的分析[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1910-1923.
[4]	姜磊, 陈星宇, 朱竑. 中国城市养老院的空间分布特征及其分异成因[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1951-1964.
[5]	龚胜生, 李孜沫, 谢海超, 王晓伟, 张涛, 石国宁, 陈发虎. 中国3000年疫灾流行的时空特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1976-1996.
[6]	贺灿飞, 王文宇, 郭琪. 中国工业地理学的传承发展与转型[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(8): 1815-1834.
[7]	黄珏, 李正茂, 张珂, 江涛. 基于GEE的中国湖泊浮游植物生物量时空动态分析[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1693-1707.
[8]	高吉喜, 刘晓曼, 王超, 王勇, 付卓, 侯鹏, 吕娜. 中国重要生态空间生态用地变化与保护成效评估[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1708-1721.
[9]	周亮, 党雪薇, 周成虎, 王波, 魏伟. 中国建设用地的坡谱演化规律与爬坡影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1747-1762.
[10]	魏石梅, 潘竟虎. 中国地级及以上城市网络结构韧性测度[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1394-1407.
[11]	杨忍, 潘瑜鑫. 中国县域乡村脆弱性空间特征与形成机制及对策[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454.
[12]	殷江滨, 李尚谦, 姜磊, 程哲, 黄晓燕, 路改改. 中国连片特困地区非农就业增长的时空特征与驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1471-1488.
[13]	胡畔, 陈波, 史培军. 中国暴雨洪涝灾情时空格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(5): 1148-1162.
[14]	黄晓东, 马海涛, 苗长虹. 基于创新企业的中国城市网络联系特征[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 835-852.
[15]	王录仓, 刘海洋, 刘清. 基于腾讯迁徙大数据的中国城市网络研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 853-869.