全球高科技产品贸易结构演化及影响因素

doi:10.11821/dlxb202012015

地理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (12): 2759-2776.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202012015

全球高科技产品贸易结构演化及影响因素

段德忠¹^,²(), 杜德斌¹^,²()

1.华东师范大学全球创新与发展研究院,上海 200062
2.华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院,上海 200241

收稿日期:2019-10-05 修回日期:2020-08-11 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2021-02-25
通讯作者: 杜德斌
作者简介:段德忠(1989-), 男, 江苏溧阳人, 副教授, 中国地理学会会员(S110010030M), 研究方向为全球科技地理。E-mail: dzduan@geo.ecnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA087);国家自然科学基金项目(41901139);国家自然科学基金项目(41901152);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金

Structural evolution of global high-tech trade system: Products, networks and influencing factors

DUAN Dezhong¹^,²(), DU Debin¹^,²()

1. Institute for Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
2. School of Urban & Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

Received:2019-10-05 Revised:2020-08-11 Online:2020-12-25 Published:2021-02-25
Contact: DU Debin
Supported by:
National Social Science Foundation of China(19ZDA087);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41901139);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41901152);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为清晰刻画全球高科技产品贸易体系变迁,本文利用世界银行以及联合国商品贸易数据库中2000—2017年高科技产品贸易数据,从产品结构、网络结构和影响因素3个方面探讨了全球高科技产品贸易结构的演化态势。研究发现：① 产品结构上,以电信设备为主的电子通讯产品主导全球高科技贸易发展,但在国家尺度上,化学产品和武器产品是大部分国家（地区）的进口依赖产品或出口优势产品;② 拓扑结构上,全球高科技产品贸易网络持续扩张,联系紧密,是一典型的“小世界”网络,并发育出稳定的“核心—边缘”式的等级层次结构;③ 空间结构上,全球高科技产品贸易格局呈现出由欧洲—北美主导向由东亚主导转变,贸易最大国也由美国转变为中国,网络空间结构也呈现出由以美国为核心的“双拱”格局向以中国为核心的“多拱”格局转变,但美国依然在多种高科技产品贸易网络中占据核心地位;④ 影响因素上,贸易规模、经济邻近性和文化邻近性对全球高科技产品贸易网络演化皆具有一定的正向作用,地理距离对全球高科技产品贸易网络的演化起到明显的负向作用。

关键词: 高科技贸易, 产品结构, 拓扑结构, 空间结构, 影响因素

Abstract:

Since 2018, with the major adjustment of the global political and economic structure, Sino-US relations, which take trade friction as the representation and science and technology competition as the essence, have become increasingly tense. Based on this, this paper characterizes the evolution of global high-tech products trade structure from three aspects of product structure, network structure and influencing factors, and draws some conclusions. First of all, in terms of product structure, global high-tech trade is increasingly concentrated on electronic communication products based on telecommunications equipment. However, on the national scale, chemical products and armament products are not only the dependence products of most countries (regions) on imports, but also the superior export products of most countries (regions). Second, in terms of topology, the global high-tech product trade network continues to expand and is closely linked. It is a typical small-world network and develops a stable "core-edge" hierarchical structure. Third, in terms of spatial structure, the global trade pattern of high-tech products has changed from Europe-North America dominated to East Asia dominated, and also the largest trade country has changed from the United States to China. In addition, the spatial structure has changed from the "double arch" structure with the United States as the core to the "multi-arch" pattern with China as the core, but the United States still occupies a central position in the trade network of various high-tech products. Fourth, in terms of influencing factors, trade scale, economic proximity and cultural proximity have positive effects on the evolution of global high-tech products trade network, while geographical distance has an obvious negative effect. The four factors of political stability, openness, infrastructure and technological innovation only pass the significance test on the importing country (region), while the economic scale only passes the significance test on the exporting country (region). The technological gap is one of the driving forces for the evolution of the global high-tech product trade network.

Key words: high-tech trade, product structure, topological structure, spatial structure, influencing factor

段德忠, 杜德斌. 全球高科技产品贸易结构演化及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2759-2776.

DUAN Dezhong, DU Debin. Structural evolution of global high-tech trade system: Products, networks and influencing factors[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(12): 2759-2776.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

表3

全球高科技产品贸易体系演化影响因素的面板固定效应模型估计结果"

变量	系数	标准误差	t	P > \|t\|
$Lco_Prox 1 i ? j t$	-0.065^***	0.009	-6.91	0.006
$Lco_Prox 2 i ? j t$	1.300^***	0.029	44.34	0.000
$Ave_Di s i ? j t$	-1.110^***	0.007	-153.40	0.000
$Eco_Pro x i ? j t$	0.254^***	0.017	14.92	0.001
$Clu_Pro x i ? j t$	1.041^***	0.093	11.23	0.002
$H_Tr a i t$	1.060^***	0.056	18.87	0.000
$H_Tr a j t$	0.572^***	0.083	6.92	0.006
$P_Sta b i t$	0.086	0.111	0.77	0.495
$P_Sta b j t$	0.143^**	0.031	4.55	0.020
$GD P i t$	0.183^**	0.054	3.39	0.043
$GD P j t$	0.191	0.101	1.89	0.155
$P_MI G i t$	0.008	0.039	0.22	0.842
$P_MI G j t$	0.121^**	0.029	4.21	0.024
$Ne t i t$	0.080	0.060	1.34	0.271
$Ne t j t$	0.116^***	0.013	9.20	0.003
$Pc t i t$	0.042	0.024	1.70	0.187
$Pc t j t$	-0.033^**	0.006	-5.08	0.015

表3

参考文献 48

[1]	Institute for Global Innovation & Development. China-U.S. Science and Technology Competitiveness Assessment Report. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2019.
	[ 华东师范大学全球创新与发展研究院. 中美科技竞争力发展报告. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2019.]
[2]	Du Debin, Duan Dezhong, Xia Qifan. A comparative study of Sino-US science and technology competitiveness. World Regional Studies, 2019,28(4):1-11.
	[ 杜德斌, 段德忠, 夏启繁. 中美科技竞争力比较研究. 世界地理研究, 2019,28(4):1-11.]
[3]	Duan Dezhong, Du Debin, Chen Ying. Global geopolitical pattern on science & technology from the perspective of intellectual property trade. Geographical Research, 2019,38(9):2115-2128.
	[ 段德忠, 杜德斌, 谌颖. 知识产权贸易下的全球地缘科技格局及其演化. 地理研究, 2019,38(9):2115-2128.]
[4]	Du Debin, Duan Dezhong, Yang Wenlong, et al. Spatial evolution pattern of Chinese economic power based on the sensitivity and vulnerability of states interdependence. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(10):1741-1751. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201610007
	[ 杜德斌, 段德忠, 杨文龙, 等. 中国经济权力空间格局演化研究: 基于国家间相互依存的敏感性与脆弱性分析. 地理学报, 2016,71(10):1741-1751.]
[5]	Yang Wenlong, Du Debin, Liu Chengliang, et al. Study on the spatial-temporal evolution and internal mechanism of geo-economic connections of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(6):956-969. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201606005
	[ 杨文龙, 杜德斌, 刘承良, 等. 中国地缘经济联系的时空演化特征及其内部机制. 地理学报, 2016,71(6):956-969.]
[6]	Yang Wenlong, Du Debin, Ma Yahua. A geographical perspective on the Sino-U.S. strategic balance of economic power. Geographical Research, 2017,36(10):1901-1914.
	[ 杨文龙, 杜德斌, 马亚华. 经济权力视角下中美战略均势的地理透视. 地理研究, 2017,36(10):1901-1914.]
[7]	Du Debin. The eve of a major reshuffle: Asia, the destination of the fifth transnational shifting of global innovation resources. Oriental Morning Post, 2014-10-14.
	[ 杜德斌. “大洗牌”前夜: 第5次创新资源跨国大转移看亚洲. 东方早报, 2014-10-14.]
[8]	Galama T, Hosek J. Perspectives on U.S. Competitiveness in science and technology. Rand Corp, 2007.
[9]	Jiang Xiaorong, Yang Yongchun, Wang Shenglan. Spatial and temporal patterns of evolution of global trade networks during 1985-2015 and its enlightenment to China's geostrategy. Geographical Research, 2018,37(3):495-511.
	[ 蒋小荣, 杨永春, 汪胜兰. 1985—2015年全球贸易网络格局的时空演化及对中国地缘战略的启示. 地理研究, 2018,37(3):495-511.]
[10]	Duan Dezhong, Du Debin, Yang Fan, et al. Industrial technology changes and spatial evolution of global technological innovation system. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019,39(9):1378-1387.
	[ 段德忠, 杜德斌, 杨凡, 等. 产业技术变迁与全球技术创新体系空间演化. 地理科学, 2019,39(9):1378-1387.]
[11]	Galama T, Hosek J. U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology. Rand Corp, 2008.
[12]	Lewis J A. Technological competition and China. Center for Strategic International Studies, November 30, 2018.
[13]	Duan Dezhong, Du Debin, Zhang Yang. Comparative research of industrial technology innovation capability between China and the United States. World Regional Studies, 2019,28(4):24-34.
	[ 段德忠, 杜德斌, 张杨. 中美产业技术创新能力比较研究: 以装备制造业和信息通信产业为例. 世界地理研究, 2019,28(4):24-34.]
[14]	Bhattacharya K, Mukherjee G, Manna S S. The international trade network. New Economic Windows, 2007,41(4):139-147.
[15]	Kandogan Y. Topological properties of the international trade network using modified measures. The International Trade Journal, 2017: 1-25.
[16]	Barigozzi M, Fagiolo G, Mangioni G. Identifying the community structure of the international-trade multi-network. Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2011,390(11):2051-2066.
[17]	Wallerstein I. The Modern World System. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1974.
[18]	Nemeth R J, Smith D A. International trade and world-system structure: A multiple network analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 1985,8(4):517-560.
[19]	Smith D A, White D R. Structure and dynamics of the global economy: Network analysis of international trade 1965-1980. Social Forces, 1992,70(4):857-893. doi: 10.2307/2580193
[20]	Yang Wenlong, Du Debin, You Xiaojun, et al. Network structure evolution and spatial complexity of global transnational investment. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(9):1300-1309. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.09.002
	[ 杨文龙, 杜德斌, 游小珺, 等. 世界跨国投资网络结构演化及复杂性研究. 地理科学, 2017,37(9):1300-1309.]
[21]	Liu Chengliang, Gui Qingchang, Duan Dezhong, et al. Structural heterogeneity and proximity mechanism of global scientific collaboration network based on co-authored papers. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,71(4):737-752.
	[ 刘承良, 桂钦昌, 段德忠, 等. 全球科研论文合作网络的结构异质性及其邻近性机理. 地理学报, 2017,71(4):737-752.]
[22]	Ruettimann B G. World trade and associated systems risk of global inequality: Empirical study of globalization evolution between 2003-2011 and regional pattern analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2013(5):647-656.
[23]	Reyes J, Wooster R, Shirrell S. Regional trade agreements and the pattern of trade: A networks approach. The World Economy, 2014,37(8):1128-1151. doi: 10.1111/twec.12121
[24]	Lee J W, Shin K. Does regionalism lead to more global trade integration in East Asia? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2006,17(3):283-301. doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2006.06.007
[25]	Basile R, Commendatore P, De Benedictis L, et al. The impact of trade costs on the European Regional Trade Network: An empirical and theoretical analysis. Review of International Economics, 2017,26(3):578-609.
[26]	Yang Wenlong, Du Debin, Ma Yahua, et al. Network structure and proximity of the trade network in the Belt and Road region. Geographical Research, 2018,37(11):2218-2235.
	[ 杨文龙, 杜德斌, 马亚华, 等. “一带一路”沿线国家贸易网络空间结构与邻近性. 地理研究, 2018,37(11):2218-2235.]
[27]	Duan Dezhong, Chen Ying, Du Debin. Technology trade pattern and change in the Belt and Road region. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(7):998-1008.
	[ 段德忠, 谌颖, 杜德斌. “一带一路”技术贸易格局演化研究. 地理科学进展, 2019,38(7):998-1008.]
[28]	Liu Z G, Wang T, Sun Z Y, et al. The structure and evolution of trade relations between countries along the Belt and Road. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018,28(9):1233-1248. doi: 10.1007/s11442-018-1522-9
[29]	Song Z Y, Che S Y, Yang Y. The trade network of the Belt and Road Initiative and its topological relationship to the global trade network. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018,28(9):1249-1262. doi: 10.1007/s11442-018-1523-8
[30]	Zou Jialing, Liu Weidong. Trade network of China and countries along "Belt and Road Initiative" areas from 2001 to 2013. Scientia Geographical Sinica, 2016,36(11):1629-1636.
	[ 邹嘉龄, 刘卫东. 2001—2013年中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易网络分析. 地理科学, 2016,36(11):1629-1636.]
[31]	Song Zhouying, Che Shuyun, Yang Yu. Topological relationship between trade network in the Belt and Road Initiative area and global trade network. Progress in Geography, 2017,36(11):1340-1348. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.11.003
	[ 宋周莺, 车姝韵, 杨宇. “一带一路”贸易网络与全球贸易网络的拓扑关系. 地理科学进展, 2017,36(11):1340-1348.]
[32]	Sawadogo R. Insurance development and international trade in developing countries. The International Trade Journal, 2019,33(3):239-254. doi: 10.1080/08853908.2018.1503574
[33]	Kwaku A S. The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions? European Journal of Political Economy, 2019(56):11-26.
[34]	Gao Boyang, Liu Weidong, Glen Norcliffe, et al. Trade barriers and the global production network: A case study of bicycle trade between China and Canada. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011,66(4):477-486.
	[ 高菠阳, 刘卫东, Glen N, 等. 国际贸易壁垒对全球生产网络的影响: 以中加自行车贸易为例. 地理学报, 2011,66(4):477-486.]
[35]	Lin F. Estimating the effect of the Internet on international trade. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2015,24(3):409-428.
[36]	Wang M, Zhang H. How information and communication technology affect international trade: A comparative analysis of BRICS countries. Information Technology for Development, 2018: 1-20.
[37]	Yan B. International trade as determined by income and income distribution. Journal of International Economics, 2007,21(4):633-651.
[38]	Becuwe S, Blancheton B, Charles L, et al. The influence of distance on French international trade (1850 to 1913): A comparison with Germany. The International Trade Journal, 2018: 1-26.
[39]	Yang X. The relative importance of distance in restricting international trade. Applied Economics Letters, 2013,20(17):1548-1552.
[40]	Kim D H. Trade, growth and income. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2008,20(5):677-709.
[41]	He Canfei, Chen Hanghang. Participation in global production networks and export product upgrading. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(8):1331-1346.
	[ 贺灿飞, 陈航航. 参与全球生产网络与中国出口产品升级. 地理学报, 2017,72(8):1331-1346.]
[42]	Rodríguez-Pose A. Trade and regional inequality. Economic Geography, 2012,88(2):109-136. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01147.x
[43]	Smith M, Gorgoni S, Cronin B. International production and trade in a high-tech industry: A multilevel network analysis. Social Networks, 2019(59):50-60.
[44]	Yuan Hong, Xin Na. Global trade network pattern and influencing factors of advanced manufacturing in China. Economic Geography, 2019,39(6):108-117.
	[ 袁红, 辛娜. 中国高端制造业的全球贸易网络格局及其影响因素分析. 经济地理, 2019,39(6):108-117.]
[45]	Hatzichronoglou T. Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification//OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No.1997/02. Paris: OECD Publishing, 1997.
[46]	Shi Bingzhan. Internet and international trade: Empirical Evidence Based on Bilateral and Bidirectional Hyperlinks Data. Economic Research Journal, 2016,51(5):172-187.
	[ 施炳展. 互联网与国际贸易: 基于双边双向网址链接数据的经验分析. 经济研究, 2016,51(5):172-187.]
[47]	Fu Shuaixiong, Luo Laijun. Does the technology gap promote international trade? An empirical study based on gravity model. Management World, 2017(2):43-52.
	[ 傅帅雄, 罗来军. 技术差距促进国际贸易吗? 基于引力模型的实证研究. 管理世界, 2017(2):43-52.]
[48]	Ding H Y, Jin Y Y, Liu Z Y, et al. The relationship between international trade and capital flow: A network perspective. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2019,91:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2018.10.001

高科技产品种类	产品贸易类别(SITC Rev. 3)
航空航天(Aerospace)	7921;7922;7923;7924;7925;79291;79293;714-71489-71499;87411
计算机—办公设备(Computers-office Machines)	75113;75131;75132;75134;752-7529;75997
电子通讯(Electronics-Telecommunications)	76381;76383;764-76493-76499;7722;77261;77318;77625;77627;7763;7764;7768;89879
药品(Pharmacy)	5413;5415;5416;5421;5422
科学仪器(Scientific Instruments)	774;8711;8713;8714;8719;87211;874-87411-8742;88111;88121;88411;88419;89961;89963;89966;89967
电子机械(Electrical Machinery)	77862;77863;77864;77865;7787;77884
化学(Chemistry)	52222;52223;52229;52269;525;531;57433;591
非电子机械(Non-electrical Machinery)	71489;71499;71871;71877;71878;72847;7311;73131;73135;73142;73144;73151;73153;73161;73163;73165;73312;73314;73316;7359;73733;73735
武器(Armament)	891

位序	2000年		2010年		2017年
位序	出口对	出口额	出口对	出口额	出口对	出口额
1	日本→美国	418.382	中国香港→中国	1142.401	中国→美国	1294.611
2	美国→加拿大	350.424	中国→中国香港	1092.109	中国→中国香港	1274.096
3	墨西哥→美国	316.236	中国→美国	834.590	中国香港→中国	700.780
4	加拿大→美国	302.776	墨西哥→美国	374.187	墨西哥→美国	607.773
5	美国→日本	245.921	韩国→中国	297.867	韩国→中国	363.661
6	美国→墨西哥	223.485	美国→墨西哥	278.747	美国→墨西哥	354.793
7	中国香港→中国	211.236	日本→中国	242.756	中国→日本	333.898
8	新加坡→美国	191.068	中国→日本	241.613	中国→荷兰	321.819
9	美国→英国	190.029	新加坡→中国香港	241.591	新加坡→中国香港	315.676
10	韩国→美国	181.302	中国→荷兰	236.449	美国→加拿大	274.947
11	马来西亚→美国	140.067	美国→加拿大	222.881	中国→韩国	266.247
12	美国→韩国	139.441	中国→德国	221.162	日本→中国	265.397
13	美国→德国	138.656	法国→德国	220.161	德国→美国	236.684
14	德国→法国	138.589	中国→韩国	214.139	新加坡→中国	214.837
15	德国→美国	127.409	德国→法国	212.955	中国→德国	209.958
16	新加坡→马来西亚	124.978	加拿大→美国	168.001	加拿大→美国	207.916
17	马来西亚→新加坡	112.685	新加坡→中国	155.106	德国→中国	196.985
18	中国→美国	110.610	韩国→美国	152.933	德国→法国	189.080
19	法国→美国	109.629	新加坡→马来西亚	150.833	日本→美国	169.018
20	中国→中国香港	109.283	日本→美国	134.076	中国→印度	162.835

全球高科技产品贸易结构演化及影响因素

Structural evolution of global high-tech trade system: Products, networks and influencing factors

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 48

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.
[2]	曹智, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞, 王永生. 中国专业村镇空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1647-1666.
[3]	冯健, 钟奕纯. 基于居住环境的常州城市居民生活质量空间结构[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1237-1255.
[4]	魏素豪, 李晶, 李泽怡, 宗刚. 中国农业竞争力时空格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300.
[5]	刘敏, 郝炜. 山西省国家A级旅游景区空间分布影响因素研究[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 878-888.
[6]	古恒宇, 孟鑫, 沈体雁, 崔娜娜. 中国城市流动人口居留意愿影响因素的空间分异特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 240-254.
[7]	袁振杰, 郭隽万果, 杨韵莹, 朱竑. 中国优质基础教育资源空间格局形成机制及综合效应[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 318-331.
[8]	熊鹰, 章芳. 基于多源数据的长沙市人居热环境效应及其影响因素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2443-2458.
[9]	杨青山, 刘鉴, 张郁, 杨维旭. 满洲里口岸—城市关系演变的多尺度因素影响分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2146-2163.
[10]	卢硕, 张文忠, 余建辉, 李佳洺. 资源型城市演化阶段识别及其发展特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2180-2191.
[11]	周扬, 黄晗, 刘彦随. 中国村庄空间分布规律及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2206-2223.
[12]	张凯煌, 千庆兰, 杨青生. 中国城市土地城镇化多层级影响因素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1): 179-193.
[13]	王超, 阚瑷珂, 曾业隆, 李国庆, 王民, 次仁. 基于随机森林模型的西藏人口分布格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 664-680.
[14]	王亚飞, 樊杰. 中国主体功能区核心—边缘结构解析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 710-722.
[15]	王振波, 梁龙武, 王旭静. 中国城市群地区PM_2.5时空演变格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2614-2630.