空间恢复力理论支持下的人地系统动态研究进展

doi:10.11821/dlxb202005001

地理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (5): 891-903.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202005001

• 理论与方法 • 下一篇

空间恢复力理论支持下的人地系统动态研究进展

刘焱序¹, 傅伯杰^1,²(), 王帅¹, 赵文武¹, 李琰¹

1.北京师范大学地理科学学部地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京 100875
2.中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室,北京 100085

收稿日期:2019-05-05 修回日期:2020-02-03 出版日期:2020-05-25 发布日期:2020-07-25
通讯作者: 傅伯杰 E-mail:bfu@rcees.ac.cn
作者简介:刘焱序(1988-), 男, 陕西西安人, 讲师, 主要从事综合自然地理与景观生态学研究。E-mail: yanxuliu@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFA0604701);国家自然科学基金项目(41801059);中央高校基本科研业务费专项

Research progress of human-earth system dynamics based on spatial resilience theory

LIU Yanxu¹, FU Bojie^1,²(), WANG Shuai¹, ZHAO Wenwu¹, LI Yan¹

1.State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, CAS, Beijing 100085, China

Received:2019-05-05 Revised:2020-02-03 Online:2020-05-25 Published:2020-07-25
Contact: FU Bojie E-mail:bfu@rcees.ac.cn
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFA0604701);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41801059);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

人地系统的概念表现了人与地在特定的地域中相互联系、相互作用而形成的一种动态结构,面向人地系统动态运行过程的复杂性,亟待构建更有力的指标体系表征地球系统和人类系统相互影响与反馈的过程。空间恢复力可以被理解为以保障人地系统结构稳定为目标的地域空间整体对自然和社会扰动的吸收、复原或转化能力,为人地系统研究中针对性理论模式和可定量化指标体系的塑造提供新途径。本文以从自然维度出发的政策与生态系统空间恢复力、从社会维度出发的环境变化与社区生产生活空间恢复力、从综合描述方式出发的空间恢复力综合指标体系三个角度梳理空间恢复力研究现状,并从结构、功能、阈值三个方面研讨不同地域功能类型下的空间恢复力指标体系,提出认知保障系统可持续性的空间状态、明晰人地系统动态过程的空间阈值、满足生态保护与社会进步国家需求三项内容可以作为人地系统动态研究的重要方向。

关键词: 人地系统动态, 景观生态学, 可持续性, 阈值, 国家需求

Abstract:

The concept of human-earth system represents a dynamic structure formed by the interaction between human and earth within a specific region. Considering the complexity of the system, it is necessary to construct a more powerful indicator system to describe the interaction and reflection processes between human and earth systems. The term of spatial resilience can be understood as the overall ability of regional space to absorb, recover or transform natural and social disturbances. Spatial resilience targeted at securing the structural stability of human-earth system, and it also provides a new approach for the shaping of targeted theoretical models and quantifiable indicator system in the study of human-earth system. This study reviews the research progress of spatial resilience from three perspectives, including: ecological policy and ecosystems spatial resilience from a natural perspective; environmental changes and spatial resilience of community production and living from a social perspective and the spatial resilience integrated indicator system from a comprehensive description perspective. Then the article puts forward three important directions of spatial resilience research in China, including understanding the spatial state that guaranteed system sustainability, identifying the spatial thresholds of human-earth system dynamic process, and satisfying the national demands of ecological protection and social development. This study also discusses the spatial resilience indicator system in various human-earth system functional areas from aspects of system structure, function and threshold. By the deepening of the theories and methods of spatial resilience, the human-earth system dynamics can be further understood, so as to improve the regional level accuracy on simulating the socioeconomic, environmental and political paths, and provide key theoretical and methodological support for the decision-making of sustainable development at global, national and regional levels.

Key words: human-earth system dynamics, landscape ecology, sustainability, threshold, national demands

刘焱序, 傅伯杰, 王帅, 赵文武, 李琰. 空间恢复力理论支持下的人地系统动态研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 891-903.

LIU Yanxu, FU Bojie, WANG Shuai, ZHAO Wenwu, LI Yan. Research progress of human-earth system dynamics based on spatial resilience theory[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(5): 891-903.

图/表 3

图1

图2

表1

空间恢复力代表性指标体系研讨"

	结构的空间组织	功能的恢复提升	参考阈值
城市化地区	空间均衡性(人口结构、产业布局、资源供给等),空间可达性(通勤成本、绿地距离等),空间公平性(教育、医疗、治安、环境治理等),空间连通性(工程基础设施、绿色基础设施),区际连通性(跨国和跨地市的人流物流信息流),城乡差异性(以上相关指标的城乡差距)等	经济增长潜力、社会稳定程度、文化传承与塑造、科技创新能力、人居环境与健康、生态系统调节服务、生态系统文化服务等	国民经济和社会发展规划、城乡总体规划和空间规划、环境容量、产业投入产出效率等
农产品主产区	种植业空间适宜性(基本农田保护、高标准农田建设、耕地占补平衡、休耕轮作等)、畜牧业空间适宜性(轮牧、休牧、禁牧位置与载畜量等)、空间环境安全度(面源污染、土壤重金属等)、区域生计安全度(粮食自给率、农业就业等)、区域资源利用效率(水资源配置、劳动力占用等)、远程耦合度(如跨国贸易)等	粮食安全与农产品质量安全、农业现代化程度、农户生计可持续性、农村环境与健康、乡土文化传承与革新、耕地生态系统服务、草地生态系统服务等	国民经济和社会发展规划、乡村振兴战略和空间规划、精准扶贫指标、农业产业投入产出效率等
重点生态功能区	生态安全格局(源地、廊道、节点、阻力等),区域社会—生态网络结构(社会决策与生态过程的联系路径),区域生态补偿绩效(补偿成本、补偿成效、补偿外部性等),景观生态风险(如景观连通度、生态系统多样性)等	景观多功能性、生态系统服务流、区域生物多样性、自然资源资产或生态资产、生态功能区农户生计可持续性等	国民经济和社会发展规划、保护区相关规划和空间规划、长时序生态指标等

表1

参考文献 85

[1]	Wu Chuanjun . The core of study of geography: Man-land relationship areal system. Economic Geography, 1991,11(3):1-6.
	[ 吴传钧 . 论地理学的研究核心——人地关系地域系统. 经济地理, 1991,11(3):1-6.]
[2]	Lu Dadao, Guo Laixi . Man-earth areal system—The core of geographical study: On the geographical thoughts and academic contributions of Academician Wu Chuanjun. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998,53(2):3-11.
	[ 陆大道, 郭来喜 . 地理学的研究核心——人地关系地域系统: 论吴传钧院士的地理学思想与学术贡献. 地理学报, 1998,53(2):3-11.]
[3]	Fan Jie . "Territorial system of human-environment interaction": A theoretical cornerstone for comprehensive research on formation and evolution of the geographical pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4):597-607.
	[ 樊杰 . “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石. 地理学报, 2018,73(4):597-607.]
[4]	Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter S R , et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 2007,317(5844):1513-1516.
[5]	Ostrom E . A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 2009,325:419-422.
[6]	Lu Dadao . Theoretical studies of man-land system as the core of geographical science. Geographical Research, 2002,21(2):135-145.
	[ 陆大道 . 关于地理学的“人—地系统”理论研究. 地理研究, 2002,21(2):135-145.]
[7]	Fu B, Wei Y . Editorial overview: Keeping fit in the dynamics of coupled natural and human systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2018,33:A1-A4.
[8]	Shi Peijun . Today and future of the dynamics of human-earth (earth surface) system. Earth Science Frontiers, 1997,4(Z1):205-215.
	[ 史培军 . 人地系统动力学研究的现状与展望. 地学前缘, 1997,4(Z1):205-215.]
[9]	Fang Chuanglin . The dynamical foundation for the system of man and earth in the district development planning. Earth Science Frontiers, 2000,7(S2):5-10.
	[ 方创琳 . 区域发展规划的人地系统动力学基础. 地学前缘, 2000,7(S2):5-10.]
[10]	Song Changqing, Cheng Changxiu, Shi Peijun . Geography complexity: New connotations of geography in the new era. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(7):1204-1213.
	[ 宋长青, 程昌秀, 史培军 . 新时代地理复杂性的内涵. 地理学报, 2018,73(7):1204-1213.]
[11]	Holling C S . Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973,4:1-24.
[12]	Walker B H, Holling C S, Carpenter S R , et al. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 2004,9(2):5. doi: 10.1890/04-0463.
[13]	Gunderson L H, Holling C S. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington DC: Island Press, 2002.
[14]	Yan Haiming, Zhan Jinyan, Zhang Tao . Review of ecosystem resilience research progress. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(3):303-314.
	[ 闫海明, 战金艳, 张韬 . 生态系统恢复力研究进展综述. 地理科学进展, 2012,31(3):303-314.]
[15]	Sun Jing, Wang Jun, Yang Xinjun . An overview on the resilience of social-ecological systems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007,27(12):5371-5381.
	[ 孙晶, 王俊, 杨新军 . 社会—生态系统恢复力研究综述. 生态学报, 2007,27(12):5371-5381.]
[16]	Ma Xuecheng, Gong Jie, Liu Dongqing , et al. Review of social ecological system research: An analysis based on bibliometrics. Advances in Earth Science, 2018,33(4):435-444.
	[ 马学成, 巩杰, 柳冬青 , 等. 社会生态系统研究态势: 文献计量分析视角. 地球科学进展, 2018,33(4):435-444.]
[17]	Guo Yongrui, Zhang Jie . Research progress and themes of geography on community resilience. Progress in Geography, 2015,34(1):100-109.
	[ 郭永锐, 张捷 . 社区恢复力研究进展及其地理学研究议题. 地理科学进展, 2015,34(1):100-109.]
[18]	Adger W N . Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 2006,16:268-281.
[19]	Smit B J, Wandel J . Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 2006,16:282-292.
[20]	Cutter S L, Barnes L, Berry M , et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 2008,18:598-606.
[21]	Gallopín G C . Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 2006,16:293-303.
[22]	Zhou Xiaofang . From resilience to social-ecological systems: What did the western research tell us about the Chinese geography. World Regional Studies, 2017,26(4):156-167.
	[ 周晓芳 . 从恢复力到社会—生态系统: 国外研究对我国地理学的启示. 世界地理研究, 2017,26(4):156-167.]
[23]	Cumming G S . Spatial Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. London:Springer. 2011.
[24]	Cumming G S, Barnes G, Perz S , et al. An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems, 2005,8(8):975-987. doi: 10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z
[25]	Cumming G S . Spatial resilience: Integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecology, 2011,26(7):899-909. doi: 10.1007/s10980-011-9623-1
[26]	Cumming G S, Olsson P, Chapin F S , et al. Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2013,28(6):1139-1150. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9725-4
[27]	Wang Zheng . On the modern meaning of the relationship between the man and the earth. Human Geography, 1995,10(2):1-5.
	[ 王铮 . 论人地关系的现代意义. 人文地理, 1995,10(2):1-5.]
[28]	Fu Bojie . The integrated studies of geography: Coupling of patterns and processes. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(8):1052-1059. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408002
	[ 傅伯杰 . 地理学综合研究的途径与方法: 格局与过程耦合. 地理学报, 2014,69(8):1052-1059.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408002
[29]	Folke C . Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 2006,16(3):253-267.
[30]	Fu Bojie . Geography: From knowledge, science to decision making support. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(11):1923-1932.
	[ 傅伯杰 . 地理学:从知识、科学到决策. 地理学报, 2017,72(11):1923-1932.]
[31]	Cumming G S . The relevance and resilience of protected areas in the Anthropocene. Anthropocene, 2016,13:46-56.
[32]	Hughes T P, Baird A H, Bellwood D R , et al. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science, 2003,301:929-933.
[33]	Chung A E, Wedding L M, Green A L , et al. Building coral reef resilience through spatial herbivore management. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2019,6:98. Doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00098.
[34]	Cumming G S, Allen C R . Protected areas as social-ecological systems: Perspectives from resilience and social-ecological systems theory. Ecological Applications, 2017,27(6):1709-1717.
[35]	De Vos A, Cumming G S, Roux D J . The relevance of cross-scale connections and spatial interactions for ecosystem service delivery by protected areas: Insights from southern Africa. Ecosystem Services, 2017,28:133-139.
[36]	Chapin III F S, Kofinas G P, Folke C . Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World. London: Springer, 2009.
[37]	Field R D, Parrott L . Multi-ecosystem services networks: A new perspective for assessing landscape connectivity and resilience. Ecological Complexity, 2017,32:31-41.
[38]	Meerow S, Newell J P . Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017,159:62-75.
[39]	Lucash M S, Scheller R M, Gustafson E J , et al. Spatial resilience of forested landscapes under climate change and management. Landscape Ecology, 2017,32(5):953-969.
[40]	Rescia A J, Ortega M . Quantitative evaluation of the spatial resilience to the B. oleae pest in olive grove socio-ecological landscapes at different scales. Ecological Indicators, 2018,84:820-827.
[41]	Rescia A J, Willaarts B A, Schmitz M F , et al. Changes in land uses and management in two nature reserves in Spain: Evaluating the social-ecological resilience of cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010,98(1):26-35.
[42]	Liu Yanxu, Wang Yanglin, Peng Jian , et al. Land ecological suitability assessment for forest coupled with the resilience perspective: A case study in Wangqing County, Jilin Province, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(3):476-487.
	[ 刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建 , 等. 耦合恢复力的林区土地生态适宜性评价: 以吉林省汪清县为例. 地理学报, 2015,70(3):476-487.]
[43]	Cutter S L, Ash K D, Emrich C T . Urban-rural differences in disaster resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2016,106(6):1236-1252.
[44]	Cutter S L, Ash K D, Emrich C T . The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change, 2014,29:65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
[45]	Adger W N, Hughes T P, Folke C , et al. Social ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 2005,309:1036-1039. doi: 10.1126/science.1112122
[46]	Zhang Tian, Liu Yanxu, Wang Yanglin . The rural spatial evolution and reconstruction on a resilience view. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(7):2147-2157.
	[ 张甜, 刘焱序, 王仰麟 . 恢复力视角下的乡村空间演变与重构. 生态学报, 2017,37(7):2147-2157.]
[47]	Yang Xinjun, Shi Yuzhong, Wang Ziqiao . Exploring the impacts of road construction on a local social-ecological system in Qinling mountainous area: A resilience perspective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(8):1313-1326. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201508010
	[ 杨新军, 石育中, 王子侨 . 道路建设对秦岭山区社会—生态系统的影响: 一个社区恢复力的视角. 地理学报, 2015,70(8):1313-1326.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201508010
[48]	Maru Y T, Smith M S, Sparrow A . A linked vulnerability and resilience framework for adaptation pathways in remote disadvantaged communities. Global Environmental Change, 2014,28:337-350. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.007
[49]	Ashkenazy A, Chebach T C, Knickel K , et al. Operationalising resilience in farms and rural regions: Findings from fourteen case studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018,59:211-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.008
[50]	Paton D, Johnston D . Disasters and communities: Vulnerabilities, resilience, and prepredness. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2001,10(4):270-277. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005930
[51]	Chun H, Chi S, Hwang B . A spatial disaster assessment model of social resilience based on geographically weighted regression. Sustainability, 2017,9(12):2222. Doi: 10.3390/su9122222. doi: 10.3390/su9122222
[52]	Baker A, Brenneman E, Chang H , et al. Spatial analysis of landscape and sociodemographic factors associated with green stormwater infrastructure distribution in Baltimore, Maryland and Portland, Oregon. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,664:461-473. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.417
[53]	Schouten M, Opdam P, Polman N , et al. Resilience-based governance in rural landscapes: Experiments with agri-environment schemes using a spatially explicit agent-based model. Land Use Policy, 2013,30(1):934-943. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.008
[54]	Kelkar U, Narula K K, Sharma V P , et al. Vulnerability and adaptation to climate variability and water stress in Uttarakhand State, India. Global Environmental Change, 2008,18(4):564-574. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.09.003
[55]	Waters J, Adger W N . Spatial, network and temporal dimensions of the determinants of adaptive capacity in poor urban areas. Global Environmental Change, 2017,46:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.011
[56]	Frazier T G, Thompson C M, Dezzani R J , et al. Spatial and temporal quantification of resilience at the community scale. Applied Geography, 2013,42:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.004
[57]	Masnavi M R, Gharai F, Hajibandeh M . Exploring urban resilience thinking for its application in urban planning: A review of literature. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019,16(1):567-582. doi: 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
[58]	Zhou Xiaofang . Measuring methods for the resilience of social ecological systems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(12):4278-4288.
	[ 周晓芳 . 社会—生态系统恢复力的测量方法综述. 生态学报, 2017,37(12):4278-4288.]
[59]	Chuang W C, Garmestani A, Eason T N , et al. Enhancing quantitative approaches for assessing community resilience. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018,213:353-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.083
[60]	MacKinnon D, Derickson K D . From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography, 2013,37(2):253-270. doi: 10.1177/0309132512454775
[61]	Allen C R, Angeler D G, Cumming G S , et al. Quantifying spatial resilience. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,53(3):625-635. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12634
[62]	Liu Yanxu, Wang Yanglin, Peng Jian , et al. Urban landscape ecological risk assessment based on the 3D framework of adaptive cycle. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(7):1052-1067. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201507003
	[ 刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建 , 等. 基于生态适应性循环三维框架的城市景观生态风险评价. 地理学报, 2015,70(7):1052-1067.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201507003
[63]	Marcus L, Colding J . Toward an integrated theory of spatial morphology and resilient urban systems. Ecology and Society, 2014,19(4):55. Doi: 10.5751/ES-06939-190455.
[64]	Zhou H, Wan J, Jia H . Resilience to natural hazards: A geographic perspective. Natural Hazards, 2010,53(1):21-41. doi: 10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
[65]	Ge D, Long H, Ma L , et al. Analysis framework of China's grain production system: A spatial resilience perspective. Sustainability, 2017,9(12):2340. Doi: 10.3390/su9122340. doi: 10.3390/su9122340
[66]	Li Y F, Shi Y, Qureshi S , et al. Applying the concept of spatial resilience to socio-ecological systems in the urban wetland interface. Ecological Indicators, 2014,42:135-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.032
[67]	Luo F H, Liu Y X, Peng J , et al. Assessing urban landscape ecological risk through an adaptive cycle framework. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018,180:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.014
[68]	Salvati L, Tombolini I, Perini L , et al. Landscape changes and environmental quality: The evolution of land vulnerability and potential resilience to degradation in Italy. Regional Environmental Change, 2013,13(6):1223-1233. doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0437-3
[69]	Li Y F, Li Y, Wu W . Threshold and resilience management of coupled urbanization and water environmental system in the rapidly changing coastal region. Environmental Pollution, 2016,208:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.042
[70]	Frazier T G, Thompson C M, Dezzani R J . A framework for the development of the SERV model: A spatially explicit resilience-vulnerability model. Applied Geography, 2014,51:158-172. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.004
[71]	Hizbaron D R, Hadmoko D S, Mei E T W , et al. Towards measurable resilience: Mapping the vulnerability of at-risk community at Kelud Volcano, Indonesia. Applied Geography, 2018,97:212-227.
[72]	Kärrholm M, Nylund K, de la Fuente P P . Spatial resilience and urban planning: Addressing the interdependence of urban retail areas. Cities, 2014,36:121-130.
[73]	Gotham K F, Campanella R . Coupled vulnerability and resilience: The dynamics of cross-scale interactions in post-Katrina New Orleans. Ecology and Society, 2011,16(3):12. Doi: 10.5751/ES-04292-160312.
[74]	Kelly C, Ferrara A, Wilson G A , et al. Community resilience and land degradation in forest and shrubland socio-ecological systems: Evidence from Gorgoglione, Basilicata, Italy. Land Use Policy, 2015,46:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.026
[75]	Li Y, Kappas M, Li Y F . Exploring the coastal urban resilience and transformation of coupled human-environment systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,195:1505-1511.
[76]	Li Y, Degener J, Gaudreau M , et al. Adaptive capacity based water quality resilience transformation and policy implications in rapidly urbanizing landscapes. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,569:168-178.
[77]	Peng C, Yuan M H, Gu C L , et al. A review of the theory and practice of regional resilience. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2017,29:86-96.
[78]	Liu Yuanxin, Zhao Wenwu . Future Earth-global sustainability research program. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(23):7610-7613.
	[ 刘源鑫, 赵文武 . 未来地球: 全球可持续性研究计划. 生态学报, 2013,33(23):7610-7613.]
[79]	Gao L, Bryan B A . Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability. Nature, 2017,544(7649):217-222.
[80]	Pelling M . Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation. London: Routledge, 2010.
[81]	Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K , et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 2009,461(7263):472-475.
[82]	Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J , et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 2015,347(6223):1259855. Doi: 10.1126/science.1259855.
[83]	Fan Jie . Frontier approach of the sustainable process and pattern of human-environment system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(8):1060-1068.
	[ 樊杰 . 人地系统可持续过程、格局的前沿探索. 地理学报, 2014,69(8):1060-1068.]
[84]	Fan Jie, Zhou Kan, Wang Yafei . Basic points and progress in technical methods of early-warning of the national resource and environmental carrying capacity (V2016). Progress in Geography, 2017,36(3):266-276.
	[ 樊杰, 周侃, 王亚飞 . 全国资源环境承载能力预警(2016版)的基点和技术方法进展. 地理科学进展, 2017,36(3):266-276.]
[85]	Fu B, Li Y . Bidirectional coupling between the earth and human systems is essential for modeling sustainability. National Science Review, 2016,3(4):397-398. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nww094

空间恢复力理论支持下的人地系统动态研究进展

Research progress of human-earth system dynamics based on spatial resilience theory

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 85

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张琨, 吕一河, 傅伯杰, 尹礼唱, 于丹丹. 黄土高原植被覆盖变化对生态系统服务影响及其阈值[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 949-960.
[2]	贺艳华, 邬建国, 周国华, 周兵兵. 论乡村可持续性与乡村可持续性科学[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 736-752.
[3]	邓祥征, 金贵, 何书金, 王成新, 李兆华, 王占岐, 宋马林, 杨庆媛, 张安录, 陈建成. 发展地理学研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 226-239.
[4]	宋爽, 王帅, 傅伯杰, 陈海滨, 刘焱序, 赵文武. 社会—生态系统适应性治理研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(11): 2401-2410.
[5]	史培军,宋长青,程昌秀. 地理协同论——从理解“人—地关系”到设计“人—地协同”[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 3-15.
[6]	刘芳, 闫慧敏, 刘纪远, 肖向明, 秦元伟. 21世纪初中国土地利用强度的空间分布格局[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1130-1143.
[7]	冯彦, 何大明, 王文玲. 基于河流健康及国际法的跨境水分配关键指标及阈值[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(1): 121-130.
[8]	樊杰. 人地系统可持续过程、格局的前沿探索[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1060-1068.
[9]	杜鸿, 夏军, 曾思栋, 佘敦先, 张永勇, 严子奇. 淮河流域极端径流的时空变化规律及统计模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(3): 398-409.
[10]	张虹, 黄民生, 胡晓辉. 基于能值分析的福建省绿色GDP核算[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(11): 1421-1428.
[11]	许学工,李双成,蔡运龙. 中国综合自然地理学的近今进展与前瞻[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(9): 1027-1038.
[12]	张健, 濮励杰, 陈逸, 彭补拙. 区域经济可持续发展趋势及空间分布特征[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(10): 1041-1050.
[13]	蔡运龙,陆大道,周一星,王缉慈,秦其明,李有利,柴彦威张镱锂,刘卫东,王劲峰,宋长青,冷疏影,王民. 中国地理科学的国家需求与发展战略[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6): 811-819.
[14]	李海涛,廖迎春,严茂超,胡聃. 新疆生态经济系统的能值分析及其可持续性评估[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 765-772.
[15]	蔡运龙,李军. 土地利用可持续性的度量—一种显示过程的综合方法[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(2): 305-313.