黄土高原乡村体制转换与转型发展

doi:10.11821/dlxb202002010

地理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (2): 348-364.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202002010

黄土高原乡村体制转换与转型发展

鲁大铭^1,², 杨新军^1,³(), 石育中⁴, 王子侨¹

^1. 西北大学城市与环境学院,西安 710127
^2. 北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院,深圳 518055
^3. 陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室,西安 710127
^4. 西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,兰州 730070

收稿日期:2018-04-19 修回日期:2019-11-29 出版日期:2020-02-25 发布日期:2020-04-25
通讯作者: 杨新军 E-mail:yangxj@nwu.edu.cn
作者简介:鲁大铭(1992-), 男, 陕西西安人, 博士生, 研究方向为人地耦合系统脆弱性与乡村转型发展。E-mail:ludm@pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41771574)

Rural regime shifts and transformation development on the Loess Plateau

LU Daming^1,², YANG Xinjun^1,³(), SHI Yuzhong⁴, WANG Ziqiao¹

^1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China
^2. School of Urban Planning and Design, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China
^3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Xi'an 710127, China
^4. College of Geography and Environment Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2018-04-19 Revised:2019-11-29 Online:2020-02-25 Published:2020-04-25
Contact: YANG Xinjun E-mail:yangxj@nwu.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41771574)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

农户生计方式的改变对研究黄土高原乡村转型发展具有重要意义。以黄土高原苹果优生区的彬县、长武县和旬邑县为研究区,从体制转换的视角出发,基于模糊层次分析、地理探测器和多元线性回归等算法,模拟乡村体制演化的路径,甄别影响乡村转型发展的微观要素,进一步揭示农户家庭体制转换与乡村转型发展之间的互馈机理。研究发现：① 在研究区内抽样选择的130个乡村中,传统农业体制型乡村共有27个,主要分布于黄土梁地貌类型区,新型农业体制型乡村共有96个,主要分布于黄土塬地貌类型区,非农体制型乡村共有7个,主要分布于河谷地貌类型区;② 当乡村地域系统由传统农业型体制向新型农业型体制转变,再至非农型体制的演化路径中,乡村转型发展度在三维空间坐标系中为倒“U”型变化趋势,乡村人口发展度在二维坐标系中表现为下凸递增趋势,乡村经济发展度在二维坐标系中表现为上凸递增趋势,农业经济发展度在二维坐标系中表现为倒“U”型发展趋势;③ 生计方式成为衔接农户家庭体制转换与乡村转型发展的控制性因素,在农户尺度上,由人力资本与自然资本决定,并直接影响到金融资本和物质资本,在村域尺度上,通过与乡村地域系统的人口、经济和农业等3个维度的响应,引导乡村转型发展过程。

关键词: 乡村转型, 体制转换, 地理探测器, 微观机制, 黄土高原

Abstract:

It is important to study rural transformation and development from the perspective of farmers' livelihood regime changes on the Loess Plateau. We selected cunties of Binxian, Changwu and Xunyi located in the apple growing area of the Loess Plateau, as a case study to construct the evolutionary path of rural regime, identify the micro factors that affect rural transformation and development, and reveal the mutual feedback mechanism between farmers' household regime and rural transformation. In doing so we adopted a regime change perspective, and applied the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method, geodetector, and multiple linear regression. We obtained the following three findings. First, 27 of 130 selected samples, distributed mainly in areas with loess girder topography, belonged to the traditional agricultural regime. Meanwhile, 96 samples, distributed mainly in areas with loess tableland topography, belonged to the new agricultural regime. Another 7 samples, mainly distributed in valley areas, belonged to the non-agricultural regime. Second, when rural transformation sees the traditional agricultural regime replaced by the new agricultural regime, and finally the non-agricultural regime, the overall performance of rural development follows an inverted U-type development trend in a 3D space coordinate system. Simultaneously, rural population development follows an upward convex development trend in a 2D space coordinate system. Meanwhile, rural economic development follows an upward concave development trend, and agricultural production development follows an inverted U-type development trend, both in 2D space coordinate systems. Third, means of livelihood is the control variable that connects family system transformation and rural transformation development, which are determined by human and natural capital and directly affect financial and material capital at the farmer level. These aspects of transformation development are guided by the response process at the village level of three dimensions, namely population, economy and agriculture, and lead the process of rural transformation and development.

Key words: rural transformation, regime shift, geodetector, micromechanism, Loess Plateau

鲁大铭, 杨新军, 石育中, 王子侨. 黄土高原乡村体制转换与转型发展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 348-364.

LU Daming, YANG Xinjun, SHI Yuzhong, WANG Ziqiao. Rural regime shifts and transformation development on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 348-364.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

表1

表2

图4

表3

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表4

表5

农户生计方式与生计资本因子回归方程"

回归方程	R	R²	Sig.
$y 1 = 0.455 + 0.074 x 1 - 0.072 x 2 - 0.025 x 3 + 0.033 x 4 + 0.034 x 5 + 0.011 x 6 + 8.173 × 10 - 4 x 7$	0.931	0.883	0.000
$y 2 = 0.411 - 0.081 x 1 + 0.086 x 2 + 0.035 x 3 + 5.761 × 10 - 6 x 4 - 0.042 x 5 - 0.072 x 6$	0.927	0.881	0.000
$y 3 = 0.293 + 0.076 x 1 - 0.11 x 2 + 0.074 x 3 - 0.018 x 4 + 0.027 x 5 + 0.017 x 6$	0.942	0.889	0.001

表5

图10

参考文献 44

[1]	Hoggart K, Paniagua A . The restructuring of rural spain? Journal of Rural Studies, 2001,17(1):63-80.
[2]	Woods M . Rural. London and New York: Routledge, 2011.
[3]	Woods M . Rural geography: Blurring boundaries and making connections. Progress in Human Geography, 2009,33(6):849-858.
[4]	Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang . Rural restructuring: Theory, approach and research prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(4):563-576.
	[ 龙花楼, 屠爽爽 . 论乡村重构. 地理学报, 2017,72(4):563-576.]
[5]	Liu Yansui . Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007,62(6):563-570.
	[ 刘彦随 . 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007,62(6):563-570.]
[6]	Li T T, Long H L, Liu Y Q , et al. Multi-scale analysis of rural housing land transition under China's rapid urbanization: The case of Bohai Rim. Habitat International, 2015,48:227-238.
[7]	He Yanhua, Fan Shuguang, Zhou Guohua , et al. Evaluation of rural transformation development in Hunan Province based on major function oriented zoning. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):667-676.
	[ 贺艳华, 范曙光, 周国华 , 等. 基于主体功能区划的湖南省乡村转型发展评价. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(5):667-676.]
[8]	Long Hualou, Zou Jian . Rural transformation and development in the process of rapid urbanization in China. Journal of Soochow University: Philosophy & Social Science Edition, 2011,32(4):97-100.
	[ 龙花楼, 邹健 . 我国快速城镇化进程中的乡村转型发展. 苏州大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2011,32(4):97-100.]
[9]	Li Yurui, Liu Yansui, Long Hualou . Study on the pattern and types of rural development in the Huang-Huai-Hai region. Geographical Research, 2011,30(9):1637-1647.
	[ 李裕瑞, 刘彦随, 龙花楼 . 黄淮海地区乡村发展格局与类型. 地理研究, 2011,30(9):1637-1647.]
[10]	Long H L, Li Y R, Liu Y S , et al. Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by 'increasing vs. decreasing balance' land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages. Land Use Policy, 2012,29(1):11-22.
[11]	Zhang Fugang, Liu Yansui . Dynamic mechanism and models of regional rural development in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008,63(2):115-122.
	[ 张富刚, 刘彦随 . 中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式. 地理学报, 2008,63(2):115-122.]
[12]	Li Erling, Xu Yanan, Yong Yajun , et al. Agricultural structure adjustment and rural transformation development in China: Taking Gongyi City and Yanling County as examples. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):698-709.
	[ 李二玲, 胥亚男, 雍雅君 , 等. 农业结构调整与中国乡村转型发展: 以河南省巩义市和鄢陵县为例. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(5):698-709.]
[13]	Slee B . Theoretical aspects of the study of endogenous development//van der Ploeg J D, Long A. Born From Within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1994: 184-194.
[14]	Bournaris T, Moulogianni C, Manos B . A multicriteria model for the assessment of rural development plans in Greece. Land Use Policy, 2014,38:1-8.
[15]	Li Hongbo, Zhang Xiaolin, Wu Qiyan , et al. Characteristics and mechanism of rural settlements spatial reconstruction in developed areas: A case study of southern Jiangsu. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(4):591-603.
	[ 李红波, 张小林, 吴启焰 , 等. 发达地区乡村聚落空间重构的特征与机理研究: 以苏南为例. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(4):591-603.]
[16]	Li Yurui, Liu Yansui, Long Hualou . Characteristics and mechanism of village transformation development in typical regions of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(6):771-782.
	[ 李裕瑞, 刘彦随, 龙花楼 . 黄淮海典型地区村域转型发展的特征与机理. 地理学报, 2012,67(6):771-782.]
[17]	Wang Cheng, Ma Xiaosu, Tang Ning , et al. Operational mechanism and restructuring of rural production space system from the perspective of farming household behavior. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):636-646.
	[ 王成, 马小苏, 唐宁 , 等. 农户行为视角下的乡村生产空间系统运行机制及重构启示. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(5):636-646.]
[18]	Feng Jian . Rural Restructuring: Models and Innovations. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2012.
	[ 冯健 . 乡村重构模式与创新北京: 商务印书馆, 2012.]
[19]	Isla F I . From touristic villages to coastal cities: The costs of the big step in Buenos Aires. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2013,77:59-65.
[20]	Xiao Jincheng, Ou Weixin . Study on the spatial restructure in the coordinated urban and rural development: A case study of Suqian city. China Land Sciences, 2013,27(2):54-60, 97.
	[ 肖锦成, 欧维新 . 城乡统筹下的城市与乡村空间重构研究: 以宿迁市为例. 中国土地科学, 2013,27(2):54-60, 97.]
[21]	Li Hongbo, Hu Xiaoliang, Zhang Xiaolin , et al. On the analysis of rural space. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):591-600.
	[ 李红波, 胡晓亮, 张小林 , 等. 乡村空间辨析. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(5):591-600.]
[22]	Li Bohua, Zeng Can, Dou Yinti , et al. Change of human settlement environment and driving mechanism in traditional villages based on living-production-ecological space: A case study of Lanxi Village, Jiangyong County, Hunan Province. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):677-687.
	[ 李伯华, 曾灿, 窦银娣 , 等. 基于“三生”空间的传统村落人居环境演变及驱动机制: 以湖南江永县兰溪村为例. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(5):677-687.]
[23]	Long Hualou, Li Yurui, Liu Yansui . Analysis of evolutive characteristics and their driving mechanism of hollowing villages in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009,64(10):1203-1213.
	[ 龙花楼, 李裕瑞, 刘彦随 . 中国空心化村庄演化特征及其动力机制. 地理学报, 2009,64(10):1203-1213.]
[24]	Liu Yansui, Liu Yu . Progress and prospect on the study of rural hollowing in China. Geographical Research, 2010,29(1):35-42.
	[ 刘彦随, 刘玉 . 中国农村空心化问题研究的进展与展望. 地理研究, 2010,29(1):35-42.]
[25]	Qiao Jiajun. Rural Community Space of China. Beijing: Science Press, 2011.
	[ 乔家君 . 中国乡村社区空间论. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.]
[26]	Yang Ren, Liu Yansui, Guo Liying , et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics for rural hollowing and cultivated land use intensive degree: Taking the circum-Bohai Sea region in China as an example. Progress in Geography, 2013,32(2):181-190.
	[ 杨忍, 刘彦随, 郭丽英 , 等. 环渤海地区农村空心化程度与耕地利用集约度的时空变化及其耦合关系. 地理科学进展, 2013,32(2):181-190.]
[27]	Hedlund M, Lundholm E . Restructuring of rural Sweden: Employment transition and out-migration of three cohorts born 1945-1980. Journal of Rural Studies, 2015(42):123-132.
[28]	Long Hualou, Zou Jian, Li Tingting , et al. Study on the characteristics and territorial types of rural transformation development: The case of "Southern Jiangsu-Northern Shaanxi" transect. Geographical Research, 2012,31(3):495-506.
	[ 龙花楼, 邹健, 李婷婷 , 等. 乡村转型发展特征评价及地域类型划分: 以“苏南—陕北”样带为例. 地理研究, 2012,31(3):495-506.]
[29]	Huber-Sannwald E, Ribeiro P M, Arredondo M J T , et al. Navigating challenges and opportunities of land degradation and sustainable livelihood development in dryland social-ecological systems: case study from Mexico. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012,367(1606):3158-3177.
[30]	Wang Ziqiao, Shi Cuiping, Jiang Wei , et al. Rural transformation from the perspective of regime shifts of socio-ecological systems in the Loess Plateau: A case study of Hongjia town in Changwu county, China. Geographical Research, 2016,35(8):1510-1524.
	[ 王子侨, 石翠萍, 蒋维 , 等. 社会—生态系统体制转换视角下的黄土高原乡村转型发展: 以长武县洪家镇为例. 地理研究, 2016,35(8):1510-1524.]
[31]	Holtz G, Brugnach M, Pahl-Wostl C . Specifying "regime": A framework for defining and describing regimes in transition research. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2008,75(5):623-643.
[32]	Crépin A S, Biggs R, Polasky S , et al. Regime shifts and management. Ecological Economics, 2012(84):15-22.
[33]	Jiang Wei . Regime shift research on typical rural social-ecological system in Loess Plateau [D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2011.
	[ 蒋维 . 黄土高原乡村社会—生态系统体制转换研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2011.]
[34]	Shi Cuiping, Yang Xinjun, Wang Ziqiao , et al. Peasant household system regime shift and its influence mechanism based on drought vulnerability: A case study of Zhonglianchuan township in Yuzhong county. Human Geogaphy, 2015,30(6):77-82.
	[ 石翠萍, 杨新军, 王子侨 , 等. 基于干旱脆弱性的农户系统体制转换及其影响机制: 以榆中县中连川乡为例. 人文地理, 2015,30(6):77-82.]
[35]	Yang Ren, Liu Yansui, Long Hualou , et al. Research progress and prospect of rural transformation andrecon-struction in China: Paradigms and main content. Progress in Geography, 2015,34(8):1019-1030.
	[ 杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼 , 等. 中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望: 逻辑主线与内容框架. 地理科学进展, 2015,34(8):1019-1030.]
[36]	Feng Jianfeng, Wang Hongli, Zhu Lin . Review on alternative stable states in ecosystems. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2009,18(4):1553-1559.
	[ 冯剑丰, 王洪礼, 朱琳 . 生态系统多稳态研究进展. 生态环境学报, 2009,18(4):1553-1559.]
[37]	Tittonell P . Livelihood strategies, resilience and transformability in African agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems, 2014,126(3):3-14.
[38]	Zhou Qian, Yang Qingyuan, Xin Guixin , et al. The impact of rural households' concurrent business behaviors response on the housing land-use pattern in poor mountain area: Based on a survey of 568 households in Yunyang County, Chongqing. Geographical Research, 2010,29(10):1767-1779.
	[ 周婧, 杨庆媛, 信桂新 , 等. 贫困山区农户兼业行为及其居民点用地形态: 基于重庆市云阳县568户农户调查. 地理研究, 2010,29(10):1767-1779.]
[39]	Zhang Bailin, Yang Qingyuan, Su Kangchuan , et al. Heterogeneous households' decision on household registration transfer and farmland relinquishment: From livelihood perspective. Progress in Geography, 2013,32(2):170-180.
	[ 张佰林, 杨庆媛, 苏康传 , 等. 基于生计视角的异质性农户转户退耕决策研究. 地理科学进展, 2013,32(2):170-180.]
[40]	Liang Liutao, Qu Futian, Chu Peixin , et al. Analysis of land use behavior and efficiency of different farm household types. Resources Science, 2008,30(10):1525-1532.
	[ 梁流涛, 曲福田, 诸培新 , 等. 不同兼业类型农户的土地利用行为和效率分析: 基于经济发达地区的实证研究. 资源科学, 2008,30(10):1525-1532.]
[41]	Chen Xiaohong, Wang Chaoxia . Analysis on the factors of suzhou farmer's behavior. Chinese Rural Economy, 2007(4):25-31.
	[ 陈晓红, 汪朝霞 . 苏州农户兼业行为的因素分析. 中国农村经济, 2007(4):25-31.]
[42]	Chang D Y . Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996,95(3):649-655.
[43]	Kwong C K, Bai H . Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Transactions, 2003,35(7):619-626.
[44]	Wang Jinfeng, Xu Chengdong . Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(1):116-134.
	[ 王劲峰, 徐成东 . 地理探测器: 原理与展望. 地理学报, 2017,72(1):116-134.]

农户类型	划分指标				调查户数(户)	占比(%)
农户类型	粮食收入占比(%)	苹果收入占比(%)	非农劳动收入占比(%)	主要劳动力投入方式	调查户数(户)	占比(%)
粮食主导型	80~100	0~20	0~20	粮食种植	104	10.13
粮食非农型	20~80	0~20	20~80	粮食种植、非农活动	235	22.88
苹果主导型	0~20	80~100	0~20	苹果种植	262	25.51
苹果非农型	0~20	20~80	20~80	苹果种植、非农活动	299	29.11
非农主导型	0~20	0~20	80~100	非农活动	127	12.37

乡村类型	划分指标(%)			村落数量(个)		占比(%)
乡村类型	粮食主导型和粮食非农型农户总占比	苹果主导型和苹果非农型农户总占比	非农主导型农户占比	村落数量(个)	总占比	塬	梁	河谷
传统农业体制型	50~100	0~50	0~50	27	20.77	5.17	58.82	10.53
新型农业体制型	0~50	50~100	0~50	96	73.85	91.38	41.18	76.32
非农体制型	0~50	0~50	50~100	7	5.38	3.45	0	13.15

准则层	准则层权重	指标层	计算方法	指标层权重
乡村人口发展度	0.31	人口密度(人/km²)	总人口/村域面积	0.0933
		人均受教育水平(年/人)	受教育年限总和/总人口	0.0635
		人口增长率(%)	新增人口/总人口	0.0698
		劳动力人口占比(%)	劳动力人口/总人口	0.0834
乡村经济发展度	0.35	人均年收入(%)	经济收入总值/总人口	0.1061
		人均固定资产产值(万元/人)	固定资产总值/总人口	0.0681
		经济组织数量(个)	家庭农场数量+农业合作社数量	0.0799
		非农收入比重(%)	非农业收入总值/经济收入总值	0.0959
农业生产发展度	0.34	亩均经济产值(万元/亩)	农业总产值/耕地面积	0.0896
		人均耕地面积(亩/人)	耕地面积/总人口	0.0820
		人均农业科技人员配置率(%)	农业科技人员总人数/总人口	0.0799
		单位耕地面积化肥使用量(t/hm²)	化肥使用总量/耕地面积	0.0885

因子	乡村人口发展度		乡村经济发展度		农业生产发展度		乡村发展度
因子	q值	p值	q值	p值	q值	p值	q值	p值
苹果种植收入占比	0.27	0.04	0.32	0.00	0.57	0.00	0.42	0.00
粮食种植收入占比	0.06	0.70	0.09	0.45	0.23	0.03	0.12	0.14
外出务工收入占比	0.33	0.00	0.29	0.07	0.02	0.93	0.37	0.00

黄土高原乡村体制转换与转型发展

Rural regime shifts and transformation development on the Loess Plateau

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	潘竟虎, 冯娅娅. 中国农村深度贫困的空间扫描与贫困分异机制的地理探测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 769-788.
[2]	刘敏, 郝炜. 山西省国家A级旅游景区空间分布影响因素研究[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 878-888.
[3]	戴尔阜, 王亚慧. 横断山区产水服务空间异质性及归因分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(3): 607-619.
[4]	刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 党素珍. 黄土丘陵区雨强对水流含沙量的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1723-1732.
[5]	彭文甫, 张冬梅, 罗艳玫, 陶帅, 徐新良. 自然因子对四川植被NDVI变化的地理探测[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1758-1776.
[6]	李瀚祺, 贾鹏, 费腾. 基于众源数据挖掘的中国饮食口味与慢性病的空间关联[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1637-1649.
[7]	宋雪茜,邓伟,周鹏,张少尧,万将军,刘颖. 两层级公共医疗资源空间均衡性及其影响机制——以分级诊疗改革为背景[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(6): 1178-1189.
[8]	王正雄,蒋勇军,张远嘱,段世辉,刘九缠,曾泽,曾思博. 基于GIS与地理探测器的岩溶槽谷石漠化空间分布及驱动因素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 1025-1039.
[9]	龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇. 土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2546-2559.
[10]	曹智, 李裕瑞, 陈玉福. 城乡融合背景下乡村转型与可持续发展路径探析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2560-2571.
[11]	周鹏, 邓伟, 彭立, 张少尧. 典型山地水土要素时空耦合特征及其成因[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(11): 2273-2287.
[12]	胡凯衡, 魏丽, 刘双, 李秀珍. 横断山区泥石流空间格局和激发雨量分异性研究[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(11): 2303-2313.
[13]	汪洋,王力力,祁鹏卫,刘志海. 重庆市主体功能区识别的主导因素与空间稳定性约束机理[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 44-62.
[14]	王欢,高江波,侯文娟. 基于地理探测器的喀斯特不同地貌形态类型区土壤侵蚀定量归因[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1674-1686.
[15]	龙花楼,张英男,屠爽爽. 论土地整治与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1837-1849.