区域可持续发展能力的能值与㶲耦合分析模型构建

doi:10.11821/dlxb201910008

地理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 74 ›› Issue (10): 2062-2077.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910008

区域可持续发展能力的能值与㶲耦合分析模型构建

樊新刚^1,²,仲俊涛³,杨美玲⁴,文琦⁴,马振宁⁴,米文宝⁴()

^1. 宁夏大学西部发展研究中心,银川 750021
^2. 宁夏大学经济管理学院,银川 750021
^3. 青海师范大学地理科学学院,西宁 810016
^4. 宁夏大学资源环境学院,银川 750021

收稿日期:2018-06-11 修回日期:2019-05-05 出版日期:2019-10-25 发布日期:2019-10-29
作者简介:樊新刚(1978-), 男, 宁夏石嘴山人, 博士, 副教授, 中国地理学会会员(S110012596M), 主要从事生态经济、区域可持续发展等研究。E-mail: fanxg@nxu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No.41761116);宁夏自然科学基金项目(No.NZ17027)

Construction of an emergy and exergy coupling model for the analysis of regional sustainable development capability

FAN Xingang^1,²,ZHONG Juntao³,YANG Meiling⁴,WEN Qi⁴,MA Zhenning⁴,MI Wenbao⁴()

^1. Research Center for Western Development, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
^2. School of Economics and Management, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
^3. School of Geography Science, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810016, China
^4. School of Resources and Environment, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China

Received:2018-06-11 Revised:2019-05-05 Published:2019-10-25 Online:2019-10-29
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41761116);Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia(No.NZ17027)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

可持续发展能力评价方法是识别人地协同规律、支撑科学决策的重要工具和热点需求。通过文献回顾与理论分析框架构建,耦合能值及?方法,提出自组织能力指数（SO）、生态压力指数（EP）、可持续发展能力指数（SC）构成的,基于热力学理论的可持续发展能力分析模型,利用文献荟萃法筛选17个典型发达国家1985年状态值计算SO与EP阈值,划分了4个阶段。利用中美两国1985-2015年特征对比验证,结果显示：① 2005年以前中国属“低自组织能力、低生态压力”阶段,之后进入“低自组织能力、高生态压力”阶段,存在低生态效率、规模扩张驱动特征;美国一直属“高自组织能力、高生态压力”阶段,存在高生态效率驱动、经济与生态脱钩特征,与全球生态足迹网络和世界自然基金会等的研究结果一致,模型具有较好适应性和可靠性。② 模型利用“获得?量/输入能值量”表达经济社会生态效率、“经济社会?损耗量/生态系统年产?量”表达生态压力,连接了经济社会对生态基底的熵化路径,可识别区域所处可持续发展阶段、分析水平变化和驱动因素。③ 模型以人类与生态并重的视角,从深度上反映经济社会的生态效率、从广度上评价生态空间被占用比例,具有宏观规模与微观效率分析相结合的优势,是对经典方法的补充。

关键词: 可持续发展能力, 自组织能力, 生态压力, 能值, ?, 耦合模型

Abstract:

Methods for the evaluation of sustainable development capability are important and highly sought after tools for identifying the synergistic relationship between humans and the environment and guiding scientific decision-making for the implementation of ecological and environmental protection measures. Compared to traditional methods such as ecological footprint, environmental sustainability index, and human development index, emergy analysis and exergy analysis result in smaller errors and are more objective. These two methods can directly convert materials and services into energy units, without evaluation indicators and weight settings, and do not require raw dimensionless data. Exploring the coupling of emergy analysis and exergy analysis can provide a new perspective on and method for the analysis of regional sustainable development capabilities. Based on a literature review, a theoretical analysis framework was constructed. This study proposes an emergy and exergy coupling model for the analysis of sustainable development capability based on a thermodynamic theory. This analytical model has three indices, namely, self-organizing capability index (SO), ecological pressure index (EP), and sustainable development capability index (SC). The emergy and exergy input and output values of 17 typical developed countries in 1985 were screened via meta-analysis to calculate the SO and EP thresholds of the model, based on which sustainable development capability was divided into four stages. The model was tested via a comparative analysis of the sustainable development capability of China and the USA in 1985-2015. The results show that China was in the low self-organizing capacity and low ecological pressure stage before 2005. After 2005, it entered the low self-organizing capability and high ecological pressure stage. It has had low eco-efficiency and scale expansion driving characteristics. The USA is always in the high self-organizing capacity and high ecological pressure stage, and is characterized by high ecological efficiency, and economic and ecological decoupling. These results are consistent with the findings of the World Ecological Footprint Network and World Wildlife Fund, indicating that the proposed model is adaptive and reliable. In addition, the study results indicate that this model can express the ecological efficiency of an economic and social system in terms of "total annual exergy amount used/annual emergy input amount". Moreover, it can express the ecological pressure as "annual exergy loss of an economic and social system/annual eco-exergy produced by an ecosystem." This model connects the entropy path of an economic and social system to the ecosystem. Furthermore, it can identify sustainable development stage and analyze changes in sustainable development level and factors driving these changes. From an anthropological and ecological perspective, the model expresses the ecological efficiency of an economic and social system, evaluates the proportion of ecological space occupied, and can combine macroscopic scale with microscopic efficiency analysis, which is an improvement over conventional methods.

Key words: sustainable development capacity, self-organizing capability, ecological pressure, emergy, exergy, coupling model

樊新刚, 仲俊涛, 杨美玲, 文琦, 马振宁, 米文宝. 区域可持续发展能力的能值与㶲耦合分析模型构建[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2062-2077.

FAN Xingang, ZHONG Juntao, YANG Meiling, WEN Qi, MA Zhenning, MI Wenbao. Construction of an emergy and exergy coupling model for the analysis of regional sustainable development capability[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(10): 2062-2077.

图/表 7

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 66

[1]	Caiado R G G, Dias R D F, Mattos L V , et al. Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,165:890-904.
[2]	Fan Jie . Frontier approach of the sustainable process and pattern of human-environment system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(8):1060-1068.
	[ 樊杰 . 人地系统可持续过程、格局的前沿探索. 地理学报, 2014,69(8):1060-1068.]
[3]	Huang Jiali . An overview and trend of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Economy, 2015,31(1):18-22.
	[ 黄茄莉 . 国际可持续性评价方法研究进展与趋势. 生态经济, 2015,31(1):18-22.]
[4]	Jin Xiangmu, Liu Qiankun . Evolution of ecological footprint models for natural resources accounting. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017,32(1):163-176.
	[ 靳相木, 柳乾坤 . 自然资源核算的生态足迹模型演进及其评论. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(1):163-176.]
[5]	Krajnc D, Glavič P . A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2005,43(2):189-208.
[6]	Huang Baorong, Cui Shuhong, Li Yingming . Ecological footprint evolution characteristics and its influencing factors in China from 2000 to 2010. Environmental Science, 2016,37(2):420-426.
	[ 黄宝荣, 崔书红, 李颖明 . 中国2000~2010年生态足迹变化特征及影响因素. 环境科学, 2016,37(2):420-426.]
[7]	Wu Jiansheng, Li Ping, Zhang Yuqing . Sustainable development capacity evaluation based on urban ecological footprint: A case study of Shenzhen. Resources Science, 2008,30(6):850-856.
	[ 吴健生, 李萍, 张玉清 . 基于生态足迹的城市地域可持续发展能力评价: 以深圳为例. 资源科学, 2008,30(6):850-856.]
[8]	Yang Yu, Liu Yi . Progress in China's sustainable development research: Contribution of Chinese geographers. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016,26(8):1176-1196.
[9]	Cao Bin, Lin Jianyi, Cui Shenghui . Review on assessment index of sustainable development. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010,33(3):99-105.
	[ 曹斌, 林剑艺, 崔胜辉 . 可持续发展评价指标体系研究综述. 环境科学与技术, 2010,33(3):99-105.]
[10]	Wang Hong . An assessment of dematerialization and effects of circular economy based on material flows analysis. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(11):1811-1822.
	[ 王红 . 基于物质流分析的中国减物质化趋势及循环经济成效评价. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(11):1811-1822.]
[11]	Wang Lin, Pan Feng . Review on the material flow analysis of environmental system-social economic system. Ecological Economy, 2018,34(3):44-52.
	[ 王琳, 潘峰 . 环境—社会经济系统物质流分析研究述评. 生态经济, 2018,34(3):44-52.]
[12]	Nielsen S N, Bastianoni S . A Common framework for emergy and exergy based LCA in accordance with Environ Theory. International Journal of Ecodynamics, 2007,2(3):170-185.
[13]	Fan Xingang . The coordinated development research of ecological economic system in Ningxia limited developing ecological zone[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2015.
	[ 樊新刚 . 宁夏限制开发生态区生态经济系统协调发展研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2015.]
[14]	Campbell D E . Emergy baseline for the Earth: A historical review of the science and a new calculation. Ecological Modelling, 2016,339:96-125.
[15]	Nakićenović N, Gilli P V, Kurz R . Regional and global exergy and energy efficiencies. Energy, 1996,21(3):223-237.
[16]	Ukidwe N U, Hau J L, Bakshi B R . Thermodynamic input-output analysis of economic and ecological systems//Handbook of Input-output Economics in Industrial Ecology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009.
[17]	Gong M, Wall G . Exergy analysis of the supply of energy and material resources in the Swedish society. Energies, 2016,9(9):1-16.
[18]	Fan Xingang, Mi Wenbao, Hou Jingwei . Application of extended exergy method in driving mechanism and efficiency of regional eco-economy. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017,28(1):273-280.
	[ 樊新刚, 米文宝, 侯景伟 . 扩展㶲方法在区域生态经济驱动机制及效率研究中的应用. 应用生态学报, 2017,28(1):273-280.]
[19]	Fischer-Kowalski M, Amann C . Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a vital factor in analysing the environmental impact of socio-economic metabolism. Population & Environment, 2001,23(1):7-47.
[20]	Brown M T, Ulgiati S . Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: Monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecological Engineering, 1997,9(1-2):51-69.
[21]	Zhang Yan, Yang Zhifeng . Emergy analysis of urban material metabolism and evaluation of eco-efficiency in Beijing. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007,27(11):1892-1899.
	[ 张妍, 杨志峰 . 北京城市物质代谢的能值分析与生态效率评估. 环境科学学报, 2007,27(11):1892-1899.]
[22]	Liu Gengyuan, Yang Zhifeng, Chen Bin . Urban metabolism process based on emergy synthesis: Theory and method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(15):4539-4551. doi: 10.5846/stxb201204260597
	[ 刘耕源, 杨志峰, 陈彬 . 基于能值分析方法的城市代谢过程研究—理论与方法. 生态学报, 2013,33(15):4539-4551.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201204260597
[23]	Brown M T, Cohen M J, Sweeney S . Predicting national sustainability: The convergence of energetic, economic and environmental realities. Ecological Modelling, 2009,220(23):3424-3438.
[24]	Zhong Zhenmei, Wen Boqi, Wang Yixiang , et al. Advances in ecosystem emergy theory and thoughts on some related issues. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010,25(4):520-525.
	[ 钟珍梅, 翁伯琦, 王义祥 , 等. 生态系统能值理论研究进展及若干问题思考. 福建农业学报, 2010,25(4):520-525.]
[25]	Lu Hongfang, Lan Shengfang, Li Lei , et al. Studies on emergy indices for evaluating system sustainable development property. China Environmental Science, 2002,22(4):380-384.
	[ 陆宏芳, 蓝盛芳, 李雷 , 等. 评价系统可持续发展能力的能值指标. 中国环境科学, 2002,22(4):380-384.]
[26]	Zhao S, Li Z Z, Li W L . A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application. Ecological Modelling, 2005,185(1):65-75.
[27]	Amaral L P, Martins N, Gouveia J B . A review of emergy theory, its application and latest developments. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016,54:882-888.
[28]	Cleveland C J, Kaufmann R K, Stern D I . Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy. Ecological Economics, 2000,32(2):301-317.
[29]	Zheng Hongfei, Wu Yuyuan . Exergy analysis methodology. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2001,21(2):75-80.
	[ 郑宏飞, 吴裕远 . 㶲分析方法论. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2001,21(2):75-80.]
[30]	Jørgensen S E, Nielsen S N . Use of eco-exergy in ecological networks. Ecological Modelling, 2014,293:202-209.
[31]	Wall G . Exergy conversion in the Swedish society. Resources & Energy, 1987,9(1):55-73.
[32]	Wall G, Sciubba E, Naso V . Exergy use in the Italian society. Energy, 1994,19(12):1267-1274.
[33]	Morris D R, Szargut J . Standard chemical exergy of some elements and compounds on the planet earth. Energy, 1986,11(8):733-755.
[34]	Sciubba E, Bastianoni S, Tiezzi E . Exergy and extended exergy accounting of very large complex systems with an application to the province of Siena, Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008,86(2):372-382.
[35]	Chen B, Dai J, Sciubba E . Ecological accounting for China based on extended exergy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014,37:334-347.
[36]	Ibrahim D . Thermodynamics, exergy and environmental impact. Energy Sources, 2000,22(8):723-732.
[37]	Sciubba E, Ulgiati S . Emergy and exergy analyses: Complementary methods or irreducible ideological options? Energy, 2005,30(10):1953-1988.
[38]	Muys B . Sustainable development within planetary boundaries: A functional revision of the definition based on the thermodynamics of complex social-ecological systems. Challenges in Sustainability, 2013,1(1):41-52.
[39]	Bakshi B R, Fiksel J . The quest for sustainability: Challenges for process systems engineering. Aiche Journal, 2003,49(6):1350-1358.
[40]	Hau J L, Bakshi B R . Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004,38(13):3768-3777.
[41]	Coscieme L, Pulselli F M, Jørgensen S E , et al. Thermodynamics-based categorization of ecosystems in a socio-ecological context. Ecological Modelling, 2013,258:1-8.
[42]	Bastianoni S, Marchettini N . Emergy/exergy ratio as a measure of the level of organization of systems. Ecological Modelling, 1997,99(1):33-40.
[43]	Jørgensen S E . Ecosystem services, sustainability and thermodynamic indicators. Ecological Complexity, 2010,7(3):311-313.
[44]	Fan Xingang, Mi Wenbao, Ma Zhenning . Construction and application of economy-pollution-environment three-dimensional evaluation model for district. Environmental Science, 2015(2):751-758.
	[ 樊新刚, 米文宝, 马振宁 . 区域经济—污染—环境三维评价模型的构建与应用. 环境科学, 2015(2):751-758.]
[45]	Baek J, Kim H S . Is economic growth good or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from Korea. Energy Economics, 2013,36(3):744-749.
[46]	Taylor L . The World Bank and the environment: The world development report 1992. World Development, 1993,21(5):869-881.
[47]	Stern D I, Common M S, Sanyal K K . Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2001,41(2):162-178.
[48]	Wang Jinnan, Zhang Jing, Liu Nianlei , et al. A EKC-based comparison of environmental quality between China with overall well-being and developed countries. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2016,8(2):9-15.
	[ 王金南, 张静, 刘年磊 , 等. 基于EKC的全面小康中国与发达国家环境质量比较. 中国环境管理, 2016,8(2):9-15.]
[49]	Grossman G M, Krueger A B . Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1991,8(2):223-250.
[50]	Mazur A, Phutkaradze Z, Phutkaradze J . Economic growth and environmental quality in the European Union Countries-Is there Evidence for the Environmental Kuznets Curve? International Journal of Management & Economics, 2015,45:108-126.
[51]	Wall G . Exergy conversion in the Japanese society. Energy, 1990,15(5):435-444.
[52]	Robert U A, Leslie W A, Benjamin W . Exergy, power and work in the US economy, 1900-1998. Energy, 2003,28(3):219-273.
[53]	Rosen M A . Evaluation of energy utilization efficiency in Canada using energy and exergy analyses. Energy, 1992,17(4):339-350.
[54]	Serrenho A C, Sousa T, Warr B , et al. Decomposition of useful work intensity: The EU (European Union)-15 countries from 1960 to 2009. Energy, 2014,76:704-715.
[55]	Lan Shengfang, Qin Pei, Lu Hongfang. Energy Analysis of Ecoeconomic System. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002.
	[ 蓝盛芳, 钦佩, 陆宏芳 . 生态经济系统能值分析. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2002.]
[56]	Jorgensen S E . Introduction to Systems Ecology. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2013.
	[ Jorgensen S E . 系统生态学导论. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013.]
[57]	Li Mingsheng, Sun Yuan, Chen Yuanhang , et al. Establishment and application of pollutant discharge-environment quality model. Environmental Science, 2014,35(3):1198-1204.
	[ 李名升, 孙媛, 陈远航 , 等. 污染排放与环境质量关系模型构建与应用. 环境科学, 2014,35(3):1198-1204.]
[58]	Brockway P E, Steinberger J K, Barrett J R , et al. Understanding China's past and future energy demand: An exergy efficiency and decomposition analysis. Applied Energy, 2015,155:892-903.
[59]	Fan Xiaoshan, Gao Jixi . Resource utilization and evolution trend of China's eco economic system . China Population, Resources and Environment, 2009,19(5):37-44.
	[ 范小杉, 高吉喜 . 中国生态经济系统资源利用状况及演变趋势. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009,19(5):37-44.]
[60]	Campbell D E, Lu H . The emergy to money ratio of the United States from 1900 to 2007//The Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida. Emergy Synthesis 5, Theory and Applications of the Emergy Methodology. Gainesville FL: The Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida. 2008,37:413-448.
[61]	Sun Dongqi, Zhang Jingxiang, Zhu Chuangeng , et al. An assessment of China's ecological environment quality change and its spatial variation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(12):1599-1610.
	[ 孙东琪, 张京祥, 朱传耿 , 等. 中国生态环境质量变化态势及其空间分异分析. 地理学报, 2012,67(12):1599-1610.]
[62]	Fang Kai . Ecological footprint depth and size: New indicators for a 3D model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(1):267-274. doi: 10.5846/stxb201111051670
	[ 方恺 . 生态足迹深度和广度: 构建三维模型的新指标. 生态学报, 2013,33(1):267-274.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201111051670
[63]	Global Footprint Network. Footprint for Nations. , 2018-05-12.
[64]	Huang Jie, Lin Tao, Zhang Hongqiang . Sustainable development efficiency of three urban agglomerations in China: Based on DEA and Malmquist model. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016,26(Suppl.1):373-376.
	[ 黄洁, 吝涛, 张宏强 . 基于DEA和Malmquist模型的中国三大城市群可持续发展效率研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016,26(Suppl.1):373-376.]
[65]	Zheng Defeng, Hao Shuai, Sun Caizhi , et al. Spatio-temporal pattern evolution of eco-efficiency and the forecast in mainland of China. Geographical Research, 2018,37(5):1034-1046.
	[ 郑德凤, 郝帅, 孙才志 , 等. 中国大陆生态效率时空演化分析及其趋势预测. 地理研究, 2018,37(5):1034-1046.]
[66]	Jorgensen S E, Nielsen S N, Mejer H . Emergy, environ, exergy and ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling, 1995,77(2-3):99-109.

序号	国家	SO (j·sej^-1)	能值输入量(sej)	?输出量 (j)	?损耗量 (j)	年生态产?量 (j)	EP (无量纲)
1	日本	1.39×10^-6	2.73×10²⁴	3.78×10¹⁸	1.42×10¹⁹	2.75×10²²	5.18×10^-4
2	美国	3.83×10^-6	1.29×10²⁵	4.95×10¹⁹	2.42×10²⁰	3.70×10²³	6.53×10^-4
3	英国	9.04×10^-7	1.28×10²⁴	1.15×10¹⁸	5.33×10¹⁸	5.43×10²¹	9.81×10^-4
4	瑞典	8.91×10^-7	3.25×10²³	2.89×10¹⁷	1.16×10¹⁸	3.07×10²²	3.77×10^-5
5	加拿大^*	2.54×10^-6	7.99×10²³	2.03×10¹⁸	6.43×10¹⁸	3.78×10²³	1.70×10^-5
6	法国	8.20×10^-7	1.32×10²⁴	1.09×10¹⁸	5.23×10¹⁸	2.28×10²²	2.29×10^-4
7	德国	1.06×10^-6	1.95×10²⁴	2.07×10¹⁸	8.95×10¹⁸	1.08×10²²	8.26×10^-4
8	意大利	6.26×10^-7	1.36×10²⁴	8.51×10¹⁷	3.96×10¹⁸	1.21×10²²	3.27×10^-4
9	丹麦	4.36×10^-7	2.32×10²³	1.01×10¹⁷	5.39×10¹⁷	1.65×10²¹	3.27×10^-4
10	西班牙	6.81×10^-7	6.97×10²³	4.75×10¹⁷	1.85×10¹⁸	2.46×10²²	7.54×10^-5
11	荷兰	8.13×10^-7	4.45×10²³	3.62×10¹⁷	1.64×10¹⁸	7.72×10²⁰	2.12×10^-3
12	奥地利	5.19×10^-7	2.94×10²³	1.52×10¹⁷	7.10×10¹⁷	3.99×10²¹	1.78×10^-4
13	比利时	8.01×10^-7	3.38×10²³	2.71×10¹⁷	1.09×10¹⁸	1.05×10²¹	1.04×10^-3
14	芬兰	7.72×10^-7	2.21×10²³	1.71×10¹⁷	6.52×10¹⁷	2.70×10²²	2.41×10^-5
15	希腊	3.66×10^-7	2.94×10²³	1.08×10¹⁷	5.05×10¹⁷	4.41×10²¹	1.15×10^-4
16	卢森堡	2.26×10^-7	1.27×10²³	2.87×10¹⁶	8.36×10¹⁶	1.89×10²⁰	4.42×10^-4
17	葡萄牙	3.27×10^-7	2.33×10²³	7.63×10¹⁶	3.67×10¹⁷	5.29×10²¹	6.94×10^-5

生态系统类型(单位)	淡水(河湖)	林地(落叶林)	农田	草原
年生物量(MJ·hm^-2·a^-1)	11.00	26.40	20.00	7.20
生态?值(GJ·hm^-2·a^-1)	93500	1000000	420000	18000

区域可持续发展能力的能值与㶲耦合分析模型构建

Construction of an emergy and exergy coupling model for the analysis of regional sustainable development capability

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 66

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	夏兴生, 潘耀忠, 朱秀芳, 张锦水. 中国综合农业分区下的Ångström-Prescott公式系数逐月校正与优选[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 888-902.
[2]	闪丽洁,张利平,张艳军,佘敦先,夏军. 长江中下游流域旱涝急转事件特征分析及其与ENSO的关系[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(1): 25-40.
[3]	马程, 王晓玥, 张雅昕, 李双成. 北京市生态涵养区生态系统服务供给与流动的能值分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 974-985.
[4]	吴霜, 延晓冬, 张丽娟. 中国森林生态系统能值与服务功能价值的关系[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(3): 334-342.
[5]	魏敏, 冯永军, 李芬, 郑玉清. 泰安市旅游生态能值分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9): 1181-1189.
[6]	谢花林, 邹金浪, 彭小琳. 基于能值的鄱阳湖生态经济区耕地利用集约度时空差异分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(7): 889-902.
[7]	张虹, 黄民生, 胡晓辉. 基于能值分析的福建省绿色GDP核算[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(11): 1421-1428.
[8]	方创琳,鲍超. 黑河流域水-生态-经济发展耦合模型及应用[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(5): 781-790.
[9]	董孝斌,高旺盛,严茂超. 黄土高原典型流域农业生态系统生产力的能值分析——以安塞县纸坊沟流域为例[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(2): 223-229.
[10]	李海涛,廖迎春,严茂超,胡聃. 新疆生态经济系统的能值分析及其可持续性评估[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 765-772.
[11]	方创琳, Yehua Dennis Wei. 河西地区可持续发展能力评价及地域分异规律[J]. 地理学报, 2001, 56(5): 561-569.
[12]	蒋业放, 张兴有. 河流与含水层水力耦合模型及其应用[J]. 地理学报, 1999, 54(6): 526-533.
[13]	田尚. 黄河河源探讨[J]. 地理学报, 1981, 36(3): 338-344.