黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例

doi:10.11821/dlxb201909016

地理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 74 ›› Issue (9): 1921-1937.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201909016

黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例

刘立程^1,³,刘春芳^2,³(),王川^1,³,李鹏杰^1,³

^1. 西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,兰州 730070
^2. 西北师范大学社会发展与公共管理学院,兰州 730070
^3. 甘肃省土地利用与综合整治工程研究中心,兰州 730070

收稿日期:2019-03-04 修回日期:2019-08-01 出版日期:2019-09-25 发布日期:2019-09-25
通讯作者: 刘春芳
作者简介:刘立程(1994-), 男, 甘肃民勤人, 硕士生, 研究方向为土地利用与生态评价。E-mail: llcnwnu@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41861034)

Supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: A case study of Lanzhou

LIU Licheng^1,³,LIU Chunfang^2,³(),WANG Chuan^1,³,LI Pengjie^1,³

^1. College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
^2. College of Social Development and Public Administration, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
^3. Gansu Engineering Research Center of Land Utilization and Comprehension Consolidation, Lanzhou, 730070, China

Received:2019-03-04 Revised:2019-08-01 Online:2019-09-25 Published:2019-09-25
Contact: LIU Chunfang
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41861034)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态系统服务的持续供给是社会和自然可持续发展的基础,人类通过对生态系统服务的消费来满足需求和提高自身福祉。研究生态系统服务的供给和人类对生态系统服务的需求与消费,分析生态系统服务的供需特征与空间权衡关系,对区域生态系统的管理和资源的有效配置具有重要意义。以兰州市为例,利用全市2017年土地覆被、气象观测和统计年鉴等多源数据,应用InVEST模型、ArcGIS和GeoDA等空间分析工具,计算了研究区产水、食物供给、碳固持和土壤保持等4项服务的供给量及需求量,并对区域内生态系统服务的供需匹配状况进行了分析与评价。结果表明：① 兰州市各项生态系统服务的供给与需求空间异质性显著,各项服务总供给量均大于总需求量,且在不同区域与不同生态系统服务之间存在明显差异;② 兰州市综合生态系统服务供需比为0.039,不同生态系统服务供需匹配状况存在差异,产水服务（0.098）>碳固持服务（0.066）>食物供给服务（0.030）>土壤保持服务（0.001）,且城乡供需匹配差异显著;③ 兰州市生态系统服务供需空间匹配有“高高型空间匹配”、“低低型空间匹配”、“高低型空间错位”和“低高型空间错位”4种类型,且各项服务的主导空间匹配类型有所不同;④ 兰州市各项生态系统服务的供需平衡状况存在明显的协同作用,分别是“高高协同”与“低低协同”。

关键词: 黄土丘陵区, 生态系统服务, 供需匹配, 空间差异

Abstract:

The sustainable supply of ecosystem services is the basis of the sustainable development. Human beings satisfy the demand and improve their own well-being through the consumption of ecosystem services. It is of great significance for the management of regional ecosystems and the effective allocation of resources to study the demand and consumption of ecosystem services and to analyze the supply and demand characteristics of ecosystem services and their spatial trade-offs. Based on the multi-source data such as land cover, meteorological observation and statistical yearbook in Lanzhou in 2017, the spatial analysis tools including InVEST model, ArcGIS and GeoDA were used to calculate the supply and demand of water yield, food supply, carbon storage and soil conservation. The supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in the study area was analyzed and evaluated. The results show that: (1) The supply and demand of ecosystem services have obvious spatial heterogeneity. The total supply of services is greater than the total demand, but there are differences between different sub-regions and different kinds of ecosystem services. (2) The supply-demand ratio of comprehensive ecosystem services is 0.039. There are differences in supply-demand matching of different kinds of ecosystem services: water yield service (0.098) > carbon storage service (0.066) > food supply service (0.030) > soil conservation service (0.001), and there are significant differences in supply-demand matching between urban and rural areas. (3) There are different kinds of spatial matching pattern between supply and demand of ecosystem services, including "high-high spatial matching", "low-low spatial matching", "high-low spatial dislocation" and "low-high spatial dislocation". (4) There are obvious synergic effects in the balance of supply and demand of services in Lanzhou, which are "high-high synergy" and "low-low synergy".

Key words: loess hilly region, ecosystem services, supply and demand matching, spatial differentiation

刘立程, 刘春芳, 王川, 李鹏杰. 黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937.

LIU Licheng, LIU Chunfang, WANG Chuan, LI Pengjie. Supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: A case study of Lanzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937.

图/表 10

图1

表1

表2

表3

图2

图3

图4

图5

表4

图6

参考文献 54

[1]	Liu Chunfang, Wang Chuan, Liu Licheng . Spatio-temporal variation on habitat quality and its mechanism within the transitional area of the Three Natural Zones: A case study in Yuzhong county. Geographical Research, 2018,37(2):419-432.
	[ 刘春芳, 王川, 刘立程 . 三大自然区过渡带生境质量时空差异及形成机制: 以榆中县为例. 地理研究, 2018,37(2):419-432.]
[2]	Liu Chunfang, Xue Shuyan, Wu Yahan . Ecological environmental effects of land consolidation: Mechanism of action and application path. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019,30(2):329-337.
	[ 刘春芳, 薛淑艳, 乌亚汗 . 土地整治的生态环境效应: 作用机制及应用路径. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(2):329-337.]
[3]	Daily C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997.
[4]	Costanza R, D Arge R, D Groot R , et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[5]	Zhang Liwei, Fu Bojie . The progress in ecosystem services mapping: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(2):316-325.
	[ 张立伟, 傅伯杰 . 生态系统服务制图研究进展. 生态学报, 2014,34(2):316-325.]
[6]	Jing Yongcai, Chen Liding, Sun Ranhao . A theoretical research framework for ecological security pattern construction based on ecosystem services supply and demand. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(12):4121-4131.
	[ 景永才, 陈利顶, 孙然好 . 基于生态系统服务供需的城市群生态安全格局构建框架. 生态学报, 2018,38(12):4121-4131.]
[7]	Rees W E . Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 1992,4(2):121-130.
[8]	Rees W E . Revisiting carrying capacity: Area-based indicators of sustainability. Population and Environment, 1996,17(3):195-215.
[9]	Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D , et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics, 2001,39(3):333-346.
[10]	Turner R K, Paavola J, Cooper P , et al. Valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 2003,46(3):493-510.
[11]	Troy A, Wilson M A . Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics, 2007,60(2):435-449. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007
[12]	Petrosillo I, Zaccarelli N, Semeraro T , et al. The effectiveness of different conservation policies on the security of natural capital. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009,89(1/2):49-56.
[13]	Castro A J, Verburg P H, Martín-López B , et al. Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2014,132:102-110.
[14]	Alama M, Dupras J, Messier C A . Framework towards a composite indicator for urban ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2016,60:38-44.
[15]	Yan Yan, Zhu Jieyuan, Wu Gang , et al. Review and prospective applications of demand, supply, and consumption of ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(8):2489-2496.
	[ 严岩, 朱捷缘, 吴钢 , 等. 生态系统服务需求、供给和消费研究进展. 生态学报, 2017,37(8):2489-2496.]
[16]	Schulp C J E, Lautenbach S, Verburg P H . Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: Demand and supply of pollination in the European Union. Ecological Indicators, 2014,36:131-141.
[17]	Baró F, Haase D , et al. Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecological Indicators, 2015,55:146-158.
[18]	Brunner S H, Huber R, Gret-Regamey A . A backcasting approach for matching regional ecosystem services supply and demand. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016,75:439-458.
[19]	Wolff S, Schulp C J E, Kastner T, Verburg P H . Quantifying spatial variation in ecosystem services demand: A global mapping approach. Ecological Economics, 2017,136:14-29.
[20]	Larondelle N, Lauf S . Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales. Ecosystem Services, 2016,22:18-31.
[21]	José V, Díaz R, Vayreda J , et al. The spatial level of analysis affects the patterns of forest ecosystem services supply and their relationships. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,626:1270-1283.
[22]	Tao Yu, Wang Hongning, Ou Weixin , et al. A land-cover-based approach to assessing ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics in the rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta region. Land Use Policy, 2018,72:250-258.
[23]	Huang Zhixun, Wang Feifei, Cao Wenzhi . Dynamic analysis of an ecological security pattern relying on the relationship between ecosystem service supply and demand: A case study on the Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou city cluster. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(12):4327-4340.
	[ 黄智洵, 王飞飞, 曹文志 . 耦合生态系统服务供求关系的生态安全格局动态分析: 以闽三角城市群为例. 生态学报, 2018,38(12):4327-4340.]
[24]	Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D , et al. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy, 2012,29(3):521-535. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008
[25]	Schirpke U, Candiago S, Egarter Vigl L , et al. Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services. Science of The Total Environment, 2019,651:928-941.
[26]	Bukvareva E, Zamolodchikov D, Kraev G , et al. Supplied, demanded and consumed ecosystem services: Prospects for national assessment in Russia. Ecological Indicators, 2017,78:351-360.
[27]	Serna-Chavez M, Schulp C J E, Van Bodegom P M , et al. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2014,39:24-33.
[28]	Schroter M, Barton D N, Remme R P , et al. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecological Indicators, 2014,36:539-551.
[29]	Stürck J, Poortinga A, Verburg P H . Mapping ecosystem services: The supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe. Ecological Indicators, 2014,38:198-211.
[30]	Nedkov S, Burkhard B . Flood regulating ecosystem services: Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, 2012,21:67-79.
[31]	Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice I C , et al. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 2013,9(2):161-185.
[32]	Wu W, Tang H, Yang P , et al. Scenario-based assessment of future food security. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011,21(1):3-17. doi: 10.1007/s11442-011-0825-x
[33]	Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S , et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 2012,21(3):17-29.
[34]	Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M , et al. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services, 2013,4(4):104-116.
[35]	Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F , et al. Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services: A concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online, 2009,15(1):1-22. doi: 10.3097/LO.200915
[36]	Boithias L, Acuña V, Vergoñós L , et al. Assessment of the water supply: Demand ratios in a Mediterranean basin under different global change scenarios and mitigation alternatives. Science of the Total Environment, 2014,470:567-577.
[37]	Bagstad K J, Villa F, Batker D , et al. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology and Society, 2014,19(2):64. doi: 10.5751/ES-06523-190264
[38]	Villa F, Bagstad K J, Voigt B , et al. A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PloS One, 2014,9(3):e91001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001 pmid: 3953216
[39]	Liu Huimin, Fan Yulong, Ding Shengyan . Research progress of ecosystem service flow. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(7):2161-2171.
	[ 刘慧敏, 范玉龙, 丁圣彦 . 生态系统服务流研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(7):2161-2171.]
[40]	Xiao Yu, Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia , et al. Involvement of ecosystem service flows in human wellbeing based on the relationship between supply and demand. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(10):3096-3102.
	[ 肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞 , 等. 基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展. 生态学报, 2016,36(10):3096-3102.]
[41]	Ma Lin, Liu Hao, Peng Jian , et al. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(7):1277-1289.
	[ 马琳, 刘浩, 彭建 , 等. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展. 地理学报, 2017,72(7):1277-1289.]
[42]	Shi Yishao, Shi Donghui . Study on the balance of ecological service supply and demand in Dongting Lake ecological economic zone. Geographical Research, 2018,37(9):1717-1723.
	[ 石忆邵, 史东辉 . 洞庭湖生态经济区生态服务供需平衡研究. 地理研究, 2018,37(9):1714-1723.]
[43]	Ou Weixin, Wang Hongning, Tao Yu . A land cover-based assessment of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics in the Yangtze River Delta region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(17):6337-6347.
	[ 欧维新, 王宏宁, 陶宇 . 基于土地利用与土地覆被的长三角生态系统服务供需空间格局及热点区变化. 生态学报, 2018,38(17):6337-6347.]
[44]	Meng Shiting, Huang Qingxu, He Chunyang , et al. Mapping the changes in supply and demand of carbon sequestration service: A case study in Beijing. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018,33(7):1191-1203.
	[ 孟士婷, 黄庆旭, 何春阳 , 等. 区域碳固持服务供需关系动态分析: 以北京为例. 自然资源学报, 2018,33(7):1191-1203.]
[45]	Peng Jian, Yang Yang, Xie Pan , et al. Zoning for the construction of green space ecological networks in Guangdong Province based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(13):4562-4572.
	[ 彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼 , 等. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区. 生态学报, 2017,37(13):4562-4572.]
[46]	Liu Wenhui, Li Chunliang, Wu Yongqiang . Reserves estimation and spatial distribution of the organic carbon pool in Lanzhou-Baiyin area, Gansu province. Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration, 2012,36(3):367-371.
	[ 刘文辉, 李春亮, 吴永强 . 甘肃省兰州—白银地区土壤有机碳库储量估算与空间分布特征. 物探与化探, 2012,36(3):367-371.]
[47]	Yan Qingwu, Bian Zhengfu, Zhang Ping , et al. Census spatialization based on settlements density. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2011,27(5):95-98.
	[ 闫庆武, 卞正富, 张萍 , 等. 基于居民点密度的人口密度空间化. 地理与地理信息科学, 2011,27(5):95-98.]
[48]	Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes W R , et al. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration. Water Resources Research, 2004,40(2):89-97.
[49]	Williams J R, Arnold J G . A system of erosion: Sediment yield models. Soil Technology, 1997,11:43-55.
[50]	Fu B J, Liu Y, Lü Y H , et al. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecological Complexity, 2011,8(4):284-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.07.003
[51]	Wischmeier W H, Smith D D . Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1958,39(2):285-291.
[52]	Cai Chongfa, Ding Shuwen, Shi Zhihu , et al. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2000,14(2):19-24.
	[ 蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华 , 等. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRIS预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究. 水土保持学报, 2000,14(2):19-24.]
[53]	Chen J, Jiang B, Bai Y , et al. Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimisation. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,650:1426-1439.
[54]	Chen Gangqiang, Li Xun, Xu Xueqiang . Spatial agglomeration and evolution of urban population in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008,63(10):1045-1054.
	[ 陈刚强, 李郇, 许学强 . 中国城市人口的空间集聚特征与规律分析. 地理学报, 2008,63(10):1045-1054.]

	产水服务(m³·hm^-2)		食物供给服务(t·km^-2)		碳固持服务(t·km^-2)		土壤保持服务(t·hm^-2)
	供给	需求	供给	需求	供给	需求	供给	需求
兰州市	2570.17	343.82	376.41	113.38	4625.65	841.37	24.53	13.19
城关区	2442.38	5903.54	79.62	1946.84	5959.09	14446.41	21.42	9.40
七里河区	2666.76	1555.42	816.52	1147.00	7034.88	3806.24	57.59	8.09
安宁区	2459.80	3228.87	113.25	1693.93	5159.55	7901.30	10.38	9.71
西固区	2617.93	587.88	270.99	209.87	5220.65	1438.59	26.94	16.79
红古区	2824.80	313.02	269.59	103.23	3992.89	766.00	15.63	18.29
榆中县	2574.14	235.00	690.80	77.50	6086.43	575.06	30.24	10.93
永登县	2733.25	169.03	301.32	55.74	3649.31	413.64	25.95	16.20
皋兰县	2054.09	111.61	115.71	36.81	4609.20	273.12	9.06	7.96

	产水服务供需比	食物供给服务供需比	碳固持服务供需比	土壤保持服务供需比	综合供需比
兰州市	0.098	0.030	0.066	0.001	0.039
城关区	-0.152	-0.215	-0.148	0.001	-0.102
七里河区	0.048	0.035	0.057	0.005	0.028
安宁区	-0.033	-0.110	-0.047	0.000	-0.038
西固区	0.089	0.009	0.066	0.001	0.033
红古区	0.111	0.020	0.057	0.000	0.037
榆中县	0.103	0.071	0.096	0.002	0.054
永登县	0.086	0.028	0.057	0.001	0.034
皋兰县	0.113	0.009	0.076	0.000	0.040

生态系统服务对	Moran's I指数
产水—食物供给	0.638
产水—碳固持	0.657
产水—土壤保持	0.015
食物供给—碳固持	0.630
食物供给—土壤保持	0.072
土壤保持—碳固持	0.136

黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例

Supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: A case study of Lanzhou

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 54

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	齐贵增, 白红英, 赵婷, 孟清, 张善红. 秦岭陕西段南北坡植被对干湿变化响应敏感性及空间差异[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 44-56.
[2]	高晓路, 吴丹贤, 颜秉秋. 北京城市老年贫困人口识别与空间分布[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1557-1571.
[3]	张琨, 吕一河, 傅伯杰, 尹礼唱, 于丹丹. 黄土高原植被覆盖变化对生态系统服务影响及其阈值[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 949-960.
[4]	张静静, 朱文博, 朱连奇, 李艳红. 伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 975-988.
[5]	于贵瑞, 李文华, 邵明安, 张扬建, 王绍强, 牛书丽, 何洪林, 戴尔阜, 李发东, 马泽清. 生态系统科学研究与生态系统管理[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2620-2635.
[6]	李睿倩, 李永富, 胡恒. 生态系统服务对国土空间规划体系的理论与实践支撑[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2417-2430.
[7]	刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 党素珍. 黄土丘陵区雨强对水流含沙量的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1723-1732.
[8]	颜俨,姚柳杨,郎亮明,赵敏娟. 基于Meta回归方法的中国内陆河流域生态系统服务价值再评估[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 1040-1057.
[9]	张生瑞, 王英杰, 张桐艳, 曹瑞昌. 基于跨省界自然地理实体地名空间格局的行政管理优化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 797-813.
[10]	陈峰, 李红波, 张安录. 基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 432-445.
[11]	曾莉,李晶,李婷,杨晓楠,王彦泽. 基于贝叶斯网络的水源涵养服务空间格局优化[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1809-1822.
[12]	张扬,白红英,苏凯,黄晓月,孟清,郭少壮. 1960-2013年秦岭陕西段南北坡极端气温变化空间差异[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(7): 1296-1308.
[13]	曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,吴健生. 景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架: ESRISK[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 843-855.
[14]	钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,柳冬青,马学成. 甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 868-879.
[15]	彭建, 李慧蕾, 刘焱序, 胡熠娜, 杨旸. 雄安新区生态安全格局识别与优化策略[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 701-710.