地理学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (9): 1717-1728.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201709015

• • 上一篇    

基于同行评审视角的地理学论文写作与投稿

李加林1,2(), 何书金3, 朱晓华3()   

  1. 1. 宁波大学地理与空间信息技术系,宁波 315211
    2. 浙江省海洋文化与经济研究中心,宁波 315211
    3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-17 修回日期:2017-08-01 出版日期:2017-09-30 发布日期:2017-09-30
  • 作者简介:

    作者简介:李加林(1973-), 男, 浙江台州人, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师, 中国地理学会会员(S110005797M), 主要从事海岸带环境与资源开发研究。E-mail: nbnj2001@163.com

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41471125);宁波大学研究生示范课程建设项目

Writing and contribution of geography papers from the perspective of peer review

Jialin LI1,2(), Shujin HE3, Xiaohua ZHU3()   

  1. 1. Department of Geography & Spatial Information Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China;
    2. Marine Culture and Economic Research Center of Zhejiang Province, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China
    3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2017-06-17 Revised:2017-08-01 Published:2017-09-30 Online:2017-09-30
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41471125;Project of Graduate Student Course of Ningbo University

摘要:

地理学论文是地理学研究成果的重要体现形式,也是地理科技信息传递和存储的重要载体。如何将科研成果以论文形式较快地发表于影响力较大的科技期刊,让科研成果得到社会认可,是地理工作者最关心的问题。在分析地理学论文的潜在期刊类型及目标期刊的选择原则基础上,指出具有统一在线采编系统的期刊集群将成为发展趋势并极大地方便作者投稿。在分析了当前学术期刊同行评审形式及同行评审专家选择原则的基础上,从同行评审视角对论文写作过程中的选题创新性、研究方法、摘要、引言、讨论与结论、地理图表、参考文献等内容进行了探讨。最后,在分析同行审稿意见类型的基础上,将同行评审意见概括为修稿或退稿2种类型,针对性地提出作者应如何根据审稿意见进行论文修改并对审稿意见进行回复;对于退稿意见,也应该认真分析同行专家的评审意见,找出文章的问题所在,进行文章研究方法、研究内容等方面的全面修改或完善,在确定解决相关问题后再重新投稿。地理学论文是地理学研究成果的重要体现形式,也是地理科技信息传递和存储的重要载体。如何将科研成果以论文形式较快地发表于影响力较大的科技期刊,让科研成果得到社会认可,是地理工作者最关心的问题。在分析地理学论文的潜在期刊类型及目标期刊的选择原则基础上,指出具有统一在线采编系统的期刊集群将成为发展趋势并极大地方便作者投稿。在分析了当前学术期刊同行评审形式及同行评审专家选择原则的基础上,从同行评审视角对论文写作过程中的选题创新性、研究方法、摘要、引言、讨论与结论、地理图表、参考文献等内容进行了探讨。最后,在分析同行审稿意见类型的基础上,将同行评审意见概括为修稿或退稿2种类型,针对性地提出作者应如何根据审稿意见进行论文修改并对审稿意见进行回复;对于退稿意见,也应该认真分析同行专家的评审意见,找出文章的问题所在,进行文章研究方法、研究内容等方面的全面修改或完善,在确定解决相关问题后再重新投稿。

关键词: 同行评审, 地理学, 论文写作, 投稿

Abstract:

A geography paper is an important manifestation of geographical achievements as well as a significant carrier of information transmission and storage for geographical science and technology. How to publish scientific papers in a more influential scientific and technical journal so that the achievements can be recognized by the community, is a major concern of geographers. In this paper, we analyzed the types of potential journals and the choice principles of target journals and pointed out that the journal groups with unified online editing system had become the trends because they facilitated the paper submission. After that, we investigated current peer review forms and the choice rules of peer reviewers, and explored several key points of paper writing, including the innovation, research methods, abstract, introduction, discussion and conclusion, figures and tables and references. Finally, we analyzed comment types of peer reviews and identified them into two main types: revision and rejection. For a paper requiring revision, we suggested that the authors should carefully revise the paper and respond to the comments from reviewers. For a paper rejected, the authors should make clear the problems, make a comprehensive modification or improvement in the research methods, research contents and so on, and resubmit the paper.

Key words: peer review, geography, paper writing, contribution