基于文献计量方法的国际地理科学研究机构竞争力分析

doi:10.11821/dlxb201709014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文利用2000-2015年WOS（Web of Science）的原始数据,以科研产出为视角,基于文献计量法,运用信息检索技术和TDA等引文分析工具,对遴选出的13个国际上具代表性的地理科学研究机构（中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所、北京大学城市与环境学院、北京师范大学地理与遥感学院、牛津大学地理与环境学院、剑桥大学地理系、伦敦大学联邦、加州大学系统、马里兰大学系统、杜伦大学地理系、伯明翰大学地理地球与环境科学学院、布里斯托大学地理科学学院、英属哥伦比亚大学地理系、国际应用系统分析研究所）的科研生产力、影响力、学科结构、国际合作力、重要成果等方面的发展现状进行了统计分析,结果显示,马里兰大学系统地理系总体学科影响力相对较强。中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所SCI&SSCI论文总数以绝对优势占居领先地位,但被引用情况却不尽人意,这也从一个侧面反映出学术影响力提升空间较大;与此同时,随着国际合作范围的扩展和国际合作能力的不断提升,该研究所的前沿开拓与创新发展力逐步走强。

关键词: 地理科学, 优势学科, 机构竞争力, 被引频次, 学科平均引用率, 文献计量研究, 国际合作

Abstract:

Based on bibliometric data from ISI-WOS during 2000 to 2015, the scientific output, influence, discipline structure, collaboration ability and highlight results of 13 international institutes in geographic science were assessed using several advanced bibliometric indices departments, including Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR), CAS; College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University; School of Geography, Beijing Normal University; School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford; School of Geography, University of Cambridge; Department of Geography, University of London; Department of Geography, University of California System; Department of Geography, University of Maryland System; Department of Geography, University of Durham; Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol; School of Geography and Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Geography at University of British Columbia; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. The analysis shows that the Department of Geography, University of Maryland ranked the top in many fields in light of citation indices. The IGSNRR, CAS is the first of the 13 institutes in terms of the number of papers among all the institutes. However, the lower citation rate indicates that there is a large gap in scientific influence for IGSNRR. In addition, the result also demonstrates that IGSNRR has become stronger in pioneering the discipline and realizing the innovations along with the increase of the fields and the ability in the international collaboration.

Key words: geographic science, preponderant discipline, competitive strength of institute, citation, average citation rate, bibliometric research, international collaboration

王淑强, 青秀玲, 王晶, 陈卉, 崔璟, 王绍强, 裴韬, 佟学思, 刘啸, 赵航, 杜涛. 基于文献计量方法的国际地理科学研究机构竞争力分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(9): 1702-1716.

Shuqiang WANG, Xiuling QING, Jing WANG, Hui CHEN, Jing CUI, Shaoqiang WANG, Tao PEI, Xuesi TONG, Xiao LIU, Hang ZHAO, Tao DU. Analysis of competitiveness of international geographic institutes based on bibliometrics[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(9): 1702-1716.

图/表 18

表1

表2

图1

表3

图2

表4

图3

表5

图4

图5

图6

表6

图7

表7

表8

图8

图9

表9

参考文献 18

[1]	Lei X P, Qiu. R.Research on evaluation of science and technology competitiveness based on extension decision model with entropy weight. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 2013(3): 122-127.
	[雷勋平, Robin Qiu.基于熵权可拓决策模型的科技竞争力评价研究. 科技进步与对策, 2013(3): 122-127.]
[2]	Pang Jing'an. Methodology for Scientometric Analysis. Beijing: Scientific and Technical Literature Publishing House, 1999: 1-15.
	[庞景安. 科学计量研究方法论. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 1999: 1-15.]
[3]	Zhong Yongfeng, Zhou Ping.International performance of chinese institutes in different disciplines: A bibliometric view. Journalof Intelligence, 2012(4): 70-75.
	[钟永沣, 周萍. 分学科探讨中国科研机构之国际表现: 科学计量学视角. 情报杂志, 2012(4): 70-75.]
[4]	Ma R M. Chao J N, Qiu J P.Scientific research competitiveness of world universities in computer science. Scientometrics, 2008, 76(2): 245-260. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1913-7
[5]	Calvino A M.Assessment of research performance in food science and technology: Publication behavior of five Iberian-American countries. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 103-116. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0141-x
[6]	Feng Jian.Scientometric analysis of the noteble research institutes [D]. Beijing: Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , 2003.
	[冯坚. 国际著名研究所的文献计量学分析[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2003.]
[7]	Leng Shuying.The Geographical Sciences during 1986-2015: From the Classics to the Frontiers. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2016: 1-16.
	[冷疏影. 地理科学三十年: 从经典到前沿. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016: 1-16.]
[8]	Zhao Fei, Ai Chunyan, You Yue, et al.Bibliometric evaluation of university scientific research: A case study of Peking University. Journal of Academic Libraries, 2014(1): 97-101.
	[赵飞, 艾春艳, 游越, 等. 基于文献计量开展高校科研评估的探索与思考: 以北京大学科研竞争力评估为例. 大学图书馆学报, 2014(1): 97-101.]
[9]	Zhang X X..
	[张晓祥. 1948- 2006 .]
[10]	Qiu Junping, Yang Ruixian, Ding Jingda, et al.Method , features and result analysis on research evaluation of subject com petitiveness of world-class universities and institutions in 2009. Evaluation & Management, 2009, 7(2): 19-28.
	[邱均平, 杨瑞仙, 丁敬达, 等. 2009年世界一流大学与科研机构学科竞争力评价的做法、特色与结果分析. 评价与管理, 2009, 7(2): 19-28.]
[11]	Tess B H, Furuie SS, Castro R C F, et al. Assessing the scientific research productiivity of a Brazilian healthcare institution: A case study at the heart institue of the Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clinics, 2009, 64(6): 571-576. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322009000600013
[12]	Bornmann L, Mutz R.Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(11): 2215-2222. doi: 10.1002/asi.23329
[13]	Lu Ying, Yang Zhiping, Wang Chunming, et al.Analysis on the development trend and the international status of disciplinary research based on SCI papers. Library and Information Service, 2015, 83(4): 15-22.
	[陆颖, 杨志萍, 王春明, 等. 基于SCI 论文的学科领域研究发展态势与国际地位分析. 图书情报工作, 2015, 83(4): 15-22.]
[14]	Wei Ruibin, Tian Dafang, Wu Yishan.Comparative research on the journal citation based on the cited life cycle. Library and Information Service, 2014, 58(1): 81-85.
	[魏瑞斌, 田大芳, 武夷山. 基于被引生命周期的期刊被引的比较研究. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(1): 81-85.]
[15]	Wei Ruibin, Chen Dandan.An empirical analysis of highly cited literature based on citation network. Journal of Modern Infromation, 2011, 31(3): 117-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2011.03.029
	[魏瑞斌, 陈丹丹. 基于引证网络的高被引文献实证分析: 以知识服务为例. 现代情报, 2011, 31(3): 117-121.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2011.03.029
[16]	Garfield E.Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas (Reprinted from Science, vol 122, pg 108-111, 1955). International Journal of Epidemiology, 2006, 35(5): 1123-1127. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl189
[17]	Liu Xueli.The method for defining highly cited papers based on WOS and ESI database. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2012, 23(6): 975-978.
	[刘雪立. 基于Web of Science和ESI数据库高被引论文的界定方法. 中国科技期刊研究, 2012, 23(6): 975-978.]
[18]	Ma Feicheng, Hu Cuihua, Chen Liang.The Theory Basis of Information Management. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2002: 83-90.
	[马费成, 胡翠华, 陈亮. 信息管理学基础. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2002: 83-90.]

一级指标	二级指标
科研生产力	论文总数、论文平均增长率、研究领域相对比重(学科强度)
科研影响力	总被引频次、篇均被引频次、王冠指数
科研发展力	高被引论文占有率、热门论文数
国际合作力	合作论文数、合作论文增长率、合作国家分布