地理学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (6): 974-985.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201706003
收稿日期:
2016-03-30
修回日期:
2017-01-14
出版日期:
2017-06-25
发布日期:
2017-06-25
作者简介:
作者简介:马程(1988-), 女, 山东人, 硕士, 主要从事生态系统服务核算研究。E-mail:
基金资助:
Cheng MA1,2(), Xiaoyue WANG1, Yaxin ZHANG1, Shuangcheng LI1(
)
Received:
2016-03-30
Revised:
2017-01-14
Published:
2017-06-25
Online:
2017-06-25
Supported by:
摘要:
近年来北京市建成区扩张迅速,对城市周边地区的生态系统服务需求上升。本文以北京市生态涵养区为例,利用能值评估方法评估该区域生态系统服务,分析各生态系统及其与城市系统之间的服务流动和依赖关系。研究结果表明:从生态系统类型上看,2012年森林生态系统服务对涵养区生态系统服务贡献最大,占到生态系统服务总能值的79.7%,其次为农田和水域生态系统,分别占总能值的19.7%和0.6%;从生态系统服务类型上看,森林生态系统的有机物生产和水源涵养是其主要的生态系统服务,分别占总能值产出的40.4%和35.8%。粮食供给是农田系统的主要能值输出,占农田生态系统能值的70%。水域提供的生态系统服务中,能值比例较高的依次为水源供给、洪水调蓄和水产品供给,分别占水域生态系统能值的35.1%、28.6%和28.2%;从能值转移矩阵分析可以看出,对城市来说,森林生物量、森林土壤水、水域地下水和农田生物量是重要的生态系统服务供给组分;系统能值动态分析结果表明,2004年到2012年森林和水域生态系统重要程度增加,农田生态系统重要程度有所减少,城市系统的角色由主动变为被动。因此,在未来的发展规划中,对森林和水域生态系统的保育应给予足够关注。
马程, 王晓玥, 张雅昕, 李双成. 北京市生态涵养区生态系统服务供给与流动的能值分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 974-985.
Cheng MA, Xiaoyue WANG, Yaxin ZHANG, Shuangcheng LI. Emergy analysis of ecosystem services supply and flow in Beijing ecological conservation area[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(6): 974-985.
表3
2004年、2008年和2012年北京市生态涵养区不同生态组分在系统中重要性比较
主动累加AS | 被动累加PS | 总累加TS | 主动累加/被动累加Q | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | ||||
森林生态系统 | 1.4E+20 | 1.7E+20 | 3.0E+20 | 8.7E+19 | 1.3E+20 | 2.2E+20 | 2.3E+20 | 3.1E+20 | 5.1E+20 | 1.61 | 1.32 | 1.33 | |||
土壤水 | 3.3E+19 | 5.7E+19 | 1.3E+20 | 9.5E+18 | 3.3E+19 | 5.4E+19 | 4.2E+19 | 9.0E+19 | 1.8E+20 | 3.41 | 1.73 | 4.34 | |||
土壤营养 | 6.8E+19 | 8.2E+19 | 1.4E+20 | 9.8E+18 | 1.4E+19 | 2.5E+19 | 7.8E+19 | 9.7E+19 | 1.7E+20 | 6.96 | 5.84 | 5.72 | |||
生物量 | 4.1E+19 | 3.5E+19 | 2.5E+19 | 6.8E+19 | 8.4E+19 | 1.4E+20 | 1.1E+20 | 1.2E+20 | 1.7E+20 | 0.59 | 0.41 | 0.18 | |||
农田生态系统 | 7.8E+20 | 5.0E+20 | 1.5E+20 | 2.3E+20 | 2.0E+20 | 2.9E+20 | 1.0E+21 | 7.0E+20 | 4.4E+20 | 3.45 | 2.47 | 0.52 | |||
土壤水 | 7.9E+19 | 6.6E+19 | 1.1E+19 | 8.5E+19 | 9.2E+19 | 2.2E+20 | 1.6E+20 | 1.6E+20 | 2.3E+20 | 0.93 | 0.72 | 0.05 | |||
土壤营养 | 7.8E+19 | 4.9E+19 | 1.9E+19 | 5.1E+19 | 3.6E+19 | 1.3E+19 | 1.3E+20 | 8.5E+19 | 3.2E+19 | 1.51 | 1.36 | 1.47 | |||
生物量 | 6.2E+20 | 3.9E+20 | 1.2E+20 | 9.1E+19 | 7.6E+19 | 6.1E+19 | 7.1E+20 | 4.6E+20 | 1.8E+20 | 6.90 | 5.11 | 2.00 | |||
水域生态系统 | 6.5E+19 | 1.5E+20 | 2.9E+20 | 2.3E+19 | 1.1E+20 | 2.3E+20 | 8.8E+19 | 2.6E+20 | 5.2E+20 | 2.85 | 1.36 | 1.27 | |||
上游 | 5.2E+19 | 8.3E+19 | 2.2E+20 | 1.4E+19 | 7.4E+19 | 1.9E+20 | 6.5E+19 | 1.6E+20 | 4.0E+20 | 3.79 | 1.12 | 1.16 | |||
下游 | 1.4E+19 | 6.5E+19 | 7.6E+19 | 9.3E+18 | 3.5E+19 | 4.3E+19 | 2.3E+19 | 1.0E+20 | 1.2E+20 | 1.47 | 1.85 | 1.78 | |||
地下水 | 8.5E+15 | 1.0E+16 | 3.3E+16 | 6.6E+16 | 4.8E+16 | 4.9E+17 | 7.4E+16 | 5.8E+16 | 5.2E+17 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.07 | |||
城市系统 | 6.5E+21 | 9.9E+21 | 2.3E+22 | 2.4E+21 | 9.7E+21 | 2.4E+22 | 8.9E+21 | 2.0E+22 | 4.7E+22 | 2.71 | 1.03 | 0.95 |
[1] |
Zasada I.Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 2011, 28(4): 639-648.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008 |
[2] |
Aubry C, Ramamonjisoa J, Dabat M H, et al.Urban agriculture and land use in cities: An approach with the multi-functionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo (Madagascar). Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(2): 429-439.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.009 |
[3] | Temple L, Moustier P.The functions and constraints of peri-urban agriculture of several African cities (Yaoundé, Cotonou, Dakar). Cahiers Agricultures, 2004, 13: 15-22. |
[4] |
Haase D, Nuissl H.Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870-2003. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 80(1): 1-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.011 |
[5] |
Kenyon W, Hill G, Shannon P.Scoping the role of agriculture in sustainable flood management. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25(3): 351-360.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.09.003 |
[6] |
Wheater H, Evans E.Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(Suppl.1): S251-S264.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.019 |
[7] |
Lamptey B L, Barron E J, Pollard D.Impacts of agriculture and urbanization on the climate of the Northeastern United States. Global and Planetary Change, 2005, 49: 203-221.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2005.10.001 |
[8] |
Hutchinson J J, Campbell C A, Desjardins R L.Some perspectives on carbon sequestration in agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 142: 288-302.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.030 |
[9] |
Davoudi S, Stead D.Urban-rural relationships: An introduction and brief history. Built Environment, 2002, 28(4): 269-277.
doi: 10.2307/23287748 |
[10] | Ba A, Moustier P.Perception of proximity agriculture by the residents of Dakar. Journal of Regional & Urban Economy, 2010(5): 913-936. |
[11] |
Sullivan W C, Lovell S T.Improving the visual quality of commercial development at the rural-urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 77: 152-166.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.008 |
[12] | Ülo Mander, Wiggering H, Helming K. Multifunctional Land Use. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2007: 93-104. |
[13] |
Overbeek G.Opportunities for rural-urban relationships to enhance the rural landscape. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2009, 11(1): 61-68.
doi: 10.1080/15239080902775058 |
[14] |
Huang S L, Chen Y H, Kuo F Y, et al.Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity, 2011, 8(1): 38-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.12.002 |
[15] |
Xie Hualin, Li Bo, Liu Liming, et al.Functional evaluation of mountain landscape: A case study of Huairou District, Beijing City. Mountain Research, 2004, 22(6): 756-761.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2004.06.020 |
[谢花林, 李波, 刘黎明, 等. 北京山区景观功能评价: 以北京市怀柔区为例. 山地学报, 2004, 22(6): 756-761.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2004.06.020 |
|
[16] | Huang Jiao.Land use management based on ecosystem services districts in peri-urban area: An exploratory study for Beijing [D]. Beijing: Peking University, 2012. |
[黄姣. 基于生态系统服务区的城市周边地区土地利用管理: 以北京为例的探索研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2012.] | |
[17] | Li Yunyan.The implementation approaches and policies and measures of ecological compensation mechanism for Beijing ecological conservation districts. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2011, 7(12): 75-80. |
[李云燕. 北京市生态涵养区生态补偿机制的实施途径与政策措施. 中央财经大学学报, 2011, 7(12): 75-80.] | |
[18] | Daily G.Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. California: Island Press, 1997. |
[19] | Tang Cuiwen, Yang Shasha, Liu Lijuan, et al.Ecological services value of forest ecosystem in eastern Qilian Mountains based on emergy theory. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(2): 433-439. |
[汤萃文, 杨莎莎, 刘丽娟, 等. 基于能值理论的东祁连山森林生态系统服务功能价值评价. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(2): 433-439.] | |
[20] | Ma Fengjiao, Liu Jintong.Agriculture ecosystem services assessment based on emergy analysis in Luancheng County. Resources Science, 2014, 36(9): 1949-1957. |
[马凤娇, 刘金铜. 基于能值分析的农田生态系统服务评估: 以河北省栾城县为例. 资源科学, 2014, 36(9): 1949-1957.] | |
[21] | Zhang Pei, Yao Juan.Research on change of lakes-rivers ecosystem services energy value at Big Kanas tourism area. Water Resources and Power, 2015, 33(8): 37-41. |
[张佩, 姚娟. 大喀纳斯旅游区湖泊—河流生态系统服务能值变化研究. 水电能源科学, 2015, 33(8): 37-41.] | |
[22] |
Vester F.The biocybernetic approach as a basis for planning our environment. Systemic Practice, 1988, 1(4): 399-413.
doi: 10.1007/BF01066582 |
[23] | Folke C, Jansson A, Larsson J, et al.Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 1997, 26(3): 167-172. |
[24] |
Xie G D, Chen W H, Cao S Y, et al.The outward extension of an ecological footprint in city expansion: The case of Beijing. Sustainability, 2014, 6(12): 9371-9386.
doi: 10.3390/su6129371 |
[1] | 张琨, 吕一河, 傅伯杰, 尹礼唱, 于丹丹. 黄土高原植被覆盖变化对生态系统服务影响及其阈值[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 949-960. |
[2] | 张静静, 朱文博, 朱连奇, 李艳红. 伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 975-988. |
[3] | 于贵瑞, 李文华, 邵明安, 张扬建, 王绍强, 牛书丽, 何洪林, 戴尔阜, 李发东, 马泽清. 生态系统科学研究与生态系统管理[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2620-2635. |
[4] | 李睿倩, 李永富, 胡恒. 生态系统服务对国土空间规划体系的理论与实践支撑[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2417-2430. |
[5] | 刘立程, 刘春芳, 王川, 李鹏杰. 黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937. |
[6] | 颜俨,姚柳杨,郎亮明,赵敏娟. 基于Meta回归方法的中国内陆河流域生态系统服务价值再评估[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 1040-1057. |
[7] | 乔治, 黄宁钰, 徐新良, 孙宗耀, 吴晨, 杨俊. 2003-2017年北京市地表热力景观时空分异特征及演变规律[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 475-489. |
[8] | 陈峰, 李红波, 张安录. 基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 432-445. |
[9] | 王亮,刘慧. 基于PS-DR-DP理论模型的区域资源环境承载力综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 340-352. |
[10] | 曾莉,李晶,李婷,杨晓楠,王彦泽. 基于贝叶斯网络的水源涵养服务空间格局优化[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1809-1822. |
[11] | 赵美风,戚伟,刘盛和. 北京市流动人口聚居区空间分异及形成机理[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1494-1512. |
[12] | 秦静,李郎平,唐鸣镝,孙岩,宋昕芮. 基于地理标记照片的北京市入境旅游流空间特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1556-1570. |
[13] | 曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,吴健生. 景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架: ESRISK[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 843-855. |
[14] | 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,柳冬青,马学成. 甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 868-879. |
[15] | 彭建, 李慧蕾, 刘焱序, 胡熠娜, 杨旸. 雄安新区生态安全格局识别与优化策略[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 701-710. |