基于二分网络的北京公交线路布局的空间依赖性

doi:10.11821/dlxb201612009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

公交网络运行系统的结构性缺陷常常致使其成为城市交通拥堵的罪魁祸首。传统公交网络空间研究皆将其视为一个独立的交通运输方式,忽视了城市道路网形态与结构的内生作用。本文基于二分网络的思想,通过构建公交线路—城市道路的空间依赖矩阵,引入系列空间依赖度测度指标从局域、全局两个尺度探讨了北京市的公交线路的空间依赖度及依赖的核心空间,并通过社团识别对北京市公交线路的依赖空间进行了划分。结果发现：① 局域依赖度方面,北京市公交线路布局高度依赖度少数城市主干道和城—郊区快速干道,其空间依赖格局形成了以市中心为核心,以城—郊区快速干道为通道的中心—外围的廊道扩散格局;② 全局依赖度方面,北京市公交线路空间布局结构失衡,比较脆弱,受城市道路路面路况影响较大,同时以四环为模糊边界的市中心区域成为北京市公交线路依赖的核心空间;③ 依赖空间划分上,北京市公交线路布局与城市地域空间呈现良好的对应性,朝阳、海淀、三环内（东城和西城）是公交线路布局规模最密的3个区域。

关键词: 公交线路, 城市道路, 空间依赖, 二分网络, 北京市

Abstract:

As the subnet is derived from and supplied by urban road network, public transport network (PTN) owes its maximum development to the development level of urban road network. The structural defects of PTN often make itself the culprit of urban traffic congestion. Traditional research on spatial distribution of PTN tends to regard PTN as an independent mode of transportation, but overlooks the endogenous effect of urban road network’s morphology and structure. Based on the idea of binary network, this paper discusses the local and global spatial dependency of Beijing bus-line distribution by constructing the space correlation matrix between bus-line and city road and introducing dependency measures from 1-mode network. This endeavor also divides the dependence space of Beijing bus-line by community detection with the help of the software named Ucinet 6. We find out that in terms of local dependence, the layout of bus-line is highly dependent on a few city trunk roads and expressway connecting downtown and suburb, so its spatial dependence pattern becomes a corridor diffusion pattern of core-periphery, which takes the downtown as the core and the rapid suburban corridors as the channel. In terms of global dependence, the unbalanced distribution structure of bus-line seems more fragile and is greatly influenced by the city road traffic conditions. Meanwhile, the downtown area bounded by the Forth Ring becomes the core space of bus-line dependence. In terms of space division, the layout of Beijing bus-line presents good correspondence to the city districts. To exemplify this, Chaoyang District, Haidian District and the area within the Third Ring Road have the densest bus-line distributions.

Key words: bus-line, city road, spatial dependency, bipartite network, Beijing city

段德忠, 刘承良, 杜德斌, 桂钦昌. 基于二分网络的北京公交线路布局的空间依赖性[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(12): 2185-2198.

Dezhong DUAN, Chengliang LIU, Debin DU, Qinchang GUI. Spatial dependency of bus-line distribution based on bipartite network: A case study of Beijing city[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(12): 2185-2198.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

参考文献 26

[1]	Da Fuwen.A research on the character of spatial distribution and accessibility of public transportation of Lanzhou City [D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2013.
	[达福文. 兰州市公共交通空间分布特征及其可达性研究.[D] 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2013.]
[2]	Calvin P Tribby, Paul A Zandbergen.High-resolution spatio-temporal modeling of public transit accessibility. Applied Geography, 2012, 34: 345-355. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.008
[3]	Yuval Hadas, Prakash Ranjitkar.Modeling public-transit connectivity with spatial quality-of-transfer measurements. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012, 22: 137-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.003
[4]	He Baohong, Chen Lichang, Gao Liangpeng, et al.Public transport stop accessibility measure and its application in parking zoning. Human Geography, 2015, 30(3): 97-102.
	[何保红, 陈丽昌, 高良鹏, 等. 公交站点可达性测度及其在停车分区中的应用. 人文地理, 2015, 30(3): 97-102.]
[5]	Guedes M C M, Oliveira N, Santiago S, et al. On the evaluation of a public transportation network quality: Criteria validation methodology. Research in Transportation Economics, 2012, 36(1): 29-44. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.03.013
[6]	Das S, Pandit D.Importance of user perception in evaluating level of service for bus transit for a developing country like India: A review. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 2013, 33(4): 402-420. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2013.789571
[7]	Timothy F, Welch A, Sabyasachee M.A measure of equity for public transit connectivity. Journal of Transport Geography, 2013, 33: 29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.007
[8]	Ji Jue, Gao Xiaolu.Evaluating urban structure by modeling satisfaction towards public transportation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(12): 1477-1487.
	[季珏, 高晓路. 北京城区公共交通满意度模型与空间结构评价. 地理学报, 2009, 64(12): 1477-1487.]
[9]	Duan Dezhong, Liu Chengliang, Chen Xinyi.Study on the complexity of the public transportation network spatial structure based on fractal theory: Taking Wuhan center city area as an example. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2013, 29(2): 66-71. doi: 10.7702/dlydlxxkx20130214
	[段德忠, 刘承良, 陈欣怡. 基于分形理论的公交网络空间结构复杂性研究: 以武汉市中心城区为例. 地理与地理信息科学, 2013, 29(2): 66-71.] doi: 10.7702/dlydlxxkx20130214
[10]	Xu Qing, Zu Zhenghu, Xu Zhijing, et al.Space P-based empirical research on public transport complex networks in 330 cities of China. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information, 2013, 13(1): 193-198. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6744.2013.01.029
	[许晴, 祖正虎, 徐致靖, 等. 330个中国城市P空间下公交复杂网络实证研究. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2013, 13(1): 193-198.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6744.2013.01.029
[11]	Michael G, Bell H.A game theory approach to measure the performance reliability of transport network. Transport Research Part B, 2000, 34: 533-545. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00042-9
[12]	Huang Xiaoyan, Zhang Shuang, Cao Xiaoshu.Spatial-temporal evolution of Guangzhou subway accessibility and its effects on the accessibility of public transportation services. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(8): 1078-1089. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.08.008
	[黄晓燕, 张爽, 曹小曙. 广州市地铁可达性时空演化及其对公交可达性的影响. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(8): 1078-1089.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.08.008
[13]	Curl A, Davison L.Transport geography: Perspectives upon entering an accomplished research sub-discipline. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 38: 100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.05.018
[14]	Walker J.Purpose-driven public transport: Creating a clear conversation about public transport goals. Journal of Transport Geography, 2008, 16: 438-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.06.005
[15]	Xiao Zhanxin, Hu Kunpeng.Study on low-carbon development path of public transportation in Pearl River Bay area. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(9): 112-119. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.09.015
	[肖展欣, 胡坤鹏. 珠江口湾区公共交通低碳发展路径研究. 经济地理, 2015, 35(9): 112-119.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.09.015
[16]	Seaborn C, Attanucci J, Wilson N. Analyzing multimodal public transport journeys in London with smart card fare payment data. Transport. Res. Rec., 2009, 2121: 55-62. doi: 10.3141/2121-06
[17]	Morency C, Trépanier M, Agard B.Measuring transit use variability with smart-card data. Transportation Policy, 2007, 14: 193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.01.001
[18]	Long Ying, Zhang Yu, Cui Chengyin.Identifying commuting pattern of Beijing using bus smart card data. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(10): 1339-1352. doi: 10.11821/xb201210005
	[龙瀛, 张宇, 崔承印. 利用公交刷卡数据分析北京职住关系和通勤出行. 地理学报, 2012, 67(10): 1339-1352.] doi: 10.11821/xb201210005
[19]	Chen Zhongnuan, Guo Minling, Xu Minlin, et al.Study on the evolution of residents reachable spatial based on regular bus transit in Guangzhou City. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(11): 1797-1803.
	[陈忠暖, 郭敏玲, 许敏琳, 等. 建国以来广州居民市内出行可达空间的演变: 基于常规公交视角的研究. 经济地理, 2010, 30(11): 1797-1803.]
[20]	Sen P, Dasgupta S, Chatterjee A, et al.Small-world properties of the Indian railway network. Physical Review E, 2003, 67(3): 036106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.036106 pmid: 12689131
[21]	Faust K.Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks, 1997, 19: 157-191. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00300-0
[22]	Fu Guangmei, Wang Hong, Ma Xiaohui.Bipartite network community structure partition based on topological characteristic. Computer Engineering, 2012, 38(12): 36-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3428.2012.12.010
	[符光梅, 王红, 马晓慧. 基于拓扑特征的二分网络社团结构划分. 计算机工程, 2012, 38(12): 36-38.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3428.2012.12.010
[23]	Xu Yongcheng, Chen Ling, Li Bin, et al.Density-based modularity for evaluating community structure in bipartite networks. Information Sciences, 2015, 317: 278-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.04.049
[24]	Zhang Peng, Wang Jinliang, Li Xiaojia, et al.Clustering coefficient and community structure of bipartite networks. Physica A, 2008, 387: 6869-6875. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.09.006
[25]	Wu Yajing, Zhang Peng, Di Zengru, et al.Study on bipartite networks. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2010, 7(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3813.2010.01.001
	[吴亚晶, 张鹏, 狄增如, 等. 二分网络研究. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2010, 7(1): 1-12.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3813.2010.01.001
[26]	Barber M J.Modularity and community detection in bipartite networks. Physical Review E, 2007, 76: 066102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.066102 pmid: 18233893

社团	社团规模				度中心性
社团	节点数总数		城市道路数	公交线路数	城市道路节点度平均	公交线路节点度平均
朝阳	462	283	179		6.763	12.117
海淀	430	253	177		7.941	10.808
三环内(东城—西城)	404	254	150		7.272	12.193
大兴	302	229	73		4.323	14.192
昌平—延庆	291	182	109		5.049	8.431
通州	263	158	105		6.418	8.562
亦庄	259	181	78		5.790	13.667
顺义	246	170	76		5.806	12.697
门头沟—石景山	246	163	83		5.690	10.875
房山	233	145	88		7.972	11.841
密云	165	104	61		6.212	10.738
怀柔	156	91	65		6.582	9.569
丰台	156	101	55		6.257	10.164
平谷	142	98	44		3.745	9.000