基于合理权重赋值方法选择的多因素综合评价模型——以JCR中70种人文地理期刊为例

doi:10.11821/dlxb201512012

地理学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 70 ›› Issue (12): 2011-2031.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201512012

基于合理权重赋值方法选择的多因素综合评价模型——以JCR中70种人文地理期刊为例

钟赛香^1,²(), 胡鹏³, 薛熙明⁴, 杨硕⁵, 朱佩娟⁶()

1. 武汉大学资源与环境科学学院,武汉 430079
2. 伦敦大学皇家霍洛威学院,英国伦敦 TW20 0EX
3. 武汉大学数学与统计科学学院,武汉 430079
4. 西南民族大学旅游与文化学院,成都 610064
5. 中国研究院国王学院,英国伦敦 WC2R 2LS
6. 湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院,长沙 410081

收稿日期:2015-01-10 修回日期:2015-10-16 出版日期:2015-12-25 发布日期:2016-01-05
作者简介:
作者简介：钟赛香(1978-), 女, 湖南人, 博士, 讲师, 研究方向为文化地理。E-mail: zhongsx.04b@whu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家基础科学人才培养基金项目(J1103409);国家留学基金项目;国家自然科学基金项目(41371164) [Foundation: Fund for Forstering Talents in Basic Science of National Natural Science Foundation of China, NoJ1103409;The China Scholarship Foundation;National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41371164]

Multi-factor comprehensive evaluation model based on the selection of objective weight assignment method

Saixiang ZHONG^1,²(), Peng HU³, Ximing XUE⁴, Shuo YANG⁵, Peijuan ZHU⁶()

1. School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
2. Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, London TW20 0EX, UK
3. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
4. College of Tourism and Historical Culture, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610064, China
5. Lau China Institute, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
6. School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Received:2015-01-10 Revised:2015-10-16 Online:2015-12-25 Published:2016-01-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对地理学多因素综合评价中较少探讨指标权重赋值方法的选择,以及少有研究涉及人文地理期刊的多因素综合评价,本文设计了基于合理权重赋值方法选择的多因素综合评价模型,并将其应用于科学网数据库内的“期刊引证报告（JCR）”中分类为人文地理类的70种人文地理期刊的综合评价。该模型针对7种指标权重客观赋值方法,采用“异同比较”,分析不同方法在不同参数设置下和聚类与否情况下的权重值、评价值和评价序的变化特征与分布规律,并依据该变化特征与分布规律,实现了对各种方法的“优劣比较”和最优选择。应用该模型对JCR中70种人文地理期刊进行排序分等,其中排名第一的“全球环境变化和政策”等14种期刊为位列第一等分的高影响力期刊。本研究完善了多因素综合评价体系,也丰富了对人文地理期刊的认知。

关键词: 客观权重赋值方法, 多因素综合评价, 权重赋值方法选择模型, 学术期刊评价, 人文地理期刊

Abstract:

The selection of weight assignment methods in multi-factor comprehensive evaluation has been rarely discussed in geographical research. There are fewer reports concerning comprehensive evaluation of human geography journals. In this paper we propose a selection model of weight assignment methods (SWAM) for multi-factor comprehensive evaluation so as to obtain rational and appropriate weight assignment methods among a pool of candidates. Specifically, each weight assignment method SWAM conducted a 'Similar-Different' comparison to analyze the change of weight distribution, as well as the evaluation score and indicator order, according to different parameter settings and adoption of clustering. Then through the comparison of 'Good-Bad', the rational and appropriate indicator-weight assignment methods were picked up. Focusing on seven objective weight assignment methods, SWAM was finally applied for comprehensive evaluation of 70 journals of human geography sorted as geography in the database of "Journal Citation Reports" from the scientific network (Web of Science, WoB) in which the data spans from 1st January 1900 to 31st December 2012. The research results show: (1) Objective weight assignment methods in this research can be divided into five groups, namely maximizingDev, variationCoe, factorAna; greyCor-0.5; entropy; principalComAna-0.8; informationGra-0.5; (2) Change of indicator clustering parameters led to change of indicator clustering results, and has influence on weight assignment; (3) SWAM selects maximizingDev, variationCoe, factorAna-0.9 and informationGra-0.5 as the rational methods for the case study; (4) When the size of sample is relatively large, the output of grade in multi-factor comprehensive evaluation is more informative than the output of order; (5) 14 journals, led by Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, are marked as first-grade high-prestige group in 70 human geography journals in JCR; (6) Journal's impact factor is important, but the H-index, the distribution of authors of citing articles and the quality of citing articles, can better reflect the journal's level and international influence. This study highlights to improve the multi-factor comprehensive evaluation research and enrich the knowledge about human geography journals.

Key words: objective weight assignment methods, multi-factor comprehensive evaluation, Selection model of Weight Assignment Methods (SWAM), evaluation of academic journals, journals of human geography

钟赛香, 胡鹏, 薛熙明, 杨硕, 朱佩娟. 基于合理权重赋值方法选择的多因素综合评价模型——以JCR中70种人文地理期刊为例[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(12): 2011-2031.

Saixiang ZHONG, Peng HU, Ximing XUE, Shuo YANG, Peijuan ZHU. Multi-factor comprehensive evaluation model based on the selection of objective weight assignment method[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(12): 2011-2031.

图/表 17

表1

表2

表3

图1

表4

表5

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表6

70种人文地理期刊综合排序分等"

期刊	排序1			排序2	排序差		分等1		分等2		分等差
Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions	1			1	0		1		1		0
Journal of Geographical Systems	2			2	0		1		1		0
International Journal of Geographical Information Science	3			3	0		1		1		0
Journal of Economic Geography	4			4	0		1		1		0
Economic Geography	5			5	0		1		1		0
Landscape and Urban Planning	6			6	0		1		1		0
Environment and Planning A	7			8	1		1		1		0
Environment and Planning D-Society & Space	8			9	1		1		1		0
Computers Environment and Urban Systems	9			7	-2		1		1		0
Annals of the Association of American Geographers	10			14	4		1		1		0
Geoforum	11			15	4		1		2		1
Applied Geography	12			13	1		1		1		0
Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography	13			11	-2		1		1		0
Journal of Geography in Higher Education	14			10	-4		1		1		0
New Zealand Geographer	15			12	-3		2		1		-1
Journal of Transport Geography	16			18	2		2		2		0
Australian Geographer	17			16	-1		2		2		0
Political Geography	18			21	3		2		2		0
Geographical Research-Aus	19			17	-2		2		2		0
Regional Studies	20			23	3		2		2		0
Asia Pacific Viewpoint	21			19	-2		2		2		0
Progress in Human Geography	22			26	4		2		2		0
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers	23			27	4		2		2		0
Geopolitics	24			22	-2		2		2		0
Urban Policy and Research	25			20	-5		2		2		0
Geographical Analysis	26			39	13		2		3		1
Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography	27			24	-3		2		2		0
Erdkunde	28			25	-3		2		2		0
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research	29			37	8		3		3		0
Professional Geographer	30			33	3		3		3		0
Landscape Research	31			28	-3		3		2		-1
Papers In Regional Science	32			32	0		3		3		0
Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs	33			40	7		3		3		0
Antipode	34			43	9		3		4		1
European Planning Studies	35			31	-4		3		3		0
Mobilities	36			35	-1		3		3		0
Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie	37			30	-7		3		3		0
Geography	38			29	-9		3		3		0
Geographical Review	39			34	-5		3		3		0
Annals of Regional Science	40			42	2		3		3		0
Geographical Journal	41			36	-5		3		3		0
Sud-Ouest Europeen	42			38	-4		3		3		0
Scripta Nova-Revista Electronica de Geografia Y Ciencias Sociales	43			41	-2		4		3		-1
Social & Cultural Geography	44			45	1		4		4		0
期刊		排序1	排序2			排序差		分等1		分等2	分等差
Gender Place and Culture		45	44			-1		4		4	0
Cartographic Journal		46	46			0		4		4	0
Population Space and Place		47	47			0		4		4	0
Cultural Geographies		48	48			0		4		4	0
Journal of Historical Geography		49	49			0		4		4	0
Eurasian Geography and Economics		50	53			3		4		4	0
Transactions in GIS		51	50			-1		4		4	0
Area		52	57			5		4		5	1
Urban Geography		53	56			3		4		4	0
Scottish Geographical Journal		54	52			-2		4		4	0
Childrens Geographies		55	59			4		4		5	1
Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography		56	54			-2		4		4	0
Geographische Zeitschrift		57	51			-6		5		4	-1
Space and Culture		58	55			-3		5		4	-1
Mitteilungen der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft		59	58			-1		5		5	0
Journal of Maps		60	61			1		5		5	0
Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie		61	60			-1		5		5	0
South African Geographical Journal		62	63			1		5		5	0
Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography		63	62			-1		5		5	0
Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien		64	64			0		5		5	0
Journal of Geography		65	66			1		5		5	0
Erde		66	65			-1		5		5	0
Boletin de la Asociacion de Geografos Espanoles		67	68			1		5		5	0
Geografie		68	67			-1		5		5	0
Revista de Geografia Norte Grande		69	69			0		5		5	0
Geodetski Vestnik		70	70			0		5		5	0

表6

图10

表7

参考文献 30

[1]	Xu Fei. Applying grey theory and fuzzy mathematic method to determine index weight. The 16th National Symposium on Computer Science and Education, 2005. Urumchi: National Computer Science and Computer Education Proceedings.
	[徐飞. 利用灰色理论和模糊数学方法确定指标权重. 第16届全国计算机新科技与计算机教育学术会议. 乌鲁木齐: 全国计算机新科技与计算机教育论文集.]
[2]	Xu Y, Da Q.An Objective and Subjective Synthetic Approach to Detemine Weights Based on Ideal-Solution for Multi-attribute Decision Making. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2005, 10(4): 45-47.
[3]	Zhang Haitao. Liu Chaoying, Tian Shui.Subjective and objective weights determined by a comprehensive law. Journal of Jianghan University (Natural Sciences), 2004, 32(4): 63-65.
	[张海涛, 刘超英, 田水. 权重确定的主客观综合法. 江汉大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 32(4): 63-65.]
[4]	Zhao X, Yao A, Guo L, et al.Study on determination of risk factors weight at process units in Gas Transmission Station based on AHP-entropy method. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012.
[5]	Ma G, He G.The synthetic method of selecting weight. Journal of Northwest Normal Unviersity(Natural Science), 2000, 36(3): 25-27.
[6]	Leng Shuying, Li Xiubin.New progresses of International Study on Land Quality Indicators (LQ Is). Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(2): 178-185. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1999.02.010
	[冷疏影, 李秀彬. 土地质量指标体系国际研究的新进展. 地理学报, 1999, 54(2): 178-185.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1999.02.010
[7]	Wang Qiang, Wu Shidai, Li Yongshi, et al.The application of major function oriented zoning in Fujian Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(6): 725-735. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.06.009
	[王强, 伍世代, 李永实, 等. 福建省域主体功能区划分实践. 地理学报, 2009, 64(6): 725-735.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.06.009
[8]	Liu Changshun, Liu Changming, Yang Hong.Zoning for water resource management in the Haihe River Basin. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(3): 349-356.
	[柳长顺, 刘昌明, 杨红. 海河流域水资源管理分区研究. 地理学报, 2004, 59(3): 349-356.]
[9]	Xu Xueqiang, Zhang Junjun.Comprehensive evaluation of Guangzhou urban sustainable development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(1): 54-63. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2001.01.007
	[许学强, 张俊军. 广州城市可持续发展的综合评价. 地理学报, 2001, 56(1): 54-63.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2001.01.007
[10]	Zhao Yan, Wang Zhiguo, Sun Baoping, et al.A primary study on scheme of soil and water conservation regionalization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(3): 307-317.
	[赵岩, 王治国, 孙保平, 等. 中国水土保持区划方案初步研究. 地理学报, 2013, 68(3): 307-317.]
[11]	Qin Yaochen, Xu Mingjie.Study on the indicators of regional sustainable development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(2): 149-156.
	[秦耀辰, 徐铭杰. 区域持续发展的指标研究. 地理学报, 1998, 53(2): 149-156.]
[12]	Dai Quanhou, Liu Guobin, Liu Mingyi, et al.An evaluation on sustainable development of eco-economic system in small watershed in hilly area of Northeast China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(2): 209-218.
	[戴全厚, 刘国彬, 刘明义, 等. 小流域生态经济系统可持续发展评价. 地理学报, 2005, 60(2): 209-218.]
[13]	Li Guoping, Xuan Zhaohui, Li Fang.The distribution and types of old industrial areas in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(4): 469-478. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2002.04.012
	[李国平, 玄兆辉, 李方. 中国夕阳产业地域划分及其类型. 地理学报, 2002, 57(4): 469-478.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2002.04.012
[14]	Li Xiaoyu, Xiao Duning, He Xingyuan, et al.Integrated assessment of oases maturity in inland river basins of China. Acta Geographic Sinica, 2006, 61(8): 855-864.
	[李小玉, 肖笃宁, 何兴元, 等. 中国内陆河流域绿洲发育度的综合评价. 地理学报, 2006, 61(8): 855-864.]
[15]	Fang Chuanglin, Mao Hanying.A system of indicators for regional development planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(5): 410-419. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1999.05.004
	[方创琳, 毛汉英. 区域发展规划指标体系建立方法探讨. 地理学报, 1999, 54(5): 410-419.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1999.05.004
[16]	Giles M W, Garand J C.Ranking political science journals: Reputational and citational approaches. PS: Political Science & Politics, 2007, 40(4): 741-751.
[17]	Garfield E.Science Citation Index-A new dimension in indexing. Science, 1964, 144(3619): 649-654.
[18]	Garfield E.The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Jama, 2006, 295(1): 90-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90 pmid: 16391221
[19]	Garfield E.Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. American Association for the Advancement of Science.Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, 1972.
[20]	White M J, White K G.Citation analysis of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 1977, 32(5): 301. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.32.5.301
[21]	Goh C, Holsapple C, Johnson L, et al.An empirical assessment of influences on POM research. Omega, 1996, 24(3): 337-345. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00064-X
[22]	Brown L D, Huefner R J.The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals: Views of senior accounting faculty in leading US MBA Programs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1994, 11(1): 223-250. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00442.x
[23]	Donohue J M, Fox J B.A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academics. Omega, 2000, 28(1): 17-36. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00024-9
[24]	González-Pereira B, Guerrero-Bote V P, Moya-Anegón F. A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(3): 379-391. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002
[25]	Guerrero-Bote V P, Moya-Anegón F A further step forward in measuring journals' scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6(4): 674-688. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001
[26]	Xu Z, Cheang B, Lim A, et al.Evaluating OR/MS journals via PageRank. Interfaces, 2011, 41(4): 375-388. doi: 10.2307/23016365
[27]	Chean B, Chu S K W, Li C, et al. OR/MS journals evaluation based on a refined PageRank method: An updated and more comprehensive review. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(2): 339-361. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1272-0
[28]	Pinski G, Narin F.Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management, 1976, 12(5): 297-312. doi: 10.1016/0306-4573(76)90048-0
[29]	Zhuang Y, Liu X, Nguyen T, et al.Global remote sensing research trends during 1991-2010: a bibliometric analysis.Scientometrics, 2013, 96(1): 203-219. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0918-z
[30]	Liu Shulin, Qiu Wanhua.Studies on the basic theories for MADM. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 1998, 18(1): 38-43.
	[刘树林, 邱菀华. 多属性决策基础理论研究. 系统工程理论与实践, 1998, 18(1): 38-43.]

	无需事先获知综合评价值	需事先获知综合评价值
客观方法	灰色关联分析法、变异系数法、熵值法、因子分析法、主成分分析法、信息粒度法、离差最大法、相关系数法	回归分析法、BP神经网络法、粗糙集法
主观方法	德尔菲法、比较矩阵法(包括层次分析法、模糊矩阵法)、专家排序法、古林法(又叫环比评分法)、秩和比方法

期刊名称
Ann Regional Sci	Environ Plann A	Geogr Res-Aust	J Maps	Rev Geogr Norte Gd
Ann Assoc Am Geogr	Environ Plann D	Geogr Rev	J Transp Geogr	Scot Geogr J
Antipode	Erde	Geogr Z	Landscape Urban Plan	Scripta Nova
Appl Geogr	Erdkunde	Geography	Landscape Res	Singapore J Trop Geo
Area	Eurasian Geogr Econ	Geopolitics	Mitt Osterr Geogr G	Soc Cult Geogr
Asia Pac Viewp	Eur Plan Stud	Global Environ Chang	Mobilities-Uk	S Afr Geogr J
Aust Geogr	Gender Place Cult	Globan Netw	New Zeal Geogr	Space Cult
B Asoc Geogr Esp	Geod Vestn	Int J Geogr Inf Sci	Norsk Geogr Tidsskr	Sud-Ouest Eur
Can Geogr-Geogr Can	Geoforum	Int J Urban Regional	Pap Reg Sci	Tijdschr Econ Soc Ge
Cartogr J	Geografie-Prague	J Econ Geogr	Polit Geogr	T Gis
Child Geogr	Geogr Tidsskr-Den	J Geogr Syst	Popul Space Place	T I Brit Geogr
Comput Environ Urban	Geogr Ann B	J Geogr	Prof Geogr	Urban Geogr
Cult Geogr	Geogr Anal	J Geogr Higher Educ	Prog Hum Geog	Urban Policy Res
Econ Geogr	Geogr J	J Hist Geogr	Reg Stud	Z Wirtschaftsgeogr

指标名称	指标解释	计算公式	属性类型
ATC	某期刊文献篇均被引频次	TC/TP×100%_{TC: 被引频次, TP: 文章数量}	效益型
IF₅	某期刊文献5年平均影响因子(2006-2010)	∑IF_2006-2010/5	效益型
IF₁₀	某期刊文献10年平均影响因子(2001-2010)	∑IF_2001-2010/10	效益型
IF₍₂₀₁₁₎	某期刊文献2011年影响因子(2011)		效益型
H-index	某期刊高引指数	H-index(f)= max_i\min (f(i), i)	效益型
P_ofP_H-index	某期刊高引文献占所刊文献比重	H-index/TP×100%	效益型
P_ofCA_bySCIE	某期刊所有施引文献被SCIE收录比重	CA by SCIE/CA×100%	效益型
P_ofCAnj_bySCIE	非本刊文献的其他施引文献被SCIE收录比重	CAnjbySCIE/CAnj×100%	效益型
P_ofFAU_TPCountry	某期刊所在国家作者在该期刊发表文章比重	FAU_TPCountry/TP×100%	成本型
P_ofFAU_TPCity	某期刊所在城市作者在该期刊发表文章比重	FAU_TPCity/TP×100%	成本型
P_ofFAU_CACountry	某期刊施引文献作者所在国家与该期刊所在国家一致的文献比重	FAU_CACountry/CA×100%	成本型
P_ofFAU_CACity	某期刊施引文献作者所在城市与该期刊所在城市一致的文献比重	FAU_CACity/CA×100%	成本型

聚类参数	0.030	0.040	0.150	0.170	0.380	0.410	0.445	0.450	0.630	0.640	0.720	0.840
ATC
P_ofP_H-index
IF₅
IF₁₀
IF₍₂₀₁₁₎
H-index
P_ofFAUTP_Country
P_ofFAUCA_Country
P_ofCAnj_bySCIE
P_ofFAUCA_City
P_ofFAUTP_City
P_ofCA_bySCIE

方法分组	所含指标	分组内涵	离差最大法	变异系数法	因子分析法-0.9	熵值法	灰色关联分析法-0.7	信息粒度法-0.5
第四组	P_ofFAUTP_Country	施引文献的第一作者或通讯作者的国家分布以及非本刊施引文献中被SCIE收录的百分比	0.426694959	0.40548975	0.379648127	0.178636096	0.400314674	0.361445777
	P_ofFAUCA_Country
	P_ofCAnj_bySCIE
第三组	H-index	高引指数	0.163870335	0.153435335	0.129260987	0.254380196	0.099010281	0.204819277
第七组	P_ofCA_bySCIE	施引文献被SCIE收录的百分比	0.117777355	0.117048822	0.120510049	0.030178532	0.148274034	0.168674693
第二组	IF₅	IF组	0.114316359	0.112621665	0.12365919	0.269315094	0.090397654	0.030120482
	IF₁₀
	IF₍₂₀₁₁₎
第一组	ATC	平均被引频次和高引指数的百分比组	0.097293295	0.100468233	0.125145912	0.245496102	0.089116029	0.045180722
第一组	P_ofP_H-index	平均被引频次和高引指数的百分比组	0.097293295	0.100468233	0.125145912	0.245496102	0.089116029	0.045180722
第六组	P_ofFAUTP_City	施引文献的第一作者或通讯作者的城市分布	0.046390362	0.059007283	0.065558471	0.012677968	0.084831342	0.099448785
第五组	P_ofFAUCA_City	某期刊施引文献作者所在城市与该期刊所在城市一致的文献比重	0.033657394	0.051928889	0.056217305	0.009316057	0.088055976	0.090310246

基于合理权重赋值方法选择的多因素综合评价模型——以JCR中70种人文地理期刊为例

Multi-factor comprehensive evaluation model based on the selection of objective weight assignment method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 30

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10