百年SSCI看国际人文地理学的发展特点与规律——基于73种人文地理类期刊的文献计量分析

doi:10.11821/dlxb201504014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从文献总量、文献类型、成长趋势、关键词、作者、国家与机构等方面,对1900-2012年SSCI收录的73种人文地理期刊的144719条文献记录,进行了较为全面的文献计量分析,包括：构建作者评价指标体系以分析作者对人文地理研究的学术贡献,利用网络图分析各阶段作者、国家与机构之间合作的网络关系等。研究表明：① 百年来,人文地理发文量总体呈快速上升趋势,但占SSCI发文总量的比重却呈下降趋势;② 英美一直引领全球人文地理研究及其发展;③ 人文地理学有明显研究热点主题,包括地方性、迁移、性别、旅游、规划等,研究注重地理与政治的结合,以及对GIS和RS为代表的地理信息技术的采借;研究热点区域集中在英、美两国,尤以其特大城市为重点,中国的部分城市近十年来也受到较多关注;④ 人文地理学作者分布有明显阶段性特征,并形成了以Johnston R J、Thrift N、Sayer A、Jackson P、Harvey D等为中心的学术高产核心作者群。本研究对揭示人文地理学发展的特征和趋势有较好的参考借鉴。

关键词: SSCI, 人文地理, 文献计量, 发展趋势, 网络分析

Abstract:

On the basis of 144719 document records from 73 Human Geography journals from SSCI database during 1900-2012, the paper conducted an integrated bibliometric analysis in respect to characteristics of document types, document outputs, keywords, authors, countries and institutions. Meanwhile, an indicator system was established to examine the features and trends of Human Geography development through comprehensive assessment towards authors worldwide. Our analysis focused on the scientific outputs, subject categories, international collaboration and geographic distribution. A multi-criteria assessment system was built to measure the contributions of 387 authors in four periods within 1900-2012. Then network phase analysis supported by Matlab and Netdraw was used to reveal the network relationships among authors, countries and institutions. It was discovered that firstly, the total amount of Human Geography documents published increased rapidly during the last century, but the proportion it held in SSCI dwindled. Secondly, the US and the UK have been playing a leading role in Human Geography research, especially institutions like University of Sheffield, UCL and University of Cambridge. Thirdly, research hotspots of Human Geography were significant in the last century, including placeness, migration, gender, tourism, planning etc., with the combination of geography with politics to be emphasized. The application of geographic information technology represented by GIS and RS aroused wide concern. The hotspot regions emerged mainly in the US and the UK, especially in some megacities. Several Chinese cities have attained incremental concentration over the last decade. In addition, leading scientists varied in different periods of the study of Human Geography, among whom Johnston R J published the largest number of articles. Moreover, a key author club has emerged led by Johnston RJ, Thrift N, Sayer A, Jackson P, Harvey D et al. With the conclusions above, this paper has shown the development characteristics and trends of Human Geography.

Key words: SSCI, human geography, bibliometrics, development trends, Netdraw analysis

钟赛香, 袁甜, 苏香燕, 胡鹏, 薛熙明. 百年SSCI看国际人文地理学的发展特点与规律——基于73种人文地理类期刊的文献计量分析[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 678-688.

Saixiang ZHONG, Tian YUAN, Xiangyan SU, Peng HU, Ximing XUE. Progress in Human Geography in a century: A bibliometric review of 73 SSCI journals[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(4): 678-688.

图/表 8

图1

表1

表2

表3

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 20

[1]	Nederhof A J.Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(1): 81-100.
[2]	Tian Yangge, Wen Cheng, Hong Song.Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006. Journal of Informetrics, 2008, 2(1): 65-74.
[3]	Liu Xingjian, Zhang Liang, Hong Song.Global biodiversity research during 1900-2009: A bibliometric analysis. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2011, 20(4): 807-826.
[4]	Lan Hung Nora Chiang, Sue Ching Jou. Development of Human Geography in Taiwan in the last decade. Japanese Journal of Human Geography, 2006, 58(6): 25-39.
[5]	Garfield E.Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 1955, 122(3159): 108-111.
[6]	Garfield E.How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 1996, 313(7054): 411-413.
[7]	Macroberts M H, Macroberts B R.Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1989, 40(5): 342-349.
[8]	Bodman A R.Measuring the influentialness of economic geographers during the 'great half century': An approach using the h index. Journal of Economic Geography, 2010, 10(1): 141-156.
[9]	Zhuang Yanhua, Nguyen T, Hong Song.Global remote sensing research Trends during 1991-2010: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 2012, 96(1): 203-219.
[10]	Moed H F, Vanleeuwen T N.Impact factors can mislead. Nature, 1996, 381(6579): 186-186.
[11]	Ren Shengli, Wang Baoqing, Guo Zhiming, et al.The impact factor should be used prudently in the evaluation of academic periodicals. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45(2): 218-222.
	[任胜利, 王宝庆, 郭志明, 等. 应慎重使用期刊的影响因子评价科研成果. 科学通报, 2000, 45(2): 218-222.]
[12]	Pritchard A.Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of documentation, 1969, 25(4): 348-349.
[13]	Chen Chaomei.CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
[14]	Borgatti S P.NetDraw: Graph visualization software. Harvard: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
[15]	Zhou Shangyi, Kong Xiang, Zhu Hong. Cultural Geography.Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004: 258.
	[周尚意, 孔翔, 朱竑. 文化地理学. 高等教育出版社, 北京. 2004: 258.]
[16]	Gao Huixuan.Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2004: 219-220.
	[高惠璇. 应用多元统计分析. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2004: 219-220.]
[17]	Men Baohui, Liang Chuan.Attribute recognition model-based variation coefficient weight for evaluating water quality. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2005, 37(10): 1373-1375.
	[门宝辉, 梁川. 基于变异系数权重的水质评价属性识别模型. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2005, 37(10): 1373-1375.]
[18]	Baxter G J, Dorogovtsev S N, Goltsev A V, et al.K-core organization in complex networks. I n: Thai M T, Pardalos P M eds. Handbook of Optimization in Complex Networks: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer, 2012: 229-252.
[19]	Zhao Limei, Zhang Qingpu.Mapping of knowledge management paradigms in China. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2012, 31(1): 95-103.
	[赵丽梅, 张庆普. 基于科学知识图谱的我国知识管理研究范式分析. 情报学报, 2012, 31(1): 95-103.]
[20]	Li Tao, Ho YuhShan, Li ChengYan. Bibliometric analysis on global Parkinson's disease research trends during 1991-2006. Neuroscience letters, 2008, 441(3): 248-252.

PY	TP	AU	AU/TP	NR	NR/TP	PG	PG/TP	TC	TC/TP
1900-1909	1 756	1 785	1.017	2 878	1.64	11 764	6.70	939	0.53
1910-1919	3 022	3 042	1.007	5 784	1.91	15 680	5.19	1 323	0.44
1920-1929	5 439	5 484	1.008	11 670	2.15	25 933	4.77	2 807	0.52
1930-1939	8 497	8 615	1.014	17 601	2.07	33 200	3.91	5 125	0.60
1940-1949	3 933	4 023	1.023	12 523	3.18	21 914	5.57	5 887	1.50
1950-1959	6 065	6 296	1.038	23 117	3.81	27 233	4.49	7 045	1.16
1960-1969	12 094	12 712	1.051	57 953	4.79	45 441	3.76	16 319	1.35
1970-1979	15 203	16 776	1.103	127 159	8.36	76 979	5.06	35 368	2.33
1980-1989	21 970	25 268	1.150	251 969	11.47	123 147	5.61	66 640	3.03
1990-1999	23 691	29 583	1.249	433 024	18.28	175 179	7.39	139 906	5.91
2000-2009	29 716	45 912	1.545	938 007	31.57	327 875	11.03	221 905	7.47
2010	4 320	7 847	1.816	160 683	37.20	51 691	11.97	8 980	2.08
2011	4 443	8 670	1.951	177 830	40.02	54 215	12.20	3 999	0.90
2012	4 570	9 343	2.044	194 558	42.57	56 337	12.33	1 918	0.42

No.	FAU/RP	TP	TC	ATC	No.	TAU	TP	TC	ATC
1	Johnston R J	530	1 764	3.33	1	Johnston R J	589	2 203	3.74
2	Seger M	318	19	0.06	2	Seger M	322	19	0.06
3	Clark G L	187	1 339	7.16	3	Clark G L	196	1 490	7.60
4	Clout H	187	74	0.40	4	Clout H	188	74	0.39
5	Zelinsky W	152	795	5.23	5	Taylor P J	168	1 907	11.35
6	Crone G R	147	24	0.16	6	Zelinsky W	158	841	5.32
7	Kretschmer I	147	15	0.10	7	Kretschmer I	155	15	0.10
8	Taylor P J	144	1 405	9.76	8	Crone G R	150	30	0.20
9	Oriordan T	142	64	0.45	9	Oriordan T	144	74	0.51
10	Freeman T W	140	21	0.15	10	Steers J A	141	265	1.88

位序	1900-1920			1921-1950		1951-1980			1981-2012			1900-1912
位序	AU		评价值		AU	评价值		AU	评价值	AU	评价值	AU	评价值
1	Mackinder H J	0.7176		Thornthwaite C W	0.6872	Zelinsky W	0.6924		Peck J	0.6778		Peck J	0.6391
2	Gregory J W	0.5379		Hartshorne R	0.3992	Tobler W R	0.5958		Scott A J	0.6594		Thornthwaite C W	0.6320
3	Huntington E	0.4638		Leighly J	0.3546	Golledge R G	0.5515		Martin R	0.6173		Scott A J	0.6151
4	Van Cleef E	0.3919		Davis W M	0.3539	Butler R W	0.5263		Anselin L	0.6098		Martin R	0.5622
5	Cornish V	0.3737		Taylor G	0.3388	Pred A	0.4794		Amin A	0.5715		Anselin L	0.5371
6	Herbertson A J	0.3584		Wright J K	0.3354	Hart J F	0.4740		Taylor P J	0.5557		Amin A	0.5228
7	Fenneman N M	0.3404		Jefferson M	0.3270	Brown L A	0.4579		Harvey D	0.5531		Johnston R J	0.5152
8	Cotton C A	0.3327		Russell R J	0.3153	Tuan Y F	0.4551		Johnston R J	0.5464		Taylor P J	0.5062
9	Unstead J F	0.3287		Spate O H K	0.3129	MorrillL R L	0.4413		Valentine G	0.5359		Valentine G	0.5014
10	Joerg W L G	0.3211		Sauer C O	0.2914	Harris C D	0.4282		Adger W N	0.5327		Harvey D	0.4928